Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This is a mentality I just don't understand.
Sweet Jesus! If they invested just a little bit of time reading old World Reports from a few years ago they would have a monumental déjà vu experience.
Last January/February I posted old articles by World Reports and predicted the same thing would occur again with delays and beyond belief excuses why the Leo Wanta funds were diverted. Back then they kept accusing some evil Atlanta law firm of holding up everything and made up all kinds of crap about them. The law firm was just one of many entities they accuse.
Dear Lord! I'm reading the boards tonight and see for the past few weeks people have been actively calling Cottrell and Bonney up.
Why the heck are these folks tormenting themselves with the BS these con men spew? It boggles the mind!
When's Chinese New Year? Is this perhaps the Year of the Moron?
February 3rd
That will be past the one year anniversary of the Krazy Al lawsuit lunacy. Anyone that still believes in the World Reports/Cottrell/Bonney/Wilcox hoax will indeed be living in the year of the moron.
I know now that that wasn't the real DT
DT is too busy haunting the RB CMKI board with the same inane nonsense he's been posting on RB for over a decade.
sheesh what an obsessive moron.
The Drunken Troll is actually writing comments that MAKE SENSE.
LOL
If DT is capable of writing that.........
I'll eat my keyboard.
Is this statement accurate?
This statement below is closer to the truth.
And Altomare's Book is a total fraud, as is that scumbag. $700,000,000 Judgment??? LMAO Try to collect one penny from that silliness. And it was not for NSS. It was a Scammer Vs Scammer lawsuit. The bigger scammer, Altomare, outscammed the smaller scammers - who JUST HAPPENED to bew in prison at the time!!!
Too funny! Now the Chinese have taken over the situation.
Baby Jesus couldn't deliver the packets by Christmas Day, so they went to a more reliable source. The Chinese will see that Economic Receipt is released for sure, and if the Chinese fail the only recourse will be a request to the Imperial Galactic Government to have Gag Halfrunt mediate the settlement.
Re: Updated Daily.."RUMORS"....believe em' or not
« Reply #35 Today at 8:40am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ty bikinipro......
showmethemoney
Snifferpup heard Wyatt's comments this way...
"Wyatt just in the GrapeVine now..................Said he had conversation with Al today...........Al could not verify if the packs have gone out or not..............Said Chinese took over a couple days ago.....................Wyatt also said Al has not filed the appeal and he doesn't expect Al to file................Kind of cryptic, but by and large positive....................Waiting to see if he comes back on~"
However, Treffry told another shareholder I know that Al did confirm the packets had gone out... that they waited until the very last minute... sent by FedEx Ground.
I spoke with LtCol. Nelson Reynolds tonight. He too has had recent communications with Al. Al didn't say anything to him about the packets being shipped out... but, did make a comment about the Chinese having control over the WGS funds.
So, more confusion in CMKXland.
If true, it would not surprise me at all if squid was funding this World Reports associates lunacy.
by goodolboy
Re: How is Al Gonna spin this?
« Reply #38 Today at 11:53am »
Today at 11:51am, gregg wrote:
Bonney is a certified insane con man. Jeesh, google search him, he's been nuts longer than CMKM has been around, there are stories about him and Leo Wanta from the 90s...
and it's not his real name, either....
Today at 11:56am, 4profit wrote:
Treffry's loaned money...
Not related to this Schapiro, (minus a C) I take it?
lol different spelling.
(Nor Queen Mary of Germany, I hope)
Since you mention Germany and Queens, we were informed by a RB CMKX poster that Queen Elizabeth and the Bush Crime Family are cousins of Hitler. Bet you never heard that one before? lol
Same day, and EXACTLY the same amount.
6,070 03/01/03 Research Investment Group 1999 Financing 10,000,000 0.00163 $16,300 $16,300
6,069 03/01/03 Joan Shapiro 1999 Financing 10,000,000 0.00163 $16,300 $16,300
Some coincidence, huh?
fishy fishy
Good grief! Check out this stinker.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58323077
capted
Sunday, January 02, 2011 8:20:37 AM
Re: None Post # of 705
PUMP AND DUMP Stock Promoter Scott Wilding !!!
http://biz.yahoo.com/e/101228/drwnd.ob8-k.html
Skyline Investments Inc
Scott Wilding 5,700,000 shares
688 NW 156 Avenue
Pembroke Pines, Florida 33028
Link to Convicted Stock Promoter Scott Wilding.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/33-8353.htm
Who dat?
Joan is the girlfriend of infamous tout Ed Thompson aka Surfit. Thompson also had a 30 year friendship with Treffry. All were connected to the PCBM/ECNC boyz in one way or another.
The 30-page Exhibit 1 to the Notice of Compliance with Federal Rule 26 contains a list of names of individuals likely to have discoverable information that the SEC might use to support its claims as well as a list of non-privileged documents the SEC might use at trial of the CMKM case.
