Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
and, now that the enrollment is completed, there are other issues. Most of all, the world has too many suffering and dying to sit around and insist on 6o days wait from today. It makes no sense. The big picture is that if the drug is very helpful we need to know.
Now.
Do interim data.
Or do dat in 15 days.
Is that enough to get the big picture?
Of course it is.
What the company is proposing is wrong and common sense tells you it is wrong- in this special circumstance. This is day 1 of the cover up of B v C failure
Post trial cover up starts! Day 1. Timeline to explain away failure of B v C.
First approach- buy a lot of unnecessary time. Prove that releasing data NOW does not matter at all. It does not matter because the drug failed.
So- delay delay delay and see if you can survive telling the truth.
That is the IP strategy.
DATA NOW!
Later data NOT critical to life and death matters. Mop up can be done later.
The trial failed, in all likelihood, and now the stalling and delays and obfuscation begin.
We all know just exactly how critical the days are from 29-60. It matters almost not at all. In terms of what really counts in the study.
This is a totally bogus notion. It is shameful.
It's only people dying, right? That's all. Those extra 31 days-so critical? Sigh. Nonsense. Complete and total nonsense.
Accepting this lie from the company is very very sad
DATA NOW! If not now, the trial filed. That is my belief.
It's only people dying, right? Who cares? My guess is that many here are in this for a short term rise and hope to buy now and sell in a month and care not a lick about B v C actually working.
People want a rise for the summer and after the pump they dump their shares.
So what if the company has an obligation to the world to release data NOW? That might get in the way of my short term profits.
Pretty sad.
It's only people suffering and dying. That's all. What does that matter against the desire for short term gains ?
Just let them all die??? DATA NOW IP! This is no normal trial in normal times. It calls for a different approach. Approach the trial results as you are screams - it failed
Posted here for many years after becoming interested in the cellulitis possibilities of B in its initial trials. I have worked in emergency depts for 30 years now and I thought it'd be a great drug in that setting. I bought shares based on that need and that trial success. I have stayed in over the years because I think B has potential in other areas, esp ulcerative colitis after the UP trial(though no controls, yes that is a problem)
Most of the data from B v C is ready and done to be collected announced if the company chose to do so. How to explain to the world that a lifesaving therapy will not be available because they have to wait 90 more days to find out if it worked? Does that make any sense?
It does not make sense. In normal times, maybe. But this is a pandemic and people need a therapeutic that would be easily administered to hospital inpatients. Or in an ED.
OK then- give us data NOW. Preliminary? Not complete? Yes. But largely complete.
Complete enough to save lives if it works.
DATA NOW LEO.
B v C failure likely- many dying and no urgency-NONE-for data. Somehow-and no I do not know how-IP does NOT think the trial succeeded and shows NO MERCY to the world- they do not have to hurry, after all, if B v C failed.
NO HURRY=LIKELY FAILURE.
Is that a fair conclusion? Sadly I think it is-
What about July 4 final data so far as known? What about now? There is bound to be enough data now to know most of what will be learned. People are dying around the world.
WAKE UP LEO and give us data!
This is bogus.
Though the trial is blinded this tells me that somehow IP knows the drug failed and will hide the results now indefinitely looking for any small positive data.
Prepare for failure and deceit and lies . 60 days and then analysis? Time frame set- already bogus. What about prelim NOW? If the drug saves lives we need to know NOW. Or in 30 days- 29 +1- at the latest. We do not need 60 days of follow up to get answers, unless the answers are likely failure and IP wants to find any positive lingering data.
you are joking right? No interim data means no clue at all if working or not working. No one has a clue , not Leo not DeGrado not me not you. The trial is blinded
Ni kto(nobody in Russian) knows
Russia? Ugh.
to repeat: stock worth nothing now, slim chance at being worth something.
Not a reason to buy
But it is a reason to hold when my average share price is so much higher
Just waiting for the bloodletting when Leo insults us with bogus data interpretation for B v C-
Huh? The RBLs do lab research. DeGrado just sits at a computer . This is the real world with very sick patients and it will take a miracle for B v C to succeed.
Miracle, nothing less.
Buying is now nonsense pump and dump- when have we seen that before? Just all the time
Exactly; cannot even buy if final data B v C announcement by company is yes, it worked. We have already seen with B OM that "success" may be "failure"- not ready for prime time, not good enough to move forward, just plain not good enough.
Do not let Leo mislead you.
Step right up folks- re read the BOM PRs about final data. Pretense nonsense bogus stats to suggest the data were good enough when they were not.
Three years later(sigh) and NO DEAL. That is what failure looks like.
Get ready for Leo to twist the data unless crystal clear.
No reason to buy now.
Also: not even any reason to buy company if IP says final data show success!
It will come down to a careful look at the numbers by you and me and big Pharma and trial experts.
seriously? In fact the exact opposite is true. The odds of a total failure are high. And the irony is that Leo will try to obscure any failure.
The chances of success in this trial are slim to none. How do you know this to be true? Let me see, let me think- oh yeah- the share price is twenty cents.
Widespread understanding of very risky trial, very likely failure, very big upside, downside too.
No reason to buy now at all.
Wait for the actual data and then look them in the eye very carefully. Review the data very cautiously- you will not be able to believe the presentation by IP unless the data are wonderful and clear.
Leo will attempt to lie with bogus statistics if the data are not really good
Hey wait a cotton picking minute. What about what Leo says about all the interest in B v other viruses?
Yeah! What about that?
