Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It won't be too long. I am confident that we get UK approval by yearend. That means that we should have a submitted MAA by sometime in September or sooner (hopefully on some sort of accelerated basis) which seems to coincide well with the time for the talk by LL in Sept.
I think it is amazing, that but for flippers many ads, there has been very little discussion of the likely contents of MB's upcoming ASCO talk on June 3 and how, if at all, it will affect share price and will (or will not) have new info of significance. It seems that most have written it off as just another ASCO, and refuse to be drawn in by the theater hour talk. Is this "fool me once shame on you, but fool me 4 or 5 times, shame on me."
Notwithstanding, I feel confident that we will have MHRA commercial approval before year end and a commensurate significant increase in share price.
Why pick (limit to) $2, why not ask about $5, $10, $20 or $40 for these time frames?
Keep in mind that "the Court" and "the Clerk of the Court" are not the same and do not carry the same weight. I am hoping that the the Clerk was right and will be backed up by the Judge (the Court) but we won't know for sure until the Court responds.
Give me a break with all this wild speculation, all that was, was someone with blonde hair from the back. No way to know who that was given that view.
Give me a break with all this wild speculation, all that was, was someone with blonde hair from the back. No way to know who that was given that view.
Upon further thought, maybe NWBO should submit a plan to the gov (they seem to be begging for people to submit their ideas) to underwrite a series of CONCURRENT trials in the numerous solid tumors that Direct and L can handle to prove out the entire platform that is just beginning with GBM. This could save multiple lives and shave many years of waiting on a long series of trials after GBM is approved. (unless of course they are currently applying for all solid cancers based on the current PIII in GBM on an agnostic to tissue theory).
you missed nothing worthwhile. Just another example of tax dollars accomplishing nothing, A pity. What a waste of time, and worse yet, a waste of what could have been a real opportunity.
Will this replacement of Exhibit 1 be a further cause of delay in this spoofing case, or can they remain with the current court schedule?
That occurred to me as well.
While you are right, the cost of iclc after the patent expires will not be terribly high, but thejr lost opportunity costs of not owning Oncovir and being able to control iclc by extending its patent will be a significant bargaining chip and worth alot to NWBO. The whole (merged DCVAX and iclc) is much greater than the sum of its parts.
Skit, I do not think what the owners of Oncovir are looking for is guaranteed continued employment. that is small potatoes. They will want a cut of the pie, and a seat at the table when Oncovir is taken over by BP (now) or by NWBO (later) to merge the DCVAX platform with iclc and thus also extend the patent that is near expiration.
My point was not for BP to buy Oncovir for itself, but to use it as an entree to make a deal with LP and NWBO for something they (NWBO) may need more than just a large checkbook. This would be chips on the table which they can use to make a good deal with NWBO.
Meirluc, it seems out posts passed each other in the night.
I might voice a possible concern. As this thread seems to assume that Oncovir on its own is going nowhere with the patent due to expire shortly, but would be worth alot in the hands of NWBO as part of the dcvax platform. It seems to me that with LP seemingly demanding a top dollar from BP (whichever one) the thing to do for a BP is to acquire Oncovir at a multiple of its current value, but this would still be a dirt cheap entree to NWBO for a necessary ingredient for DCVAX. Right now would the time to do this as the BP could easily outbid NWBO in its bid for Oncovir at this time - this may not be true further down the road..
Was anyone present for the presentation? Can you provide a summary of what was said? Thanx.
But all that means, is that when all you have is only about $740,000 we Canadians are already Millionaires.
I think that for the patient perspective, this is great promise for turning these cancers into manageable diseases as you pile on treatment upon treatment and successfully increase the OS. However from an investor perspective, this could prove unsustainable. So if for example each treatment added to the mix demands something like $250,000 for its part of the treatment, which seems now to be the going rate for many of these treatment, when you pile on say for such treatments in a combo, you now get to an unsustainable increase in the treatment cost per patient. The only way to keep the per patient cost "reasonable" is to cut the individual take for each of the component treatments that are part of the combo. Thus each individual treatment will have to accept say $75,000 to $100,000 to limit the total cost per patient to limit the total cost of the combo rather than the say $250,000 that DCVAX is now expected to get. Any thoughts?
