Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
my understanding is their engineers are into future Gs as we speak....
from this G to the next to the next. would you be saying that IDCC is into a string of "G"s? or a "G" string?? LOL
Hope all is well with you and yours
FORM 4
• Check this box if no longer subject to Section 16, Form 4 or Form 5 obligations may continue. See Instruction 1(b). UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES
Filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 17(a) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 or Section 30(h) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 OMB APPROVAL
OMB Number: 3235-0287
Expires: January 31, 2008
Estimated average burden hours per response... 0.5
1. Name and Address of Reporting Person *
MILLER WILLIAM C 2. Issuer Name and Ticker or Trading Symbol
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS CORP (IDCC) 5. Relationship of Reporting Person(s) to Issuer
(Check all applicable)
_____ Director _____ 10% Owner
__X__ Officer (give _____ Other (specify
title below) below)
Sr. Programs & Eng. Officer /
(Last) (First) (Middle)
781 THIRD AVENUE
3. Date of Earliest Transaction (Month/Day/Year)
09/19/2006
(Street)
KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1409 4. If Amendment, Date Original Filed (Month/Day/Year)
6. Individual or Join/Group Filing(Check Applicable Line)
_X_ Form filed by One Reporting Person
___ Form filed by More than One Reporting Person
(City) (State) (Zip)
Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned
1.Title of Security
(Instr. 3) 2. Transaction Date (Month / Day / Year) 2A. Deemed Execution Date, if any (Month / Day / Year) 3. Transaction Code
(Instr. 8) 4. Securities Acquired (A) or Disposed of (D)
(Instr. 3, 4 and 5) 5. Amount of Securities Beneficially Owned Following Reported Transaction(s)
(Instr. 3 and 4) 6. Ownership Form: Direct (D) or Indirect (I)
(Instr. 4) 7. Nature of Indirect Beneficial Ownership
(Instr. 4)
Code V Amount (A) or (D) Price
Common Stock 09/19/2006 S 3,716 D $ 33.73 10,329 D
Common Stock 09/19/2006 S 300 D $ 33.72 10,329 D
Common Stock 09/19/2006 S 332 D $ 33.71 10,329 D
Common Stock 09/19/2006 S 2,652 D $ 33.7 10,329 D
Common Stock 09/19/2006 S 200 D $ 33.67 10,329 D
Common Stock 09/19/2006 S 1,317 D $ 33.66 10,329 D
Common Stock 09/19/2006 S 1,000 D $ 33.65 10,329 D
Common Stock 09/19/2006 S 200 D $ 33.64 10,329 D
Common Stock 09/19/2006 S 283 D $ 33.63 10,329 D
Common Stock 1,870 (1) I By 401(k) Plan
Table II - Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned
( e.g. , puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
1. Title of Derivative Security
(Instr. 3) 2. Conversion or Exercise Price of Derivative Security 3. Transaction Date (Month / Day / Year) 3A. Deemed Execution Date, if any (Month / Day / Year) 4. Transaction Code
(Instr. 8) 5. Number of Derivative Securities Acquired (A) or Disposed of (D)
(Instr. 3, 4, and 5) 6. Date Exercisable and Expiration Date
(Month / Day / Year) 7. Title and Amount of Underlying Securities
(Instr. 3 and 4) 8. Price of Derivative Security
(Instr. 5) 9. Number of Derivative Securities Beneficially Owned Following Reported Transaction(s)
(Instr. 4) 10. Ownership Form of Derivative Security: Direct (D) or Indirect (I)
(Instr. 4) 11. Nature of Indirect Beneficial Ownership
(Instr. 4)
Code V (A) (D) Date Exercisable Expiration Date Title Amount or Number of Shares
Option (Right to Buy) $ 13.19 09/19/2006 M 10,000 (2) 01/29/2011 Common Stock 10,000 (3) 0 D
Explanation of Responses:
1. As of the most recently published account statement dated September 19, 2006, the Reporting Person beneficially owned 1,870 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the InterDigital Communications Corporation Savings and Protection Plan.
2. A grant of 10,000 options which vested as follows: 1,666 on each of 06/30/01 and 12/31/01; 1,667 on each of 06/30/02; 12/31/02; 06/30/03, and 12/31/03.
3. Granted pursuant to the InterDigital Communications Corporation 2000 Stock Award and Incentive Plan.
/s/ Rebecca Bridgeford Opher, Attorney-In-Fact for William C. Miller 09/21/2006
** Signature of Reporting Person Date
Reminder: Report on a separate line for each class of securities beneficially owned directly or indirectly.
* If the form is filed by more than one reporting person, see Instruction 4(b)(v).
