It means that once this collapses it will be difficult for management to find a real job.

Should AXIM begin to show confirmed signals an uptrend is in place (saying it is so does not make it so) accumulation of the stock should begin and placing stops along the way to protect AXIM profits.

If you are in hell remember each person transiting that damnation is there through their own actions despite entreaties to the contrary.

When you are traveling through hell, the only option those truly have is to think about the harm caused and those trusting victims paying the price for misplaced trust disguised as caring. Beware.

Speed.kills.

In the parlance of the OTC this stock is what is called “being billchabbaned” or not being told the whole story. Sometimes depending on the depth you might say ACRL investors are bahiged with doubts.

It has been clearly, and adequately proven over time when one is in the position of being in the red of AXIM stock specifically, using stop losses is a far better way to manage the AXIM investment than averaging down. Years of experience has shown it is a far better to accept what the market is telling one on AXIM than what some may believe to be true, or be feasible based on nothing more than optimistic speculation, or putting a sheen on a rusty razor blade. Once the uptrend on AXIM has been established (saying it is does not make it so) that would be the time to begin averaging down; but starting from a new entry at a lower price is far better than adding to the risk on a losing investment. Sleep comes easier as well.

It very might be Musk or DLM although as seen below it is sometimes difficult to ascertain exactly what hand is feeding the other. Using well known Shakespeare as an example it can be difficult even with an miserable and useless Arknet app (that does not work however) it is indeed difficult to determine company incentives and motivations.

John Shakespeare was a prominent citizen who served on the town council for many years. He even became a high bailiff in 1568 (the equivalent of Mayor). Aside from his craft as a glover, he traded as a wool dealer and was also involved in money-lending. He was granted a Coat of Arms in 1596, elevating him and his heirs to the official status of gentlemen.

When William was born in 1564, his parents had already lost two infant daughters. Joan died within the first few weeks of her life, and Margaret died a year after she was born. William's younger siblings were Gilbert (1566-1612), Joan (1569-1646), Anne (1571-1579), Richard (1574-1613) and Edmund (1580-1607).

Gilbert was probably based in Stratford for most of his life. There are records that suggest he may have been a haberdasher. He may have spent some time in London as there is a record of a haberdasher with the name in St Bride’s London.

Joan was the only surviving daughter of John and Mary Shakespeare and the only one of Shakespeare’s siblings to outlive him. She married hatter William Hart in the late 1590's. From 1601 the Harts lived in a cottage within the west part of the Shakespeare house on Henley Street.

It's likely that Richard was named after his paternal grandfather. Anne unfortunately died at the age of eight.

Edmund was the youngest of Shakespeare’s siblings, born when William was 16 years old. Edmund became an actor in London, as his brother William did. He died in 1607 and is buried in Southwark Cathedral in London. It is thought that William Shakespeare paid for his brother’s burial inside the church and for the great bell to be rung in his memory.

Shakespeare Family Life
At the age of eighteen, William married Anne Hathaway, a young woman from the village of Shottery, just outside Stratford-upon-Avon.

William and Anne Shakespeare had three children. Susanna was born six months after their marriage, followed by twins Judith and Hamnet in 1585. Hamnet died at age 11.

Shakespeare's four grandchildren all died without heirs, so there are no direct descendants of his line today. Susanna and John Hall’s only daughter, Elizabeth, married twice but both marriages remained childless. His daughter Judith and her husband Thomas Quiney’s three sons all died at an early age, either in infancy or as young adults before having children.

It is possible to claim a relationship to Shakespeare through his sister, Joan. There are many descendants of Joan and William Hart alive today, in both the male and female lines.

So a question might be, will Arknet be admitting to its somewhat shady Aussie relatives?

Never too late to laugh.

Anyone literate sees no post-planning marketing underway only empty vacuous press releases with no relief.

Nada relief-zilch relief-zero relief

Not a relief.

Missed sarcasm

Assuming of course you were the only one who noticed it which I am sure is the case.

I read it was an Jewish agent who sunk the Titanic. Agent Iceberg.

Does he like the whooshing sound deadlines make when they zoom past him?

