completing the mission
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So how much is the net profit margin for BBDA?
The only thing worse than Lian Brian is a company that assists enviromental polluters that use fracking to extract natural gas.And ruin drinking water of entire towns.Maybe you can hook up Brian with a job like that.I'm sure he could handle lying to little old ladies to get them to sign over their rights.
It starts with a good story and ends with many excuses.
Aurus did have a good story.Many people including myself like the thoughts of reclaiming minerals that were discarded.But as we have seen that there was never any intention of sharing anything other than a story.The new shell is the same as the old shell.It is an unpaid taxes inactive company in name only.Which means in the words of IB,Has no connection to any assets anywhere.Except shares of course.
That disclaimer is to say that even if the company did well it is not typical.It is like disclaimers listed along with multi level marketing schemes.
Past performance of share selling shells seems to continue till their demise.
Actually if Orchard shorts 2 billion at lets say .0005 they can buyback at half of market price.If market price remains at .0005 then they can buy at .00025
But realistically they would whack the heck out of the bid and get it too the .00025 and buy at .000125 and only use up $250K of the agreed amount.I see an AS raise in the near future because there is always .0001 buyers of these types of share selling schemes.
Don't worry,the Obama propaganda machine will play all the make beleive you want.Just like the penny stock promoters claiming Fannie and Freddie are a great buy while flipping these POS to the sheople.I guess your pension did not buy Freddie at $65. per share.
You are so wrong about the red herring.
The problem is verymuch larger than that lawsuit could yield.
The real problems are not being addressed because of the to big to fail mentality.Instead the failures are propped up and allowed to continue to live the life of riley.
http://activerain.com/blogsview/1932456/mers-the-forthcoming-foreclosure-crisis-
Yup,thanks to the socialist Obama illegal immigrant clan.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/29/us-obama-relative-arrest-idUSTRE77S6RG20110829
This particular lawsuit is a red herring for the seagulls.
There is a much larger problem that has not been addressed and is a ticking timebomb.There is problably way over 1.2 triilion worth of mortgages that were not properly secured and cannot be foreclosed on and the homeowners cannot get clear title because of this defect.Not many people have learned about this yet.But ot comes down to this.Would you continue to pay for a mortgage on a house you could never get clear title to?And there is also the MERS situation created by Fannie and Freddie that pose the same threat of ownership.And that affects 60 million homes.
http://activerain.com/blogsview/1932456/mers-the-forthcoming-foreclosure-crisis-
"Who created it? i. Fannie Mae’s CEO James Johnson ii. Countrywide’s CEO Anthony Mozilo 1. Who was later indicted on securities fraud charges in 2009 2. Mozilo acknowledged Countrywide was increasing risky loans and did not tell investors iii. Countrywide and Fannie Mae were the lead organizers/shareholders/”members” of MERS"
"People have begun to question how a shell company call MERS could foreclose on homes when they had no ownership claim f. To this day, MERS has never originated a single loan nor loaned a dime to a single borrower 4. Traditional Filing System a. Traditionally filed by: i. Traditional note is assigned to the mortgagor and recorded with the county ii. If the note is sold to a third party, the actual promissory note must be delivered to the third party, and recorded with the county b. Structured mortgage securities typically constructed as Trusts 1. Trust hold mortgage note, which allows bundling of notes 2. Note is physically transferred to Trust c. Creation of a legal Residential Mortgage backed securities (RMBS) and Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDOs) i. The physical note the bank hold must be deposited into the Trust 1. Note holder entitled to receive payments and interest 2. Has the right to foreclose/take property in event of default 5. MERS Filing System a. Has completely ignored the structuring process i. Proper filing of the mortgage note every time the product changed hands did not happen under MERS ii. Instead, they issued “blank” mortgage assignments all along the channel of transfers, skipping the actual physical recording of the mortgage at the county registry of deeds b. MERS filing/record keeping i. MERS does not keep documents, it is a “paperless” system 1. Many of the so-called mortgage backed security trusts do not actually hold the promissory notes which evidence the debts that are supposed to be backing the bonds purchased by these investors ii. Causes improper construction of Trusts 1. Note is never reassigned to Trust 2. Requisite filing of mortgage lien with county never done 3. There is no documentation, as it is a “paperless” system "
One reason BRYN is a very risky buy.
Past performance of the company.
Look at the 2 year chart.
A P+D is a P+D and never works out long term for the average investor/bagholder who are still under water with this thing.
READ THE FINANCIALS!
