Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I had a rough day. can any one point me to a good adult site that doesnt do the cascade of pop ups?
BBC CHNG MEE are my only greens the rest is a sea of red
BBC Bodisen AMEX.. Up in London AIM BODI 5% . On 1000 volume. high volume for a country with 80% capital gains tax...how can people even trade there? but I check it anyhow to see where BBC is going....
War protester's fiery suicide provokes questions
Man's flaming body was meant to be a symbol of rage, but no-one listened
CHICAGO - Malachi Ritscher envisioned his death as one full of purpose.
He carefully planned the details, mailed a copy of his apartment key to a friend, created to-do lists for his family. On his Web site, the 52-year-old experimental musician who’d fought with depression even penned his obituary.
At 6:30 a.m. on Nov. 3 — four days before an election caused a seismic shift in Washington politics — Ritscher, a frequent anti-war protester, stood by an off-ramp in downtown Chicago near a statue of a giant flame, set up a video camera, doused himself with gasoline and lit himself on fire.
Aglow for the crush of morning commuters, his flaming body was supposed to be a call to the nation, a symbol of his rage and discontent with the U.S. war in Iraq.
“Here is the statement I want to make: if I am required to pay for your barbaric war, I choose not to live in your world. I refuse to finance the mass murder of innocent civilians, who did nothing to threaten our country,” he wrote in his suicide note. “... If one death can atone for anything, in any small way, to say to the world: I apologize for what we have done to you, I am ashamed for the mayhem and turmoil caused by my country.”
There was only one problem: No one was listening.
It took five days for the Cook County medical examiner to identify the charred-beyond-recognition corpse. Meanwhile, Ritscher’s suicide went largely unnoticed. It wasn’t until a reporter for an alternative weekly, the Chicago Reader, pieced the facts together that word began to spread.
Soon, tributes — and questions — poured in to the paper’s blogs.
Martyr or man consumed by mental illness?
Was this a man consumed by mental illness? Or was Ritscher a martyr driven by rage over what he saw as an unjust war? Was he a convenient symbol for an anti-war movement or was there more to his message?
“This man killed himself in such a painful way, specifically to get our attention on these things,” said Jennifer Diaz, a 28-year-old graduate student who never met him but has been researching his life. Now, she is organizing protests and vigils in his name. “I’m not going to sit by and I can’t sit by and let this go unheard.”
Mental health experts say virtually no suicides occur without some kind of a diagnosable mental illness. But Ritscher’s family disagrees about whether he had severe mental problems.
In a statement, Ritscher’s parents and siblings called him an intellectually gifted man who suffered from bouts of depression. They stopped short of saying he’d ever received a clinical diagnosis of mental illness.
“He believed in his actions, however extreme they were,” his younger brother, Paul Ritscher, wrote online. “He believed they could help to open eyes, ears and hearts and to show everyone that a single man’s actions, by taking such extreme personal responsibility, can perhaps affect change in the world.”
His son, who shares the same name as his father, said his father was trying to cope with mental illness. Suicide seemed to be the next step, and the war was a way to give his death meaning.
“He was different people at different instances and so, so erratic. I loved him no doubt, but he was a very lonely and tragic man,” said Ritscher, 35, who is estranged from the rest of the family. “The idea of being a martyr I’m sure was attractive. He could literally go out in a blaze of glory.”
Born in Dickinson, N.D., with the name Mark David, Ritscher dropped out of high school, married at 17 and divorced 10 years later. Eventually, he would change his name to match his son’s and, coincidentally, a world-famous prophet. At the end, he worked in building maintenance and was a fixture in Chicago’s experimental music scene.
He described himself as a renaissance man who’d amassed a collection of more than 2,000 musical recordings from clubs in Chicago. He was a writer, philosopher and photographer. He was an alcoholic who collected fossils, glass eyes, light bulbs and snare drums. He paid $25 to become an ordained minister with the Missionaries of the New Truth and operated a handful of Web sites protesting the Iraq war.
A member of Mensa who claimed to be able to recite the infinite number Pi to more than 1,000 decimal places, he titled his obituary “Out of Time.” Friends, who seemed surprised about his death, found themselves searching for answers. Ritscher’s death became even more enigmatic than his life.
'Too hard for them'
Perhaps the most famous self-immolation occurred in 1963, when Buddhist monk Thich Quang Duc burned himself at a Saigon intersection in protest against the south Vietnamese regime. Another activist, Kathy Change, lit fire to herself in 1996 at the University of Pennsylvania to protest the government and the country’s economic system.
Ritscher’s death brought back memories for Anita King, a 48-year-old artist from West Philadelphia who was Change’s best friend.
“I think both of them, they just felt like their death could be the last drop of blood shed,” King said. “It was too hard for them. They had too much of a conscious connection to the struggle to go on in their lives.”
In the end, only Ritscher knew the motivations for his suicide. There is little doubt, though, that he was satisfied with his choice.
“Without fear I go now to God,” Ritscher wrote in the last sentence of his suicide note. “Your future is what you will choose today.”
© 2006 The Associated
shocking........yep were all greedy bastards .....even those friendly Austrailians....
Dow Jones Co. owner Of MarketWatch was succesfully sued by Joe Gutnick.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news...
