Taking it day by day as there is no other way.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Was Hunter The Bagman For Joe?
Was Hunter Biden the Bagman for Joe? Secret Service Records Show Shocking Number of Flights Hunter Took from Joint Base Andrews All Over the World
By Leisa Audette
May 23, 2021
After Facebook and Twitter famously censored bombshell reporting by the New York Post on Hunter Biden, it was clear that any negative news on Hunter would be ignored or suppressed by the media. Well, thank goodness for Judicial Watch, who obtained Secret Service travel records showing a shocking number of flights taken by Hunter Biden between 2009-2014.
According to Judicial Watch, Biden’s son Hunter took 411 trips across 29 countries between 2009 and the middle of 2014. That includes 23 flights into or out of Joint Base Andrews—home to Air Force One and Air Force Two.
The Secret Service records show that countries and territories visited by Hunter Biden between June 2009 and May 2014 included:
Ethiopia and India on June 14-22, 2009
Argentina on September 14-17, 2009
France and Spain on November 9-13, 2009
Canada on February 12-15, 2010
The Dominican Republic on February 18-22, 2010
Puerto Rico on March 20-27, 2010
China on April 6-9, 2010
Belgium, Spain, and the United Kingdom on May 5-8, 2010
UK, Egypt, Kenya, South Africa, Ascension Island, U.S. Virgin Islands on June 6-13, 2010
Denmark and South Africa on August 9-24, 2010
Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China on April 16-22, 2011
Mexico on May 15-17, 2011
Colombia, France, United Arab Emirates, and France again on November 1-11, 2011
UK and Russia on February 15-18, 2012
Germany, France, and the UK on February 1-5, 2013
UK and Ireland on March 20-22, 2013
China on June 13-15, 2013
Switzerland and Italy on July 26-August 7, 2013
Japan, China, South Korea, and the Philippines on December 2-9, 2013
China and Qatar on May 7-14, 2014
The media have ignored the mystery of why Hunter Biden traveled to the above destinations.
One exception to the media silence was when NBC reporter Josh Lederman noted in an October 2, 2019 report that, “What wasn’t known then was that as he accompanied his father to China, Hunter Biden was forming a Chinese private equity fund that associates said at the time was planning to raise big money, including from China.”
OUR PREVIOUS REPORT ON THE 2013 TRIP TO CHINA:
A 2013 trip Vice President Biden took to China with Hunter Biden was called a “social visit” for Hunter, but it doesn’t look like that’s the case:
According to NBC News, Hunter Biden said his meeting with a Chinese banker was just a social visit, so why did he have a business partner at the meeting?
“Hunter Biden was forming a Chinese private equity fund that associates said at the time was planning to raise big money, including from China. Hunter Biden has acknowledged meeting with Jonathan Li, a Chinese banker, and his partner in the fund during the trip, although his spokesman says it was a social visit.”
The curious thing is that ten days after the meeting, Hunter Biden was approved for a business license there:
“The Chinese business license that brought the new fund into existence was issued by Shanghai authorities 10 days after the trip, with Hunter Biden, a member of the board.”
Talk about a quid pro quo!
Hunter Biden worked connections with foreign leaders during his dad’s official trips more than once. Ukraine was another case where Hunter used his dad’s position as Vice President to profit. Isn’t this what the American people should know?
Was Hunter the bag man for Joe? Is Joe the “Big Guy”?
Emails from a computer allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden show Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company. According to the New York Post, Biden said one of the deals would be “interesting for me and my family.” The email sent to Hunter Biden in May of 2017 included details of “remuneration packages” for six people involved in an unnamed business venture.
In the email, Hunter Biden was listed as “Chair/Vice Chair depending on the agreement with CEFC.” This is an apparent reference to the former Shanghai-based conglomerate CEFC China Energy Co.
Hunter Biden’s pay was listed as “850”…
Also, in the email is a “provisional agreement” under which 80 percent of the “equity,” or shares in the new company, would be split equally among four people, including “H,” apparently referring to Hunter Biden.