Exhibit 1 is 30 =
People
Adam Barnett
Vincent Lo Castro
Debra Ann Edwards
Bill Frizzell
Shawn Hackman
Bruce Harlan
Christopher Jensen
Diana Lee Flaherty
Joan Shapiro
Edward Thompson
Allan Treffry
Gary Walters
Don Yarter
Documents
4. Testimony transcript of Bill Frizzell, taken on January 6, 2006.
6. Testimony transcripts of Bruce M. Harlan, taken May 3, 2006, May 4, 2006, and June 15, 2007.
12. Testimony transcript of Don Yarter, taken March 22, 2006.
14. Testimony transcripts of Edward S. Thompson, taken on March 5, 2007, and April 23, 2007.
20. Testimony transcripts of Keith Allan Houser, taken on August 16, 2006, and May 31, 2007.
26. Testimony transcript of William Haseltine, taken on September 8, 2005.
27. Testimony transcripts of John M. Edwards, taken on April 14, 2005, and September 13, 2005.
28. Testimony transcript of Christopher Jensen, taken on September 20, 2005.
52. Materials from Janice Shell, obtained March 2005.
57. Materials retrieved from publicly accessible websites on the Internet, obtained January 2005 - October 2007.
74. Materials from Bill Frizzell obtained December 2005 - January 2006.
75. Materials from Venetian Casino & Resort, obtained December 2005.
82. Materials from Don Yarter, obtained April 2006.
86. Materials from Bruce Harlan, obtained May 2006 - February 2007.
98. Materials from D. Roger Glenn, obtained July 2006 - November, 2007.
102. Materials from Biotech Medics, Inc., obtained August 2006.
116. Materials from Shawn Hackman, obtained October 2007.
120. Materials from Allan F. Treffry, obtained May 2008.
127. Materials from Goldstake Enterprises, Inc., obtained August 2005.
128. Materials from Christopher Jensen, obtained September 2005.
175. Materials from nufced@yahoo.com, obtained August 2006.
177. Materials from Ed Thompson, obtained January 2007 - March 2008.
192. Materials regarding U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. stock promotion efforts, obtained September 2007.
Well, I'm not, since he was never involved. Come to think of it, I don't believe they used paid promoters at all, unless I've forgotten one.
Actually Janice, Wilding was involved. Not only that, but it is very interesting the Research Investment Group received shares the same day (03/01/03) as the usual suspects, including Ed's girlfriend Joan.
6,071 03/01/03 The Bruce Harlan Trust 1999 Financing 20,000,000 0.00163 $32,600 $32,600
6,072 03/01/03 The Bruce Harlan Trust 1999 Financing 20,000,000 0.00163 $32,600 $65,200
6,073 03/01/03 The Bruce Harlan Trust 1999 Financing 20,000,000 0.00163 $32,600 $97,800
6,074 03/01/03 The Bruce Harlan Trust 1999 Financing 20,000,000 0.00163 $32,600 $130,400
6,068 03/01/03 Chris Jenson 1999 Financing 10,000,000 0.00163 $16,300 $16,300
5,066 12/18/02 Kim Lo Castro 1999 Financing 3,000,000 0.03500 $105,000 $105,000
5,065 12/18/02 Vincent Lo Castro 1999 Financing 3,000,000 0.03500 $105,000 $105,000
5,068 12/18/02 Vincent Lo Castro 1999 Financing 4,000,000 0.03500 $140,000 $140,000
5,067 12/18/02 Lo Castro & Assoiciates 1999 Financing 3,000,000 0.03500 $105,000 $105,000
5,084 12/31/02 Lo Castro & Assoiciates 1999 Financing 10,000,000 0.01300 $130,000 $235,000
6,075 03/01/03 Lo Castro & Assoiciates 1999 Financing 20,000,000 0.00163 $32,600 $416,520
6,076 03/01/03 Lo Castro & Assoiciates 1999 Financing 20,000,000 0.00163 $32,600 $449,120
6,077 03/01/03 Lo Castro & Assoiciates 1999 Financing 20,000,000 0.00163 $32,600 $481,720
6,078 03/01/03 Lo Castro & Assoiciates 1999 Financing 20,000,000 0.00163 $32,600 $514,320
5,070 12/18/02 NPJB, Inc. 1999 Financing 4,000,000 0.03500 $140,000 $140,000
6,070 03/01/03 Research Investment Group 1999 Financing 10,000,000 0.00163 $16,300 $16,300
5,086 12/31/02 Rick Anthony 1999 Financing 6,000,000 0.01300 $78,000 $78,000
5,087 12/31/02 Frank Ormstead 1999 Financing 6,000,000 0.01300 $78,000 $78,000
6,069 03/01/03 Joan Shapiro 1999 Financing 10,000,000 0.00163 $16,300 $16,300
6,067 03/01/03 Stop & Company 1999 Financing 12,000,000 0.00163 $19,560 $19,560
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/33-8387.htm
ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
AND IMPOSING SANCTIONS
BY DEFAULT ON RESEARCH
INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.,
AND SCOTT H. WILDING
RIG, a Florida corporation, promotes small cap companies by hiring others to mass distribute e mail messages and faxes touting its corporate clients.