If the shares were gifted by either member of the insiders (DLM or JL) then one would have to find the year end financial filings and count 45 days forward. If the dispositions were made and not reported 45 days after the year end financial filings they are in breach of Form 4 regulations.

A change in beneficial ownership by an insider triggers a Form 4 filing requirement. Gifting of shares is also covered. To end this conversation regarding the discrepancy in shares owned and disposed of by DLM and JL simply ask the SEC for their opinion on whether or not a discrepancy in shares is required to be reported. If the shares were sold that would require a Form 4, if the shares were gifted that would also, trigger the filing of a Form 4.

Reporting gifts on Form 4. Section 16 insiders (officers, directors and 10% shareholders) are generally required to report changes in beneficial ownership of equity securities within two business days of the transaction, on Form 4. However, they may wait to report certain transactions, including bona fide gifts (both acquisitions and dispositions) until 45 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year, through filing a Form 5.

That would apply to the gifting of shares to the company by JL. So the bottom line for DLM is what happened to those shares that were not included in the ownership reportings. The key words are "change in beneficial ownership". If DLM disposed of shares that were not gifted or provided to a charity he could be in trouble since the disposition of those shares should have been reported within two business days of the disposition, if they were sold.

Reminds of another denial. This time the picture can be replaced with DLM and J. The caption will read…”what!? My Lai?”
Even trusting investors here have to keep food on the table. So an amended 10Q or 8K explaining the discrepancy signed off on by the auditor and their lawyer and the company head should be enough to put the matter to rest.

So in essence, what is being said here is quite simple. Company management signed off on the 10Q without reading it or ensuring the information being made public is accurate, and transparent. If the shares were not sold and it was simply a error, or ommission of fact, then the company should, file an amended 10K explaining the discrepancies. And if DLM is so busy raising his large family, and running a pizza business and a roofing business, maybe he needed to sell those shares to put food on the table and a roof over their heads and forgot to file the Form 4 as required. The other possibility is the company does not care about accuracy or transparency and signed off on an official required filing without first verifying the content. I can see an error being made for one but when the share counts are different for two, well that seems odd. Maybe the company management is not literate.

Is that the $200 they earned as revenue when you state accrued value?

It is too bad they wint have a piece of the action or, to be punny, peace of the inaction (I crack myself up). The world does not need another crypto coin especially one doomed to fail unless, and here is an idea, they could issue a coin for the defendants engine invention. A useless coin for a useless app. No need to prove the engine works it already has been determined it doesn’t or, and here is a thought, they could issue a coin for the app -oh wait it is not being accepted. Darn there goes an idea. The rest of the possibilities are improbable impossibilities.

Are you saying the meta verse is already o et crowded and Ttcm memorials taking up space?

Were those in attendance digging the floating gravestones or memorials or did it leave them cold? Pretty obvious given the lame video posted these guys could not sell ice cold soft drinks in a hot desert. Their marketing efforts are a joke. A grade four student could rewrite the grade five effort and make it more impactful.

Interesting comment regarding the 10Ks, as it was posted they were well worth reading. Are they only worthy reading if one does not point out the discrepancies?

Hidey ho there. Given past transgressions one might find it difficult (unless one was receiving compensation in kind) to trust an executive team where there was a history of malfeasance and sanctioning.
I would place less trust in a team member who liked wearing pyjamas in public as opposed to someone who is in the trenches with investors. Taking obscene compensation ahead of anything close to approaching a real product would not be my first choice of an investment opportunity.

One will of course note that this particular position is clearly augmented by diffuse and non-arbitrary rationale whereby it will be, can be and most likely is difficult to defend a position whereby executives are rewarded handsomely, ahead of any real progress, and with little to no follow-up on agreements that supposedly would be of benefit to shareholders. Their press releases may well have been written by a fifth grader or someone of less ability. The difference therein lies in the careful reading. Given one lofty member of the company careful reading while wearing pyjamas might seem to go hand in hand. However as a goodnight story the only frightened ones are the investors looking for the tinder box in this fairy tale.