Umm- no grant, no new data, nothing for Leo to stand on, other than blather. Chatter.
It is embarrassing for a CEO to prattle on in such fashion
Gird your loins. rend your garments. Batten the hatches.
Get ready for a nickel a share for this very long shot-
share price rising only because some with to make a short term play only- sad, but true.
No reason for any serious investor to buy now when-
When what?
When the chance of B v C trial success is very very slim, to none.
Gee, one wonders where all the papers are about the other viruses that B obliterates? And all those grants for that wonder viral drug to support such research?
As usual, Leo plays a game of insulting investors with hopes not events.
No need for B v C unless it works and months to go before we know.
No reason to spend even a penny on IP until data are back.
What chance the trial succeeds?
Slim. Very slim.
Put your feet up investors, and relax.
There could be a miracle. But how likely are miracles?
A nickel share price is just around the corner, if it can hold 5 cents
It could rise if people are unfamiliar with IP tactics of deceit and keeping critical data from shareholders. It could.
It does not deserve to go up a penny
People can buy all they want at a nickel this fall
Prepare for similar insulting nonsense from your CEO as he hides the truth about the B v C data.
Prepare as well for 5 cents a share. If the company survives it might be worth buying, that is, if it ever does the B UC trial.
Or will B be gone in auction if B v C bites the dust??
Want a laugh from 3 years ago?? 3 long years - go read through the B OM subset data PRs from April 2018. That was when I moved Leo to spam- talk about insulting the public and your shareholders. Such nonsense paraded as statistics
Oh sure- B OM ready any day now.
Who believes this stuff? If Leo does he ought not run a company.
It has been suggested the trial data will be a binary event. If bad news Leo will attempt to obscure the truth with unhelpful data as he has done before, with P2b and B OM.
Can he fool anyone? Maybe.
Where was the outrage over the B OM subset data? Instead some wanted to pretend that small number statistics are relevant. They are so relevant that there is NO DEAL for B for OM even though it is a devastating problem in medicine with NO GOOD RX
Wait for obfuscation- it is coming to shareholders like you and me this summer, or fall.
why anyone has bought even a single share of IP since we discovered the trial would be with moderately to severely ill COVID inpatients, is a a mystery. why?
Why not wait for the data? The chance that B will work in that setting is slim.
It is not none.
But that is no reason to buy a single share.
Now we have to sit around and wait for Leo to make up some pretend good data, you know like the B OM subset data he released as PRs? You, how to lie with statistics, for those stupid enough to accept those numbers.
What an insult. What pretense. What deceit.
I get it, I get it: the CEO can't HANDLE the truth.
Could anything be more obvious?
Funny - when I pointed this out to the CEO- in more respectful terms- I was moved to spam
For telling the very simple and obvious TRUTH
Truth leads to spam!
Bad news will mean that we wait and we wait and we wait some more and Leo says nothing and then releases some not good enough for prime time or deal data(B OM) or never releases any data (Prurisol)
That is the future for shareholders and the B v C final data
For those who failed to notice: the PRs about small samples of B OM(spring 2019 I think) reported as positive- perfect examples of lies masquerading as PR. They were and are total nonsense and attempts to mislead. The big B OM deal? Oh yeah- there was none.
That tells you how honest Leo was being with those ugly ugly PRs.
And did someone say Prurisol? Yeesh.
Dr DeG has no clue if B v C will work in this trial- none. He invented a cool peptide and designs zillions of synthetic molecules. Interesting line of work
Does not guarantee success, not in the least.
How helpful was he with the grant process? LOL. Not a single grant. One under the radar paper- big whoop.
DeG help in the US trial- gosh it's in Russia right? I am sure he spends a lot of time in Moscow. Not to mention- he sits a desk and uses software to design molecules. He does not work in hospitals snd know ZIPPO about clinical trials and epidemiology
He will be helpful as a poster child IF the trial succeeds. Otherwise the next company to own Brilacidin after IP folds, can hire him like Leo did.
He has been responding to me at times. But I have too bitter memories of Prurisol and B OM to trust him about trial data. He has lied with bogus statistics on many occasions in PRs and presentations. It must be hard for him to ponder Prurisol and all that endless failure to tell shareholders the truth-
I have the slightest hope for B v C- as do we all. Not worth selling at this price- nearly worthless already.
Miracle still possible. Just not at all likely.
will IP be able to stay above a nickel? If B v C fails?
Leo promised interim B v C data. Interim moved to spam, sorry folks. So much for promises.
Hey IP where is all that other anti viral data for B? Where? Where are all the grants? Where?
Did the govt move B to spam?
Promises promises
Leo says he will do the B UC oral trial. really? So do it already. More likely- company expires after B V C failure and B is up for auction - again.
History repeats itself.
The next company to own B- not us- will be the one to reap the benefits of B UP and maybe other indications
I am already long looking past likely failed B v C trial. I would advise all here to do the same.
B UC? Where is it? Where? No news. B OM? long gone-
moved to spam! I wrote to Leo to ask him to please inform shareholders when the trial fails. Remember Prurisol? What a joke. He wrote back to say I am moved to spam.
After all his spam? For so many years? LOL. I like irony.
What are the chances we get quick data back if the trial does not succeed? Leo's pattern is delay delay delay bad news
Prepare for prices of a nickel
so true. It will all come down to success in the current trial.
When a better trial woulda been a prophylactic B nasal or oral inhaler, perhaps, instead of what we got:
Very sick people already hospitalized in Russia. With very widespread disease.