The mystery deepens when other initials listed include”10 Jim” and “10 held by H for the big guy.”
https://100percentfedup.com/was-hunter-biden-the-bagman-for-joe-secret-service-records-show-shocking-number-of-flights-hunter-took-from-joint-base-andrews-all-over-the-world/
Was Hunter The Bagman For Joe?
Was Hunter Biden the Bagman for Joe? Secret Service Records Show Shocking Number of Flights Hunter Took from Joint Base Andrews All Over the World
By Leisa Audette
May 23, 2021
After Facebook and Twitter famously censored bombshell reporting by the New York Post on Hunter Biden, it was clear that any negative news on Hunter would be ignored or suppressed by the media. Well, thank goodness for Judicial Watch, who obtained Secret Service travel records showing a shocking number of flights taken by Hunter Biden between 2009-2014.
According to Judicial Watch, Biden’s son Hunter took 411 trips across 29 countries between 2009 and the middle of 2014. That includes 23 flights into or out of Joint Base Andrews—home to Air Force One and Air Force Two.
The Secret Service records show that countries and territories visited by Hunter Biden between June 2009 and May 2014 included:
Ethiopia and India on June 14-22, 2009
Argentina on September 14-17, 2009
France and Spain on November 9-13, 2009
Canada on February 12-15, 2010
The Dominican Republic on February 18-22, 2010
Puerto Rico on March 20-27, 2010
China on April 6-9, 2010
Belgium, Spain, and the United Kingdom on May 5-8, 2010
UK, Egypt, Kenya, South Africa, Ascension Island, U.S. Virgin Islands on June 6-13, 2010
Denmark and South Africa on August 9-24, 2010
Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China on April 16-22, 2011
Mexico on May 15-17, 2011
Colombia, France, United Arab Emirates, and France again on November 1-11, 2011
UK and Russia on February 15-18, 2012
Germany, France, and the UK on February 1-5, 2013
UK and Ireland on March 20-22, 2013
China on June 13-15, 2013
Switzerland and Italy on July 26-August 7, 2013
Japan, China, South Korea, and the Philippines on December 2-9, 2013
China and Qatar on May 7-14, 2014
The media have ignored the mystery of why Hunter Biden traveled to the above destinations.
One exception to the media silence was when NBC reporter Josh Lederman noted in an October 2, 2019 report that, “What wasn’t known then was that as he accompanied his father to China, Hunter Biden was forming a Chinese private equity fund that associates said at the time was planning to raise big money, including from China.”
OUR PREVIOUS REPORT ON THE 2013 TRIP TO CHINA:
A 2013 trip Vice President Biden took to China with Hunter Biden was called a “social visit” for Hunter, but it doesn’t look like that’s the case:
According to NBC News, Hunter Biden said his meeting with a Chinese banker was just a social visit, so why did he have a business partner at the meeting?
“Hunter Biden was forming a Chinese private equity fund that associates said at the time was planning to raise big money, including from China. Hunter Biden has acknowledged meeting with Jonathan Li, a Chinese banker, and his partner in the fund during the trip, although his spokesman says it was a social visit.”
The curious thing is that ten days after the meeting, Hunter Biden was approved for a business license there:
“The Chinese business license that brought the new fund into existence was issued by Shanghai authorities 10 days after the trip, with Hunter Biden, a member of the board.”
Talk about a quid pro quo!
Hunter Biden worked connections with foreign leaders during his dad’s official trips more than once. Ukraine was another case where Hunter used his dad’s position as Vice President to profit. Isn’t this what the American people should know?
Was Hunter the bag man for Joe? Is Joe the “Big Guy”?
Emails from a computer allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden show Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company. According to the New York Post, Biden said one of the deals would be “interesting for me and my family.” The email sent to Hunter Biden in May of 2017 included details of “remuneration packages” for six people involved in an unnamed business venture.