Respondent Wilding, 42, of Pembroke Pines, Florida, is the sole officer and director of RIG.
Krazy Al did reference Tramp respectfully in one of his early messages to his public
oops
eggie isn't sounding too confident in Krazy Al's Xmas betting man speech.
hmmm....."ulterior agenda/some specific purpose"? For instance, would selling certs classify as an ulterior agenda/some specific purpose?
georgie18
Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Reply #295 Yesterday at 9:42pm »
FROM MILLIONAIRES...
Based on the update the plaintiffs received received prior to Thanksgiving, the CMKX Distribution Fund was projected to be released on Thanksgiving Week. So, if you were a betting person, what would you conclude about the release occurring before Christmas? I am not. The funds need to be released now....please.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
truebrit
Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Reply #297 Yesterday at 10:25pm »
How would you feel if you were Bob Holleneg after reading this that Al Hodges wrote today "Some seem to believe that I have instructed various plaintiffs [most of whom have their own sources of information] to go to the boards/pal-talk and release information [either for some specific purpose or to serve some ulterior agenda] – I HAVE NOT?
I think Bob has been a loyal servant to Al Hodges, and has quoted Al on many occassions and when he hasn't quoted Al he has always stated as such. I have always thought that Bob's ulterior motive, both then and now has been to help and advise for the benefit of the shareholders.
Truebrit
Something tells me Krazy Al will have PLENTY of time now...
lol
Well, he does take the time to read the message boards. Tramp's board seems to be his favorite. nuf said.
My goodness the zoo board gets crazier all the time. RB doesn't even bother to remove racist like Dale Sams, aka Drunken Troll anymore. That CMKI board is literally covered with his racist remarks and profanity!
If he's not interested, perhaps Krazy Al could take over...
Even though Hodges is a director of World Reports, he is still actively practicing law and it is doubtful he has the time. Ashley Mote seems to have the time, but he lacks Story's unique creativity. lol
I very much doubt that ANY of those "sources" are legit.
Certainly not the ones I shared with you previously that Story was in touch with.
I can't think of one reason Al would mislead us and after all He IS ALSO A CERT holder
There's a reason right there.
Janice has the only explanation He is either CRAZY or he is correct with what he says
Not CRAZY...KRAZY! lol
jimmy, have you ever toyed with the notion that Hodges has been taken in by the World Reports monkeys?
How much credibility do you think their sources have? Because there are some of their sources who are NOT legit!
I would love to see Al rip him a new AH when it comes out.
Krazy Al certainly didn't rip a new AH after his interview with Floyd Norris, so how could he rip one now that he lost the motion to dismiss? Hodges couldn't even get pass first base. LOSER!
Right again Mr Norris!
If the suit is dismissed, those shareholders are not likely to conclude that the claim is nonsense. Instead, they probably will see the dismissal as proof of an even larger conspiracy. Buyer’s denial can be a powerful thing.
Dealing With Fraud by Denial By FLOYD NORRIS
March 11, 2010
Years after Charles Ponzi was imprisoned for a fraud that cost victims millions of dollars in 1920, the state of Massachusetts determined it had recovered all the assets it could, and began to distribute them to victims, who stood to receive less than 30 cents for each dollar they invested.
To get the money, the victims had to turn over the notes they had received from Ponzi. But many of them refused to do so when the cash was offered in 1931.
Those who refused, wrote Donald Dunn in his book, “Ponzi: The Incredible True Story of the King of Financial Cons,” were “holding onto the belief that Ponzi somehow would yet make good on his promise of 50 percent interest.”
He did not.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/business/12norris.html?pagewanted=print
That was probably not the first, and certainly not the last, example of what might be called “buyer’s denial.” It is the belief that somehow a fraud was not what it seemed to be, and that there was still a way to avoid losing the money the victim had foolishly invested.
“One has to ignore a lot of data to come to that conclusion. But that may be better than having to admit to yourself that it is over and you’re never going to get your money back,” said Dean G. Kilpatrick, the director of the National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center and a professor at the Medical University of South Carolina. “It stands to reason that some would prefer to believe something else.”
To conclude that, it may be necessary to believe that there is some large conspiracy involving the government. Otherwise, why would prosecutors have wrongly claimed there was a huge fraud?
Perhaps the largest case of “buyer’s denial,” at least in terms of alleged damages, is in the fraud involving a tiny company known as CMKM Diamonds, which purported to have valuable diamond mining claims. In reality, what it had was a publicity machine, including the sponsorship of a car at “funny car” races around the country.
