Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hey, what happened to our A/V guy...Chuck Wagner?
I'll venture to guess this is him. MHO
Chuck Wagner Enterprises
Road 1209 South Commerce Street
Place 89102 Las Vegas
United States
Telephone 001 (702) 388-1636
Telefax 001 (630) 859-8032
http://www.nevada-business-directory.com/company-home-nevada/chuck-wagner-enterprises-4803575.html
RCC International Wastewater Systems
Announces PR/Marketing Agreement
On Friday August 14, 2009, 10:00 am EDT
KISSIMMEE, Fla-- RCC International Wastewater Systems (RCC/IWS) lays groundwork for
future.
RCC/IWS is pleased to announce that it has reached an agreement with Chuck Wagner to
provide public relations and marketing services to the company. Chuck's work in Radio /TV
broadcasting and production includes services for The Boyd Group, Station Casinos, Exclaibur
Hotel, Sam's Town, Rio Suite Hotel and Casino, the Stardust Hotel, Coast Casinos, and nearly 20
other major hotels. Sports clients include the San Diego Padres, Baltimore Orioles, Philadelphia
76ers, Colorado Avalanche, Los Angeles Lakers, Minnesota Twins, Dallas Mavericks, Utah Jazz,
and many other well known sports franchises. Other prominent clients include Pet Food
Supermarket, Prime Cable, Las Vegas Motor Speedway, Hawaiian Airlines among many others.
Mr. Wagner's main task will be to provide RCC/IWS with his broad range of TV studio capabilities
to create broadcast video quality marketing over the Internet. Claude Smith, President of
RCC/IWS states, "Chuck's substantial network-quality video capability will allow IWS to create a
new type of marketing and visualization for our clients. We are, indeed, fortunate to have him and
his staff helping us grow our future business base worldwide."
Chuck Wagner says, "Being involved with a green company is an exciting new opportunity for us.
We can use the same type of video capability required for high profile hotel and sports clients to
produce a new and powerful green message to the IWS client base."
Chuck will provide video marketing for the IWS standard product line in addition to providing new
ways of marketing its joint venture products such as the Evolu-Tech Catalytic Water Treatment
product line, from Quebec, Canada.
Why is this stock on a downtrend into the toilet? thanks and GL to all...
Your question has been answered. The game is over. This $0 stock is at $0 where it belongs. !RCCH! The market never lies. The mistake was in some people believing that this has anything to do with INVESTING. too bad...
Is Lucinda still on the board on directors of this company? If so...I don't feel she deserved to be served any legal notice on
Christmas Eve. (all in fair play boys and girls...)
Case FAMRS904094 - VERNON GENE NEWTON-V-LUCINDA J NEWTON
Viewed Date Action Text Disposition Image
01/05/2010 PROOF OF SERVICE OF PETITION/SUMMONS;DECL DSCLSR;SCHLD ASST/DBT;I&E FILED AS TO LUCINDA JANE NEWTON. PARTY SERVED ON 12/24/09. TYPE OF SERVICE IS PERSONAL. WITH FEES OF $0.00. Not Applicable
01/05/2010 DECLARATION REGARDING SERVICE OF DECLARATION OF DISCLOSURE AND INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION FILED BY VERNON GENE NEWTON FOR PRELIMINARY. Not Applicable
12/23/2009 CASE ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO DEPARTMENT R16
12/23/2009 FAMILY LAW CASE INITIATED AND PARTY INFORMATION ENTERED. Not Applicable
=================================================================
LUCINDA NEWTON (42)-As a member of the Board of Directors, Lucinda,
Gene Newton's wife, adds to the potential of excellent direction due
to the fact that Mrs. Newton carries an MBA in Education and is
currently employed full-time by the Alta Loma School District, soon
to be promoted to the position of being the school Principal. She
also has been a long standing resident of the state of California.
