Gorgol, you made the correct decision 1000%. There are more people ready to invest in this company more money than is already invested. All are waiting for LQMT to sell the technology they have acquired to industries willing to sign license agreements. Revenues will bring the money in and the bacon home. Until there is transparency between LQMT and potential and existing investors all you will see are spikes and crashes. Pumpers and dumpers.

There are no pr’s. LQMT gives off a stay away impression for anyone interested. Blogs are a joke. Executives excuses are a joke. You either roll the dice or leave the table.

The call for you to leave the table was correct. If you are concerned you might miss a spike. Buy a few shares.

The chart is the same. The summary tells a bit more.

You will not get this from the LQMT design guide nor the current biocompatibility page. But you will get it here...

https://www.liquidmetal.com/biocompatibility/
Read the summary section.

Expect to see .30+ in July.

Would be nicer to see doubts in their integrity proven wrong and everyone’s expectations proven right. :)

LQMT apparently has some transparency issues.

http://us.ppgrefinish.com/PPG-Refinish/trademark-ownership.aspx

This is a real company.

Is Liquidmetal a registered trademark of LQMT?

https://buyat.ppg.com/RefinishProductCatalog/ServeFile.ashx?FileId=17984BE1-300A-4CDF-8288-3A38798E59F9

https://www.liquidmetal.com/perforators/

You might want to contact your buddy at SPUR first and see what his opinion is first. If he does not take the initiative, there is only so much you can do.

Liquidmetal updates website. https://www.liquidmetal.com

Yes, I remember your posts on this matter and the suggestion for you to send the info to LQMT, as well as the posts brought to this board regarding the difficulty to weld LM TO OTHERALLOYS. I posted the details that LQMT posted on their website as well as the condensed/limited version included in LQMT ‘s latest 80 page design guide.

It is very easy to criticize the LQMT response. However, the bigger picture here is the real honesty in Martin’s reply, and that is the fact that LQMT, is still looking for a solution to this very important aspect as it does have a negative impact on its use depending on where it might be used.

Perhaps LQMT might enlist SPUR to assist them in finding the solution.

Good luck to you.

Andyd33, contracts takes us to .30 and beyond.

Right now the only insiders buying are the outsiders.

Perhaps from a new client of indistinguishable size.

So I read the JB article posted here yesterday, and I do appreciate the post. After reading it I got the feeling that I have read most of JB’s post before. And then it hit me. I read most of the opinionated information here on this board many times. Its as close to plagiarism as you can get without calling it plagiarism. The views on Mr. Li, LQMT and others of his, have already been stated by the posters here. And then without direct backup draws conclusions or delusions just like many here do, I don’t know which. They’re nice theories, but Tesla and Apple are not new. So where is the research, where is the reason to bet the farm, the house and the first child? Where is the urgency to rush out and buy LQMT? Was there a big contract from Tesla? Did Apple waive the restriction of CE for LQMT? Or was there a bunch of gibberish? Or better yet, why pay for the service, when much more DD AND REALITY IS POSTED HERE by many here?

I mean his ability to fill a scrabble board is unmatched. But, where is the research or why is his research any better than that done here. What the heck was new? Tesla, Apple? Was that it. Not very innovative for someone digging for new information to compell buying or adding shares. He was scratching his head for a year, he said. Now I’m scratching mine, wondering if he should be giving discounts.

Like I always say: “people from Brooklyn, they don’t buy the bridge. They sell you the bridge”. JB’s theories are not far off, they’re just not worth imo, paying for on LQMT. But I do appreciate the positive post.

I can understand the reasons for holding onto LQMT. Those reasons were already stated by this board and you don’t have to wait for a newsletter to give you another product idea, that LQMT has not sold yet. Heck this board has dozens of uses for LQMT, and as it is, LQMT has had a heck of a long time trying to sell just one of them.

Now if JB has a new idea for marketing LQMT, now that would be breaking news worthy of a news letter at any price.

You see, JB and LQMT have something in common right now. Both can talk the talk and both can walk the walk. But can they walk the talk? That’s the $64 million dollar question, and right now the answer is no or at least not yet.

LQMT is about to mature this year 2018. Good luck to all and thanks to the many posters here who do great DD and research.

Here is the second post related to springs from LQMT

https://www.liquidmetal.com/spring-prototype-results/

Who they made this for is the bigger question.

https://www.heraeus.com/media/media/group/media_group/press/2018_3/180202_heraeus_amorphe_metalle/180201_Heraeus_New_amorphous_metals_EN.pdf


https://www.heraeus.com/media/media/group/media_group/press/2018_3/180202_heraeus_amorphe_metalle/180202_Heraeus_Amorphe_Metalle.jpg

Hitachi, also makes springs using a different Amorphous metal alloy formula.

Another company in Japan, also manufactures small amorphous metal parts of gears and springs, mainly used in jewelry.

There are many out there. But LQMT and Eontec have the attention of clients. No one is talking.

Reminds me of my friends from the Peanuts Characters; Charlie Brown and Lucy van Pelt. I don’t have to tell anyone here who plays the role of Chuckie. Do I......?