There is no indication in any way,shape or form that Gary is doing anything other than diluting the hell out of INOL and sharing that with a bunch of others.He will succeed at the dilution.And the common shareholder that bought as a true investment will fail at making a profit.The sunami of shares has not even begun.
Your half way there.
Gary has absolutely nothing in common with Gates or Allen.
Gates and Allen created successful business by actually working and generating revenue.All though quite little in the beginning.
Contacts really had little to do with it.As I showed you with the Home Depot manual.Contacts should be nothing more than administrative because they are a publically traded company.Real business is about product and price not personality and friendships.And so far with INOL,selling Inohealth products has failed even though millions of dollars of deficits.
Page 5
Conflicts of Interest
https://suppliercenter.homedepot.com/en_US/Supplier_Center/Functional/SupplierReferenceManual/2011_SRG_Deliverables/Supplier_Reference_Guide_Spring_2011.pdf
Policies like this are very important when conducting real business in a publically traded company.The reason is to limit the company from being defrauded by people colluding.These types of policies are actually required by SEC.
I have no doubt Gary thinks and acts like you.
For example.INOL delivers $300,000.00 worth of product to Gulf Coast Pharmaceutical.Which turned out to be a bunch of BS.With a real company there would have been a written agreement that would have spelled out how the transaction was going to occur.Conveniently Gary kept such agreement secret.Obviously just one of those verbal contact agreements that have no good place in legitimate business.
My point was that real businesses start small.And the founders actually work at it.Gary and Sharon sell shares to skim as much money as possible without generating any revenue at all.That is why they will always fail at creating a real business.
It is good to be able to get along with contacts.But real big businesses that deal in real goods are only administrative .
Especially with publically traded companies.
Did you know publically traded companies have special rules in doing business?
http://www.answers.com/topic/microsoft
"Gates and Allen named their partnership Micro-soft.Their revenues.Their revenues for 1975 totaled $16,000.00"
This lawsuit is a gimmee for the banks involved.The banks have many more billions of dollars of mortgages that cannot be foreclosed on because the mortgage deeds are incorrect.For example the mortgage deeds do not have the trustees of the securities assigned to them.Instead they have a bank named on them that do not have the appropriate interest to foreclose.So what will happen is the banks will foreclose on the properties after they are forced to buyback the mortgages that were not transfered in the first place.Those foreclosures will be illegal also,but the banks will do it anyhow.Because with them it is about what they can get away with,not what is legal.All a homeowner has to do is demand the complete mortgage account history including beneficial owner of note.And that will show the note and deed were severed,and once severed they cannot be legally put back together.Hence the lawsuit to get a judgement to justify the next step of the fraud.
PS,I was in contact with FHFA feeding them info of how the banks, asset managers,lawyers and real estate agents are mishandling the resale of foreclosed properties owned by Fannie.Of course Fannie is OK with the mishandling because they are used to assisting in the fraud perpetrated by the banks.The feds are just breaking off a piece of the action like any Godfather would do.
Do you remember how the INOL share selling scheme started?
It started with a hype about DNA testing to help people decide about using a common drug named Plavix.And because Plavix has been over prescribed and therefor very profitable,people bought stock thinking INOL could piggyback on the success of big drug pushers.We seen posts,(Plavix,Plavix,Plavix).And as it turns out there have been 0 sales for INOL.Now the newest BS is fountain of youth skin cream.Which is another product that has a saturated market.So when do the product changes stop and some actual sales occur?A guy I met at Harvard(Bill Gates),had a real innovative idea.His first year sales were $16,000.00 but he worked hands on and had 0 consultants.He worked out of a garage and there were no silly big salary agreements that would choke any start up company.And that is the difference between a real business and a share selling scheme like INOL.Simply the way Gary and Sharon control INOL should show you there is absolutely no intention of building a real business.I think we all know how it turned out for the guys working out of the garage.And also know how things will turn out for INOL and the common shareholder.Gary could have made more sales if he bought a weiner wagon and sold hot dogs and soda.There would not have been 1.2 million dollars of stock sold the first year.But at least the customers would have gotten a meal.
"" If you do own a business, would you burn a major customer? After my contact's death, I built a relationship with his replacement and continued to sell to the grocery chain until I sold my business.
If I would have enforced the contract, I would have no longer been able to continue my business relationship with the chain.""
Contacts should be irrelevant and merely administrative.As a matter of fact,if you were doing business with Home Depot for instance.They have policies in place so even the appearance of favorable relationships are forbidden.How could you state that enforcing a fair contract is burning the company you are selling to?What you describe is the type of business Gary would be involved in.And it is quite clear the socalled delivered product was a hoax to sell shares.
