Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"Examples include a material increase in asset composition" according to the OTC Markets self made rules. MCIC clearly filed a 205,285.00 increase in inventory and Ben publicly filed that they had purchases and sales. Attorney could write a letter to get MCIC current and if the attorney had really big balls? He could also tell OTC Markets to screw themselves, the horse they rode in on and the boy that watered that horse. "displays characteristics" of a shell? What if OTC Markets decides that not having a tranny on the bottle of beer they quote for a company in their market does not meet their absolute and sole discretion on not displaying a characteristic that they decide could be a shell risk? They can label any company on the OTC a shell risk? What if they decide they want tranny influences on those companies products at their sole and absolute discretion? They do hold all the keys to the city with their absolute and sole discretion on who gets a trading restriction with their shell risk BS flag.
I am looking for Ben to bitch slap them into understanding that MCIC is not a shell risk and I don't think his high paid lawyers seen this coming. But it's a game they play.
Here is the goal that many large shareholders set for Ben. Teach the bitches we are not a shell risk. And transform MCIC into one of the greatest OTC companies that existed.
OTC Markets gets to play games at it's "sole discretion" until Ben shows the cards. Hopefully he upsets them big time by showing them they are clueless. - "The Shell Risk designation indicates that a company displays characteristics common to Shell Companies. This designation is made at OTC Markets’ sole and absolute discretion based on an analysis of the company’s annual financial data and may differ from issuers’ self-reported shell classifications in their own public filings. Our analysis evaluates asset composition, operational expenditures, and income related metrics. No action is required by a company to perform the evaluation other than publishing current annual financial information.
In limited circumstances, OTC Markets will consider removal of a company’s shell risk designation upon written request by a company. Please be advised that such requests will only be considered when there has been a material change in financial condition since the most recent fiscal year-end that is reflected in publicly available interim financial statements. Examples include a material increase in asset composition or operating revenues with related financial disclosure as a result of an acquisition or change in control transaction."
https://www.otcmarkets.com/glossary#shell-risk
$MCIC - Sales = Bitcoin kinda move up.
Kinda like following the recipe when cooking, I always say it matters not because it all ends up going down the toilet anyway. WAIT. Bad analogy. Think of MCIC shares as bitcoin. In May 2010 Bitcoin was worth less than .01C. As people started to buy up Bitcoin they seen a small return on their money as price went up to 10 grand. Now, watch what happens when people buy everything on the ask for $MCIC. Same concept. Supply/Demand/Greed/Wealth/Profit - All relative.
HEY. 4 million on the ask at .0027. That creates a nice opportunity for someone to scoop up a nice little position in MCIC. It will be funny when someone takes that block from whatever idiot that thinks sub-penny is a good exit point here. Mr. .0027 - Don't hit your ass on the way out the door. (you are going to need that cash to stock up on extra booze for morning consumption)
Did you notice all the markets are bleeding red today but the little gem $MCIC is up 34.9% on low volume? I just made a note of that with my #2 pencil. As always, MCIC to the moon.
Only one MCIC shareholder is nasty enough to refer to Uranus everyday in an attempt to illegally manipulate the share price and volume down. Many feel that these kind of actions will lead to future criminal and civil charges against the individual. Other publicly traded companies have taken people to court for less brutal assaults and slander in the past.
Good afternoon. Eyes on MCIC!! Heat up in June?
I think they do it to manipulate the closing price based on buy orders they hide.
It was me. I needed the money. I had a free trade left from signing up for my brokerage account years ago. They rounded the trade up to .01c and I could not be more happy. Just joking. Who sells 1 share anyway?
Lots of nice talk on Twitter today............................
I think ALL MCIC shareholders should give management a special thanks. I will draft an appreciate letter with my #2 pencil. And get ALL of us on IHUB MCIC board to sign the appreciation letter. I can see the smiles and feel the love in the air.
I sure don't use much lead out of my #2 pencil making the list of MCIC investors that talk junk all day looking for cheap shares. I see one name on that list. GUYS - any clue?????????? Go, MCIC to the moon. Shout out to the great management at MCIC and Brahmarsk Corporation for working with them. Volume and PPS up a little today. Nice. $MCIC on watch.