You usually do not have to opt-in in a class action. If you meet the qualifications of the "class" then you are automatically in, unless you opt-out.
Thanks, food for thought....
Sojo and Judge,
If we provided ChatGPT access or a copy of all the outstanding TA theory texts published to date and access to market data, do you think ChatGPT would be able to make reliable short term predictions on a regular basis? Would it be a version of tomorrow's financials, today? Could it predict NWBO's short term share prices in advance? I could sure use a crystal ball like that.
I think we have two revolutions in the making.
1) Cancer - Go NWBO!
2) AI - ChatGPT for President!
Ask a patient if he would rather have a subdermal injection or drill a (small) hole in your head to administer the drug, which they would prefer (assuming they both work equally well).
Unless I missed it, (I was trying to do two things at the same time) LL did not highlight the 50% + early success in the combo trial with ICLC. I wonder why? Is it too early to draw solid conclusions? But at least a mention that this is showing early promise should have been warranted. Is she that conservative? I guess when she finally does speak about it, people will notice.
I was under a similar understanding from a communication of several months ago.
Going red. The usual.
Since LP sold/assigned 10% of the lawsuit claim,
I got the same innuendo from LG several months ago as I understood him, that they were going forward based on manual production. Automation will come later as it becomes ready for prime time. Of course things could be different several months later.
1) Up to date financial information given in an ASM or quarterly conference call is not illegal. Calling Dave and getting the information that isn’t public is illegal.
Any idea if Allan Butler is still alive or when he died?
Thank you very much.
I have a friend with pancreatic cancer. Does any one know how long he survived his DCVAX-Direct treatment back in 2014? I saw a video he put out that said he was still alive in 2018. Are there any other such good stories of those treated back then for pancreatic cancer in the PI back circa 3014. Does anyone have the chart they put of those various solid cancers they treated back then? Thanks for the help.
One piece of news is not enough. They have to produce more news consistently and talk of preparations so they can make PRs much more often. One news and then you stop gets you nowhere. the shorts have to know there will plenty of great news announcement about what is coming, not just what will come. One piece of news followed by silence till the next is a recipe inviting the shorts to do their best. They need to be concerned when that next PR will be out (and not just many months later.
They are now blazing their own path, a path no one else has taken, to get this treatment to market. NWBO continues to check off milestones as they come closer and closer to approval. This process isn't fast. Yet, management is doing exactly what they need to do to methodically check off the boxes towards RA approval(s).
before the April 3 deadline of the MAA submission,
I have been in a long time - from before 2013. But luckily the bulk of my holding was acquired around the lows later on. I still hold warrants at near the low that will not expire for a while. While I have been exhausted by the continued delays, adding steps, moving the goal posts, the changing of my expectations to times further out, but I now do believe we are truly near the end of all this with the MAA and MA that are both around the corner and could drop at any moment. The points I ponder the most at this time are, 1) will they only file in the UK for the MAA or will they go with some means of filing in multiple jurisdictions in parallel (eg ORBIS), 1a) it would be nice to know if they are doing a rolling submission, but we will know this fairly soon, 2) will they be able to file not only for glio (n & r), or will they try to use the notion of tissue and/or tumor agnostic, and file for multiple cancers at one time? Glio is a given in my book that just needs a little time to play out. 3) how the spoofing case proceeds and whether there will be a settlement in the short term or a trial in the long term. 4) Whether and when the spoofing trial will be expanded to include naked short selling and other manipulations, and 5) what is happening on the BO or partnership fronts, 6) when we eventually uplist, but this is low on the totem pole of concerns.
but Tissue agnostic ain’t happening.
I do not click on any site that requires me to accept cookies in order to read their webpage.
but there have been too many changes of story
All I know is from this BB. That seems to be the assumption on the BB, but I have no proof of that. I would really like to know that with more certainty.