I don't think FINRA will approve an RS for such a share selling scheme.FINRA has started to scrutinize scams like INOL.
Don't kid yourself.This is a race to no bid.There is at least 6 sellers besides Gary and the messageboard suckers.They all want to make money before the no bid.The guys in the best situation is Gary and the Dude that can buy $500,000.00 in shares at a 50% discount of market price.This is going to be the biggest .00005 stock ever.
Check out the map of another company very close to IP address of Lightsmedia.
Charles Swab 2
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=327+INVERNESS+DR+S,+ENGLEWOOD,+CO,+801126012+US+&z=14&iwloc=addr
And just plain old Charles Swab.Right near NTT America.
http://maps.google.com/maps?rls=com.microsoft:*:IE-SearchBox&oe=UTF-8&rlz=1I7GGIE_en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=charles+schwab+2+colorado&fb=1&gl=us&hq=charles+schwab+2&hnear=0x874014749b1856b7:0xc75483314990a7ff,Colorado&ei=TDlhTpfmO4K80AGiv7Um&sa=X&oi=local_group&ct=image&ved=0CCIQtgM
Maybe no meaning at all.
Sure is funny.
What struggling borrowers should do is ask Fannie and Freddie what the certificate number their mortgage is bundled in.Then go to SEC website and see who the trustee was supposed to be.Then do a title search and see if the trustee was assigned mortgage.If not,the borrower should tell Fannie,Fredddie and whatever bank is claiming to be the servicer to go pound sand.Because not only the mortgage can't be foreclosed on because it was severed from the deed,but the mortgage deed can't be discharged legally either.So why pay money when the debt can't be released?
That would be like paying a 5 year car loan and the bank saying they will not release the lien on the title because they just don't do that.Why do you think the houses in Detroit ended up selling for $100. each?It was much more than the tanking of the local economy.It was because the titles are garbage and will never support regular bank financing again.
Is that why they returned it?
Who on earth would want useless crap like that on their books if the deal was to sell the service also?Gary didn't want that crap on his books also.Just look at the financials.It does not exist.
There is nothing wrong with food banks.
I have assisted there more than once.They play a very important role in feeding people who have been scammed by the likes of the Bertholds.I'm talking about good people that were mislead thru pr's and incomplete financials.Not those that have conspired with them and got free and discounted shares.Those people can go eat cake!
I think I know Gary's plan.
According to his financials he is going to seek more people to buy shares of this POS.The last guy got in at 50% discount.So at least 50% discount shares are available.
Now look at his BS sales agreement with Inohealth.
And you will see it depends on how much someone brings to the table as to much much they get.
That sales agreement is for share selling info not real products.
After all he did not file anything to make that agreement whole.
I wouldn't advise buying a half million dollars of this stock though.Even though the agreements state up to that amount at a 50% discount at a market price.Do you guys get it yet?Gary and his contract makers are screwing those investors also.And if any of them have or had people posting on this board or other social media outlets.The contract maker will not let them have their shares.Didn't Gary already renege on a share agreement?Which means the lawyers get some more of the action.
At one time he was on Wallst.net when he was president of PHMB.
He would not post to any of the questions I had.Instead called me on the phone.I told him to email me or answer the questions in public so all investors can see.Well,Gary does not do that.I'd say he prefers to blow smoke up callers A**ES,just like when people from this board call him.
Read the financials.
You lost your money to a den of thieves.
I'd say it was all a rouse and when Gary found out how it would look on the financials he changed his mind.
I'd say there was not $300,000.00 worth of product shipped,but $300,000.00 worth of services sold using the product shipped.
I'm sure Gary did not want to pay the taxes on something that he feels would never happen.After all,the money collected selling shares is all his,Sharon's and consultants.The only thing Gary has sold $300,000.00 worth of product is INOL shares.Those are products and a disservice to the buyers.
None of that transaction is listed in the financials.
Point out what you think outlines such an event in the financials.
Here is some pictures for you to try and make sense of the processes involved at Fannie.They do not have all the details because the devil is in the details.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/07/11/business/20080711_FANNIE_GRAPHIC.html
A friend of mine requested a mortgage discharge because he paid off his mortgage.The bank said"we don't do that".
I happen to beleive they sold his mortgage to Freddie which is Fannie's evil cohort.Their mortgage deed reflects the original mortgage issuer that did not assign the mortgage deed as required by law.Now they have a cloud in the title that will require legal fees and title insurance when it did not have those issues before.