$MCIC on watch for fillings, news, updates, BIG THINGS. MCIC - Only the best management can spend two plus years working on the business and personal money to save the company. Ben will soon be voted the best CEO of an OTC Company for 2023. I bet "everyone" would be excited about that. (Maybe not the ex-janitor from 10 years ago). HAHA
$MCIC - Don Kennedy Lewis Nicholas was a janitor that scrubbed toilets over 10 years ago at the office on Sherman's Highway. We think Ben fired this guy because he was eating food out of the trashcans he emptied. Major alcoholic and terrible crack addict. He had to be terminated and seems to still be upset with MCIC all these years later. Hopefully he still has the 100 shares he received as a Christmas bonus?
Instead of telling MCIC shareholders to have a great day. Just say "enjoy your next 24 hours". It's saying the same thing but it sounds much more cold. There are many different kinds of MCIC shareholders including male, female, transgender, gender neutral, non-binary, agender, pangender, genderqueer, two-spirit, third gender, and all, none or a combination of these.
But there is one shareholder that has been around for 10 years that is more strange than all the other types combined. :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(
I was informed this is a more comprehensive list to cover all MCIC shareholder types.
Androgyne
Androgynous
Bigender
Cis
Cisgender
Cis Female
Cis Male
Cis Man
Cis Woman
Cisgender Female
Cisgender Male
Cisgender Man
Cisgender Woman
Female to Male
FTM
Gender Fluid
Gender Nonconforming
Gender Questioning
Gender Variant
Genderqueer
Intersex
Male to Female
MTF
Neither
Neutrois
Non-binary
Other
Pangender
Trans
Trans*
Trans Female
Trans* Female
Trans Male
Trans* Male
Trans Man
Trans* Man
Trans Person
Trans* Person
Trans Woman
Trans* Woman
Transfeminine
Transgender
Transgender Female
Transgender Male
Transgender Man
Transgender Person
Transgender Woman
Transmasculine
Transsexual
Transsexual Female
Transsexual Male
Transsexual Man
Transsexual Person
Transsexual Woman
and
Two-Spirit
I agree. That feed was showing sales along those numbers. Anything close to that and BOOM!! I just put a checkmark by $MCIC with my #2 pencil. Checkmarks are my notes to flag a stock if it is going to da moon. Everyone knows the lonely voice of opposition against MCIC is nothing but an ex-spouse of a previous company officer or a very large shareholder that declared war against everyone connected to MCIC over 10 years ago. It must have been an ugly divorce to cause this much hatred against MCIC. They probably lost the divorce over them having an affair with those tall basket ball players we heard about and MCIC had nothing to do with that. Rumor has it they also lost 100 grand cash trying to flip after that Bioharp run. What idiots dumps all profits off a historic run back in on a maybe they the Bioharp back from Sam? We only know 1.
We all know "who" was behind the stunt. Drop the act. Not being able to flip MCIC shares with the mountain of trash talk does not warrant such cowardly attacks on a CEO at their personal property. Until any MCIC wants to loan the company 250,000 bucks like Ben did, they need to rethink about going to private property to cry like a baby.
I can only think of one MCIC shareholder that qualifies as that bad of scumbag. Ben has put over 1/4 of a million dollars into MCIC in the past few years. What gives this scumbag the right to say anything to Ben and especially at his home? I hope Ben cursed him out and told this idiot the facts of life.
Asked a chat bot (Bard) to write me the MCIC story. 2 seconds later this was the response. - "Ben was a man with a big dream. He wanted to create a billion dollar company that sold PPE products in bulk. He knew that this would be a challenge, but he was determined to make it happen.
Ben started by doing some research on the PPE industry. He learned that there was a growing demand for PPE products, especially in the healthcare and construction industries. He also learned that the market was dominated by a few large companies.
Ben knew that he would need to find a way to differentiate his company from the competition. He decided to focus on selling PPE products in bulk. This would allow him to offer his customers lower prices and better service.
Ben also decided to focus on quality. He only wanted to sell PPE products that met the highest standards. He knew that this would be important to his customers, especially those in the healthcare industry.
Ben started his company with a small loan from his parents. He rented a small office and hired a few employees. He also started working on building relationships with potential customers.
It took a few years, but Ben's company started to grow. He was able to land some big contracts with hospitals and construction companies. He also started selling his products online.