Several shareholders in CMKM — some of whom kept buying shares after the government exposed the fraud — want 10 current and former commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission to pay them $3.87 trillion, an amount equal to about half the United States government debt in public hands. You might think that would be enough, but the suit claims those are merely compensatory damages. They also want punitive damages, but do not cite a figure.
That is an impressive amount for a company whose last published balance sheet showed total assets of $344. That is dollars, not millions.
The tale the shareholders tell, in a lawsuit filed in January in federal district court in Santa Ana, Calif., is of a conspiracy involving not just the S.E.C., but also the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security.
Before getting into their view of reality, we’ll look at the record as developed in court cases filed by the S.E.C. and the Justice Department.
By their account, CMKM Diamonds illegally issued hundreds of billions of shares of stock, which insiders proceeded to sell into the market while the company issued a series of false news releases and failed to file required financial statements with the S.E.C.
With volume in the stock reaching billions of shares a day, the company needed an explanation for where all those shares came from. Disclosure that the company was simply printing them might have alarmed even the least astute investor.
CMKM came up with an explanation that would also be used later by another “pump and dump” fraud named Universal Express. It blamed “naked” short-selling by criminals who had sold shares they had not borrowed beforehand.
Eventually, the S.E.C. ordered a temporary halt to the trading, citing the lack of public information on the company. The insiders kept selling shares, earning a total profit of at least $64 million, according to the government.
The case stands as a tribute to the ineffectiveness of civil remedies against determined crooks. The S.E.C. sued the insiders in federal court in Nevada. Most of them did not bother to reply. The S.E.C. got an order requiring John Edwards, a British citizen said to be the mastermind of the fraud, to pay $55 million in restitution, damages and interest. He left the country.
Urban Casavant, the company’s chief executive and the man who ran the publicity machine, was ordered to pay almost $69 million, but did not. He moved to Canada.
Both of those men, along with four other people said to have been involved in the fraud, were indicted by a federal grand jury in Nevada. Mr. Edwards is fighting extradition from Britain. Mr. Casavant is a fugitive.
The other view of CMKM is advanced by A. Clifton Hodges, a lawyer in Pasadena, Calif. In his class-action suit representing shareholders, and in an interview, he maintained that the government had set up a sting to catch the criminals who were doing the naked shorting.
The government had, the suit says, “evidence that short-sellers were utilizing their activities to illegally launder moneys, wrongfully export moneys, avoid payment of taxes and to support foreign terrorist operations.”
The government supposedly set up a sting using the services of Robert Maheu, a former F.B.I. agent and associate of Howard Hughes, who briefly served as a director of CMKM and complained that he was not paid. Mr. Maheu has since died.
The government now should distribute to shareholders the money it made on the scheme, the suit maintains. It does not explain how it arrived at a number in the trillions.
Mr. Hodges told me he had evidence to back up his case, but would not reveal it now.
He said the suit is allowed under a 1971 Supreme Court decision that allowed victims of ostensibly improper searches by federal narcotics agents to sue the agents as individuals, even though they could not sue the government. He thinks that justifies suing everyone who was an S.E.C. member from 2004 to the present.
Mr. Hodges told me that he could produce testimony from an unnamed witness who had heard Christopher Cox, then the S.E.C. chairman, direct that no enforcement action be taken against CMKM. Mr. Cox declined to comment, citing the pending litigation, but it is worth noting that the S.E.C. did file enforcement actions against the company while Mr. Cox was at the helm.
Mr. Hodges told me he has the phone number of Mr. Casavant, the fugitive former chief executive, in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan, and had spoken to him. He would not provide the number.
While pursuing his own theory of what happened at CMKM, Mr. Hodges does not seem to have done an especially thorough job of keeping up with the official version. The federal indictment of Mr. Casavant was unsealed in September, six months ago. But when I spoke to him this week, Mr. Hodges told me that Mr. Casavant had not been indicted.
Because I had written about CMKM several years ago, several shareholders brought this suit to my attention. When I told one I believed that the suit was unlikely to succeed, another called to ask me if the government was paying me off to suppress the news.
If the suit is dismissed, those shareholders are not likely to conclude that the claim is nonsense. Instead, they probably will see the dismissal as proof of an even larger conspiracy. Buyer’s denial can be a powerful thing.
Floyd Norris comments on finance and economics in his blog at nytimes.com/norris.
Well her you have it naysayr\ers
At any rate, the reason I mention it at all, is as a basis for you to understand that I now receive almost daily information from FBI, CIA, NSA, Pentagon, and JCS sources, as well as a plethora of other people with whom I have established a rapport and respect, and who have met certain screening criteria. It is information assembled from these sources that persuade me.
jimmy, we naysayers want to become believers too. Because the kool-aid must taste great and be pretty potent stuff to take the Xers into this la la fantasy land.