Internet libel case with global implications ends in settlement
By The Associated Press
11.16.04
MELBOURNE, Australia — In a low-key end to a groundbreaking case that extended the reach of Australia's libel laws to the world, Dow Jones & Co. has settled a defamation lawsuit launched against it by an Australian mining magnate.
The case started after mining boss Joe Gutnick claimed that an October 2000 Barron's magazine article had portrayed him as a schemer given to stock scams, money laundering and fraud. The article was also published online.
Dow Jones, which publishes The Wall Street Journal, Barron's, Dow Jones Newswires and several stock market indicators, argued that the case should have been heard in the United States, where libel rulings are regarded as more favorable to publishers, because the article originally was published there.
But in a landmark ruling in December 2002, the High Court of Australia unanimously ruled that the case could be heard in Gutnick's home state of Victoria because people there could have read the article online.
Scholars said the decision — the first by a nation's top court to deal with alleged cross-border Internet defamation — created a global precedent that could subject Internet publishers to lawsuits regardless of their geographical location.
A settlement in the case emerged Nov. 12 following out-of-court mediation.
Lawyers for Dow Jones issued a statement in Victoria Supreme Court saying Barron's never intended to suggest that Gutnick was a customer of Melbourne man Nachum Goldberg, who was jailed for tax evasion and money laundering.
"I was delighted to hear the statement being read out in court — it was an outrageous allegation," Gutnick said.
Dow Jones also agreed to pay Gutnick $137,500 in addition to $306,000 in legal fees.
The settlement is not likely to affect the precedent already set, said University of Ottawa professor Michael Geist, who noted courts in the United Kingdom and Canada have already cited the Australian decision in asserting jurisdiction over other Internet defamation cases.
"The actual Gutnick dispute may be over, but its legacy will likely live on in the world of Internet law for many years to come," Geist says.
Meanwhile, the first big case asserting that a U.S. based Web publisher can be charged with violating laws in foreign countries, a suit filed by an anti-racism group in France against Yahoo for allowing the sale of Nazi memorabilia on its auction site, continues to wend its way through the courts more than four years after it was filed. The plaintiff, La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L?Antisemitisme (LICRA), won a judgment in France in November 2000 after Yahoo said it would not and could not prevent French Web users from gaining access to Nazi-related materials on the company?s U.S. Web site. Even since then, a fine against Yahoo has been piling up at the rate of nearly $10 a minute or nearly $5 million a year.
Bodisen needs to sue Dow Jones Co. for this headline.
"Herb Greenberg: AMEX seeks to delist Bodisen, more
at MarketWatch (Mon, Nov 13"
Everybody buy some BBC today so I can have a Merry Christmas Thanks.
Shawn
September 11 victims are aggressively pursuing a $1 trillion lawsuit in the United States that accuses dozens of Saudi royal princes and wealthy businessmen of providing funding that led to the terror attacks. Libel suits targeting U.S. media organizations and others in the British courts, some of the Saudis may hope to shift the focus and win judgements that will bolster their position in the United States.
The opening salvo in this Saudi counteroffensive may start as early as this December when The Wall Street Journal goes to trial in a libel action filed against it by two members of the Jeddah-based Jameel family, which operates the largest independent Toyota dealership in the world.
The U.S. business daily, which publishes a European edition, is also the target of a separate lawsuit filed by the family-run Al-Rajih Banking and Investment Corp., a Saudi group heavily involved in “Islamic” banking activities. Both lawsuits stem from a February 2002 Journal story reporting that Saudi authorities were monitoring about 150 bank accounts for possible suspicious activity related to terrorism, among them, the Journal claimed, accounts maintained by businesses related to the Jameels and Al-Rajihs.
In addition, Khalid bin Mahfouz, a wealthy Saudi who used to head one of the kingdom’s largest commercial banks, has filed suit with his son Abdulrahman in the British courts against Jean Charles Brisard, chief investigator for the lawyers representing the September 11 victims in the United States and the author of a French book—later published in the United States—about the financing of terrorism and the family of Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Mahfouz is also suing the British weekly newspaper The Mail on Sunday for an article published a year ago which carried the headline BIN LADEN’S TEXAN BANKER HAUNTS BUSH, which repeated allegations from the French author’s book.
In filing the action, the Saudi businessmen and their lawyers are seeking to take advantage of what even U.S. investigators acknowledge has been a recurring problem in their efforts to unravel the financing of international terror groups: a lack of hard evidence showing how the money flows to terror cells. Despite stacks of intelligence reports linking various Saudi charities and businesses to Al Qaeda, U.S. investigators have found it difficult to trace financial transactions involving specific terror cells or operations—and even more challenging to build criminal cases against suspected individual financiers.
The dearth of hard evidence has emboldened some Saudi business figures who say they have been unjustly tarred in the course of U.S. investigations. The British courts provide a favorable venue for recourse. Unlike the United States, British libel law places the burden of proof on the defendant—usually the media—to prove that what they published or broadcast was true.
