Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The best strategy is to win thousands at the slot machine or roulette table and then take the proceeds and roll them into the trifecta. Can’t go wrong.
$WNFT
Muhahahaha
Fear we’re going to be rich once this is all over brother. George is sending in the dollar volume and this is going ballistic (same with the other two). In the meantime it’s time to hit up the Casino Queen in the hopes of striking up more WNFT capital…. Nothing like buying lotto tickets with lotto tickets
Callous and POLO can SUCK IT
I am certain that you called TSNP a front loaded scam under .01 and it ran to $1.93
What a miserable pea brained hoot
Wassup brotha!!
You betcha….as long as it takes
WE ORDER THIS APPEAL DISMISSED
Calasse is garbage and about to be overthrown by the Nevada Supreme Court
Ground Control to Major $WNFT
Ground Control to Major $WNFT
Take your protein pills and put your helmet on
Ground Control to Major $WNFT
Commencing countdown, engines on
Check ignition and may God's love be with you
$WNFT to $5 and Calasse can kiss my white ass
I’m sorry that your life is so miserable that you rejoice at seeing other individuals suffer. Will be praying for you.
I have actually, and I could care less at this point. There’s more to life than money and it isn’t real, it’s just numbers on a screen. Don’t get me wrong, I still want to see Calasse lose, but what’s done is done and you can’t sit there contemplating the woulda, coulda, shoulda mindset or you’ll drive yourself insane.
I’m sure yolo is working hard right now uploading the appeal brief. Hence why there hasn’t been any messages in a couple of hours
Appeal brief uploaded at 11:59:59
Tik Tok
You know, I've come to realize that you're simply reflecting your own pain and suffering on others. You must have some significant trauma that you've gone through in the past or have been dealing with, and I'm sorry that happened. Wishing you the best Nicky.
Believe me, I've had plenty of moments where I was upset with myself for not cashing. And after doing some self-reflection over the last several months (and a much needed break), I have come to the following conclusions:
1.) I was greedy and wanted to get rich quickly. It didn't start off this way but progressed as the stock kept climbing over several months (at first it was slow and steady). Then, the "instant rich syndrome" kicked in when we hit near the peak in July of 2022, and I allowed greed to dictate my decision making. I was so high on paper profits that I additionally neglected to consider any possibility or rumors of a pending appeal that would cause the stock to reverse course, plain and simple.
2.) Next to greed, was pride. The pride of wanting to see Calasse lose and the stock reverse course, following the July 8th massacre. The pride of not allowing the appeal to force me to sell out of fear and desperation and wanting to see this through until the end. Don't get me wrong - I still want to see him lose and believe he will, eventually. WNFT shareholders will emerge victorious, we have just taken a significant detour from the original plans of merger (which I believe is perfectly reasonable to assume could have happened, had Calasse not reared his ugly head).
3.) Finally, given that I had built up a social media channel that had been 'touting' GOFF/WNFT on my channel since approximately June of 2021, I felt a certain moral obligation not to 'dump' on my followers. Given that my thumbnails/titles often consisted of phrases such as "this could be the next 1000% runner"... you get the point. Actually, this is probably the most significant factor, as I remember telling the good ol' boys in the cord (like 2 days before the July 8th massacre), that if anything went wrong, I would be "riding the Titanic down to the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean", and that I would "save the lifeboats for the women and children".
I have succeeded in doing the aforementioned, and there is nothing left to say, except that it takes as long as it takes.
$WNFT
Nah, all good. Gotta look on the bright side. This significant dip in price has afforded me the ability to convert a good portion of my WNFT shares into the Roth account for minimal taxes due next year. As long as it takes.
I already addressed this. If you want to be literal, then sure... The appeal will be dismissed for lack of standing. And then a writ will be filed and granted and the district court judgment will be reviewed and thrown out, just like the cases I mentioned here:
Read it and weep:
https://casetext.com/case/loza-v-leverty-assocs-law-chtd
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a default judgment. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Thomas W. Gregory, Judge.
Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant is not a party to the action with standing to appeal. In the proceedings below, appellant was named and served only as a corporate officer, administrator or trustee of certain defendant trusts. She was not named and did not appear in her individual capacity. This court has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal only where the appeal is brought by an aggrieved party. See NRAP 3A(a). A person or entity is not a party within the meaning of NRAP 3A(a) unless that person or entity has been served with process, appeared in the court below, and has been named as a party of record in the trial court. See Valley Bank of Nev. v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 448, 874 P.2d 729, 735 (1994). Here, appellant, in her individual capacity, does not appear to have been served with process, or been named as a party of record in the district court proceedings.
Moreover, the district court order denying the motion to set aside the default judgments makes no reference to appellant; the order denies only motions filed by the defendant business entities. Accordingly, appellant does not appear to be aggrieved by the order in her individual capacity. NRAP 3A(a). Additionally, appellant, a non-lawyer, cannot represent on appeal the trusts that are named as parties below. See NRAP 46A(b)(2); Salman v. Newell, 110 Nev. 1333, 1336, 885 P.2d 607, 608 (1994) (business entities may not appear or file documents without counsel); State v. Stu'$ Bail Bonds, 115 Nev. 436, 436 n.l, 991 P.2d 469, 470 n.l (1999). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED
I’ve been 100% correct of wnft since last March 2022.