Here's your challenge. Convince Hodges to reveal at least one person from every agency he claims to have sources in. Don't accept any cloak and dagger explanations about why he can't name any of his sources because that is BS. Hodges is just another citizen like the rest of us. If he is privy to classified information, than we can be also.
On our way to becoming converted into "believers" we will conduct our own "screening criteria" to validate if these are indeed valid sources, or impostors. On the top of our list of criteria will be absolutely no association, communication, or ANY kind of involvement with Story, Bonney, Cottrell or Wilcox.
Seem fair enough, jimmy?
I would love to see these dopes put up their own money and try to find their own attorney
Deli should be expected to contribute $25K as he has profited quite nicely from selling the dream
LMAO
Deli DOES have his own attorney BECAUSE he sold the "dream".
I can assure you, he's not broke.
I'm certain he isn't broke either. Just pointing out Anthony is not as wealthy as some may have alluded to, and the possibility that he might be the one that leads folks to this conclusion.
If you've got any spare time, look into Robert Arnoni of Youngstown next
ouch!
fung, Youngstown is a notorious place where the mob operates. This guy's name ends with a vow.....pass. lol
As of a few hours ago my new focus involves one of the CMKX/GBDX insiders. Trying to stir my memory about some old posts. If my memory is correct there is one particular post I need to find.
BTW, by "JCS sources", does Krazy Al mean our very own Kingpin?
Too funny!
A sit down with Kingpin would be a good reality check for Krazy Al. LOL
I now receive almost daily information from FBI, CIA, NSA, Pentagon, and JCS sources
Hey, what happen to Krazy Al's communications with Interpol? Did they tell him to get lost? Maybe they can share their method of how to get rid of looneys with the FBI, CIA, NSA, Pentagon, and Joint Chiefs of Staff!
If the DOJ attorney really did say that, then it's unlikely he wasted any time talking about "private trusts".
Well now I'm confused. Who was the attorney that was present in court?
According to some shareholders yesterday who were there at the courthouse it was a young nobody attorney who knew nothing about the case.
But according to Proto who posted on tramp's board it was the Senior attorney, and Hodges said he spoke to Attorney Staub before the hearing.
As far as the US attorney that was there representing the defendants:
Al said this guy is the head [actually one of the Senior] US attorney in the LA office and he is very competent.
• I did have a colloquy with Mr. Staub prior to the hearing in which I confirmed that he had essentially little or no input from his individual clients and/or the SEC; he as well confirmed that he had absolutely no knowledge of any “behind-the-scenes” discussions or other activities.
geez whiz! can't these monkeys report one simple little detail accurately?
And why does Al believe the defendants or Stuab should have wasted any significant time on his delusional lawsuit? Why should they give a chit? The motion to dismiss was a textbook matter. It was the Xers and Krazy Al that made a mountain out of a molehill with their Krazy sting theory. The Krazy lawsuit couldn't even register on the media's radar. And speaking of the media, with all the threats of exposing this story to the media, why hasn't Krazy made good on that yet? Now that the motion to dismiss is finalize why not go to the media ASAP?
Good grief! LOL
Why would an attorney from the DOJ have said anything at all to them? He doesn't owe them explanations
Apparently the attorney was there only as a representative to accept the courts decision, so he would not have been able to contribute much info even if he wanted to.
Just a bit of speculation on the subject of sanctions, or lack of. IMO, the DOJ/defendants never pressed Judge Selna for sanctions because the taxpayers picked up the tap and the defendants were not financially harm. Also, the DOJ made use of young attorneys so this was merely time spent gaining some experience and not away from any major cases. Without a request for sanctions by the defendants Judge Selna may have pushed the matter aside because this is California after all, and Krazy little piss ant attorneys are not rare there. I just did a little research on a disbarred Cali attorney and was amazed at what they get away with out there until disbarment occurs.
It was reported there were 27 shareholders in attendance that had a "scrum" with Al after the hearing. Al told them he would take this matter to the U.S. SC if he had to. Al also stated in court that he disagreed with Judge Selna's decision.
Here's the weird part. It has been reported that the SC had already secretly weighed in on this matter and Al won, and that the motion to dismiss was the expected outcome but it doesn't matter because everything is already "done". WHY in God's name were these 27 shareholders acting like a deer staring into the headlights? They should have taken the opportunity to pepper Hodges with questions about the numerous inconsistencies that are thrown out there. The inconsistencies are an open window for unethical gurus to take advantage of them (in more ways than one).
Because these shareholders lack the gumption or intelligence to directly confront the people that have been force feeding them stories, they expect 50 state Attorney Generals to take on their responsibilities. They constantly whine about not thrusting the Government or the system because of Krazy conspiracies theories that have no hard evidence to back them up. But they have no qualms running to Governments for help and wasting more taxpayer money when there is at least a four month RICO trial looming costing millions with hard core evidence of insiders defrauding them.