In the email, Hunter Biden was listed as “Chair/Vice Chair depending on the agreement with CEFC.” This is an apparent reference to the former Shanghai-based conglomerate CEFC China Energy Co.
Hunter Biden’s pay was listed as “850”…
Also, in the email is a “provisional agreement” under which 80 percent of the “equity,” or shares in the new company, would be split equally among four people, including “H,” apparently referring to Hunter Biden.
The mystery deepens when other initials listed include”10 Jim” and “10 held by H for the big guy.”
https://100percentfedup.com/was-hunter-biden-the-bagman-for-joe-secret-service-records-show-shocking-number-of-flights-hunter-took-from-joint-base-andrews-all-over-the-world/
Thanks Veloyt.
Yep, right up there with Sharpton, Jackson... .
Happy Birthday POS Stock Hoarder!
A Horn That Sounds Like Shots Fired...
A Horn That Sounds Like Shots Fired...
A Horn That Sounds Like Shots Fired...
Pick Up The Pieces ~ Alan Gorrie
I Love This Song! it's been a fav of mine since it fist appeared.
I Won't Give Up ~ Jason Mraz
I think is best version of Jason's tune
I'm Yours ~ Jason Mraz
I like it too. Daryl's got so much good stuff it is easy miss one. Every now and then I still find myself.
Under The Influence ~ Elle King LADH
Ex's & Oh's ~ Elle King LADH
Awesome Jamm!!! I Can't Go For That ~ Cee Lo Green LADH
One On One ~ Cee Lo Green LADH
Goodybye Kiss ~ Grace Potter LADH
Low Road ~ Grace Potter LADH
Love Grace Potter
Great Sax!!!
HARR!!!!!
Clean, good stuff. that was a good episode.
OANN is far better than Newsmax. You have to watch the Newsmax stories, a lot like you need watch FNC because of lefty bullchitt.
Love it.
This war on the blue is so crazy, and it sickens me anybody ever bought into this bullchitt.
The whole thing was a lefty scam.
The man is a true pig.
Yep, but I find it keeps repeating the same programs over and over through the day. Their format drives me nuts so I quit following them. I would love to have OANN.
It was a good show, most of Waters World are good shows.
Sadly I am a comcast customer.
Wherever she is not needed, LOL!
Go Trump!
Thanks MM.
In Commie Oregon... New Gun Legislation to Gov. Brown
Oregon Senate sends gun legislation to Gov. Brown
By Peter Wong
Portland Tribune
Gov. Kate Brown is the final stop for the Oregon Legislature's major gun legislation of 2021.
The Senate voted Wednesday, May 5, to accept the House version of a bill that combines requirements for locks and safe storage of firearms with a narrowed ban on concealed-handgun license holders bringing firearms into some public places.
The vote was 17-7. Sen. Betsy Johnson of Scappoose was the lone Democrat to join six Republicans in opposition to the revised Senate Bill 554. Five Republicans and one independent were recorded as excused or absent.
Sen. Floyd Prozanski, a Democrat from Eugene and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the bill follows the principles laid out by a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision. The court for the first time concluded there was an individual right to bear arms under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, but that right can be regulated.
"What we do know is that reasonable regulations can be placed on these individual rights we have," Prozanski said. "The bottom line is that we have a bill that does in fact address certain areas that we feel as a state need to be regulated."
Oregon would join 11 other states with some form of requirements for locks and safe storage of firearms, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
As for the narrower scope of the ban on guns in some public places, Prozanski said it was a compromise. The original Senate version would have left it to all local governments to decide restrictions for themselves. The final version limits the option to school districts, community colleges and state universities. The option for cities, counties and special districts was removed.
The ban still applies to the Capitol in Salem and the passenger terminal at Portland International Airport.
As a state representative in 1995, Prozanski voted for a law that pre-empts local governments from regulating firearms, other than discharging them in public. "But I will tell you that even though I thought it was the best decision I could make at that time, today is a different day," he said.