Well, maybe not 100% correct…
We Are The Champions $1.25 soon...
.20 cents soon..RM Gets it to multi~dollars by March 2023
WNFT BY MARCH 2023~$2.69 A SHARE
That’s okay though, we all make mistakes… I’m only 99.69% correct myself on a given day….
..And with that being said, I will retreat back to my cave.
LOL
Back to your bridge jumping games.
Heartbreaking!
You’re right I shouldn’t be posting. Back to my cave….
$WNFT
It must be that mega whale Lucky.
Lol not me I promise. But a nice fire sale today for those who want the shares. Looking to add some more myself if this dips below .04
Let’s goooo!!!! Nice grab!!!
Exactly. POLO argues that he was he not served with due process, which is incorrect. Furthermore, Calasse never intervened to become a party. Case closed.
Says who, you? Just because you might not like it or agree with it, doesn’t mean anything.
You can’t cancel shares.
If the aforementioned is true, then what happened to Calasses shares again? Oh that’s right, they were cancelled! LOL
And why did 10 bags leave again ???...lol
This court has suspended the appeal and is asking one simple question: why did you not move to intervene? The case it cited in the OTSC makes that abundantly plain.
If Calasse had moved to intervene, then this court would never have filed this OTSC and Calasse would then be able to make all of these arguments you are making about due process, service, etc. Because those arguments attack the propriety of the lower court’s judgment.
But he messed up. He didn’t move to intervene. The governing case law, which the NVSC cited to in the OTSC makes it plain. He needed to intervene in order to be able to attack any aspect of the lower court’s judgment on appeal.
A motion to intervene could have also served Calasse’s purpose here (prob would have been the better option under the circumstances, actually) and would have made him a party to the underlying lawsuit. He didn’t do that either.
Moreover, despite the error in failing to move to intervene, Calasse was given a chance to prove he properly obtained those shares at issue. He failed in this respect as well.
The judge is saying “in this circumstance, only a named defendant can appeal. You were not named as a defendant. And only a defendant is to be served w/process. Tell me why I should let this appeal go forward if you did not move to intervene to become a defendant.”
He sued the proper party. Notice was given to all shareholders. Calasse stepped in as a non-party and tried to prove his case and failed, no?
He had an opportunity in the lower court to prove that he legally held those shares. He failed, did he not?
An Order to Show Cause is NOT an invitation to discuss all the issues in a case. It is a POINTED inquiry and the parties to whom it is directed to are to respond solely to that query.
The only way anyone can be deemed to be a required party is by a court order/decision. Which is done on motion. A court doesn’t unilaterally decree these things. They decide the issue after it is presented to them.
They should have formally filed a motion to intervene and made a request to the judge to be added as a party. They failed to do so. Big mistake.
GS used the same procedure here as every other custodian who has gone this route in Nevada. Suit naming the company, gaining custodianship, then moving via notice to cancel shares.
Are you suggesting that the NVSC is going to determine on this OTSC whether the way lawsuits to gain custodianship have typically been handled in Nevada is somehow improper?
If Calasse wanted to become a party, the burden was on him to file a motion to intervene. Nevada law could not possibly be clearer on this.
Once again, it was a lawsuit for custodianship. You don’t name anyone personally when you do that. You get custodianship and then you file a motion to cancel shares and notice the shareholders. That’s how it is done in Nevada. Good luck trying to change how they do things.
Kind of like how you keep ignoring the fact that the NVSC will refuse to address anything to do with the propriety of the lower court judgment and will only want an answer to one question: why didn’t Calasse move to intervene to be added as a party and preserve his right to appeal?
You do realize that the NVSC itself already has blown this argument out of the water in the OTSC itself, right? It’s asking why Calasse didn’t intervene. And cited case law noting that a party in his shoes must intervene to be a party.
A court does NOT unilaterally add parties. Never. They only determine who is required UPON APPLICATION. Thus, it was up to Calasse to file for joinder by way of a motion to intervene. And then the court would have made a decision as to whether he was a required party.
Joinder only occurs upon application of (1) a party making a motion to add a non-party, or (2) a non-party making a motion to intervene. And then the court decides if the application has merit.
I’ll make it more elementary for you. The only way to reverse an order of a lower court is through an appeal. But the Chief Justice of the NVSC is not asking to address the merits of that lower court Order at all in the OTSC, is he? No, he wants the issue of standing to be addressed.
When a court addresses joinder under Rule 19, it’s not about the court mandating to a plaintiff or defendant that an additional party be joined to a lawsuit.
Joinder in this context is about a party making a motion to add a party and THEN the court deciding whether to grant the request. A court NEVER unilaterally adds a party. It has to be on application from someone.