This behavior is really becoming quiet a joke at the expense of the taxpayers.
Re: Updated Daily.."RUMORS"....believe em' or not
« Reply #61 Today at 7:30am »
seagull
Re: gossip 12/7/10
« Reply #13 Today at 6:35am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By: one2few
Today at 2:26am, one2few wrote:Swather,
The second version is much more to my liking and resonates with what we've been hearing for some time. It also echoes IBM when he said we would take our case to State and Federal Courts if need be.
one2few....agree
some more odds and ends.....
-there were 27 shareholders there
-the case was the last one for the day and the judge called a break to clear the court room before our case was heard
-the judge told everyone that they must leave all cell phones, cameras and recorders outside in a conference room.
-Wyatt sat beside AH representing the plaintiffs....AT was there and sat in the audience
-AH briefly talked to the shareholders in a scrum after the case was dismissed.
-In the scrum, AH said that he would take the case all the way to the SC if needed and would file an appeal if we are not paid in the next few weeks....there was no line drawn in the sand
-the judge let AH go first in his comments followed by the young lawyer.
-AH indicated that he didn't agree with the judge's ruling because of the significance of the lawsuit and the number of shareholders it represented. AH reiterated what he said in his previous filing.
-the SEC lawyer said very little summing everything up with a comment that since the trust is a private trust with a private company, as was stated by AH in his summary, it has nothing to do with the SEC.
-AH tried to talk to the SEC lawyer before the case started, but he knew nothing about what was going on and was useless to talk to. He said he was there merely to accept the judge's decision.
This info is taken from Don McCurdy on Paltalk who was at the courthouse
that's about it
http://tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15147
It's all Tylers fault, or the Bush Crime Family. lol
The court transcript will probably have the DOJ attorney simply replying about Krazy Al's claim that the DTCC is the one controlling the trust, or something to that effect. No different than the last hearing, imo. I'm betting he NEVER said the actual words, " your honor, we have verified the existence of the private trust".
Remember when the Xers first reported back about the last hearing? Completely different account than what was actually on the illegal recording of the hearing.
by wolfbela
AG Action-Individual
« Thread Started Today at 7:44am »
The AG action is mailing today as per Mike's notification post here, as we have not been given official notification of payment, nor been notified by any party not to proceed.
I have included here a link below to download with all the files and instructions to mail to your individual offices. This is for people that have no state coordinator, or even if you missed the deadline, you could participate.
http://www.zshare.net/download/836072442c05ee7c
These files are generic and do not include individual laws and statutes that may have been violated in our eyes, yet give you a chance to forward your complaints to your officials.
I had planned to attend the hearing as I had purchased my tickets, hotel and car, but things became more complicated at home here, so I was forced to cancel. In hindsight, I am glad I did, as still nothing has been made clear to me.
I would have asked these questions to be answered.
1. Where is the trust.. I am assuming it is with the DTCC as we received a blip yesterday that supposedly even the SEC lawyer said the trust was with a private entity.
So that would mean the government is not the holdup anymore, I would assume.
2. Who is the trustee.. beginning to doubt there even is one..
3. Why isn't it released, or being released as part of a supposed negotiated dismissal here..
My biggest question is why doesn't OUR COMPANY file for a court order and have our money released immediately. I am sending a fax to Frizzell's office right now and demanding to know why the company isn't in court today requesting release of these funds to the shareholders.
These are the questions I wish those who attended who have gotten the answers for, and if you did, please post them for us.
Below are also the two websites which list the respected state offices for the shareholders to mail to. They are also listed on your instructions.
http://www.nasaa.org/about_nasaa/2062.cfm
http://www.naag.org/current-attorneys-general.php
Good Luck.
Jerry WolfBela
Re: AG Action-Individual
« Reply #2 Today at 8:05am »
MY FAX TO BILL FRIZZELL
I will let you know if I hear anything.
Jerry WB
December 7, 2010
Bill Frizzell
Frizzell Law Firm
602 South Broadway
Tyler, TX 75701
Mr. Frizzell,
It was indicated in the court hearing yesterday in the Bivens lawsuit action, anchored by Mr. Hodges, that a trust exists with a private entity, presumably the DTCC. This was supposedly also stated by the SEC representative lawyer in the case.
If this is true, why isn't the CMKX corporate office filing a action in federal court to have our trust fund(s) released immediately, since the government has indicated they are not holding up this process. It would seem to me that this should be the proper and prudent procedure on behalf of the shareholders as legal counsel for the company.
If we shareholders, who have really had enough of all of this, do not get action or an answer of substance, we shall seek our own representation very quickly to pursue this action on our own.
Sincerely,
Jerry XXXXX
CMKM Diamonds Shareholder
Those guys are nuts.....
