Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What are you talking about... literally makes no sense
Lmfao the only person’s opinion that matters is the judge... we will see what he says... even if the motion to dismiss isn’t granted, LG still has fraud, usury and unjust enrichment on their hands... good luck with that... good to see the whole picture, not only one side ! Motion to dismiss is the easiest motion to satisfy, then comes summary judgement
What a great post ! The knowledge that’s been shared here is amazing... can’t believe all the friends I have here telling me what to do with my money... taking the time to come here FOR FREE !!!!!! And keep me safe from the scary Viva people... get out the pitch forks let’s round them up and off to the jail arghhhhhhhh... LG is the best ! Hoorah Hoorah... I hope they take all the money, I love when a company goes under cheer cheer hooray hooray
So 50% of all PROFITS from every endeavor... and 50% revenue specifically from the devices ?
Lmfao prove the dilution... there is literally no dilution currently and hasn’t been for many many months.. and the a/s was raised, not the o/s, so if no dilution occurs or more shares sold into the o/s, then who cares at this point... could be many great things for the a/s increase such as a merger
Lmfao no, completely wrong... filing for LG needed to be done in 7 days... now Viva must file their reply at least 1 day before... that’s the factual representation of the rule... and yep, refresh exactly second after, makes sense makes A LOT of sense
Of course LG is correct and telling the truth, like obviously everything they say is fact and everything Viva says is a lie and perjury... why don’t we just give JF jail time while we are at it... ridiculous... I’m waiting for Viva’s reply, you know to be unbiased and have all the information at my finger tips... furthermore, guess I was right about LG having to file yesterday, funny how the filings were known to be out here seconds after they were posted... LG connection ? Nooooo it couldn’t be..
I’ve never understood what the problem is about a firm writing something good about a stock they are invested in... what is said is true, so what’s the problem...
Yeah lmao, what changed your mind here ? Dwyer’s been stepping up big time
Provide the proof for these accusations... otherwise I will not believe... not that I believe them anyway lmfao, I just know no proof will be provided because there isn’t any...
Please explain how Matt is benefitting from this, with the share structure maxed out and no dilution whatsoever... please enlighten all of us how this is a scam/scheme/whatever
Agreed, TK, would be nice to actually use Edgar and OTCmarkets for DD instead of opinions based on hatred for JF and the Company... hmmmm
Someone is trying to hold this down, it’s extremely obvious
That’s great DD ! Very useful ! I’m looking forward to the next batch... hopefully it’ll come before May 9... This will be fun soon, just wait lmfao
The opinions on here don’t use those avenues as DD... either just post a screenshot without any explanation as to why it’s important, and when questioned there isn’t an answer received... or just blab On about “JF sucks”, “the company ceases to exist”, “looks like the company shut down” lmfao which is ridiculous... seems like a very liberal standard for DD if you ask me
I love being in little known companies like this at this low price... allows us to load unbelievable amounts before the masses realize this company is going to be huge
Lmfao the MMs just shook people out, it’s hilarious to watch them do this... now they take alll the walls down and up it goes again... every time
How is an opinion based on nothing DD, I never understood that... isn’t DD using documents or charts or something as a basis for the assertion... DD isn’t just someone’s opinion based on nothing but their view towards the CEO or company... JF will prove everyone wrong soon enough, as I said before, May 9 Motion to Dismiss, then the fun will begin.
Anyone actually with the product would see that they haven’t “ceased” operations... channel additions, packages, and quality continues to get improved... and they sponsored that fitexpo event, which proves business is moving... May 9 ! Get ready for shortly thereafter, going to be fun
Deflect to the SP... which was created by LG recklessly dumping their fraud scheme... but we should be happy and just give them what they want right, because it’s in the contract... that was entered into on fraudulent pretenses and deceit... I gave the explanation of what CPLR 2214 means, and obviously I’m correct... thanks, that’s what I thought !
Here’s just the facts of this rule:
CPLR 2214(b) is the law that states how much time before the court date the papers have to be given to the other side.
In this case, Viva’s return date for the motion to dismiss is May 9 (the appearance date)... according to CPLR 2214, since Viva provided LG notice of the motion over 16 days before the return date of May 9, LG must provide their answering documents 7 days prior to May 9 (which is today)... after Viva receives these answering documents from LG, Viva must provide any replying documents at least a day before the return date (at least by May 8)...
If you disagree, then please explain your reasoning.
Then please explain further, I value the explanation... thanks in advance
Yes, we know... what’s your point ?
