Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
History will note, the first trial of a US president was about hush money, brought by a state district attorney, that ran on getting that former president, for a party that was completely unabashed about charging that former president in time to keep him from office.........
They may also have to add that it backfired
My point exactly, thanks........This case is just sowing division.... Will Trump go to jail?....Will it change trump voters minds or, reinforce the rights narrative of political misuse of the justice system.....
It wont be a political win, its by a progressive DA, in a city largely democratic that doesn't like tfg,,,,,about a case people consider more like Clinton's and Edwards....
Just political poison for the country as a whole....
friendly judges......friendly DAs,,,,,,Someday the shoe may well (and probably will) fit the other foot and people can make a case about nearly anything....Thats the point and the can of worms that been opened...
Wasn't there a discussion about the need for impartial judges? Sure would cut out a lot of BS and bias
I didn't say anything about how gates votes....And I could care less...
Perfect example of how dems can't have a conversation about anything meaningful, go take up one of the stupid topics Maher points put lol, thats what you're good at...
Get your apology letter to ken Starr finished up and sent out because dems are now no better....
The banana Republic comparison has credibility,,,, There were bigger fish to fry, not hush money for crying out loud...
To counter, take Musk, he has advanced rocketry, electric cars
Your elitist comment may better suit my Monsanto remark and the 2 parties. And folks think inequity just came out of thin air.......
So there is plenty bad to say about Gates and the monopoly he set up, people say bad things about musk too....But I would imagine with enough billionaire money a lot of problems could be solved....Mostly though, if the billionaires and corps would take a little less, inequity wouldn't exist.....Hence many of our political problems wouldn't either...
Dems have no high ground, not in the least in spite of their denials
And China owns more farmland than gates....FWIW
https://www.factcheck.org/2023/07/factchecking-haleys-claim-on-china-u-s-farmland-and-military-installations/
The Microsoft co-founder is considered the largest private owner of farmland in the country with some 269,000 acres across dozens of states, according to last year’s edition of the Land Report 100, an annual survey of the nation’s largest landowners.
But a Gates spokesperson said in a statement on Friday that the claim that he’s bought the majority of the nation’s farmland is false, pointing to a U.S. Department of Agriculture report from February that showed there were more than 895 million total acres of farmland in the country last year.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-bill-gates-blackrock-788010130032
To add to any conversation about big ag, Monsanto and all.....You have 2 corporately bound parties that are not going to get in the way of Monsanto like companies.....
Gates, is buying up farmland, for good use? most likely, is it organic, probably not....he is after bio fuel and developing new seeds...
Gates, in an Ask Me Anything session on Reddit last year, said his “investment group” was behind the purchases, and suggested it was linked to seed and biofuel development.
“The agriculture sector is important,” he wrote. “With more productive seeds we can avoid deforestation and help Africa deal with the climate difficulty they already face. It is unclear how cheap biofuels can be but if they are cheap it can solve the aviation and truck emissions.”
A Felony Jaywalking case before the Jury
Enjoy the bananas the dems have severed to all
More often than not people vote against someone or a party, not for someone......but you knew that
Anyhoot carry on,,,,you all enjoy the evening
No just keeping the record straight with your avoidance babble.....babble on
Its not necessarily a vote for this day and age, its votes against one way or the other...
Have a good one
We need centrist SC justices,,,,,,A few more centrist DAs would be healthier for the country also....
Centrist challenger ousts progressive prosecutor in DA race in Portland, Oregon
https://apnews.com/article/portland-oregon-progressive-district-attorney-election-756eff76ca7391a18fd703417b788f94
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Centrist district attorney candidate Nathan Vasquez has ousted the incumbent progressive prosecutor in Oregon’s Multnomah County, home to Portland, after running a campaign in which he vowed to be tough on crime.
Liberals want to stack the supreme court with all liberal judges, the right with all conservative ones......
