Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Pull the plug fully LOL
That will do it
Who wants to take one for the team??
The moment you sell it skyrockets, and you kick youself.. you have to be a person with the most ill-luck to volunteer..
I did that in Tesla when it was 200,.. so caNt do a double whammy..
Volunteers please.. one for the global sake...
Mkt has come back nearly 70% of it's lost value from the March crash (most stocks), and we make up for the other 30%, as we have climbed up only 30% probably from the lows.. but hey it adds up to 100%
Sad state of affairs....
Waiting for the boom day... +1 more day gone to the dogs....
Are there questions allowed in tomorrow's webinar?
I feel tomorrow's session is primarily to provide clarity that the capital needed is 135B and not 235B as portrayed. He may have received some heat for the optics and trying to clarify that it's investor friendly
Hopefully they speak something about SPSA and warrants too, to give clarity to the investor community
It has been approved last year itself. So it will happen B4 7/15
Alibaba shareholders voted overwhelmingly in favor of a stock split that the e-commerce giant said could help with further fundraising activities.
That stock split, which must come into effect before July 15, 2020, will see one ordinary share split into eight. That would mean the current number of ordinary shares — which stands at 4 billion — will increase to 32 billion. The vote took place at Alibaba’s annual general meeting late on Monday.
135 Billion
Finally the devil is being looked at
From the valuewalk article today,
Regarding the new capital rule, Schmerin believes press reports and commentary are misleading because they suggest the new capital rule requires Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to raise more than $240 billion and achieve a 3.85% equity to asset ratio.
Instead, he believes that a closer reading of the rule indicates that they will only have to raise about $135 billion and possibly even less than that. Bove did not offer any explanation as to why all the other commentary on this issue might be wrong.
Good luck with that....
As far as stuff happening soon,, Suuuuuuuuurrrrrrrreeeee. We have been seeing it from Jan 20,2016 onwards...
LOL
Moelis is a financial advisor to Paulson (and an article from 2017)
Those days are long gone by
Now FHFA has its own financial advisor, Fannie and Freddie are going to get their own IPO/Financial advisor and its a completely new ball game
But if you still want to believe that Moelis is the game, sure.. go for it..
the game has changed significantly. And one should remove their 2012-2017 blinders...
FHFA is doing all the rightful things, even if it means its slow and not something what the preferred shareholders want
Last but not the least, Paulson & Trump have so many dealings that they would have made money in the last 3 years.. SO lets not act that this is the only favor that he owes... Insider trading wise, they all would have made their billions and this is just one of the handshake deals, which may not happen
Not a recco
So that's the latest blindfold we all are wearing??
Sure. Sounds fun
Collins, - move over.. we have a new sheriff in town
POWER HOUR
is going to be fun today...
Why is it going up suddenly
2021 is just another view by ACG analytics who are not privy to anything more than you and me
It could be earlier than that or way later than that..
But glad that u got that off ur chest and used the board as a sounding board, that must have felt good :). I do it from time to time..
Agree and disagree
the capital rule set by FHFA is ridiculously high and significantly different from what is recommended for Other Financial institutiions.. DO you think if the same rule is set forth for every single financial institution - would there be liquidity in the market?
SO i a still not 100% certain on intentions of MC - whether he really cares about GSE survival in next crisis or make it difficult to come out, given the various different cases going on and being dragged and dragged
so I am not a big fan of the cap rule, given that we had new firm assisting them in their rule making etc... Unless the 125B is going to be returned, i see this capital gathering a next to near impossibility or dilute the hell out with massive re-offering, which again is probably GSE friendly but not investor friendly
All my view points are from investor viewpoint only and not from GSE future crisis point
My opinion is that, it is unfair to criticize Joe Light for this article. We all felt that the capital requirements of 235B was way too high and it was no different from the prior capital rule... So it is correct to call out that this cap rule is going little to the extreme and delaying it big time....