Do you like to be forced to pay fees because of the actions of others?
Actually it is worse than a one time fee or fees.
That property will require those fees everytime it is sold if bank financing is involved.
If you have a house you bought from about 2000 thru 2008 you too probably have the same problem.
Most people never pay off a mortgage or even know how to buy a house for cash and what titles should look like and what they do look like.
They just fork over thousands of dollars because they think it is normal to give all the socalled professionals involved a peice of the action.
You know,just like how organized crime breaks off a peice of the action.
That is what happened.
You are probably in denial because like most people you know one or more people in the industry of finance and or real estate transfer and don't want to realize their involvement of the destruction of millions of property deeds in what once was a free United States Of America.
I also get only 1 post per day because of to much truth.
Contrary to Jane the current hosting is Lightsmedia Englewood Colorado.
http://ip-address-lookup-v4.com/lookup.php?ip=161.58.154.1&x=49&y=13
NTT America is the IP Address
Organization.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/internet-service-providers/ntt-america/ntt-america-spammer-and-scam-h-3yf38.htm
You really don't expect them at Lightsmedia to say OK we also were in on the scam with the dead guy?The live guys don't want to accept their resposibility either.
How about cancelling the other half?
Did you call the TA and verify the cancellation?
Not that that matters a whole lot,but if that doesn't even happen then why would you expect anything more from this one?
If anybody is touting a stock and saying you better get in,is a good indication that the stock is not worth what they paid for it.In the case of BRYN,their associations with stock fraud scammers is enough of a reason for people to at the very least wait and see if they turn over a new leaf.Highly unlikely though.Did you know that some of these stock scammers have only done crooked business all their lives?
INOL is not a biotech company.
It is not even a business,it is an empty shell.
Actually worse than an empty shell.It is a shell with a 3 million deficit.So maybe after the 3 million deficit is fixed and all the shares sold by Gary,consultants and other financial instrument holders that all INOL has to do is rinse and repeat.
Maybe this time people have understood how these guys operate.
Then again ,What does it matter because it looks like INOL is the Bertholds retirement plan and the people they are puppets for will just use other unethical people to do more of the same.
Flanagan Associates had at one time 64 box schemes on record.
I see no reason why that number isn't just as accurate today.
Give them a call and maybe you to can be president,you seem to have the same qualifications as Gary.
Forget about the hinting.A company like BRYN must prove themselves thru filings with real revenues.
I understand that you,someone you know or work for has bought into this scam.All those that buy into these things have to make a choice.Either continue it or work towards ending it even though their money will be lost.The likes of the Bertholds and their handlers count on bagholders helping to continue the share selling even though they also know there will be buyers even at the .0001 level.Even entering at that level is a serious risk here.
I don't thnk you do get it.
INOL is not really an investment at all.There is obviously no intent of any business other than selling shares.You perpetuating the cycle just so you to can make money on this scam is just as unethical.Whether this POS goes up,down or sideways matters not.What matters is that the stock is not being sold to build a business that will benefit all those who buy the stock.Only those lucky enough to get out in time.
This is not a real estate stock.
It is a government sponsored and protected private company criminal enterprise that could and should be dismantled at any time.
It's a HAWALA system.
http://www.interpol.int/Public/FinancialCrime/MoneyLaundering/hawala/
NITE is the umbrella that many small brokers hide their existence under.And the share selling scheme companies can also.
http://www.knight.com/legal/operation.asp
"Knight Direct LLC ("Knight Direct") provides institutions with direct market access trading through Knight Direct, an advanced electronic platform. Knight Direct offers a suite of algorithms that allow buy- and sell-side clients to more effectively source liquidity and manage the trading process as well as maintain anonymity"
Actually the relentless share sellers are Gary and his buddies he is sharing all the share selling with.
Buy some more and blame the MM's.
So what about the suckers that bought those shares at the .0085 level?How is their investment doing?Hmmm?
And then Gary finally filed the 4 consultant agreements.
And since then has debentures and other discount share agreements.
And those are only the ones he is admitting.
How about you buy all the shares?
3.8 billion of them,But don't worry Gary will do the right thing with your money and divy it up with the consultants that helped him to learn how to operate Inohealth.
That's close to the amount I lost buying into ABVG which Gary took over and turned into the PHMB scam to complete the cycle.That put that account at about a value of $1.24.Hows that for shareholder value creation?
Welcome to the club.Sign the register please.