** Intentional misstatements or omissions of facts constitute Federal Criminal Violations See 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 15 U.S.C. 78ff(a).
Note: File three copies of this Form, one of which must be manually signed. If space is insufficient, see Instruction 6 for procedure.
Persons who respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB Number.
_______________________________________________
Created by 10KWizard www.10KWizard.com
DD I congradulate you for your first post without touching the BOLD button
The guy who doesn't check the paper till tomorrow had the same opportunity to check the paper yesterday as you did, meaning he COULD HAVE sold if he read the same time you did. An insider who sells on news BEFORE he releases it to the press doesn't give US the same opportunity to act on the news as he has. That is the immoral part and that is why it is illegal.
What if I owned a company and I released news that I had the exclusive contract to supply bottle openers to all of the major league baseball parks. My stock takes off. I then find out that the commissioner decides to ban bottles from the park and sell cans only. he calls and cancels the contract. I go out and sell into the rally and you buy my stock. 2 days later I sell all of my stock and release the can news. Since I only make bottle openers, and MLB was my only customer, my stock dives. All 450 people that own my stock, you included, get the news at the same time and start to sell. All sell and the price goes into the thrown. I now decide that I am going to close the doors and retire. You, on the other hand, have to work the rest of your life cause you mortgaged the house to bye my stock that I was selling on insider news.
That logic is hosed. there is no such thing as a 'moral crime'. It is either against the law, which makes it criminal, or it is immoral, which makes it against good judgement and treatment of your fellow man. Only an amoral person can logically believe that insider trading is the 'right' thing to do morally. and yes, insider trading IS legally criminal as well.
yes he would. It is his way.
He wouldn't post repetitively if everyone would stop engaging him with replies. That and ignore would do wonders to help everyones complaints about him.
Agreed. How do you like the NICE rise in price today Art? You can tell who was on the sidelines today by who is pissin and moanin the loudest
My friend, I will HI FIVE with you all day long where IDCC is concerned. We just need to get away from this toilet cause there is a bad smell comin' from it. Need to call the plumber.
If I was paying monthly for this flogging of my investment I would cancel ihub for sure
And your point is????
on top of his head
Guess that hair grows back quick
Hell if I was an insider I would sell my shares as I see fit to meet the needs of my family and/or self.
not me.
I would sell just to pizz off the whiners
maybe this is the report that Ed is using for his boner play
Currently , IDCC stock is selling for $3.70 more than the Piper Jaffray IDCC Target price of $25.00 and Qualcomm stock is selling for $23.10 Under the Piper Jaffrey target price of $57.00
OD - The 'final product' that was produced is none other than one of m3s's bricks. a big enough one tied to the fish will take it right to the bottom.
A prototype was built from which changes were made before a final product was produced. The final product was tested in the field on giant seabass and goliath grouper. Fish captured and released with this device were shown to survive through the use of acoustic tagging and tracking.
Nokia was the first to create a magical substance. its called reindeershit. Olia smoked a loaf and came to the conclusion that he did not have to pay anyone for IPR. Since he found the magic substance, he has spread it around to several other CEOs with the same result.
OT Korean Scientists Create Magical Substance
Once you work on it, it becomes a part of you, something you never forget. She (the SR) served our country well for 4 decades.
the USSR was not very "friendly" to their own people, let alone anyone who fell from the sky. Powers has demons not many of us can even begin to imagine.
Good luck to your son or daughter that joined, and thank them for me for their time in service. Take care my friend.
Hook.. In the introduction to your post it said that the SR71 was a spy plane from the '60s. I worked on it in the 80s (84-88) we would launch the SR at the start of the our midnight shift and recover it at the end of our shift. in the 8 hrs it was gone it flew to the mid east took pictures and return. that was from California. It truely ws an amazing aircraft. For more information on the Blackbird look at this website. it is pretty good.
http://www.wvi.com/~sr71webmaster/sr-71~1.htm
http://www.habu.org/
http://www.wvi.com/~sr71webmaster/srlink~1.htm
Management did not "create" the top. Investors who panic when management sells created the top.
one of the 7 wonders of the world?
using my right to voice my opinion here. Your post reflects your Intelligent level to be somewhere between the cookie monster and jethroe clampet
Thanks olddog. Hopefully that is not what yesterday was about.
if someone acquired more than 5% of the shares, how long do they legally have before they have to declare it ?
I believe we defined this term a few weeks ago. Many is just another way of saying several
OT: Could you define "many" please?
"...meaning more than two, and less than many..."
