Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I merely answered your assertion that you don’t give trading advice . You clearly advised no one should buy .
I would also add that to the extent Sharp is my “hero”....
I’m a trader — Sharps stocks made me well into seven figures ....
one trades to make money ... there is no other goal trading stocks: MAKE MONEY.
I anticipate that many consider him a “hero” since he has the knack to be able to create value for shareholders and traders.
This isn’t trading advice ? Really?
“All he did was glorify and draw attention to a delinquent filer that nobody in their right mind should be giving any attention to or trading. “
No — you’re saying why he’s doing is illegal and you’re telling others not to buy .
That’s offering “financial advice” ( to put it politely ) and making accusations without facts. What exactly is illegal and not allowed under current law?
Aren’t YOU giving trading advice and accusing Sharp of doing something illegal ?
Should people be convincing others NOT to buy as well ? Giving trading advice ? What if others could have made $$ and didn’t buy because of the advice ?
Is there something illegal happening?
If not -/ shouldn’t others be free to trade without getting “advice” not to buy?
Hmmmmmmmmm....,
Foote is dead on right with his analysis of digital assets rise —-
And here’s yet another piece of news backing that up : India backing off and now on board
“National Payments Corporation of India Says It Will Not Ban Cryptocurrencies Through UPI”
https://news.bitcoin.com/national-payments-corporation-of-india-not-ban-cryptocurrencies-upi/
Seems like you provided inaccurate information once again eh ?
More George Sharp: “I voluntarily agreed to set aside the order in the interest of due process and a proper hearing. It was the right thing to do.”
I voluntarily agreed to set aside the order in the interest of due process and a proper hearing. It was the right thing to do. https://t.co/a75teZUKRR
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) May 7, 2021
Told ya so ..... George Sharp:
“To those who stated that I misled investors about being granted custodianship of $RETC or that it was a temporary custodianship (ridiculous), here is the signed order. I was granted unconditional custodianship & a Temporary Restraining Order against the officers & directors”
Photo of Documents are on Twitter
To those who stated that I misled investors about being granted custodianship of $RETC or that it was a temporary custodianship (ridiculous), here is the signed order. I was granted unconditional custodianship & a Temporary Restraining Order against the officers & directors pic.twitter.com/DlbukZFAAR
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) May 7, 2021
Without a doubt
In lower Big Board land ....
Gotta love the volume and more importantly DOLLAR volume
Yup — go where liquidity is .... plays where small volumes move the price a lot are dangerous
How can that be ? I’m making lots of money on Sharp plays ... millions huh ...
Hmmmmmmmmm
Love the liquidity in this OTC
Watch the patterns — buy lows
Yes it looks like the OS was lowered for $HMBL
Pattern looks pretty clear . Lots of liquidity . That’s all I care about .
I trade to make money -/ I could care less what a stock does on one day . I’m not a flipper . I’m a pattern trader .
I buy low and sell high and make lots of money .
I made millions on his stocks —- trading is about making money - and that’s it .
Personalities don’t interest me .
That is incorrect : READ AGAIN
You are 100 percent incorrect on the process
GEORGE SHARP:
“Let me say this one more time for you boneheads who think I made up the award of $RETC custodianship. I didn't say I was awarded custodianship, THE COURT DID. I just agreed to have current management have its day in court because that was what was likely to happen anyway.”
Let me say this one more time for you boneheads who think I made up the award of $RETC custodianship. I didn't say I was awarded custodianship, THE COURT DID. I just agreed to have current management have its day in court because that was what was likely to happen anyway. pic.twitter.com/skdHQLAnEu
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) May 7, 2021
So you’re arguing the judge is wrong and corrupt ? THATS your “case”? LOL
That’s not going to happen
I don’t disagree
It depends on the RS — FORW did a 1:8 and HMBL did a 1:4 to clean up share structures .... and both made long term shareholders a lot of money . ( assuming they held through the build up and through the giant appreciation in value) .
It’s in the best interest to get current for shareholders however that gets done as the SEC is cracking down on non current tickers .... Sharp has been advised to change tactics by his lawyers to obtain control .
Nope
I would fully read all 6 tweets ....
Who cares — it’s up 50
Percent today with lots of volume
That’s a lot of questions and speculations
Yes — it means nothing
Nice position ....
This is the OTC — I don’t care about that with OTC.
They are both Pink current and have auditors and SEC lawyers . What exactly is “a mess”?
And I like the looks of both for another longer term gain pattern from current positions .
I actually got in it for awhile and made some cash .... didn’t like the looks for a longer term pattern .... but I’ve been wrong before : )
FORW was a mess ... a BIG mess .
Do you mean Pink no info ?
Few OTC companies are SEC registrants even if pink Current .
Are you referring to OTCM disclosures?
I’m a BIG believer in simplicity especially in getting older .
Strip away the noise and focus on the basics .
Life is much easier : )