Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I guess if we were a democracy you would have a point. The fact is we are a representative republic specifically designed to limit to impact of just the popular vote.
Interesting turn of events. On one hand, who lets a great case out the door. On the other, perhaps he case looks like it may really be going to trial and Mishon didn’t want to put out the funds to carry that load. Mishon appears to have spend a decent amount of money at this point. There may have been a strategic move away from contingency cases which force our team’s hand. I hope things become clearer in this regard
For some reason I thought Raskin ran Mishon
I wonder if the original law firm was bought by them?
I can’t believe I’m saying this but I agree with part of what Glowie is saying here(throwing up in my mouth). Carter should have communicated to the shareholders why he was allowing this to lapse into recision. He spoke to a few shareholders but more was owed if it was just that he didn’t want to spend the money to keep this liquid.
Agreed. Thank you!!
Google his resume. It showed this case hire by our law firm
Akl was our guy
Good luck to both of us my friend. Whatever happens I hope it helps you, your family and friends.
I guess we will just have to see. I certainly hope you are correct. 3 decades of experience in the US judicial system leads me to a different conclusion. 5 bucks a share would total 35m for me. Happy to be wrong here
If you think Carter is going to hold out for 5 bucks a share when he is holding 900m shares you are dreaming.
Depends on your share count.
Agree
I wonder why they rejected RPX but took up this one?
You should put in zero for Glowie
Should be simple to determine. Rip open a cable box and look at what tech has been used. Quick way to a settlement
This is just a basic point of fact that cannot be disputed by the other side. They are either using our patent or they are not. The fact that they are arguing that they are not using our patent due to the lack of the triggering device makes me wonder whether any testing has been done
I have a basis question for the board. From what I understand from the arguments on both sides is that we contend that our patent basically utilizes a triggering device to divert signals to one of four channels. The other side basically contends that there is no triggering device. The signal is automatically spread to the 4 channels. My question is has anyone seen anything on destructive testing on the cable box or modem that indicates which side is correct?
However, the benefits the other side would gain from a high low trial agreement would be lost if an award is appealed. See my previous discussion about what that is.
Agree. Every decision the judge makes can be appealed
The appeal process is what worries me the most. Those judges are the most at risk for corruption. I’m really hoping for a settlement
I agree 100 percent. I see the judge doing his best to close off the appeal routes here.
Sticking with my Wag .45 + royalties at a minimum
Happy Thanksgiving. I hope next thanksgiving we are all wearing silk pajamas all day long
No need for that. I grabbed the check on behalf of the board. Happy to do it.
Careful. Zomby likes to eat
I can’t wait to meet you all after this is all said and done
Jbbb definitely spoke with Billy. He had the same conversation with others I know that spoke with Billy. Jbbb is in the long positive camp here. He’s just a bit dramatic
We will soon find out Glowie. If we get a trial date we will get a settlement at a minimum. If Andrews decides summary judgement in favor of the other side u will be the smart one
From the Zombywolf report regarding the hearing last yr he seemed surprised that our side was appealing 822 as we already had enough with the other two to move forward. If we hadn’t appealed 822 we already would have gone to trial or settled this by now.
We have two full patents that have been infringed on at a minimum . Not very likely that the judge won’t leave this up to a jury to decide.
He and I can’t get paid if we both own stock in a corporation that doesn’t exist if what you are saying is correct.
As Billy has 900m shares of a non existent Corp as you say then how do u suppose he gets paid in the end? Do you think he has an alternate agreement with Chanbond and the inventors?
Yep. That’s the next one in the que.
I insure Bitmain in the US. I can assure u all they are building mining facilities
Has the PTAB issued any rulings on these patents?
That would be a great development