Exactly, typical paint job of under $100... guess they want to fool stupid people
Lmfao it’s hilarious because by the time summer is over this will have already gained massively... and still have massive room for growth
That’s not even including our non-cancelable master agreement with CC regarding the sales of devices, as well as joint ownership of CC patents/licenses, as well as ownership in CC itself...
Do your own DD, if you don’t like what people are providing you... the reason TGGI is this low is because of the current share structure, once that’s fixed (through a buyback which the company has promised) this will fly, if not before... we own over 100 mil shares of BDCI, and 540 mil shares in another ticker trading over .01 (name of which will be provided soon)...
This is the OTC, you invest on the potential lmfao... why is this being treated as if it’s currently a billion dollar company trading on the nasdaq... this is penny stocks, we are here betting on a winner... and OTTV definitely has that ability... furthermore, I listed yesterday the numerous catalysts we will have in the coming weeks/months... either accept them or don’t, I don’t really give a shit... this is just opinion/speculation... nobody is right and nobody is wrong... the fact is that May 9th is a motion to dismiss hearing, and it seems like a fairly good chance of being dismissed when you read the court documents...
The only factual representations provided is the 10k/10q not being released (which many here believe is for a reason; ie merger or court case dismissal hearing)... everything else is pure speculation and conjecture, with no basis for “fact”... no proof that VIVA finance isn’t a subsidiary, no proof of what “NA Defendant” means (I emailed the New York court and they stated that these aren’t generic terms, and would need to call the Supreme Court to know what it means), but it doesn’t mean that the defendant isn’t going to show up lmfao... also the court date for 7/18 isn’t trial, it’s a preliminary conference, and furthermore is just place holder for if the 5/9 motion to dismiss hearing isn’t granted... if you read the court documents you’d see how frivolous and ridiculous LG’s case is... in addition, LG hasn’t provided an answer or opposition documents to Viva or the Court, which they are required to do and will likely need to be done by tomorrow according to the court rules. Thank you for the post, very helpful indeed.
Lmfao okay bud... even if YOU believe this to be true, you could have made a lot of money on this... sooooooo
First off, that’s not the beginning of the trial... that’s the date set for the preliminary conference since the April 25th preliminary conference was adjourned to enable the Motion to dismiss to be heard before the trial dates and deadlines are set (ie. discovery and such)... the only important upcoming date is MAY 9... that is the hearing for the motion to dismiss... if the motion to dismiss is granted, then the case is over... the 7/18 prelim conference is strictly a placeholder as of now, which will only be utilized if the motion to dismiss isn’t granted. Thanks though for everything.
BDCI is simply the largest shareholder of Cannabis Consortium... the RM and name change were withdrawn... CC is still a private company, and will hopefully file a form 10 soon to register the securities and trade on an exchange... the private investor is getting shares in CC, which is still a private company as of now... it’s all in the recent Annual Report, take a look maybe instead of telling me I’m wrong when it’s right there in the report...
That’s incorrect... BDCI is simply the largest shareholder of Cannabis Consortium... the RM didn’t occur. The private lender is receiving shares in Cannabis Consortium which is still a private company as of now... hopefully soon will file a form 10 to register securities and go public... it’s all in the recent Annual Report.
The are investing money to CANNABIS CONSORTIUM... BDCI is just a majority shareholder of CC, but it’s not CC... CC is a separate entity...
No that’s for Cannabis Consortium... not BDCI’s share price... BDCI is the majority owner of Cannabis Consortium, but BDCI is not Cannabis Consortium... obviously anything that CC does will greatly benefit BDCI and TGGI.
So you admit that’s it’s all in the pipeline, and that delays happen in every business ? Thank you... I’m ready for all that to come to fruition ! Yayayay May 9th is soon, let’s get this case dismissed and let’s all this news roll out !
Lmfao really... seriously... this was posted at 8:14 am; the fitexpo didn’t begin until 10 am (as the website thefitexpo.com states)... FACTS ARE FACTS, and those are the FACTS... wow... lmfao *edit* I seeeeeee...
Paid the demand for shares ? You mean be swindled out of more shares, when LG/Rico committed fraud, usury violations, and are the reason we are this low with their reckless conversion... LG ALREADY MADE 8 TIMES THE ORIGINAL LOAN... no CEO or company would take that shit, nobody
Our shares will be worth much much much more soon enough... patience is key, and we know that the dismissal hearing is May 9th, doesn’t take a genius to see how frivolous this case is... hopefully once that’s occurred, the catalysts I mentioned will begin !
We don’t know anything more than OUR opinions... who is to say I’m wrong, who is to say I’m not right... May 9th Motion to Dismiss hearing, read the documents, and it shows how frivolous and ridiculous LG is being... oh I should add that to the catalyst, this case being dismissed !