The above Director was appointed to serve his/her term to the next
annual meeting of the stockholders and holds no proxy statements,
nor has the Director been convicted of a misdemeanor or felony.
http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:RAp32KrmxHEJ:www.secinfo.com/d12st4.2a.9.htm+rcc+holdings+lucinda+newton&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
fun, This post answers both of your questions. Now, can you please explain how this is relative to RCCH. thanks
AT&T and Verizon Wireless Finalize Asset Swap
AT&T and Verizon Wireless announced the completion of the FCC-mandated asset swap. AT&T picked up Rural Cellular Corporation properties from Verizon Wireless, including licenses, network assets and subscribers, in the Burlington, Vt. metropolitan service area, as well as rural areas of Kentucky, New York, Vermont, and Washington states. In return, Verizon Wireless acquired former Dobson Communications Corporation properties, including licenses, network assets and subscribers, in Kentucky, as well as 10 MHz of PCS spectrum in a number of areas and an undisclosed amount of cash.
http://www.phonescoop.com/news/item.php?n=3754
==================================================================
AND WHEREAS, plaintiff, United States of America, and defendants, Alltel
Corporation (“Alltel”) and Midwest Wireless Holdings L.L.C. (“Midwest Wireless”),
have filed a Joint Motion to Modify Final Judgment on October 30, 2008 in order to
allow Alltel to be acquired by Verizon, which had previously acquired Rural Cellular
Corporation (“RCC”), a company that acquired all of the assets divested by Alltel and
Midwest Wireless pursuant to the Final Judgment;
http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f239200/239238.pdf
==================================================================
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the Registrant owns 100% of the equity interest in each of the subsidiaries.
INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED IN MINNESOTA
RCC Atlantic, Inc.
RCC Atlantic Licenses, LLC
RCC Minnesota, Inc.
RCC Transport, Inc.
Wireless Alliance, LLC (Registrant has a 70% interest in this entity)
TLA Spectrum, LLC
INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED IN VERMONT
Alexandria Indemnity, Inc.
http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Rural_Cellular_(RCCC)/Filing/10-K/2008/Subsidiaries_of_Registrant/D329626
==================================================================
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/E9-4341.htm
http://www.alacrastore.com/company-snapshot/Rural_Cellular_Corporation-2000757
Not worried, but thanks anyway. You can multiply any dollar amount times any number of shares. The product will always be zero as there is no bid. RCCH is not worth the virtual paper it is printed on.
500,000,000 shares X 0 = $0
Not too difficult...
A landscaper with $800 million in revenue. Seems you can get people to believe just about anything. Did you know for about $75k you can go get yourself a nice public shell, and sell $1 million in stock as a non reporting pink sheet scam. It's real simple.
how many shares you think? thanks
I suspect that for 5 years Graham tried to sell his product. He claimed 100's of million could be had in a 36 billion market. Sound familiar...lol
Obviously he sold nothing and now will take this course. We all know that course...we live it on this website. \
It is the same course Don Cape, and Gateway engineering took with IWS. Get it yet...guess not.
All my opinion...LMFAO
Untrue. There is also a virtual office in Atlanta and an office at Claude's home in Florida.
The patent was issued in 2005. You stated this was a new patent. Would you care to elaborate. thanks
Youre right. I did take a negative slant...for a myriad of reasons. How would you define your statement claiming RCCH will "gap up". thanks
Looks like Graham has been trying (unsuccessfully) to market his product since 2005. That's not surprising when you take a look at his business plan/income statement/projected cash flow scenario over a 3 year period. He immediately projects revenue of 235 million in the first month of operations. No serious investor would take his plan seriously.
But, yes. The Eagle will stretch his wings over such numbers.
You can forget about that.
Patent isn't in question. Grahams' claim that he holds 19 patents is the question. The other question is the repeated attempt to associate Rcc Holdings inc with Rcc Holdings Corp.
There is no association. Any attempt to associate these two entities I would consider false, and misleading. Don't you agree?
US Patent 6948663 - Yard chemical dispensing apparatus
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6948663/fulltext.html
Graham claims to have been awarded 19 Patents. Maybe he can tell me where they are...I can't seem to find them under his name or his wife.
Awarded 19 U.S.Patents in new innovation irrigation technoligies in water conservation and green applications.
http://www.brightfuse.com/william-graham-2/background
Here are the numbers Graham put together.
http://www.brightfuse.com/william-graham-2/projects
IMO Graham and Newton are a perfect match!
LMFAO
An old argument that holds no validity. Go find the nearest train wreck and take notice of how many people are just standing around.
The stock is not listed. eom
One of the pre-requisites in any application for ANY government bid on a wastewater project is that there is a Certified Wastewater Operator in the employee of the applying entity.
oops!!
That's correct. RCC International Wastewater Systems aka International Water Solutions Corp. claims to be a FULL SERVICE TURNKEY SOLUTIONS PROVIDER!