Under British libel law, said a lawyer close to some of the current cases, the courts presume that a published article is false rather than true. All a plaintiff has to prove is that it was published and that its contents were likely to damage the subject of the article by holding them up to public “odium, ridicule or contempt.” Under the British system, losers in libel cases not only have to pay damages awarded by a jury but also usually have to pay the plaintiff’s legal fees, which sometimes can run to one million British pounds or more. Because of the high financial risks of libel cases, and the draconian nature of British law, libel plaintiffs in Britain sometimes file—or threaten to file—lawsuits to deter other media from reprinting a particularly sensitive story, then let the lawsuit quietly lapse once the controversy has blown over. (In recent years, however, British courts have made it a bit easier for libel defendants by allowing the media to claim that there was an overwhelming “public interest” in publishing a particular controversial story and that publication was undertaken only after exhaustive efforts were made to verify facts and contact parties for comment).
After one recent Saudi-related hearing in a wood-paneled courtroom inside London’s gothic Law Courts complex, one of the British barristers (trial lawyers) in the case told journalists “Say what you like about Osama bin Laden. He’s done wonders for the defamation [libel] bar.”
There has so far been remarkably little attention given to the British lawsuits—in large part because British law greatly limits pretrial publicity that could influence potential jury members. Lawyers and principals contacted by NEWSWEEK this week were reluctant to discuss the cases, although Brisard dismissed the action against him as a “trick” aimed at undermining the lawsuit by the September 11 families in the United States. Norman Chapman, a British lawyer suing the Journal on behalf of the Al-Rajih banking group, said his client had been “vigorously pursuing” the paper for some time. “We want to put the record straight on behalf of our clients.” Andrew Stephenson, the lawyer for the Jameel family’s action against the Journal, said it was natural for his clients to sue in England given their substantial financial interests in the country. “If you’re a Japanese and hit by a car in Trafalgar Square, then you can sue in the British courts.”
A lawyer for The Wall Street Journal declined to comment on the suits. But there are signs that the paper plans to defend itself vigorously. Following recent submissions from the Journal’s principal barrister, prominent human-rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson QC, the judge postponed the trial date in the Al-Rajih case. The paper wants to try to prove that its allegations against the Al-Rajih’s were “justified” by showing that the bank had provided services to controversial Islamic charities, including the Muslim World League, the International Islamic Relief Organization and the Al Haramain Islamic Foundation. All three have been repeatedly linked in U.S. court documents to alleged terrorist financing, and the Al-Haramain foundation was designated a terrorist entity by the U.S. government in March 2002. The Al-Rajih family is also connected to several charities and businesses in the Washington area that were raided by U.S. Customs and FBI investigators in the winter of 2002 as part of a terrorism-financing investigation.
Nobody from the Al-Rajih family or its banking businesses has been charged in the investigation. But in a lengthy affidavit recently unsealed by a U.S. judge at The Wall Street Journal’s request, a Customs agent said an investigation into possible U.S. tax violations involves U.S.-based executives of a Virginia foundation that federal investigators say was set up to handle Al-Rajih family funds.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3339584
I'm buying all the chinese stocks I can, I'm loading up on BBC right now. I'm dumping good American companies just because of the Dollar.
Nicaraugua elects socialist . and vows to start making Nike sneakers to sell to America. Another step toward the abyss
Whats our oil doing under their sand?
you cant face the truth
I grew up in Methodist church and as an adult have belonged to a Southern Baptist Church. Some whom I worship with find my ideas offensive and some agree with me. Sometime I feel very awkward speaking my mind in church but I do it anyway. I believe that Jesus forgives everyone and in heaven we all will meet. And there will be no pain. And there will be peace.
When I read the news about Iraq it makes me cry. I know there is nothing I can do to help, so I ask God to help those people, and all suffering people.
Its not working, or even worse it is working.. thats probably the sad truth.
The gunmen attacked the four mosques with rocket-propelled grenades, machine guns and automatic rifles. Residents said the militiamen prevented them from entering the burned buildings to remove the dead, and they and Hussein said Shiite-dominated police and Iraqi military stood idly by.
Private Spies Stalk The Internet
By: Paul Joseph Watson
Trying to entrap non-existent "Al-Qaeda cells" into incriminating themselves
Private Spies Stalk The Internet
Trying to entrap non-existent "Al-Qaeda cells" into incriminating themselves
Thursday, November 23, 2006
An organization of highly trained, committed and ruthless individuals with links to global intelligence agencies are using the Internet to try to foment terrorism in order to advance their unified political agenda. No it's not Al-Qaeda, it's Vigil, the elite private spies who are stalking the web and telling the government about any e-speech they deem suspicious.
The Scotsman reports,
The organisation is not the US Central Intelligence Agency or Britain's MI6 but Vigil, a shadowy network of retired spies, senior military personnel, anti-terrorism specialists and banking experts.
"Sixty per cent of Vigil's work involves gaining information via the internet, by infiltrating chatrooms."
"The information gleaned is passed on to authorities such as the FBI, and British Counter Terrorism Command (CTC)."
As has been exhaustively documented on this website, 90% of alleged major terror busts target either completely innocent people caught in a dragnet or are outright examples of entrapment, incitement and guilt by association.