Thats was thread in a nut shell
Some think centrist judges would better serve the country,,,,,,,Maybe that's just too much common sense for all the partisans that are tearing this country apart...... Its getting easier and easier to ignore both sides of the isle......
But as in the example set forth by the new wave liberal DA policies....people will eventually gravitate to a more conservative approach.....
( I went on to post this,,,,,centrist is best ;) wait, let me get the link for ya......here you go
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174498273
No it was stacking the SC,,,,lol
Centrist challenger ousts progressive prosecutor in DA race in Portland, Oregon
https://apnews.com/article/portland-oregon-progressive-district-attorney-election-756eff76ca7391a18fd703417b788f94
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Centrist district attorney candidate Nathan Vasquez has ousted the incumbent progressive prosecutor in Oregon’s Multnomah County, home to Portland, after running a campaign in which he vowed to be tough on crime.
Liberals want to stack the supreme court with all liberal judges, the right with all conservative ones......
Thats was thread in a nut shell
Some think centrist judges would better serve the country,,,,,,,Maybe that's just too much common sense for all the partisans that are tearing this country apart...... Its getting easier and easier to ignore both sides of the isle......
But as in the example set forth by the new wave liberal DA policies....people will eventually gravitate to a more conservative approach.....
Arguing for arguments sake on such a simple subject, that's when you know tribalism is more important, party is more important than country.....So repubs aren't the only ones that can be accused of that...
Personally I think you should stfu and read this......remember I'm just a bot of some kind attached to another alias, and the other is I'm a paid Russian influencer......lmfao......
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174496341
Oops
Lets take your, whatever it is....There are laws against stealing.....But lets use the left and say all our judges are liberal and hold the position that those thieves are the real victims.....Its taken to court and the liberal judges agree, we will no longer prosecute certain laws, we will lower the standards so to speak and let people steal more, say 1000.00 without bail and with little to no consequence....
Sure enough, soon people can't park their cars downtown, they can't shop, shops have to close for security and the fact that they are now losing money...........Not good
Now the right says, just cut the hand off a thief,,,,,not good
I think I'd rather have a more centrist approach to the law
Now you're just making chit up as to my position,,,,in return I will say you must not have taken any debate classes as you need a position for such.....Not just put words in peoples mouth...
My point is to how it should be,,,,,,parties nominate judges of all kinds for their own purpose, Im sure there are plenty of independent mind people that make better judges than the ones we have....Then we might quit hearing the phrase 'along party lines'
Christ on a crutch.....This is simplicity at its best,,,,,,,
Impartiality with the constitution is better You are the one who brought up slavery, think 9 impartial judges wouldn't have seen the right thing to do?
This is a common sense topic on impartial judges as opposed partisan ones..
Because people saw it as unfair....Your not making any sense and complicating things when there is no need for it...Another case of simplicity is best and when this country is tired of bitchn back and forth, hopefully that's what we will have......
Its damn sure something to strive for, impartiality..... I think an impartial judge in the slavery day would have seen the right thing to do...
Well if its absurd, just go on bitching when the other side has the advantage,,just like they will when you do...
The law shouldn't be impartial to ideology,,,, got it
See my reply to another poster on the subject...Obama did confirm two quite liberal justices in Sotomayor and Kagan...
Garland and centrists like him should be the only one on the court imo...As the law needs to be impartial to all things political or cultural....
To say the two parties don't nominate and confirm judges fitting to their ideology is just plain disingenuous as we can see by the current make up of the court and most of its history...
Thats fine, thinking they they are a woman in a mans body,,,,Ok.....
Now follow me as I read your whole post,,,,,Genetics is weird, you get so many of this or that for every 1,000,000 lets say,,,So there will be so many people (men for this discussion) that are wired a bit differently..... I get it and have used that analogy before in discussions just not here.....