State of Safety Action, a nonprofit that advocates prevention of gun violence, issued a statement of support after the vote. "Safe storage saves lives, helping prevent unintentional shootings and firearm suicides," Henry Wessinger, the group's president, said. "It will make it harder for potential school shooters to obtain a gun, and it will support responsible gun ownership."
GOP opposition
Senate Republican Leader Fred Girod of Lyons took issue not only with the restrictions but also the process that allowed the House to merge its safe-storage bill with the original Senate version, which dealt with firearms in public places.
"This is an example of how bad this building can get," he said. "We were locked out of the process in this bill."
But like his counterpart in the House, Republican Leader Christine Drazan of Canby, Girod also took issue with the way some gun rights advocates lobbied in opposition to it. The Senate's March 25 vote on the original version prompted threats against some Republican senators, and a recall effort aimed at Girod, because they did not walk out to call a halt to Senate business.
"There is a fringe group out there that is sure not welcome in my office," Girod said. "It is not OK to threaten people's lives, their staff. It's not an appropriate way to lobby."
Other Republicans opposed the bill.
"It clearly infringed on the right to people's self-defense," Sen. Tim Knopp of Bend said after the vote. "I voted to support women and minorities in my district who want the opportunity for self-defense for themselves and their families as the Oregon Constitution allows for."
Sen. Lynn Findley of Vale spoke at length against it.
"This bill is not about gun violence, but about a fear of guns," he said.
Key points
Key provisions of the revised Senate Bill 554:
• Guns must have trigger or cable locks, be stored in a locked container or in a gun room. An offense is a Class C violation, which carries a maximum fine of $500, unless someone under age 18 obtains access, in which case it is a Class A violation with a maximum fine of $2,000. No jail time is imposed for violations.
• Stolen firearms must be reported to police, generally within 72 hours.
• Initial filing fees for concealed-handgun licenses are increased from $50 to $100, and for renewals, from $50 to $75.
• The Oregon Capitol and the Portland airport passenger terminal are off-limits to all firearms, including those borne by holders of concealed-handgun licenses, except for law enforcement. (The bill specifies airport terminals with annual passenger counts of 1 million; Eugene and Medford were at those thresholds in 2019 prior to the coronavirus pandemic. Sponsors say that the ban applies only to Portland.) Violations are considered Class A misdemeanors with maximum punishments of one year in jail and a fine of $6,250.
• Firearms bans for license holders are optional at the discretion of the governing boards of Oregon's 197 school districts, 17 community colleges, seven state universities and Oregon Health & Science University. Notices must be posted online, and at entrances to buildings and grounds.
• The final version removes optional bans by cities, counties and special districts. Firearms bans already apply to state courts, which often are in buildings maintained by counties.
pwong@pamplinmedia.com
twitter.com/capitolwong
https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2226621611687/oregon-senate-sends-gun-legislation-to-gov-brown?s=oldSite&ss=a3
And none of these restrictions will in anyway stop gun violence as they like to call it because the criminals who perform most of the crime with guns are in position of firearms illegally. This is only an infringement upon legal citizens.
Yep! In an emergency it rather surprising just fast this old broke down fat man move, HARR!!!
TX Senate To Ban CRT In Schools
Texas Senate Looking To Ban Critical Race Theory In Schools
Nathan "The Bull" G.
May 9, 2021
A new bill going through the senate in Texas wants to make it against the law to teach race or sex-based guilt in all public schools.
Senate Bill 2202 is currently being reviewed by the House Public Education Committee and seeks to ban the curriculum of radical ideology that goes along with Critical Race Theory in Texas public schools. The bill goes on to mandate a strong academic focus on the founding documents and ideas of America.
Idaho has already passed a similar bill and West Virginia, Oklahoma, Missouri, and Arkansas have already set bills out for consideration and are currently being talked through in their houses.
The structure and language of the bill shows a strong understanding of the dangerous ideas that it is looking to stop. In lieu of denouncing Critical Race Theory, by total or in full, the bill is looking to aim at what lawmakers think to be the most divisive ideological components of the theory, especially those which can be directly shown to laud discrimination on the basis of race and or sex.