It comes as no surprise therefore that Vigil's main boast is that it helped snag hook-handed hate preacher Abu Hamza by tricking Hamza "into handing over videos and audio tapes which were used by US authorities in their case against James Ujaama, who pleaded guilty in 2004 to trying to help al-Qaeda militants."
Having trigger-happy retired spooks who were schooled in the mind set of Cold War paranoia, eager to please new masters for lucrative payoffs and fat pensions, actively embed themselves in Internet chat rooms, on forums and social networking sites to search for terrorists based on what they type is only going to lead to more frame-ups and false suspicions.
But why should that concern the Bush or Blair juntas? After all, they find no qualms in using "Al-Qaeda confessionals" knowingly obtained by torture and graciously provided by the barbarous regime of Uzbekistan. Any contribution by Vigil that will keep the phantom war against non-existent groups rolling is welcomed.
And so it goes that Vigil's noble efforts to cleanse the world wide web of its malcontents fits into a broader strategy on behalf of the US and UK to infiltrate, pollute, misdirect and criminalize the Internet. This is part of a chilling effect to dissuade people from speaking their minds about the mess in Iraq, the real story behind 9/11 and the war on terror in fear that their every word might be twisted and passed off as some kind of code for terror.
- The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.
- In addition, the Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror.
- In a speech last month, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills."
Chertoff pledged to dispatch Homeland Security agents to local police departments in order to aid in the apprehension of domestic terrorists who use the Internet as a political tool.
- The European Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the Internet to spread propaganda.
The establishment is hell-bent on smearing bloggers as terror sympathizers, rabble-rousers and extremists, Daddy Bush being the latest to publicly scorn online activists for creating an "ugly climate."
Spying on critics of the "war on terror" and its erosion of civil liberties would gain currency according to one respondent to the Scotsman piece, who urged Vigil to investigate, "some of the extreme comments from posters," which "could keep Vigil & his crew busy for a while."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2006/231106privatespies.htm
Clever people often get into trouble, but wise people seldom do.
Who is backing the sunnis?
So many here are propagandizing the muslim hate thing I have to believe they are paid...
We killed Jesus so we can twist and turn and go back to our old ways. After jesus was dead, people wanted to go back to revisit the old testament. But that is not what Jesus taught. The old testament scripture that god sent his son to denounce should be used as a referance as what not to do. Not a platform for teaching the previous misguided ways as somehow good. Teachings of those that want to go back to old testament by your favorite minister have to be dismissed. Quotes from Jesus are hard to find here or even in modern Christian Churches. And Jesus predicted this on the day he was crucified when he talked about the cock crowing . That was for us also not just his deciples. We deny him Every day.
Thanks for praying for me.
Shawn
Why we killed Jesus. So we can twist and turn and go back to our old ways. After jesus was dead, people wanted to go back to revisit the old testament. Paul was One of the many. But that is a twist on what Jesus taught. The old testament scripture that god sent his son to denounce should be used as a referance as what not to do. Not a platform for teaching the previous misguided ways as somehow good. Teachings of those that want to go back to old testament have to be discounted. Quotes from Jesus are hard to find here or even in modern Christian Churches. And Jesus predicted this on the day he was crucified when he talked about the cock crowing . That was for us also. We deny him Every day.
the old testament was washed away by jesus christs birth, if the old tesament were true, then jesus christ would not have been sent to contradict it and show that jewish religion was to be abandoned for christianity. You can not have two or more gods or then we might as well start reading greek mytholigy and discuss how that relates to modern politics. so there are no chosen people, many peoples in the world have had hard times jews had there bad times for sure but not any different than any other people or religion, or state or whatever you believe the chosen people of 2006 are. just as a practical mater the israel of the bible is not here any more, it is gone the peoples have dipersed and the land has been devided and peoples living there for thousands of years have changed religions intermixed with multiple other races the notion that the Israel of biblical time still exists is just not true. and if you believe in the new testament jesus makes the old testament totaly obsolete. the moment jesus was concieved by gods hand he was a christian not a jew. so he was not a jewish carpenter. he was a christian carpenter. So if you want to pick and chose what jesus denied in the old testament and what he left as gods word, that is just your oppinion. literal interpretation of the new testament would show that all jews end in hell that would make them chosen for damnation. and now we would have to start second guesing god on that point so the only logical answer is that the old testament died when jesus was concieved. thats why we killed jesus,,that was to hard to accept,,, as I gather from your conversations it still is hard to accept for you...The man murdered in lebanon was many things but you only mension his religion, as if that were a factor. now in America, Gods country, 50,000 people are murdered here each year by other Americans how do you explain 50,000 americans murdering each other when most Americans dont have any religion or surely dont wear it on there sleve. but we seem to kill allot of our own .. but one lebanese politition in the most screwed up part of the world is killed and its all a part of the 666 thing,, strange on how you focus your attention away from your own country. where you actually could help in some small way.. but you want to go 12,000 miles away to help sove the crimes .. strange..