Ben's company continued to grow and eventually became a billion dollar company. He was able to achieve his dream and help millions of people by providing them with the PPE products they needed to stay safe.
Here are some of the key factors that contributed to Ben's success:
He had a big dream. Ben knew that he wanted to create a billion dollar company, and he was determined to make it happen.
He did his research. Ben took the time to learn about the PPE industry and the needs of his target customers.
He differentiated his company. Ben focused on selling PPE products in bulk, which allowed him to offer his customers lower prices and better service.
He focused on quality. Ben only wanted to sell PPE products that met the highest standards.
He built relationships with potential customers. Ben took the time to get to know his potential customers and understand their needs.
Ben's story is an inspiration to us all. It shows us that anything is possible if we have a big dream and are willing to work hard to achieve it.
2021 was reinstatement filing that spiked crazy volume for a few days. A large chunk of that 500 million for the year. The following years had a downward trajectory in volume as we seen them gear up for several new things based on websites and stuff. Now the 10 year chart is reset to .001-.002 to before 2021 levels. But that is based on hardly volume at all on an unchanged float. I think after all these years you were right in regards to what will happen here. Boom or bust. Go MCIC!!!!!
2023 27,476,896 (30,271 this week)
2022 82,920,325
2021 533,724,540
2020 104,291,876
2019 51,904,744
2018 82,305,766
2017 106,273,486
2016 139,355,100
2015 76,982,183
2014 161,467,904
The way I read it is OTC Markets gets to play judge, jury and executioner with the shell risk banner. They never outlines what metrics or how they decide if the shell is a risk. It opens the door for discrimination and corruption. Going current will not necessarily remove the shell risk. It was put on MCIC when it was current. OTC Markets now has a badge and a gun in the equities market. Yet, they are publicly traded themselves. Who monitors them and can put "shell risk" flag on them? I look for MCIC to have enough assets and revenue to warrant the removal of the shell risk flag.
I was just doing some Google searches on what exactly MCIC has to do to please "OTC Markets to remove the shell risk" and allow ALL brokerages to not having trading restrictions on an OTC stock. OTC Markets never outlined what metrics they used or intend to use on a company's filings to flag it as "shell risk". At it's "sole and absolute discretion?"
They can take their "Shell Risk" flag on MCIC and shove it up.....OTC Markets gets to play king of the hill with it's "sole discretion"? Is inventory enough or does Ben need revenue/profit/cash flow? Wait.... OTC markets gets to decide the fate of any OTC company at it's "sole discretion"? Maybe they like certain hookers as well? The way I read this is Ben could do 500 million a year and these bastards could say "you know guys, that's just not enough by our evaluation to..... not be a shell risk". Funny if shell risk is removed. - -
"As part of its ongoing review of companies, OTC Markets may designate a company with a shell risk flag, where it believes, in its sole and absolute discretion that a company displays characteristics common to shell companies. The designation does not indicate that a company has labeled itself as a shell (that would instead be a firm shell flag not a “shell risk”). The shell risk review includes evaluating asset composition, operational expenditures, and income related metrics. When a company receives a shell risk flag, it has the opportunity to provide evidence, including material changes in financial condition in publicly reported financial statements, to OTC Markets to request the removal of the flag"
HAHA - I have a BIG FAT GREEN crayon to make notes on MCIC. Like the color of cash green. Now, let's get the daily average volume up around 25 million and kick the PPS up multi-folds on the way to the moon. Sleeping giant is about to wake up and scream!!!! Ben did not buy inventory with his own cash "in hopes" of selling it. I bet it and more was already SOLD> Pure logic.
I got my #2 pencil and i just made a little note beside $MCIC - "To the Moon"!!!
That would be too funny considering MCIC has 11,433 documented public comments that can be used in a court of law under tortious interference with a publicly traded company. Specifically, libel and slander against not only the company but also the shareholders. It opens the door to an extreme risk in legal action being taken. Only thing that would probably help is - National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH): (866) 615-6464.
I did not realize that "trying" to manipulate the MCIC PPS down took sooooooooo much TIME and COMMITMENT? Try getting a puppy or something.