One section of the bill goes on to detail a litany of specific concepts that “no teacher, administrator, or other employee in any state agency … shall require, or make part of a course.”
The concepts talked about include the following:
> That “one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex.”
> That “any individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive either consciously or unconsciously.”
> That “an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her race or sex.”
> That “members of one race or sex cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race or sex.”
> That “an individual’s moral character is necessarily determined by his race or sex.”
> That “an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by members of his or her race or sex.”
> That “any individual should feel guilt, anguish, or any form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex.”
> That “meritocracy or traits such as hard work are racist or sexist, or were created by members of a particular race to oppress members of another race.”
The bill, also, would make it more difficult for any educator to bring politics into the classroom and would stop schools from making teachers “discuss current events or widely debated and currently controversial issues of public policy or social affairs.”
The House Bill goes even further by stopping school and districts from taking “private funding for the purpose of developing a curriculum, purchasing or selecting curriculum materials, or providing teacher training or professional development for a course” in any of the following areas of study: “Texas history, United States history, world history, government, civics, social studies, or other similar subjects.”
If this bill or the many others like it work in stopping the destructive and pervasive Critical Race Theory, it could lead to a new path forward for the more liberty-minded states.
https://steadfastandloyal.com/news-for-you/texas-senate-looking-to-ban-critical-race-theory-in-schools/
Note: There are active links contained within the original article at the website posted above.
TX Senate To Ban CRT In Schools
Texas Senate Looking To Ban Critical Race Theory In Schools
Nathan "The Bull" G.
May 9, 2021
A new bill going through the senate in Texas wants to make it against the law to teach race or sex-based guilt in all public schools.
Senate Bill 2202 is currently being reviewed by the House Public Education Committee and seeks to ban the curriculum of radical ideology that goes along with Critical Race Theory in Texas public schools. The bill goes on to mandate a strong academic focus on the founding documents and ideas of America.
Idaho has already passed a similar bill and West Virginia, Oklahoma, Missouri, and Arkansas have already set bills out for consideration and are currently being talked through in their houses.
The structure and language of the bill shows a strong understanding of the dangerous ideas that it is looking to stop. In lieu of denouncing Critical Race Theory, by total or in full, the bill is looking to aim at what lawmakers think to be the most divisive ideological components of the theory, especially those which can be directly shown to laud discrimination on the basis of race and or sex.
One section of the bill goes on to detail a litany of specific concepts that “no teacher, administrator, or other employee in any state agency … shall require, or make part of a course.”
The concepts talked about include the following:
> That “one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex.”
> That “any individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive either consciously or unconsciously.”
> That “an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her race or sex.”
> That “members of one race or sex cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race or sex.”
> That “an individual’s moral character is necessarily determined by his race or sex.”
> That “an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by members of his or her race or sex.”
> That “any individual should feel guilt, anguish, or any form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex.”
> That “meritocracy or traits such as hard work are racist or sexist, or were created by members of a particular race to oppress members of another race.”
The bill, also, would make it more difficult for any educator to bring politics into the classroom and would stop schools from making teachers “discuss current events or widely debated and currently controversial issues of public policy or social affairs.”
The House Bill goes even further by stopping school and districts from taking “private funding for the purpose of developing a curriculum, purchasing or selecting curriculum materials, or providing teacher training or professional development for a course” in any of the following areas of study: “Texas history, United States history, world history, government, civics, social studies, or other similar subjects.”
If this bill or the many others like it work in stopping the destructive and pervasive Critical Race Theory, it could lead to a new path forward for the more liberty-minded states.
https://steadfastandloyal.com/news-for-you/texas-senate-looking-to-ban-critical-race-theory-in-schools/
Note: There are active links contained within the original article at the website posted above.
ROTFLMBFAO!!!!!!!!!!!