Hi there. Given past transgressions one might find it difficult (unless one was receiving compensation in kind) to trust an executive team where there was a history of malfeasance and sanctioning.
I would place less trust in a team member who liked wearing pyjamas in public as opposed to someone who is in the trenches with investors. Taking obscene compensation ahead of anything close to approaching a real product would not be my first choice of an investment opportunity.
However, and this is key, they have yet to prove themselves worthy of the trust many investors have placed in their leadership, rather than the apparent lack of leadership. Some company managers should learn to lead by example rather than being made an example. Right mate?

Given past transgressions one might find it difficult (unless one was receiving compensation in kind) to trust an executive team where there was a history of malfeasance and sanctioning. TTCM does not follow up on simple matters like who won the scavenger hunt, or results from Boston University agreement (alledgedly), or even what they are wanting to accomplish.
I would place less trust in a team member who liked wearing pyjamas in public as opposed to someone who is in the trenches with investors. Taking obscene compensation ahead of anything close to approaching a real product would not be my first choice of an investment opportunity.

Just the usual blather and nothing posts

Reads line it was written by a fifth grader. Oh look at the time. Bedtime. Goodnight.

Using the term “driver” may not be wise in describing a Nugent run enterprise. The engine did not work but maybe they can rely upon organic based power plants with organic drive trains a la The Flinstones. No reliance on foreign oil or magnets!

Very robust explanation. Thank you. I see it closed red today. So your explanation seems to be a polarity opposite of what someone who claims to have seen it running believes but it may have been the magnetic personality of the so called inventor of the perpetual motion machine. I would have been convinced had NASA shown genuine interest and enthusiasm rather than a weak attempt to infer that interest. Scientists working on non-fossil fuel based power plants would also have been interested if the idea had merit which judging from the lack of interest seems to clearly illustrate to all it had none. This type of pie in the sky vaudeville snake oil sideshow is not new to the OTC and it has shape shifted into something else all together. Perhaps a spinning memorial ark for the deceased engine? A spinning memorial ark for the awesome phone. A spinning memorial ark with a ? Mark on it for the winner of the scavenger hunt. So many memorial arks so many press releases deserving of one.

Maybe they can do digital after life memorials for press releases that never amounted to anything, let alone an update. The will keep the metaverse spinning.

LIke many things, no follow up from the company, hoping it is forgotten as they move on to the next soon to be forgotten item on the list.

lol, the point was made-bad actors get in the door who are just Awesome but somehow forgiven and or forgotten as the light shines, the cockroaches run and hide. Well, not all of them.

One of the red flags of investing in something like Nugents past bust, is trusting someone when they tell you they know something nobody else knows and you should get in on the ground floor and benefit from it, and you better do it quickly! Typical.

Does that same poster know who won the scavenger hunt? It was never press released.

you keep referencing the 8K. Nothing in there of any substance I can see. Just the usual fodder for shenanigan consumers. Pray tell what do you see in there that makes it so interesting? Please state your case clearly.

If he did that would prove the states case against him. Why would he say it does not work and kill his golden goose of yore? I have it on good authority the moon is made of green cheese and they have not yet denied it so that makes it true? IN all the years from development to showing someone it worked not one other party showed serious interest in a world where reliance on fossil fuels has been shown to increase climactic events. I doubt it very much. I am quite sure his patents are not bound by any such order. What those orders mean, if granted, is he cannot attempt to further a fraud by using in a demonstration, the subject matter of how the fraud was perpetrated, perfectly logical. Is there an order prohibiting the transfer of the patent to say, China?

It was stated...

"Everyone needs to do their own DD and decide but to state that an imperfect system that has corrupt actors can't get something wrong is a fallacy."

Agreed, as much as the OTC and SEC tries to keep them out, some highlighted and bolded above, do get in the door, like Awesome Boy.

But it, arknet(ski) will save the world. I am just waiting for the announcement from DLM about saving Ukraine-spinning buildings showing before and after the attacks so the Russians cannot claim they did not do anything. Main Streetski lives. Digital after life pictures of destroyed buildings.

I wonder if that same 5th grader writes the press releases for TTCM? It appears so. Full of, well, nothing.

And some find it difficult to believe that a fraudster is just that-a fraudster. But for the money invested in and shares provided to, logic would indeed take hold and make its own case. When some have much to lose the truth becomes the first victim. What is so interesting about the recent PRs and 8K's? Nothing there I can see.