POPPYCOCK! I SAY...POPPYCOCK!!
You bring up a good point. Outside of Montana, Idaho and New Mexico...where the EPA maintains regulatory control... a license for Wastewater System Operation would need to be obtained. Not surprisingly, neither Claude Smith nor Dave Campbell are registered in the State of Florida as Certified Wastewater Operators.
A wastewater company without a certified operator in neither of the two states they're registered to conduct business in?
What are they gonna do if someone buys one of these things?
I'd like to buy one right now. Unfortuantely, I can't seem to get anybody on the phone.
what a joke
Actually, it is RCC Holdings (Gene Newton) that claims a corporate office in Montery Hall. Can you show me where International Water Solutions Corp. is shown to be a subsidiary of RCC Holdings. thanks
Just when you thought you read it all you just get more surprised.
http://www.business.gov/register/business-name/dba.html
I suspect the less one knows, the more surprised they can be.
Do you believe that RCC Holdings needs to register to conduct business in Canada? How bout Georgia?
Hint: the $75.00 virtual office don't cut it...
LMFAO
I heard a rumor that Dave Campbell didn't want to talk much about RCCH. LMFAO whaddaya think?
You're absolutely right. It's laughable...
Any legitimate company on the pinks that wished to list on a proper exchange...would firstly supply all required documentation, and gain a small degree of legitimacy ON THE PINKS. There is absolutely no point or advantage attempting to move a piece of illegetimate garbage to a proper exchange. TSX, OTCBB, reporting Pink...all the same crap.
In order to legally conduct business...a company must register itself with the SOS of the State in which it plans to operate. The information I posted relates to shareholders...that RCCH is no longer legally allowed to conduct operations in California. This is obviously pertinent to RCCH as the CEO of RCCH has had no less than 30 civil cases and one felony count brought against him in the State of California.
As far as Canada is concerned...RCCH has not registered to conduct business in Canada... but Gene did set himself up with a $150 a month virtual office. I guess that sounds important to some investors. LMFAO
Entity Name: RCC HOLDINGS CORP.
Entity Number: C3002211
Date Filed: 05/15/2007
Status: FORFEITED
Jurisdiction: COLORADO
Entity Address: 3281 E GUASTI RD STE 370
Entity City, State, Zip: ONTARIO CA 91761-7622
Agent for Service of Process: VERNON NEWTON
Agent Address: 3281 EAST GUASTI ROAD STE 370
Agent City, State, Zip: ONTARIO CA 91761
Data is updated weekly and is current as of Friday, January 22, 2010. It is not a complete or certified record of the entity.
Suspended or Forfeited: The business entity's powers, rights and privileges were suspended or forfeited in California 1) by the Franchise Tax Board for failure to file a return and/or failure to pay taxes, penalties, or interest; and/or 2) by the Secretary of State for failure to file the required Statement of Information and, if applicable, the required Statement by Common Interest Development Association. Information regarding the type of suspension can be obtained by ordering a status report. For information on ordering a status report, refer to Information Requests.
http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/cbs.aspx
That would be stockholder manipulation. Are you thinking that back in '07 there was stockholder manipulation going on?!! LMFAO
Is this the manipulation back in '07 that you're talking about? Not sure this has anything to do with it. GL sounds like you've got a nice size position here.
Looks like Gene filed all his Quarterly reports on Nov. 6 2007 Some of which are simply duplicated.
http://www.pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=rcch
Then on Nov. 7 he filed with Colorado SOS to raise AS to 2.5 billion.
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do?masterFileId=20031077454&fileId=20071514370
Incompetence, arrogance...IMO RCC Holdings will also need to register the so called "business" with the proper authorities in Canada. They have yet to do so and cannot legally conduct business out of their Montery Hall virtual office.
Are you claiming that Gene was manipulating the stock? wow thanks
Not so sure about that, froggy. The REGDEX filed stated that Gene Newton was the accredited investor. Gene Newton was owed, as of Sep 07, $883K.
http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=12428
If the explosion of volume following the filing of the REGDEX in Sep 08 was the selling of "SUPPOSEDLY-UNRESTRICTED" shares by an insider (and that would have to be determined in an investigation) it could most certainly be construed as fraud.
Pile on all the other garbage and you've got a pretty good case.