..........and Al IS krazy!
Forget about DHL trucks delivering the packets. Baby Jesus will deliver the packets now.
Dismissed with Prejudice. More to come. Not necessarily a bad thing. Some in attendence asked Al if we would still be paid by Christmas and he replied...if I was a betting man, I would say yes. Then said, I am a betting man.
I asked if he seemed surprised or disappointed and the response was...nope. It seemed as though this was the response they were looking for.
pr
Déjà vu? Didn't Al say the same thing about betting awhile back?
All Part of the PLAM!!
ROFL jimmy, that was a good one!
Oh boy. There goes any hope of packets by Xmas. The CMKX kiss of death is posting on the zoo board again!
By: jay_adobe
07 Dec 2010, 06:12 AM EST
Rating: Msg. 975712 of 975741
'Tis a glorious moment in time to be a CMKX shareholder.
What are the odds we hear from Krazy Al tonight?
LMAO
very_tired15: I believe today was the last page to be written in the public book of cmkx..
Good grief!
straighttalk
Re: ** UPDATE PG 9 Updates from Courtroom**
« Reply #262 Today at 10:28pm »
The PPS is not $6.00, not even $5.00 FACT....WATCH
hafizesh
Re: ** UPDATE PG 9 Updates from Courtroom**
« Reply #277 Today at 11:03pm »
what bought over from the RUMOR THREAD
by sunbeam777
snowyblizzard: Halasy_Policy: PJ on the mic stated Al Hodges will put something out either tonight or tomorrow./
PJ stated the appeal would only be filed if we don't get paid in the next couple of days. /she said that was per AH/
PJ1_10: LUCY_N_DA_SKY1: he said the private entity was the dtcc// was told that as well
--------------------------------------
whats this about... "if we dont get paid in a couple of days..."
If the Queen and the Pope can't get it done, lets sic the Joint Chiefs of Staff on it. That'll fix everything
Can you believe the media STILL hasn't discover the story of the century yet? LOL
There is rumor floating around that eggie flew over to the states with the Queen of England to support Hodges in his hour of need. ;)
Up next for the Xers:
To All Shareholders:
Al Hodges did his job. We respected that and held off specifically to protect the shareholders from any possible declination relative to the Bivens Action.
Now, the AG Action will be executed as of 12/07/2010! as planned.
Mike
Watch 'em try to spin it...
The Xers have been spinning so much today even I am getting dizzy! LOL
Great Scott!!
Bain admitted he wrote two reports for U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. that did not comply with National Instrument 43-101, the national securities policy that prescribes standards for mineral disclosure.
He agreed to a six-month practice suspension, starting on Dec. 31. He also agreed to pay the association's costs, up to a maximum of $5,000.
All part of the plam? LOL
Its so good that we have you fine citizens on these boards telling us about all the evil people in the world
Thank you for acknowledging these boards serve another purpose other than just pumping penny stocks.
As long as your here , maybe you could tell me why you waste your time on a stock that was revoked 5 yrs ago?
There are numerous revoked stocks. CMKX is NOT your average revoked stock though. The US DOJ alleges it is part of a RICO criminal enterprise. The government is spending millions of taxpayers money to investigate, indict and bring to trial the defendants accuse of serious crimes such as fraud, money laundering, and income tax evasion.
There are citizens and amateur sleuths all over the country who invest their time following Federal cases. Why do you believe something as important as a RICO case should be an exception?
There are highly rated TV shows devoted to reporting crimes stories. If you believe their viewers are wasting their time also, well that's your opinion.
how does he manage to always get by with the minimum of penalties?
The Torch and Kim are probably claiming to be broke.
BTW, interesting about the Ray Anthony lawsuit. A few people on the internet have claim Anthony is very wealthy, with one stating Anthony is the wealthiest person in the state of Pennsylvania (he's not even in the top ten). I had serious doubts about this allege wealth of Anthony. Perhaps he tells people about how wealthy he is, but where is the evidence?
Forbes does not acknowledge him at all.
Too funny!
seeking
Sweetie I would never speak for Bob, IMO Bob will do what he has always done unless otherwise stated by Bob. Wyatt (Reese) & Allen Truffey were both in court today. Wyatt sat next to Al as a plantiff, AT sat in the audience...
swather
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Re: Court Hearing Info UPDATE PG 3
« Reply #118 Today at 9:11pm »
Don McCurdy was there.....on Paltalk, he said that the SEC lawyer was just a stand-in and knew nothing about the case......the SEC lawyer was there just to acknowledge the dismissal. The SEC lawyer said the SEC would take the case to the SC if needed.....the SEC lawyer said this was a private trust fund and does not involve the SEC
AH just reviewed what he had previously argued in his submission....he argues that this is not a typical Bevins case
AH said that 2 SC judges visited Obama to keep him up to date......The Joint Chiefs of Staff are now in control of all world fund payments
outside the court AH did say that if he was a betting man, we would be paid by Christmas
That $5,000 slap on the wrist is reminiscent of the $60,000 slap on the wrist he got for PCBM
Vinnie the Torch received 23 months probation for a misdemeanor. Hopefully they will monitor the scammer closely now. I agree about the $5,000 though, it should have been a lot heftier considering the original 1,732 charges. Suppose you can only fine the scammer on the 9 he plead guilty to.