Hence, GS was under no requirement to join anyone. It was incumbent upon Calasse to move for joinder by filing a motion to intervene. And then the lower court would likely have granted the application. But he didn’t do it.
Here, if Calasse wanted joinder, if he wanted to be a party, he had to make a motion for joinder. If he had, maybe the court would have said he was required. But he didn’t. He blew his chance.
If the NVSC was inclined to do as you claim, the OTSC would have directed GS to answer why Calasse was not named as a party. Instead, they have put the pressure on Calasse to explain why he didn’t move for joinder via intervention.
I don’t think you are grasping just how rare it is for these writs to be granted. You aren’t grasping just how profound of a procedural error has to have occurred, or how important of a process issue has to be involved, for a Court to issue a writ.
And do you think that a court is going to grant a writ because Calasse might argue that he wasn’t given proper notice when he ended up appearing and contesting? These writs are rarely granted. It has to be a major process concern.
If you seriously think that a court will grant a writ because Calasse will convince them that there was a major process error re: notice in a case where he appeared and fully contested the issue… Good luck with that one.
And again: this inquiry will not be considered on this Order to Show Cause. If Calasse wants to thereafter waste his time seeking a writ, rather than pursuing the wiser option of suing his counsel for malpractice, then good luck to him. He’ll need it.
And seeking a writ, and even a higher court simply agreeing to hear a writ, should not be grounds for anyone to claim the $. A higher court would still have to decide after agreeing to hear the case.
Ok last post I promise…
It’s definitely number 1 lol… and actually that was a typo, June 2021 is when I bought the stock. No way I would sell now, bought for the asset and will hold this through until the end, just have to take a break from all social media activities. But I wish everyone the best and see you all on the $WNFT retirement cruise!
This will be my last post for a while but I’ll be holding my 4+ million shares for much higher levels.
I wish all shareholders nothing but the best and see you on the other side. I’ve held this stock since June of 2020 and believe George Sharp will get it done and to me, this is an investment - the time will come to sell, but I’ll hold for as long as it takes to see the the reverse merger asset come to fruition and a substantial increase in dollar volume and liquidity.
$WNFT
Good defense attorneys are great at creating arguments out of thin air, to make them seem legitimate. As much as Polo (Asshays legal council?) loves to point out “the obvious”, (and I must give credit for the effort) I’m not buying it. The SC will lay the smack down soon enough imho
$WNFT
Absolutely, very attractive for private companies seeking to go public. She’s ripe and ready to storm out of the gate once Calasse is gone!
$WNFT
Yes, the Supreme Court looks at the appeal and says “ehh, no thanks” and tosses it in the shredder.
And if that happens, you can make whatever ‘case’ you want as to why Calasse should have the shares, but it won’t change the fact that the shares have been cancelled, remain cancelled, and will never be coming back.
$WNFT
All I wanna know is wen $WNFT hit SIX HUNNIT and FIDDY pennies?
Welcome to the $WNFT club fam.$SRNW also has that SEC reporting status, audited financials and beautiful share structure, especially once the cancellations go through. When a merger is released on that one who knows. But we do know WNFT is ripe ready for a blast off out of the gate here once Calasse gets the smack down from the SC. If Calasse gets thrown out in February, merger could be right around the corner.
$GVSI, crazy price action and sentiment. Can rip back to .04-.06 pretty quickly too once the float churns out. But as for me I will ride these WNFT shares to the moon and as long as it takes
If I make enough from $WNFT I will start my own stock message board social media company, one where there is not endless censoring and discrimination against the true diamond handed longs, who simply want to have a legitimate conversation about the sizes of their returns, the size of the float, and the size of other “long” topics. The naked shorts and paid bashers that work for them have a monopoly on the entire stock message board market, and it’s time that we stand up against this tyranny!
Fair enough, we will see what happens here with the SC, but I do believe the odds are stacked against Calasse.
I’ve been of the mindset to buy and hold for the asset, as long as it takes. Could have sold a majority of my position at .25 or so for a handsome profit, but didn’t and of course waking up to .06 the next day was a real treat. But I’ve also kept my average low at .0233 and so that has helped out with the psychological aspect of it all.
This will probably set the record for the longest I’ve held an OTC, but I went into this with a long term mindset and will exit with one as well. Eventually, this stock rips to all time highs and sees a ton of attention and dollar volume imo
$WNFT
Imagine what will happen when even a mere $10 million or so in liquidity hits this stock.
$WNFT
Fake news. no one gives a damn how much HMBL is down, the run still happened and you either got rich off it, stood on the sidelines or went broke. Too bad so sad it’s down 99% and folks bought at the peak. They took the risk and lost.
When WNFT goes up 2000% and trades $10’s of millions in volume, you will still be here, screaming hijacked scam, and I’ll be long gone, having turned my measly $105,000 investment into a fortune.
Audited financials and fully SEC reporting. WNFT setting up for a nice reverse merger with a completely legitimate company. Still believe it could be any one of the bigger dogs and will make history if so.
$WNFT
Real news