Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The manipulation is called selling. Why is that so hard to understand?? The selling has been going on for years, nothing has changed. People stated what would happen without a confirmation of the million, well we didn't get a confirmation and it happened.
Judging by the price action, I'm guessing it's ENRN.
At least we are saving travel expenses, this time it was in Texas, last time it was outside Denver.
Hey that was uncalled for!
What's really amazing is they have developed "amazing new products of Blue QD, Carbon QD, Perovskite QD and a QDLED that has no meaningful deteriorations after 10000 hours" while spending next to nothing on R&D while other companies put tens of millions into those areas.
No one. They are patents of which Apple files thousands a year. It's a theoretical product that's at least a couple generations away. Apple has been filing Qdot patents since the iPhone 4, none resulted in a product to date.
If our Qdot performance is comparable or better than that of Nanosys, why is every product in the marketplace is using Nanosys dots?? Don't you ever ask yourself that?? Since we naturally can make them cheaper than someone using a backwards batch process, do you think Samsung, Vizio, Hisense, HP, Acer, TCL and others just decided they all wanted to pay more for less, or maybe just maybe something makes other dots better than ours?
You keep talking like the "tech city" is some massive project and it is being increased to 320,000 square feet. Star Park is an averaged sized incubator facility at a second tier US university, and it is 500,000 square feet.
30000 shares
An interview at CES with the head of Nanosys on the future of qdots in the display arena.
It doesn't require a 8k, but this is a company that in the past has issued a PR to announce they were shipping SAMPLES. They issued a PR to announce receiving a YTexas award. This is a company that is using stock to pay their bills every single month, if they thought an 8k would increase the PPS a penny, which would be 33% and would therefore cut by 33% the amount of shares they give away every month, you don't believe they would issue one??
You do realize you have been saying "last chance for cheap shares" for the last 7 years.
Oh I know this time is different.
Of course the last time was different too. And the time before that. And the time before that......
And "arsenal of ventures", I'll have to remember that one. LOL
Now Trump's the reason the Chinese backed off??
You do realize nothing happened with it after the signing more than 2 years ago, and the trade situation just recently started.
You better try to get on Solartech's meds if you really believe this nonsense.
My guarantees are becoming much more precise, a year ago I predicted we were within 10 cents of a bottom and a couple months ago I said 5 cents, at this rate I may be able to give you a better projection very soon.
I can guarantee we are within 2.8 cents of the bottom.
It's amazing all these companies are wasting hundreds of millions on R&D while QTMM and their pocket change budget already has all the answers.
It really is simple.
Zero sales.
You can go back at least 5 years on this board and find endless claims of a superior product and lower cost, but the fact remains, as Ken Werner the author of the original article has himself admitted, that if you see a qdot product in the marketplace, it has Nanosys inside.
Either those companies using Nanosys like paying more for less or perhaps our claims in the past were lacking some truth. If those claims in the past were lacking......
I wish I still owned some OLED, as I stated here years ago, I got stopped out in the high 40's when it was bouncing between 40 and 80 a couple years ago. If it falls back to my sell point I may rebuy some, but I don't have any fantasies about it either way.
Unlike........
I realize facts play no role in your posts of fantasy, but your statement that "UDC has grown into a company with a market cap of $4 billion, thanks to its millions of dollars of royalties, especially from entrepreneurs in China" is blatantly false. OLED receives the vast majority of its earnings from Samsung and LG, neither of which are Chinese companies. Revenues from China are just starting to emerge now that BOE (I believe last year your rants had BOE and QTMM taking over the world together) has moved heavily into oleds.
For the millionth time, OLED receives licensing revenues because they have proprietary patents on the usage of OLEDS, something QTMM does not have in any way regarding Qdots. It's a lot easier to successfully license an overall product category than it is a production method.
"UDC $OLED down around 10 % after all those QD in OLED stories in the last week. "
Do you actually believe that's the reason or are you just saying it to pump up Qdots?
Anyone who did 10 seconds of research would know OLED is down because of Apple's warning last night. If Apple sneezes OLED catches a cold, even though they are much more tied to Samsung and LG. It's been that way for 2 plus years.
The article said assemble, not manufacture. That's a massive difference, and it means nothing whatsoever to QTMM.
Whether that was good news or not depends on your point of view.
We got rid of a respected leader in the industry and now two years later the stock has fallen 70%, but at least the reactors are turned on (not that anyone is buying anything they churn out)
Look on the bright side, if we signed up Djibouti we'd get to hear how they are the next tech superpower and India is meaningless and why this is further proof of the brilliance of Stephen and confirmation of our fantastic product.
I've given up trying to understand people here long ago.
