Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I said from the beginning she is time barred. We shall see...
That is just nonsense she is a bankruptcy attorney she understands the documents
Nothing we can do but wait, lets see if she prevails... Its not like we have not been lied to before...
Pretty impressive!
She will hold you in contempt and you really don't want that!
I thought it was tonight or in the morning and some one said it would be minuscule. We can hope...
I predict Monday that we will be saying it will be next month...
Don't for get about the marketing for donations she will get paid...
You are correct ghost rider...
I know what you said I'm just saying she's wrong in my opinion but we we shall soon see
I usually don't agree with you but that's what I was stating before when she stated on behalf of herself and other shareholders, in doing so she makes it appear as if she's acting pro se for herself and as attorney for the other shareholders that's what I said in a prior post. Now with that said, it's the same thing when you having a law firm that's a partnership and one of the attorneys who is a partner handles a case against the firm would be acting pro se for himself and attorney for the other partners. Notice I said it appears not that she's actually acting on behalf of those shareholders as their attorney. And I do think your number 3 answer it's problematic as well and I do agree with you on that I think Jerry is wrong.
I never said she was not qualified so stop putting words in my mouth. Anyone can act pro-se I just think it was a waste of time and she is time-barred. Irrelevant as we are not going to get billions anyway. For as grammar policing, you know where you can put that...
Geeezz Pro-se means "One's Self" you can not be an attorney for ones self because your one and the same... Buy putting in her filings she is Pro-se for her self and equity holders one could argue she is now counsel for equity holders...
Its not illegal its impossible...
Does not mean she does and I bet the objection is denied as untimely. Best thing all the Pro-se's can do is let the rough end drag, because I an going to laugh when the court slaps them with a big ass attoney's bill of cost.
Well I read some of the argument and this is not going to hold anything up, I think she is time-barred to file an objection. Not sure if she is an Attorney or not...
He is currently gearing up to launch his DOJ conspiracy to remain relevant when this blows up and we get squat! With that said everyone is entitled to there opinion...
What do you guys think the ceiling will be on this? I have owned it for over 8 years just holding.
Sounds good!
Looked up your channel, you are a talented guy with the fixtures.
I don't mean to sound like a Wendy's commercial but wheres the beef-billions.
Anything is true in fantasy land! LMAO
Coop is totally separate from Escrow Holders and the finalization of the BK and has been the min they emerged as the new company WMIH and merged to become coop. THERE IS NOTHING AS FAR AS SH or FDIC in terms of billions coming back to us. How many times do they have to tell us this...
COOP, Escrow and the BK is totally a separate issue.
Correct, just watch when this is over and all the pie in the sky predictors are wrong... They will come up with a reason why they where right and the evils of the BK Court allowed our money to be take. When in reality there is no money left to pay us billions and there has been a gross misunderstand of Bankruptcy law and SH assets. When FDIC says nothing is there and the LTI says the same, well I tend to listen.
HM its always 21 days including weekends now if the 21's day falls on a weekend or holiday then the last day would be the next work day by close of business. The Judge is not giving them any special treatment she is just following the rules for appellate procedure.
Nothing and if you-all get paid so will I but I tend to listen to the one that should know and what they have told us. We will know soon...
Have you guys stop to think that there is a reason why fusion, with cats and all the rest of the old timers that was on this board 2 years ago stop posting we are not going to get shit Rosen said it, no hidden assets there are no safe harbor asset AZ is spewing disinformation and I think there is a gross misunderstanding of safe harbor asset. How many times does the FDIC the trustee and every other government official or officer of the court has to tell us that there are no hidden assets before you can realize there are no hidden assets.
No she said they had 21 days and its not up to her approval. However, the time for them to appeal is time barred because the district court already ruled on this issue and I think they could face sanctions if the appeal this because the matter has already been decided by the district court and the DC will deny the appeal.
Unless they appeal which I doubt they will
The order becomes final in 21 days
21 days order becomes final
Well if that is not proof of nothing coming back I don't know what is.
Yes I am, you got me, I have been exposed.
Not sure how long she has been there but her term is 14 years then the the court of appeals can reappoint or keep her.
Now that is funny so now I am working for the MAN lol
Here is an interesting read for everyone: https://www.hlbriworkoutblog.com/2018/04/supreme-court-narrows-scope-safe-harbor-exception-securities-clawbacks/
Once the bankruptcy is over then its over. The BK court has jurisdiction over all aspects of this case and there is no money going to flow outside the BK. What AZ is missing is you can not Bankrupt a trust, only liquidate it, which the LT is responsible for so they would know if there was hidden money.