The gear was added to their portfolio of industrial products. The Products I refer to are the products of which LQMT already has publicly stated they have sales/orders. Many industries use and manufacture products that require gears of all sizes and purpose. This is why I do not want to speculate on who or whom they may be in talks with. The fact that I post, is that they have added this product to product page they already have recent sales.

There is also a need for a superior gear, LQMT has the formula. The engineering tests have already been completed. The question remains, who will use it. One company or a hundred companies? Is demand worth a million or five hundred million or more? That is where speculation plays a role.

LQMT making gears. There are no specifics for who. From auto to NASA. A test of amorphous metal gears by NASA reveals BMG gears work fine under extreme cold temperatures without lubricant at -328°. Cannot find any contracts or who is ordering prototypes. The gears can also be used in robotics.

The gears are a fact. For who is pure speculation.

Good luck to all.

That statement is correct from a USA point of view. FDA approval is not required in most of LQMT ‘s geographical footprint.

Increased resistance to bacterial growth and infections. The stent walls better resist collapsing and are superior to corrosion, but to be frank I have not come across where a stent was ever removed due to corrosion.

But all of this is moot, since the article was posted on the basis of infringement on an existing LQMT patent, for stent implants.

In post 150111, briefly revealed is the story of an Israeli Medical company evolving from research to reality using Amorphous metal to manufacture an implantable stent.

So why did I post it?

Because from further research, I thought LQMT had the patent first. And if so, why is there no lawsuit?
Mr. Li, are you listening?

Knock knock is anyone home? Oh well, I’ll just leave this letter at the door with all of the other unanswered questions from the many here.

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geK.XvAwVbRSMAnelx.9w4;_ylu=X3oDMTByNXM5bzY5BGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMzBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzcg--/RV=2/RE=1527084144/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.plasticstoday.com%2fcontent%2finjection-molded-liquidmetal-targets-mim-machined-parts%2f19266670618910/RK=2/RS=qOd2hSZTGUDRiuurU61C6nwdJ34-


http://www.freepatentsonline.com/EP1996113.html

Read the first link from 5 years ago. Then the second link from just last year.

It is in use today. Not ten years from now. Your focus is on dr. Jacob and medinol in the first link.

WOW! Sounds like all of us and none of us at the same time... http://smallcapir.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/LQMT-SN-BB-IR-Brief.pdf

Talk about the true meaning of déjà vu.

Just got in, saw the LQMT share price. Conclusion: if it’s Tuesday, it must be Friday.

Tomorrow I’m going to ask everyone; How was the weekend? That ought to wake everyone up:)

Source for institutional info. https://fintel.io/so/us/lqmt

Real news! 3 of 5 hedge funds exit LQMT, selling 254,000 shares since 01-01-18. 1 new hedge fund entered with a very negligible purchase and owns a ridiculous 5000 shares. The 3 remaining Institutional owners, now accounts for 635,000 shares, an amount less than some of the independent traders here may own.

That’s about 7 tenths of 1%. .07. Meaning if all institutional shares were sold, it would have a real zero impact or about a drop of about 1/2 of 1 Penney =.005. Putting it bluntly. There is hardly any confidence in LQMT by these traders.

My research tries to follow the money not the hype. My research tries to see the potential of a company. The technology of amorphous metal offers much promise. LQMT offers very little promise by way of new news. Thus very little new traders are attracted to the company. Long terms are still here for the potential they believed in over 10 years ago. The only difference between then and now, are the newer toys/products that exist today, that may use Amorphous metal parts. But the potential remains the same. The resources that LQMT, has acquired at a high price, may bring that potential we all hope for to reality this year.

Without results expressed in new agreements, with new revenues this year and not just in hollow words from a poorly staffed marketing team, I believe will seriously impact the goodwill of long term shareholders.

There are other companies out there, to invest in potential with a higher degree for success. There will be a point in time where the hype of patents and the speculation of new toys fall on deaf ears. There will be a time, when the lack of sales and the silence becomes too loud to justify loyalty. That time is also fast approaching.

So we have a new material with great potential in the hands of a few, with new resources to achieve a goal long overdue.

2018 LQMT, longterms deserve better.

Good luck to all.

Has anyone seen mr. Li? I checked with the hospitals, police files for missing persons , obituaries, lost and found, no mr. Li. Very odd. Very strange. No one believes me. I told everyone who I asked about mr. Li.

I told them that a man from China, visited the U.S. a couple of years ago and plunked down about $64 million dollars to buy a company that virtually had no income and no serious pipeline of products and was trading at .06 cents a share. Not only that he agreed to buy the shares for almost triple the price and then purchased a new headquarters for the company he bought and threw himself a open house party to welcome everyone. All were in awe and marveled at what this man had done. Even one self appointed pumper put out a long winded newsletter stating this was the investment of a lifetime. Everyone was in lal la land. The company had a new hero.