Rule 504
Rule 504 provides an exemption for the offer and sale of up to $1,000,000 of securities in a 12-month period. Your company may use this exemption so long as it is not a blank check company and is not subject to Exchange Act reporting requirements. Like the other Regulation D exemptions, in general you may not use public solicitation or advertising to market the securities and purchasers receive "restricted" securities, meaning that they may not sell the securities without registration or an applicable exemption. However, you can use this exemption for a public offering of your securities and investors will receive freely tradable securities under the following circumstances:
You register the offering exclusively in one or more states that require a publicly filed registration statement and delivery of a substantive disclosure document to investors;
You register and sell in a state that requires registration and disclosure delivery and also sell in a state without those requirements, so long as you deliver the disclosure documents mandated by the state in which you registered to all purchasers; or,
You sell exclusively according to state law exemptions that permit general solicitation and advertising, so long as you sell only to "accredited investors," a term we describe in more detail below in connection with Rule 505 and Rule 506 offerings.
Even if you make a private sale where there are no specific disclosure delivery requirements, you should take care to provide sufficient information to investors to avoid violating the antifraud provisions of the securities laws. This means that any information you provide to investors must be free from false or misleading statements. Similarly, you should not exclude any information if the omission makes what you do provide investors false or misleading.
http://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/qasbsec.htm#eod6
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:SpEyebaee6sJ:www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/rule144.htm+rule+144+pink+sheets&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2009/02/sec-charges-thr.html
Amazing isn't it! I'm surprised Gene didn't keep the PO box in Hong Kong. I guess all the checks are heading to Montreal. LMFAO
Baida was a big part of the "collateralize-the-asset-paper-shuffle game" the eagle was playing back in 2006. Unfortunately for him, his fraudulent underwriters at Wisdom got nabbed. Mr. Ngai never got his 100 million paper note for his buried gems. lol goodbye 15 billion in assets LMFAO
MINING FINANCE
The Mining Finance created by CMIG has its exclusive managing concept and operating mode.
Its managing concept is:
To reach the aim of value increases in assets and stock rights through the benign circle of CAPITALRESOURCESASSETS
CAPITAL RESOURCES ASSETS and frequently by financing ways and means.
Its operating mode is displayed in the following three mechanisms:
Resources-Activating Mechanism. The mining resources, except an extremely few portion which is under development and exploitation, have not yet been used financially. CMIG will, with the mining industry as a platform, use various financing ways and means to activate the mining resources, getting them capitalized, converting them into bonds and securities so that the resources may promptly become working capital.
Equity Trading Mechanism. CMIG will promote the Equity Trading Mechanism in the mining industry. It has a plan to work in on-line cooperation with some well-known international and Chinese equity trading centres, enabling the Chinese mining equity to enter the path of ¡°Open Trading¡± and ¡°International Trading¡±.
Stock Right Replacing Mechanism. CMIG will adopt flexible, accurate and legal ways to equivalently replace the stock rights of each mine, so as to acquire win-win value-increasing opportunities. In the meantime, such a replacement will also produce good conditions for stock expansion in Mine Restructuring, Mine Purchasing and Mine Listing
http://www.cmig.cn/omei/ekyjr.asp
Yep. It must be all RCCH hype.
Here's the form you mentioned. Newton would have to disclose 1 felony and upwards of 30+ civil proceedings. He would also have to disclose the retraction of the SB/2A registration and a laundry list of other garbage.
http://www.tmx.com/en/pdf/Form2A.pdf
IMO the eagle knew full well he would never cut the mustard in having his nonsense company "uplisted - merged". And as such, falsely led investors from the start.
Looks like RAR2 INLAND EMPIRE OFFICES haven't been paid as of
01/07/2010 RICHARD L SEIDE IS REMOVED AS ATTORNEY FOR RAR2-INLAND EMPIREOFFICES-CA,INC, AND KIMBALL TIREY & STJOHN IS ADDED AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD.
RCCH is an associate of RCC/IWS? What happened to "subsidiary"? How come RCC/IWS's Management Releases don't mention RCCH?
RCC IWS has been aided by several groups in the development of its products and getting its message of water conservation and re-use out. These associates have helped make it possible for RCC/IWS to grow and succeed.
Lakeside Company
The EPA Environmental Technology Verification Program
NYU Poly BEST program
Water and Wastewater Magazine
Voice Of America
RCC Holdings
http://www.rcciws.com/index-2.html
How come RCCH changed their address six times in six years? How come civil suits were filed by these previous landlords?