It's easy to understand, a lot of online brokers have a $5 fee, so for $5 you create an illusion of strength of the stock price. That works no matter what you think, remember this thread started when i replied to someone's comment on how strong the stock looked, and i stated that "strength" was based on the 2 orders of $39 and 20 cents. It also can prop up an account balance if someone owns enough of this, and there are lots of reasons for people to do that be it loan covenants or margin purposes.
Yesterday wasn't a partial fill. The stock's high yesterday was .0351, and it was trading at .033 when a $39 trade went through at 4:00 at .0395. That was a classic painting the tape. At any point in the day those shares could have been purchased at .035 or less.
Strength??? There was no strength. Someone has been playing games to prop up the stock price.
Yesterday after a million plus shares traded at around .0325, one last sale drove the price up more than 15%, from .033 to .039, on 1000 shares, or $39. Today's first sale at 4 cents was for 5 shares, or 20 cents worth. After that we were immediately back to where we were most of yesterday at .033 with 200,000 shares traded, mostly sells of between 10000 to 60000 shares, and then someone again painted the tape raising the price 15% with a 230 share or $8 purchase. Someone is putting in very tiny limit order buys to make the stock price look better
You're right. If you are going to watch one channel with a logo on maximum brightness 20 hours a day, burn in is possible on an oled.
In the real world it's highly doubtful. I'm on my 2nd oled , never had an issue, and my first which I gave to my sister is still going strong. The half dozen or so people I know that have them have never had an issue with it. But of course all of us do weird things like change channels and we don't watch TV 20 hours a day.
For some unknown reason companies are still going with OLED. Maybe you should let them know that you know more than they do.
LG signed a long term royalty agreement with OLED in 2015, so the Kodak patents have no effect. LG has stuck with their old production method because they've been able to minimize the bad panels and reduce costs, something Samsung was not able to achieve.
LG and Samsung are both expected to show foldable oled phones at CES in January.
"It took them 10 years + to penetrate the market with the OLED technology but TV makers are not buying it."
They aren't????
Then why is BOE, who you were saying last year was our partner, building multiple oled TV fab plants costing billions??
Why is LG making oled tv's for themselves, Panasonic, Sony, Grundig, Philips, Metz, Loewe, Skyworth, Changhong, Haier, Konka and others???
If TV makers are "not buying it", why does LG Display aim to produce 10 million OLED TV panels in 2021, up from less than 2 million in 2017, at a cost of 18 billion dollars??
You can always take every statement put out by this company to the bank.
Of course you can also expect to receive an overdraft notice from the bank a few days later
Maybe this time is different, but you may want to make sure you can cover any checks QTMM is writing for you.
How many employees do you think Apple had after 10 years in business??
These are not QTMM's first ten employees, they seem to leave as soon as they can and even post online that they are actively seeking new employment. Why would they do that if this was soon to blast off??
You are ignoring another possibility BigE. Since that picture took place in 2014, it's possible we created a time machine with our Qdots and supplied them to that company so they could create that picture back then.
You may think that's ridiculous, but is it any more ridiculous than a company with 9 employees, 1 scientist, and 0 sales becoming bigger than Intel??
"With some startups it takes a decade"
Really, I was not aware of that.
Could YOU please name the companies YOU are aware of that had no sales or revenues after a decade??
Who is recognizing them as anything besides their own PR's???
A year or 2 ago this board went nuts when Ken Werner wrote something about QTMM. Now he's writing this about Nanosys:
" There are other quantum-dot companies operating in this industry – but for some reason those dots don’t appear in products any of us buy"
They've been implying for almost a decade. There is no doubt QTMM has the best PR's. On everything else, there is nothing but doubt.
I think you have to have customers and partners before you can release their names.
You may want to give another try on those royalty rates. Yes, OLED royalty rates are between .5 and 1.5%, but they are not based on the total price of the end unit, just on the screen cost. Thus OLED does not get $10 or so when you buy your new iphone, they get around 1% of the screen cost, or 50 cents to a buck.
So the other times were not for real but this one is, got it.
When nothing happens this time and you post this again next month, and the next month, and the next year, will those be the real ones too??
My son's favorite story is the boy who cried wolf, and there's an important lesson in that you may want to learn.
Eh, forget it, just take your meds.
You've posted that rocket at least a hundred times and it always explodes on takeoff. Your record of perfection is hard to beat.
The reason for being current is to keep the doors open. That does not make a sale imminent, or probable, or even likely. It just means some people can continue to believe and keep furnishing funds.
Yes, more QD displays using Nanosys.
Isn't it funny that the Chinese are not going forward with QMC and using our product because of Trump, but apparently they must not realize Nanosys is from the US.
Makes you go hmmmmm........