Two years later and the income is virtually the same and the “no serious pipeline” is still not serious and there is no mr. Li to be found. They told me, impossible, I was out of my mind and I made the whole thing up.

I almost believed them. After all the story does sound insane. Except for one small detail.

The stock trades 400% above the .06 share price and still trades 50% above the purchase price and all without one single peep from the company or mr. Li.

Has anyone seen mr. Li?

I see him every day between .22 and .27

2018 Good luck to all. Maybe we can make a movie out of this story. All we have to do is find someone like the late Frank Capra to film it.

Gee, there is a marketing manager? To have a marketing manager, you need a market :)

You have a valid point. In fact several. There is never a doubt as to your translations, when it comes to breaking down many of the posts.

If there were any money to be made, traders would have scooped up 100 million shares. It could be done but it would have to be done in about 100 trading days due to the volume. In reality it would have been done already.

This validates your posts. LQMT.23 to .25= no news or fake news.

Set CE aside. If they cannot sell lemonade in the desert, that means two things. Either they cannot sell or there are no people out there in the desert. No demand. By the end of this year or sooner we will know if LQMT knows how to sell the lemonade.

You made the correct call to sell. It was about priorities not what if’s. Your attachment to a unsuccessful company over a long period of time, reminds me of the classic case of a hostage sympathizing with their kidnappers. And if and when you get back in, that to will be the right call.

Good luck to you.

Well just who do you think is responsible now, for both sides of the agreement? Li or Li? Or do you believe the agreement is still between the former CEO. The agreements are between LQMT and Eontec. It is just that the ceo for both companies are the same currently. The schizophrenia comment was meant to be satirical and not to be taken seriously. Like when people post about Li, and I say; Li who?

There has to Be levity here, or reality will set in. And we all know that, reality with LQMT ‘s PR’s and response to a shareholders inquiries and current revenue will lead to frustration, anger and negativity and it is justified as well.

Enjoy life, be happy. Yes, you are correct there were different representatives at the time of the agreements.

Eagle1947, your time frame looks to be spot on. The company we have shares in, have highly skilled people in the field of LM and MIM, but poorly skilled people in the area of marketing.

Hence all long terms went through the Apple and now Eontec forced events to survive. Unfortunately we have not witnessed any changes in the marketing area as far as we know and as far as LQMT has disclosed.

Drawing from this history and without a bit of luck and or surprise from mr Li, LQMT, is headed south of the border again as far as confidence goes. And as confidence goes so will shareholders.

So either the momentum they have now leads to new revenue agreements or the shareholders will cut bait and stop fishing. 1 year should do it. This year should give all a clue.

Money will talk or many will walk. The words of LM on the blog, are easy to come by and cheap. But even at that price, many shareholders and LQMT cannot afford it.

2018 Good luck to all.

You are 100% correct if everyone trusted each other. That is why you have the cross license agreements and all of the covenants regarding not trusting each other.

Whatever happened to the handshake? Those days have been long gone for many decades. Very sad for all. No trust. Everyone has to be threatened with lawsuits, jail time and a gun has to be pointed at all parties in an attempt to have all parties to live up to their word.

And just think? Lugee Li is party to both sides of the agreement. He must have been schizophrenic, when he signed the agreement.

Where is CE and luxury (watches/Jewlery)? In every 10Q filed.

LQMT has not received a waiver. Apple has to grant a waiver for LQMT to enter into new CE agreements. On the other hand Eontec, does not need a waiver. They were already manufacturing parts for CE with at least 2 other mobile phone manufacturers. EON the parent company of Eontec has many subsidiaries. It is quite amazing how technology from patents are distributed and trickle down all over the globe. Some of these actions lead to lawsuits, others are to expensive and too exhausting to pursue.

LQMT would have mislead their shareholders if it were discovered that: A. They were pursuing CE without one and B. They were pursuing CE with one and did not disclose this. Your talking a huge problem for LQMT, if you believe they were granted a waiver.

Look at their business model. Look at the areas they are exploring as stated in their financial statements and website. They are not pursuing CE. When they get a waiver they can announce it and issue a NDA. Then all of us can speculate. Now if Eontec were granted a waiver, that is fine. But LQMT would not see a penny. Specifically, what amount would LQMT receive? 1%, 5%, 10%? Would not Li be in a position of conflict of interest if he violates the LQMT/Eontec agreements? What is he going to do sue himself? Who determines proper compensation to the shareholders of LQMT?

I don’t see Eontec violating the agreements. I do see other companies making and assembling the products that reach our shores.

As usual I could be wrong.

No degree? and a lifeguard? He’s overqualified!

Li who???ZZZzzz ZZZzzz ZZZzzz

Speaking of hush hush. Why has LQMT not acknowledged what the relationship is between them and...http://www.interreg-icap.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ICAP_20180126_BERTUNA_Protec.pdf

This was a link from a LQMT page. The link was gone after I posted it here around May 8.
Now it is quite possible I dreamt this all up and just happened to find the link on my own. But even if knew of the other company ‘s existence, I could not find a link to the link above on the other company’s website. I must be sleepwalking.