]
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Like the rest of us do .....
EXDIMER, you're wasting your time. You're absolutely correct but he's never, EVER, going to get it ........
I believe that he's just wishing out loud figuring that, if he says it enough, maybe it's true.
You're not gone, yet?
If whining "Where's Susman, where's Susman?" is your dictionary's definition of logical, then YES, you are the most logical poster on this board.
Funniest statement of the day!
When the tool speaking now said, "Your honor, don't take this out on the SNHs, who are essentially innocent victims".
Hahahahaha ....... priceless!
Agreed ... It's an absolutely ridiculous argument and it's being borne out of desperation.
What's scary is ... even if(when) we win here, is this the way these low-lifes are going to continue to do business and treat other innocent stockholders for the next few decades? They really, reaallllyyy, need to be taught a lesson.
But it's even better than that. The SNH idiot is now stating that a company can't maintain an ethical wall for long periods of time and we shouldn't expect them to.
I LOVE it! Or should I say, I love "IT"!
Exactly, it's like she's doing EC's arguing for them.
I disagree. The judge just owned him.
He's now basically admitting the IT but arguing that it wasn't done thru fraud, just "innocent ignorance".
Please don't mention "the name of whom we don't speak of".
You might just be conjuring the creature to come back.
The judge showed her hand at least somewhat.
When it was clear she wanted to break for lunch ... and the first SNH lawyer wanted to go ahead and have his say before the break ... shw said something to the effect of "Perhaps the other SNH lawyers will be quicker, if after me listening to what you've had to say will be most of what needs to be said" (I'm paraphrasing here)
Therefore, even though we can't be absolutely sure which way she is leaning, we can virtually guarantee that she is grouping the SNHs together.
BriBri is actually good at oral, ironically. You'd think he'd want MORE time.
When she said oral arguments on October 24th, I almost pooped my drawers .... until she was corrected.
Rosen is bringing up Examiner's report ... earlier he threatened to bring back MARTA.
Ol BriBri keeps trying to bring up the past. What's next, is he going to reference Roe v. Wade? The sinking of the Lusitania?
Love it!!! "I stand corrected."
Translation: "Oops, you caught me in another lie."
Probably the worst day of Milwani's entire life.
Other than his wedding day, of course.
"$30,000,000,000 BILLION dollars" equals $30,000,000,000,000,000,000.
Did you mean just plain ol' 30 billion dollars?
It's another matter ... unfortunately, it's probably JMW's daily nooner with BriBri Rosen!
Gropper saw it a few minutes ago and said it's complete ... he could hardly hear anything. Just slap some camouflage paint on it per ASTM spec.
P.S. Gropper's secretary just called and said, "Don't forget to backdate the damn construction recipt this time."
"REALLY?"
LOL ... I can just see Groper now.
"Wait a minute! You're allowed to use my own words against me? That doesn't seem fair." <turns to judge> "Your honor, am I allowed to object?"
Agreed 100%.
It doesn't seem fair, instead of incriminating yourself (and the bad guys) or pleading the 5th, just keep saying, "I don't recall."
Hopefully, JMW is wise enough to know what is happening and treat this fairly.
I noticed that. He must have taken some type of pill at break.
If he wasn't such a lying sack of doo-doo, I'd almost feel sorry for the guy.
The only way he's going to get out of this mess is if one of his relatives expires within the next few minutes.
I love his defense strategy.
He has TWO.
1) Um, I don't remember.
2) I'm sorry, could you repeat the question!
It's like that old sports saying (when talking about a lousy player on the opposing side)
"He's the best player on our team!"
They should just bring the bus into the courtroom and lower it on all of the "bad guys". It sounds like they'll all be under there anyway.
I can see him now. "Come on, Mom, we need you to take one for the team ... but you're going to have to be very committed to our cause."
I agree with the SNHs. If I was being shot by the firing squad and I was number 3, I'd sure want to make sure #s 1 and 2 got shot first, even if they did have a previous engagement with a "death in their family"!
Thanks much, William48.
What does that mean?
Cuz they can.
Did you really just say --- so I ran some numbers on your tool?
That's too funny.
And I guess criminals being patted down for weapons by the arresting police are being "sexually molested"?
Hopefully you'll have more money in your account than just enough for ONE dinner! :)
Kinda makes you sick to your stomach, doesn't it.
And they wonder why the statistics show that 90% of investors lose money investing in penny stocks.
The worst part about it, we know that the SEC and other higher powers will do nothing about it.
What did you call me? :)
I noticed one poster on the WAMUQ board stated $4.20 for commons and $420 for preferreds.
First, they stated it almost like it was a fact when it was really just a very incorrect opinion.
Second, that means that commons would get a ~28 times payout over their current price and preferreds would get a ~10 times payout.
I believe, even if the settlement doesn't follow the absolute priority rule, there is no way that commons are going to make out almost 3 times better than preferreds.
I can see a haircut, just so commons get something, but I can't imagine preferreds taking the entire hit just so commons could walk away rich.