Hitler was not a muslim ? Lee harvey oswald? timothy mc veigh?lets look at the log in our eye
the old testament was washed away by jesus christs birth, if the old tesament were true, then jesus christ would not have been sent to contradict it and show that jewish religion was false and to be abandoned for christianity. You can not have two or more gods or then we might as well start reading greek mytholigy and discuss how that relates to modern politics. so there are no chosen people, many peoples in the world have had hard times jews had there bad times for sure but not any different than any other people or religion, or state or whatever you believe the chosen people of 2006 are. just as a practical mater the israel of the bible is not here any more, it is gone the peoples have dipersed and the land has been devided and peoples living there for thousands of years have changed religions intermixed with multiple other races the notion that the Israel of biblical time still exists is just not true. and if you believe in the new testament jesus makes the old testament totaly obsolete. the moment jesus was concieved by gods hand he was a christian not a jew. so he was not a jewish carpenter. he was a christian carpenter. So if you want to pick and chose what jesus denied in the old testament and what he left as gods word, that is just your oppinion. literal interpretation of the new testament would show that all jews end in hell that would make them chosen for damnation. and now we would have to start second guesing god on that point so the only logical answer is that the old testament died when jesus was concieved. thats why we killed jesus,,that was to hard to accept,,, as I gather from your conversations it still is hard to accept for you...
THE C.I.A.’S TRAVEL AGENT
On the official Web site of Boeing, the world’s largest aerospace company, there is a section devoted to a subsidiary called Jeppesen International Trip Planning, based in San Jose, California. The write-up mentions that the division “offers everything needed for efficient, hassle-free, international flight operations,” spanning the globe “from Aachen to Zhengzhou.” The paragraph concludes, “Jeppesen has done it all.”
Boeing does not mention, either on its Web site or in its annual report, that Jeppesen’s clients include the C.I.A., and that among the international trips that the company plans for the agency are secret “extraordinary rendition” flights for terrorism suspects. Most of the planes used in rendition flights are owned and operated by tiny charter airlines that function as C.I.A. front companies, but it is not widely known that the agency has turned to a division of Boeing, the publicly traded blue-chip behemoth, to handle many of the logistical and navigational details for these trips, including flight plans, clearance to fly over other countries, hotel reservations, and ground-crew arrangements.
The Bush Administration has defended the clandestine rendition program, which began during the Clinton years, as an effective method of transporting terrorists to countries where they can be questioned or held. Human-rights activists and others have said the program’s primary intent is to send suspects to detention centers where they can be interrogated harshly, and have criticized it as an illegal means of “outsourcing torture.”
A former Jeppesen employee, who asked not to be identified, said recently that he had been startled to learn, during an internal corporate meeting, about the company’s involvement with the rendition flights. At the meeting, he recalled, Bob Overby, the managing director of Jeppesen International Trip Planning, said, “We do all of the extraordinary rendition flights—you know, the torture flights. Let’s face it, some of these flights end up that way.” The former employee said that another executive told him, “We do the spook flights.” He was told that two of the company’s trip planners were specially designated to handle renditions. He was deeply troubled by the rendition program, he said, and eventually quit his job. He recalled Overby saying, “It certainly pays well. They”—the C.I.A.—“spare no expense. They have absolutely no worry about costs. What they have to get done, they get done.”
Overby, who was travelling last week, did not return several phone calls. Mike Pound, the head of corporate communications for Jeppesen, said that he would have no comment, and he added, “Bob Overby will have no comment as well.” Tim Neale, the director of media relations for Boeing’s corporate office in Chicago, said, “The flight-planning services we provide our customers are confidential, and we do not comment publicly on any work done for any customer without their consent.” The C.I.A. had no comment.
The British journalist Stephen Grey, in a new book, “Ghost Plane,” refers to documents obtained by Spanish law-enforcement officials, along with flight logs, which indicate that international flight planners provided essential logistical support for many of the C.I.A.’s renditions, including that of Khaled el-Masri, a German car salesman who was apparently mistaken for an Al Qaeda suspect with a similar name, in January of 2004. (Although documents show that Jeppesen provided this support, Grey’s book does not mention the company.) Masri, who is a Muslim, was arrested at the border while crossing from Serbia into Macedonia by bus. He has alleged in court papers that Macedonian authorities turned him over to a C.I.A. rendition team. Then, he said, masked figures stripped him naked, shackled him, and led him onto a Boeing 737 business jet. Flight plans prepared by Jeppesen show that from Skopje, Macedonia, the 737 flew to Baghdad, where it had military clearance to land, and then on to Kabul. On board, Masri has said, he was chained to the floor and injected with sedatives. After landing, he was put in the trunk of a car and driven to a building where he was placed in a dank cell. He spent the next four months there, under interrogation. Masri was released in May, 2004, on the orders of Condoleezza Rice, then the national-security adviser, after she learned that he had mistakenly been identified as a terrorism suspect.
Ben Wizner, an A.C.L.U. attorney who is representing Masri in his lawsuit against the former C.I.A. director George Tenet and private aviation companies, says that if Boeing can be proved to have played a role in Masri’s rendition the A.C.L.U. may amend the lawsuit to name the company as a defendant.
The American flight crew fared better than their passenger. Documents show that after the 737 delivered Masri to the Afghan prison it flew to the resort island of Majorca, where, for two nights, crew members stayed at a luxury hotel, at taxpayers’ expense.
