Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No, Flopper.
>>Step 3: Approval for use through the NHS, 1 year
Once the drug is authorised it will then require a separate appraisal before it can be made available through the National Health Service (NHS). In England and Wales this appraisal is carried out by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and in Scotland it is carried out by Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC). In Wales additional authorisation may also required from the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group.
NICE work with patient support groups such as The Vitiligo Society to gain public and patient involvement in the appraisal. You can visit the NICE website for updates on their approval timeline for a treatment, provided an application is made this information is available publicly.
If NICE recommends the drug for use through the NHS, then NHS England is normally expected to fund the treatment within 90 days.
https://vitiligosociety.org/vitlife/our-guide-to-how-a-treatment-is-approved-for-use-in-the-nhs/
Actually what I just said was wrong. Flip's trying to confuse us again. The NICE process takes one year. Once they approve it takes 3 months for the funding process.
>>If NICE recommends the drug for use through the NHS, then NHS England is normally expected to fund the treatment within 90 days.
It was confirmed last week here that NICE doesn't even have the paperwork. Once they have it they'll need three months.
Interim funding is very limited.
>>MHRA decisions typically come three months before NICE price evaluation decisions. There is a format for interim funding for cancer therapies if relevant.
Don't see LP out there. Too bad NWBO's band couldn't play.
Great time with #thecheckpoints at @BuddyGuys with the guy himself 🦀!
— Maurício Ribeiro, MD (@mauriciofribei1) June 3, 2024
Nice set list and good vibes @sitcancer #ASCO24 pic.twitter.com/FwPnSsZ5I5
50,000 shareholders and one lousy picture of the ASCO booth! No video, no interviews, no presentations, no nothing.
Help me to understand why would MHRA provide an opinion if NICE hasn't even received the paperwork yet?
Is it Friday yet?
On another note, I don't believe I've ever experienced a time where ASCO was barely even an event here. Strange.
Those will show up in Captain's next Shares Outstanding report. LOL
Yeah, it doesn't matter to them. Welcome to the new world of investing. Just like nobody seems much interested in getting to the bottom of Fauci and his gang's abuse of the system. If not for just a few journalist, Rand Paul, and Judicial Watch the story would just disappear. Puzzling behavior for an entire society which suffered greatly because of their actions.
Hearing that too. Is that stunning or what?!!
>>Payments skyrocketed during the pandemic era: those years saw more than double the amount of cash flow to NIH from the private sector, compared to the prior twelve combined. All told, it’s $1.036 billion.
It’s unclear if any of the Covid vaccine royalties from Pfizer and Moderna, the latter of which settled with NIH by agreeing to pay $400 million, is even included in these new numbers. NIH isn’t saying.
So why then would I be skeptical of that?
Beautifully put. As a normal retail investor you'd have to be an absolute moron to disagree.
And, that's completely incorrect. My only failure was to think they'd make it into a reputable journal (JAMA). I've always believed they'd drag the process out as long as possible.
>>I'm merely pointing out that you have been wrong about every single milestone up until this point. Why should we trust you now?
The milestones up to date would take little more than cash placed in the right accounts. It's easy to imagine paying off a few key players to make it as far as they have. JAMA is the distinction but I remain skeptical.
Jack and the Beanstalk mentality. So old.
What if two thirds of customers are on the government ticket?
That's actually the best argument that the disciples failed to offer up. But there's a difference; NWBO Management is non-existent, promised so much and poorly timed many things that never happened on top of their private endeavors.
What's a coffee a cost these days? Extrapolate. I'm sure there's a profit model on there somewhere
Endless junk from Doc
Zero care, these abominable frauds.
Cult here believes in "The spirit of Direct". From my point of view it appears to be good for the barista bar at ASCO.
What don't you understand about legacy shareholders being down 99.X % ?
Your list is all nonsense. Wake up!
Have you witnessed yourself DCVAX Direct coming back from the dead?
It's like London Fish n' Chips.
I don't know about that but the one I really want to see is called "The Danish Dancer" and it has the same ending as in the movie Fargo with Macy
Any truth there's a new salad bar offering this year?
LG put the "Do not disturb" sign up for the summer so wouldn't expect to see him or LP there.
I don't know but Danish is the barista.
Who writes this junk?
Anyone know, does the booth turn a profit?
Hey Adam, I wouldn't order anything at the snack bar. LOL.
Booo!!!
So you have nothing in common with common shareholder you're saying. Got it.
If you really believe that you should be more concerned with why a big money company hasn't bought this tiny broke company to save all those lives.
Good line at the coffee-snack bar?
A lot of interesting ASCO presentations today. What's going on over at the NWBO booth?
That is total BS. One observation I've made here is that pumpers seem to take everything at face value if it's coming from a perceived authority figure. It all actually makes sense.
And no whistleblowers suddenly died either.