"That is the problem with this "company"/stock. - I would like to hear more. So, there is a problem with the company and stock???? Save us all. I am inspired to sell my MCIC shares and I sure hope the price don't go up. If it does, that CREATES an $MCIC class action lawsuit against the individual who manipulated innocent MCIC shareholders into selling their shares at devalued levels. I hope the individual that scammed MCIC shareholders into selling is also a licensed financial advisor but that is not going to matter so much as they are clearly committed securities fraud anyway. Also, MCIC can easily get the identity and start the first legal action against the individual that has orchestrated and executed a 10 year libel / slander campaign against a publicly traded company. OOOOOPS. Maybe they should have stopped on year 8? MCIC to the moon and MCIC shareholders stand to gain on legal action against the 10 year libel / slander campaign. I wonder if the defendant will want to settle or take a summary judgement. Maybe a few "failure to appear" warrants? Watch out for security cameras? That facial recognition reports those with warrants.
Yes. The class action lawsuit would require that the defendant would have to travel to dozens of different court rooms all around the country. MCIC shareholders could take all the public info in place and it would be a slam dunk for libel/slander against the defendant. That in return was a ruthless and deliberate attempt to devalue the share price. Next, regulatory agencies pull the trading records and start a criminal investigation as the libel / slander was done publicly to manipulate the share price down for the defendant to buy MCIC shares. So, when MCIC is above a dime soon, I know several MCIC shareholders that are whales. And they are not going to have anything better to do than shove lawsuits so far up the defendant's anus that all the jokes about the planets are going to be funny. MCIC to the moon and lawsuits up the defendants anus for libel / slander. Sounds like a substantial development to me. GO MCIC. Push on that!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anyone seen the relentless attack on the corporation, previous management, current management, note holders, and shareholders of $MCIC? MCIC starts a lawsuit against this and opens the Door for each shareholDer to join a class action suit. That means the DefenDent must travel to each state and county that every shareholDer is at anD have a lawyer to defenD them. KInDa funny. But this has happeneD on other occasions with corporation besiDes MCIC. Just think of the cost of traveling to say 38 states and needing a Defense attorney each time? It would be 6 figures in just legal expenses. Libel/SlanDer is taken seriously in civil suits. Even if the attacker won the case??? Cost of legal Defense anD time in court!!!!! GO MCIC. And GO MCIC shareholders. Time to have fun.
Thanks. The writing is on the wall. This is about to change fast. I love that the chart is back to 10 year low PPS levels. One spark of volume and get luck catching this one when it runs.
It is easy to see all 3 are coming. I do not think Ben would have just dropped another 200K cash into the company for this inventory on a "maybe they can sell it". That product had to be already sold. Now, had he brought in 2K or 20K inventory to put on a shelf? I don't know the margins on selling gloves in bulk? But this is not a bad "first order" if my "pre-sold" theory is correct. I am in the import business some myself. You have got to have it sold or know you can sell it. I was really glad to see them purchase inventory. Something is finally going on.
They have been quiet lately in regards to news. Obviously there has been developments recently. I think we will hear about it soon.
That is exactly what I think. I think that is a very accurate and excellent way to examine and outline the facts from the public filings. Thanks for spelling it out. And have the opinion that Ben did not tie up 200K of his own cash in hopes that maybe someone would buy the inventory he purchased. Also, I have the opinion that there will be much more to follow than 200 grand in product to be sold. No one starts a business with the expenses he already had in it with hopes to just sell this initial batch of inventory. I am thinking this is the most positive development in a decade. 200K is not a large number but every business had to start somewhere. I remember the first 20 bucks a company that I started generated in revenue. Since then it has done 15 to 20 million in revenue. But it started with me having inventory and a customer buying something for 19.99 to be specific. That being said, I damn sure did not start that business with purchasing 200K in inventory because I had zero cash initially. I purchased a few hundred dollars worth of inventory and grew it into something much larger.
This is not rocket science people. It's just the basics of starting a business.
How much dilution in share structure over the last decade with MCIC with this so claimed shell games?
I think that person made money back in that day on MCIC. But instead of locking in some of the profits and bringing the cash home? They went all back in and tried to get insider info. Story was that it was 96% loss.
Do you remember Dshell's trading history in MCIC? And specifically how that worked out for the individual based on his false insider info? Only about 15 years ago.
I think it would be a good idea to agree with that post and buy MORE $MCIC shares if it could scare anyone to selling. Boo. Halloween is a long ways off.