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/061030ta_talk_mayer
Show me the money. 20 billion in oil revenues from Iraq per year.pre 2003 invasion,, post invasion 150 billion per year to set up friendly dictator, and rebuild country,,,, New plan.... scrap the old plan... get the fuck out of Iraq...
Iraq is a blend of anarchy democracy dictatorcy tatertots crisp human buritos and christian values. all working together to pump oil into ships headed for America.
What's our oil doing under their sand?
Bush in indonesia is moving the Iraq debate forword at a brisk pace.
he stated that he will begin mulling over troop levels, an issue that has not been addressed since the iraq invasion in 2003.
ask your son how to build a country from scratch and needles
Teach your children that Idol worship was just a figure of speach and golden calf heads were what god was talking about, not flags, political groups, nations, your self righchous self or any of that stuff'
the other day you wrote about there being more christian zionist than jew,,, thats funny but true!!!
The UN is Resposible for creating Gods chosen land in 1948. so the UN should redraw the world maps to include all of us in the Holly land also.. because there are to many palestinians in gods new UN created chosen land ,,, Jesus would like to fly a stealth bomber and drop cluster bombs on I raqi troops. because god kills and jesus saves and Jews are gods chosen people jesus was a jew untill he realized his penis was not circumcized , so he must be a christian.. was jesus a jew and a christian yes he was thats why all Christians are gods chosen people also.
that would be like angels singing ..... jesus thinks torture is not ruled out in the ten comandments.
20,000 Us troops in Soudi Arabia jacking off while the Soudi terrorists kill 3000 americans on 911.Royal family gets free dictator protection plan From the US and aid in the form of millitary hardware, that is basicly a kickback to the us military contractors and bush family.
20,000 Us troops in Soudi Arabia jacking off while protecting Islamic facist dictatorship Saad Family., on 911 and king Saad was smoking a cigar at the white house.
20,000 Us troops in Soudi Arabia jacking off when they should be in the whore houses in Korea fucking 14 year old sex slaves, and pretending to protect us from the rice farmers in North Korea. on 911
Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen offers hassle-free torture flights and will be sued along with the US government in a case of mistaken identity.
THE C.I.A.’S TRAVEL AGENT
On the official Web site of Boeing, the world’s largest aerospace company, there is a section devoted to a subsidiary called Jeppesen International Trip Planning, based in San Jose, California. The write-up mentions that the division “offers everything needed for efficient, hassle-free, international flight operations,” spanning the globe “from Aachen to Zhengzhou.” The paragraph concludes, “Jeppesen has done it all.”
Boeing does not mention, either on its Web site or in its annual report, that Jeppesen’s clients include the C.I.A., and that among the international trips that the company plans for the agency are secret “extraordinary rendition” flights for terrorism suspects. Most of the planes used in rendition flights are owned and operated by tiny charter airlines that function as C.I.A. front companies, but it is not widely known that the agency has turned to a division of Boeing, the publicly traded blue-chip behemoth, to handle many of the logistical and navigational details for these trips, including flight plans, clearance to fly over other countries, hotel reservations, and ground-crew arrangements.
The Bush Administration has defended the clandestine rendition program, which began during the Clinton years, as an effective method of transporting terrorists to countries where they can be questioned or held. Human-rights activists and others have said the program’s primary intent is to send suspects to detention centers where they can be interrogated harshly, and have criticized it as an illegal means of “outsourcing torture.”
A former Jeppesen employee, who asked not to be identified, said recently that he had been startled to learn, during an internal corporate meeting, about the company’s involvement with the rendition flights. At the meeting, he recalled, Bob Overby, the managing director of Jeppesen International Trip Planning, said, “We do all of the extraordinary rendition flights—you know, the torture flights. Let’s face it, some of these flights end up that way.” The former employee said that another executive told him, “We do the spook flights.” He was told that two of the company’s trip planners were specially designated to handle renditions. He was deeply troubled by the rendition program, he said, and eventually quit his job. He recalled Overby saying, “It certainly pays well. They”—the C.I.A.—“spare no expense. They have absolutely no worry about costs. What they have to get done, they get done.”
Overby, who was travelling last week, did not return several phone calls. Mike Pound, the head of corporate communications for Jeppesen, said that he would have no comment, and he added, “Bob Overby will have no comment as well.” Tim Neale, the director of media relations for Boeing’s corporate office in Chicago, said, “The flight-planning services we provide our customers are confidential, and we do not comment publicly on any work done for any customer without their consent.” The C.I.A. had no comment.
The British journalist Stephen Grey, in a new book, “Ghost Plane,” refers to documents obtained by Spanish law-enforcement officials, along with flight logs, which indicate that international flight planners provided essential logistical support for many of the C.I.A.’s renditions, including that of Khaled el-Masri, a German car salesman who was apparently mistaken for an Al Qaeda suspect with a similar name, in January of 2004. (Although documents show that Jeppesen provided this support, Grey’s book does not mention the company.) Masri, who is a Muslim, was arrested at the border while crossing from Serbia into Macedonia by bus. He has alleged in court papers that Macedonian authorities turned him over to a C.I.A. rendition team. Then, he said, masked figures stripped him naked, shackled him, and led him onto a Boeing 737 business jet. Flight plans prepared by Jeppesen show that from Skopje, Macedonia, the 737 flew to Baghdad, where it had military clearance to land, and then on to Kabul. On board, Masri has said, he was chained to the floor and injected with sedatives. After landing, he was put in the trunk of a car and driven to a building where he was placed in a dank cell. He spent the next four months there, under interrogation. Masri was released in May, 2004, on the orders of Condoleezza Rice, then the national-security adviser, after she learned that he had mistakenly been identified as a terrorism suspect.