I felt this article is calling out what everyone has been saying all along, but just because they were bad players in the past, we do not have to put this article through the lens of " Why do they not like it, do they want it to fail"
JM2C
Tired of the drip drip drip
But I am not giving in.. I will continue to be the forest person than make quick bucks with the trees
Ride till the end......
So court opinions on Seila appeared or another no news Monday?
Sure shot coming or a hopeful guess?
Our bad luck Seila will come on a 2000 point down day and we will swim with Dow..
But if it comes tomorrow, it should be fun
RED mostly
Agreed. Yet another opinion like yours and mine (same value)...
Are you saying, you are making YOUR Financial decisions and YOUR future retirement planning, based on some anonymous posters on the internet, who may be playing with 50 shares, but calling out pumping 100K every 10 minutes?
I had you high up there for your DD, but then this happened...
I feel like I was SOLD OUT. The negative vibe was then so toxic on the board that I killed my re-entry buy order and, now, am unlikely to reconsider for quite some time.
1:8 split coming B4 July 15 wpwp (remember I was approved last july with a no later than July 15 2020 split date). May be date got finalized for the split on Friday and hence the spike in the last hr...
LOL
We continue to read between the lines even on empty blank pages....
2:10 to Yuma...
LOL
Serves right :)
Zero effects
Money speaks power..
Opinions are as valuable as toilet paper, as it don't have any power
Back to drip drip mode.. any good news has a steam for only 3-4 hours for this stock..
Oh well..
If the bankers can influence this for the last 12 years and make everyone dance to their tunes, what makes us think the courts will be on our side? Except for one judge, the courts also all along were always against us..
All our hopes are now pinned to something not directly relevant to us -Seila. I see it as classic punting example.
Needless to say about Judge Sweeney. Discovery for 12 years and no trial so far.. Magellan would have discovered the whole earth twice by this time..
Settlements - Don't even know if settlements will happen.. ifnitndidnt happen so far, it's for a reason..
We all continue to read between the lines and spin the story to your liking , bit everyone is screwed (that includes you preferreds too,)..
How about the warrants then.?? That needs to be teared up too right?
Are we back to dripping mode? Hopefully not...
That is in appeal with supreme court which we are all counting on...
But the position is not open until 2024... Unfortunately
In that case why he has his own advisor, fa have their own fin advisor rfp, fre have put their own fin advisor rfp if he knows exactly what's thebsolution.. if it's such a simple one liner off the cuff remark has so much weightage., Then there were so many interviews in the past from the powers that be, who said fnma will be wiped out, this shd be shorted to what not... Too much weightage given.. let the courts rule on Seila and everything will change...
Is there a URL or tweet of Thompson speaking about the settlements please?If so can you kindly share it.
Freddie was intentionally kept low to get the gap back again today between the two.. oh well...
I think he wants to stick It to fairholme for dragging them to the courts for decade.. so you may win but you won't get what you want FULLY... is his Attitude... I like it
Lol
For a minute I thot of selling my core at 2.75 y'day and buy back later at 2 as I was sure of a ride down. But having waited 8 years, what if it was THE RIDE and the fear of screwups made me hold it. Alas hindsight is always 20/20..
The challenge is there is no empty chair and nonsigns of chair emptying either... So I guess we are stuck w the squid
I see your id to be new, not sure if you are new or another troll attempt
But
1) You will hear that this stock is struggling to stay above 3 for 30 days. Thats why it is not uplisted - FALSE.. It is in OTC because of FHFA decision. Even when it was above 3 for 30 days, it was not done. So its not an automatic given .. Its still FHFA decision
2) you will hear about reverse split as the only way for it to go beyond 5 and then it will uplist -- FALSE.. Again ignore
3) when Court announces, FHFA decides etc, it will zoom past the price in a jiffy as you saw yday.. It is just the lack of clarity that is keeping it down
4) You will hear that institutions are voided to have anything below 5... Again you saw yday there was a 50 M volume. So definitely there are rules that not strictly written and institutions are accumulating
In a nutshell, just hang in there and it will happen. If its a troll attempt, the above points still hold good