Several latin - (a) more than you can fit in your pocket, but less than a shit load. (b) not quite a bunch (c) less than most people expect
THere is a suprise
disagreements between the companies centered around intellectual property rights
Agreed
No, I think Q will try to get more than that from NOK. By the way, you posted that on the wrong board. This is the IDCC board
0.01 % sounds like a fair royalty rate based upon the number of neccessary patents
song needs one change - his position should be doggie instead of short
(how's my song?)
got a link?
no popo, when he said several, YOU were expecting 4. HE could have meant 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 etc. Unless YOU get specifics you are only guessing.
Several latin - (a) more than you can fit in your pocket, but less than a shit load. (b) not quite a bunch (c) less than most people expect
Several latin - (a) more than you can fit in your pocket, but less than a shit load. (b) not quite a bunch (c) less than most people expect
AMS would be MUTT not mute
you could have said "yes, but lets wait till it's published to discuss it'" THAT would have been an honest response.
"He refused to answer the question" - didn't a poster here ask IDCC the same question and IDCC also "refused to answer the question", so was IDCC being "less than honest"?
Or, is it simply appropriate for proper publication to occur via the Proxy?
TIA,
Corp_Buyer
I believe that most folks who trade IDCC have always traded the ASM for a drop after the meeting. Sell into the meeting and buy 2 or 3 days latter for a few bucks less. or better yet, short before the meeting and take a couple of buck profit after. Earnings have been about the same. This year looks to be setting up for a trader breaker. It isn't acting the same as always. People are having to buy back in HIGHER than they expected, or cover at a loss. Can't say I haven't been waiting for this day to come. We may be approaching that magical time mschere always talks about when there are 10 retail and the rest institutional holders. Retail will get pushed out when they try trading and get stuck on the sidelines. It will be me and 9 others.
nice summation. The more input from different attendees the better picture those of us who were not there can get. Thanks to you and all the others that have shared their view of the ASM
So, do you have any citations from reputable independent sources to refute that annual elections for Directors favors shareholder value? If so, please post them for all to see and consider. If not, your opinion is duly noted.
I have no citations. Only life experience that allows me to spot sour grapes when I see them. Your agenda has been documented on this board for over 2 years now. You can find the citations outlining your agenda starting here
http://207.90.219.90/boards/profile.asp?User=16811
I found a typo in your post
from your post with the typo underlined and corrected in bold
Voting this year has the same meaning as last year:
YES NO = a vote in favor of shareholder value, reduced management entrenchment, increased Director accountability, increased shareholder alignment, and increased shareholder value in the event of offers to buy the company.
NO YES = a vote against shareholder value in favor of continued management entrenchment, continued lack of shareholder alignment, continued lack of Director accountability, and reduced shareholder value in the event of offers to buy the company.
Management is conflicted, so it is not about "supporting" management. This is a policy decision for the responsible and thinking owners of the company to make concerning our Board of Directors.
I anticipate that the corporate governance advisory firms such as ISS, our instutional investors, and our shareholders in favor of increased shareholder value will vote in favor of the shareholder proposal requesting annual elections of all Directors, because it is good policy, this year just as they did last year.
JMHO
It's OK for you to speak out but not me. I see. THAT is typical FAR left speak. The threat to freedom today comes from Islamo Fascism and communism. The far left is the home of communism today. Socialists who think they can do it better than those that came before them and failed. I for one do not wish to come under the rule of communist leaders nor religious rule of ANY kind. Far left nor far right. The likes of Gore, Dean and others of that control the Dem party worship a religion of their own. It's called the environmental and/or 'we only want to help you cause your too damn stupid to run your own life' cause. Why cant we build more nuke plants and drill for oil on our own land? those that say it's big oil need only look to who is preventing BIG OIL from getting the resources we have. China is going to drill off Cuba and wala, there goes the oil we should be getting to break our dependence. I and most conservatives love the outdoors and our planet. But we also live in a real world that says we all need to get along. we can take the resources we need in a way that is in harmony with nature. We need politicians with a backbone, we do not have that in either party today. As far as nukes go, if it wasn’t for the doom sayers of the 70’s we would not be where we are today. France and Japan both get more power from nukes that all other sources combined. Sit back and let the socialist party take over. Dems what your freedoms more that any other party in America today. They just have more practice dressing up a pig than the rest as a result of their power lock for the last 60 years. Please pass the lipstick.
26 out of 88 posts (30%) attributed to one sour poster. (his plus replies) not a bad ration, and all negative. I'd send him packing, but then there goes the advertizing $$$
I believe that will land you in the pokey. Money laundering is a felony.
OT. It's working fine for me. Maybe clean your cache.
FUD man working overtime this morning can only be good news. Someone has their tail caught under the short door.