Ben Wizner, an A.C.L.U. attorney who is representing Masri in his lawsuit against the former C.I.A. director George Tenet and private aviation companies, says that if Boeing can be proved to have played a role in Masri’s rendition the A.C.L.U. may amend the lawsuit to name the company as a defendant.
The American flight crew fared better than their passenger. Documents show that after the 737 delivered Masri to the Afghan prison it flew to the resort island of Majorca, where, for two nights, crew members stayed at a luxury hotel, at taxpayers’ expense.
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/061030ta_talk_mayer
CIA tortures man with the same name as terrorist.
Boeing helped fly the man to a torture zone and will be sued along with the US government in the case.
THE C.I.A.’S TRAVEL AGENT
On the official Web site of Boeing, the world’s largest aerospace company, there is a section devoted to a subsidiary called Jeppesen International Trip Planning, based in San Jose, California. The write-up mentions that the division “offers everything needed for efficient, hassle-free, international flight operations,” spanning the globe “from Aachen to Zhengzhou.” The paragraph concludes, “Jeppesen has done it all.”
Boeing does not mention, either on its Web site or in its annual report, that Jeppesen’s clients include the C.I.A., and that among the international trips that the company plans for the agency are secret “extraordinary rendition” flights for terrorism suspects. Most of the planes used in rendition flights are owned and operated by tiny charter airlines that function as C.I.A. front companies, but it is not widely known that the agency has turned to a division of Boeing, the publicly traded blue-chip behemoth, to handle many of the logistical and navigational details for these trips, including flight plans, clearance to fly over other countries, hotel reservations, and ground-crew arrangements.
The Bush Administration has defended the clandestine rendition program, which began during the Clinton years, as an effective method of transporting terrorists to countries where they can be questioned or held. Human-rights activists and others have said the program’s primary intent is to send suspects to detention centers where they can be interrogated harshly, and have criticized it as an illegal means of “outsourcing torture.”
A former Jeppesen employee, who asked not to be identified, said recently that he had been startled to learn, during an internal corporate meeting, about the company’s involvement with the rendition flights. At the meeting, he recalled, Bob Overby, the managing director of Jeppesen International Trip Planning, said, “We do all of the extraordinary rendition flights—you know, the torture flights. Let’s face it, some of these flights end up that way.” The former employee said that another executive told him, “We do the spook flights.” He was told that two of the company’s trip planners were specially designated to handle renditions. He was deeply troubled by the rendition program, he said, and eventually quit his job. He recalled Overby saying, “It certainly pays well. They”—the C.I.A.—“spare no expense. They have absolutely no worry about costs. What they have to get done, they get done.”
Overby, who was travelling last week, did not return several phone calls. Mike Pound, the head of corporate communications for Jeppesen, said that he would have no comment, and he added, “Bob Overby will have no comment as well.” Tim Neale, the director of media relations for Boeing’s corporate office in Chicago, said, “The flight-planning services we provide our customers are confidential, and we do not comment publicly on any work done for any customer without their consent.” The C.I.A. had no comment.
The British journalist Stephen Grey, in a new book, “Ghost Plane,” refers to documents obtained by Spanish law-enforcement officials, along with flight logs, which indicate that international flight planners provided essential logistical support for many of the C.I.A.’s renditions, including that of Khaled el-Masri, a German car salesman who was apparently mistaken for an Al Qaeda suspect with a similar name, in January of 2004. (Although documents show that Jeppesen provided this support, Grey’s book does not mention the company.) Masri, who is a Muslim, was arrested at the border while crossing from Serbia into Macedonia by bus. He has alleged in court papers that Macedonian authorities turned him over to a C.I.A. rendition team. Then, he said, masked figures stripped him naked, shackled him, and led him onto a Boeing 737 business jet. Flight plans prepared by Jeppesen show that from Skopje, Macedonia, the 737 flew to Baghdad, where it had military clearance to land, and then on to Kabul. On board, Masri has said, he was chained to the floor and injected with sedatives. After landing, he was put in the trunk of a car and driven to a building where he was placed in a dank cell. He spent the next four months there, under interrogation. Masri was released in May, 2004, on the orders of Condoleezza Rice, then the national-security adviser, after she learned that he had mistakenly been identified as a terrorism suspect.
Ben Wizner, an A.C.L.U. attorney who is representing Masri in his lawsuit against the former C.I.A. director George Tenet and private aviation companies, says that if Boeing can be proved to have played a role in Masri’s rendition the A.C.L.U. may amend the lawsuit to name the company as a defendant.
The American flight crew fared better than their passenger. Documents show that after the 737 delivered Masri to the Afghan prison it flew to the resort island of Majorca, where, for two nights, crew members stayed at a luxury hotel, at taxpayers’ expense.