Oh well, he still has the other charges to face.
Yeap! Identity theft and insurance fraud are not misdemeanors. Vinnie and Kim also have the civil lawsuit to sort out.
Acca should be strung up by his toes
Judging from what posters are writing on some of the message boards, there are a number of them that would disagree about the "toes". lol
Ah, now THIS will be fun!
By: planter82
04 Dec 2010, 10:14 PM EST
Rating: Msg. 975005 of 975061
I will post a full report back from court on Monday
jarta, this is the same group that was unable to comprehend what was clearly stated in the Jeffries letter by their attorney. Now you want to school them on the motion to dismiss? lol
An attorney such as yourself explaining details to the Xers is a noble gesture, but Xers have removed themselves from reality. Their idea of a credible attorney is someone like Treff who rants on endlessly about the most absurd conspiracy theories. It will be amusing to see what nonsense they come up with next.
tiger, ... The Order that is found in the links is a dismissal with prejudice that grants the Government's motion to dismiss. The findings and holdings written into the Order by the judge are that the amended complaint did not state a plausible cause of action.
It is not a voluntary dismissal based upon a settlement between the parties. If it was, it would say so and the language which is in the order would not be there. ... eom
Used car dealer pleads guilty
11/23/2010 3:31 AM
Used car dealer pleads guilty
By Linda Metz, Staff writer, lmetz@observer-reporter.com
A Canonsburg used car dealer will still be able to conduct business, but he will have to use a third-party notary to complete the sale of a vehicle.
Vincent A. LoCastro, 47, of 102 Standing Rock Drive, McMurray, who owns and operates All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg, pleaded guilty Monday to false application, tampering with public records and two counts of failing to submit odometer disclosure statements, all of which are misdemeanor charges, and five summary offenses before Washington County Judge Janet Moschetta Bell.
He was sentenced to 23 months of probation and fined $5,000. As part of his plea, LoCastro agreed he and all All Pro employees will use a third-party notary, such as a messenger service, to collect taxes, submit fees and issue registration cards and licenses to complete the sale of a vehicle.
"We've been abiding by that for some time now," LoCastro told the judge.
LoCastro had faced 1,732 total charges, but he only pleaded to the nine. All other charges were dismissed by the prosecution.
LoCastro was charged by state police after customers who purchased vehicles complained that they did not receive their titles and/or registration from the state within 90 days of purchase.
According to court records, LoCastro allegedly sold 52 vehicles between Feb. 7, 2009, and Nov. 2, 2009, collecting $26,597 in taxes and fees from the buyers. Trooper Kevin Daerr said dealers are required to pass the collected fees within 20 days of the sale of the vehicle, but LoCastro failed to submit them to the state Department of Transportation.
Other charges stemmed from LoCastro's fraudulent business practices at the dealership in 2007 and 2008.
Early in 2008, LoCastro agreed to comply with a state consumer protection law regarding some cars that were improperly sold through the dealership. State Attorney General Tom Corbett had filed claims that LoCastro violated fair trade practices, consumer protection laws and Pennsylvania auto regulations.
The filing said his company misrepresented the condition of advertised vehicles and collected deposits for online auctions but failed to return them when purchasers did not complete a transaction.
LoCastro signed a voluntary compliance agreement and paid $11,607 in civil penalties, the cost of investigation and filing fees and has returned deposits or security collected from consumers who canceled or breached sales contracts.
In December, LoCastro was indicted in federal court for allegedly using another person's personal information to obtain financing for nine luxury cars. He was charged with identity theft for allegedly using the name, date of birth and Social Security number of "a person known to the grand jury" to acquire loans that resulted in four banks losing more than $330,000.
In October, LoCastro was arrested by agents of the state attorney general's office for allegedly making a false insurance claim. He is accused of filing the false claim for a Cadillac Escalade that was involved in a crash in Pittsburgh. The vehicle was being leased by his dealership, All Pro Auto Mall, 108 S. Central Ave.
The federal and state attorney general cases against LoCastro have not yet been resolved.
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/washnews/11-23-2010-Locastro-plea
http://ptcrimewatch.blogspot.com/
the most important difference is that this time he bolded some stuff
Oh yeah!. The bold changes the entire dynamics of Krazy Al's allegations. LOL
Maybe Judge Selna will add bold print when the time comes to sanction Krazy Al.