Where I disagree with current the current state of all this is they still have a mans body...I can't help that, they can't and women and girls can't... When people disagree that they shouldn't play sports with biological females it not out of discrimination, its just a plain unfair advantage...If they share bathrooms or locker rooms they are making young women and girls feel quite uncomfortable as you may well imagine....It just plain not fair to them and they shouldn't have to endure it...
In summery they have to play with the cards that are dealt to them and be respectful of the other women...And understand that like it or not they have a huge advantage in sports, and since their body is male its just not appropriate to make women and girls feel uncomfortable....Sorry, there are just some things they cannot do because of their condition...
But this is a rational discussion we are having, you didn't call me transphobic, I didn't call you misogynist,,,,,The vast majority feel as I do,,,,,Yet the left is too easy to start right in labeling everyone trans phobic without having a nuanced discussion such as this....It doesn't make me a gay hater,,, Im just taking up for girls and women's rights to keep things fair...
Its where the left makes a big mistake, they can't see the other side of the coin in all this and just demand they are treated equal in areas they just plain are not.....Then they start with the name calling....And btw to throw it in, and again like it or not, a comedian has the right to make fun of who ever, hillbillies, transgender and whomever they chose...I will go on to say those that are actually haters of all things different have that right too (but that is the few)...Just like I don't much care for those that would burn the flag,,,dang if they don't have the right to do it....But let them hate for hates sake it only makes them look bad..
All too many people are cancelled out of their jobs or professions for trying to have the same discussion we just had...That is as wrong as any other cancel culture from no matter what group or affiliation..
So hopefully this will clear any air on both sides, well see how its taken and go from there, cause I'm sure not going to type this much again...
Well there you go again, like its not an obvious truth the 2 parties find ideologically compatible judges for the SC....When in fact all SC justices should be centrist, which is what the law and its interpretation should be all about..
When did I deny science. And its just my opinion mind but I don't think I'm the one being immature.......
And people that don't agree with you aren't transphobic, people could care less if some men want to pretend they are a woman or not, but there is a time and place for everything.....And that's when the pearls start getting clutched......And the name calling like immature begins.....
So, what is your definition of a woman?
Dems have just gotten silly...
Sotomayor and Kagan aren't liberal Judges? I liked Garland, alas, not on the SC
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_Supreme_Court_candidates
From one prick to another,,,,,sorry you feel that way
Hit a nerve eh, look up the talking points McKinsey & Company have put out on Immigration, globalization (free not far trade) and look how they are parroted even unwittingly by partisans like yourself....
Then look at all the crap they've been involved in.....
Its the scam of the Millennium....
To comment on the SC, two parties do their best to get the the most extreme person of their ideology on the bench they can squeak by instead of centrist judges and wonder why we get split decisions down party lines.......
When one gets the advantage it time to bitch.....You all bring it on your self...
Now I should just roll my eyes, but performance posting is entertaining even if its
not realistic
When did I say Nancy did? Since its an ever ask question by the left, What is your definition of a woman?
See how silly dems have become
Gave a whole rant on it this morn, go look it up....Probability the most ridiculous of them all is men in women's sports.......Thats as far left as it gets....
Populism at its simplest, is commoners tired of elites who have taken advantage..... Now you will complicate that definition for your own agenda.....So in this case occur razor is once again correct
Never said a bad word about aoc, that's just where that elitist attitude of yours fails you and others. That feeling of superiority that you can do or saying anything about anybody, because you are superior to them.....Lol, fun in the short term but never ends well in the long term...
And if aoc isn't far left no one is,,,,,,
Free Market was her excuse,,with a wink and a nod no doubt
Pelosi defends lawmaker stock trades, citing ‘free market’
https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775
Sorry you feel that way, misrepresentation is relative, dems can be accused of as much too....Both parties and the media do it,,,,Its called spin, for lack of
Just like calling all Trump supporters racist....Or any one who disagrees on immigration, gender issues or even for those who are long time repubs....Definitely a misrepresentation of people and its no help to your cause or causes..