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/061030ta_talk_mayer
CIA tortures man with the same name as terrorist.
Boeing helped fly the man to a torture zone and will be sued along with the US government in the case.
THE C.I.A.’S TRAVEL AGENT
On the official Web site of Boeing, the world’s largest aerospace company, there is a section devoted to a subsidiary called Jeppesen International Trip Planning, based in San Jose, California. The write-up mentions that the division “offers everything needed for efficient, hassle-free, international flight operations,” spanning the globe “from Aachen to Zhengzhou.” The paragraph concludes, “Jeppesen has done it all.”
Boeing does not mention, either on its Web site or in its annual report, that Jeppesen’s clients include the C.I.A., and that among the international trips that the company plans for the agency are secret “extraordinary rendition” flights for terrorism suspects. Most of the planes used in rendition flights are owned and operated by tiny charter airlines that function as C.I.A. front companies, but it is not widely known that the agency has turned to a division of Boeing, the publicly traded blue-chip behemoth, to handle many of the logistical and navigational details for these trips, including flight plans, clearance to fly over other countries, hotel reservations, and ground-crew arrangements.
The Bush Administration has defended the clandestine rendition program, which began during the Clinton years, as an effective method of transporting terrorists to countries where they can be questioned or held. Human-rights activists and others have said the program’s primary intent is to send suspects to detention centers where they can be interrogated harshly, and have criticized it as an illegal means of “outsourcing torture.”
A former Jeppesen employee, who asked not to be identified, said recently that he had been startled to learn, during an internal corporate meeting, about the company’s involvement with the rendition flights. At the meeting, he recalled, Bob Overby, the managing director of Jeppesen International Trip Planning, said, “We do all of the extraordinary rendition flights—you know, the torture flights. Let’s face it, some of these flights end up that way.” The former employee said that another executive told him, “We do the spook flights.” He was told that two of the company’s trip planners were specially designated to handle renditions. He was deeply troubled by the rendition program, he said, and eventually quit his job. He recalled Overby saying, “It certainly pays well. They”—the C.I.A.—“spare no expense. They have absolutely no worry about costs. What they have to get done, they get done.”
Overby, who was travelling last week, did not return several phone calls. Mike Pound, the head of corporate communications for Jeppesen, said that he would have no comment, and he added, “Bob Overby will have no comment as well.” Tim Neale, the director of media relations for Boeing’s corporate office in Chicago, said, “The flight-planning services we provide our customers are confidential, and we do not comment publicly on any work done for any customer without their consent.” The C.I.A. had no comment.
The British journalist Stephen Grey, in a new book, “Ghost Plane,” refers to documents obtained by Spanish law-enforcement officials, along with flight logs, which indicate that international flight planners provided essential logistical support for many of the C.I.A.’s renditions, including that of Khaled el-Masri, a German car salesman who was apparently mistaken for an Al Qaeda suspect with a similar name, in January of 2004. (Although documents show that Jeppesen provided this support, Grey’s book does not mention the company.) Masri, who is a Muslim, was arrested at the border while crossing from Serbia into Macedonia by bus. He has alleged in court papers that Macedonian authorities turned him over to a C.I.A. rendition team. Then, he said, masked figures stripped him naked, shackled him, and led him onto a Boeing 737 business jet. Flight plans prepared by Jeppesen show that from Skopje, Macedonia, the 737 flew to Baghdad, where it had military clearance to land, and then on to Kabul. On board, Masri has said, he was chained to the floor and injected with sedatives. After landing, he was put in the trunk of a car and driven to a building where he was placed in a dank cell. He spent the next four months there, under interrogation. Masri was released in May, 2004, on the orders of Condoleezza Rice, then the national-security adviser, after she learned that he had mistakenly been identified as a terrorism suspect.
Ben Wizner, an A.C.L.U. attorney who is representing Masri in his lawsuit against the former C.I.A. director George Tenet and private aviation companies, says that if Boeing can be proved to have played a role in Masri’s rendition the A.C.L.U. may amend the lawsuit to name the company as a defendant.
The American flight crew fared better than their passenger. Documents show that after the 737 delivered Masri to the Afghan prison it flew to the resort island of Majorca, where, for two nights, crew members stayed at a luxury hotel, at taxpayers’ expense.
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/061030ta_talk_mayer
I didn't catch the ticker. I read you blog . allot of info, thanks.
Bushes new pick for defence secretary Robert Gates, is a homosexual rights champion. He helped create the dont ask dont tell policy. In order to lure more gays into the armed forces, and he made the shower stalls open so gay soldiers can oogle there fellow soldiers while showering.
and there
http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/bush-911.htm
pull the strings someone please.
Delisting. One letter from AMEX about compliance , does not indicate delisting. Fraud? when profits are up 11% earnings .74 per share, OK whatever you say... sell your shares then like the rest of the sheeple.
BCC makes money. like me.. Herb Greenberg and Cramer punped this stock at 20 dollars. they are just mad cus they lost there money, like usual, and the sheep herd lost there money .. now I'm here to take it ,, like usual,, Shlik
So Bush is a communist when he steps outside our borders.. what a guy..