Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm sensing a fur-ball coming on.
HhH
the magnitude within which the current blather surrounding N-scub, and that of others using Infineons KTM etc is numbing.
it sounds like another version of the "*ONLY* level 5 smart card reader"
24601 likes to smuggly opine, "so where's Corvadis ..."
uhhhh, "so Where's wave?, ye withering savant"
they've got another "*ONLY*" solution.
(From the folks that are cronically incapable of truth or accuracy).
Maybe they do, and maybe my next roll of the dice will be box cars, but not one cent of all this "dd" and "contacting the company" sheds a single photon of light on the matter.
dd and company contacts are credibility challenged.
I am dig space, and I have spoken.
Matt, do you and I have the same secretary?
Well I recon that is the best I can hope for.
Hi MAtt,
it's me again, are you making any progress on the consideration of my case?
24601:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2846496
I am not orda. Above was in response to:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2846428
I am not guvna.
and on further edit: you have a remarkable ability to ignore the content of the majority of oids in order to prattle about my few posts a week. It speaks very poorly towards your balance and candor.
additional edit, if you let me post again matt, I promise I will ignore the freeking 24601 windbag
this edit is too much fun!! did I forget anything?
Oh yea, Susie, you're about as funny as a tree stump.
24601, you dwell way too much on Spin's exaggeration of his sell point. In fact at real time he said he dumped in high mid threes, not fours ... but its all about undermining the witness to you. Snackman swore on his family ... oh yea, you wouldn't want to go there would you. And of course you were certain that you didn't ... oh lets forget it.
There are going to be mistakes. Some people acknowledge them (me) some people don't (you).
Was that clear or should we drag in malagagalulu.
Not a cult. Not a cult at all!
HhH, puulease tell me I wasn't sneering
Sorry matt,
Here’s the translation
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2842237
an original ref:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2841635
relating to:
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=WAVX&read=411600
the affirmation:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/replies.asp?msg=2842237
and then the grand synthesis:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2846428
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2845612
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2846496
Wowza!
PS geez matt, the whole freeking planet is hugely happy you allow such serious stock talk to flourish unfettered.
PPS Sorry Howie, you are funny, but the truth is much much funnier.
PPPS and I actually made money on this run, all on place and forget GTCs. I love the predictability of this thingy. (sorry I couldn’t help it)
Holy Barf Bags Matt,
will you not let anyone offer sense?
This is the tripe (or should I say trip) from the land of the loyal DD superslueths aka Snacult ...
"Malagulu say jambo for all rafiki. Kaianaga Kaoanaga and for Fay Wray have for mapendano. Malagulu say for more kubwa tumbili come down for mountain for mapendano for Fay Wray. Malagulu say mlima come for villages.
Malagulu say for long suffering villagers, zito hufuata jepesi."
THREE have posted it and ONE has even, get this, TRANSLATED IT.
You know what it means?
It means MSFT is dropping its next major Windows release and ceding that space to Wave in a new partnership.
Not a cult. Not a cult at all. Not a facilitator. Not a facilitator at all.
Again, pass me the bag, me’s got barfin’ to do.
Seriously matt,
I've cooled down, I don't want to post that often, but would like to be able to chime in ... (usually it seems during my incarceration) ... in integrating disparate views or otherwise organizing those views for proper dissection.
ditch me in a heart-beat if I even trend towards trouble.
Matt,
I'm into self-help.
Matt,
What do I have to do to get out of here?
chowderhead, no doubt about your comments:
"I only post once in a while"
your 35 posts in the last 5 days surely makes you as rare as the dodo
PS HhH, not only is the detritus around here a reincarnation of anti-humor, the folks are at least as deluded as voids.
Precious.
And matt is off the cliff with you, although, my dig space moniker which was established within the TOU, posted within the TOU and never ever wandered outside the TOU is, well, just another example.
Matt is about collecting steak dinners. If he thinks TOSing you buys more steaks, he goes for it.
He'll change his mind (with you) ... but me ... well, I'm here for good.
i.e., at some point Howie = more steaks.
Hi Matt,
we don't talk much, 'cept my occasional petition for release, few and far between these days ...
but, o.k., fry her.
I would tell you why but I might tend towards the politcal, and I'm trying to enforce self-discipline in hopes of serving my time and getting out some day.
dig space BTK
ahh zen,
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2579828
it was, of course, non other than Mr. Peter Sprague, former CEO, former Chairman, and current CEO of Esspress. (you think the other 89% of revs came from the Ukrainian gambit, of you figure its the porn bit on TVTonic?)
How many downloads was that of TVTonic during the porn hyps, like 20 thousand?? That works out to about a nanosecond per subscriber.
Freeking gobbling the stuff up.
Folks need continuity in their hype and PR fantasies.
Somebody needs to put Monday's statement and Friday's in the same ... 'cept Matt is kinda not in the mood for that sorta thing right now.
no problem tony,
seems the CC is pretty sure to be dismal back-peddling as
1. the lead time to announcement of the CC was unusually short
2. i see no juicy leaks short of the phantom blah blah
3. SKiSS generall rolls out a nice puff PR to distract the faithful in the 48hours preceeding.
all points to an absoultely dismal rehash of how happy Wave is with the direction thingy.
Haven't seen much of howie, but I'm not around much myself so if its not directed to me, I likely don't see it in these parts.
I check iHubWavx about every 2 days to see what the flavor of the half-week is.
I'm glad somebody finally amended the prevailing wisdom of DD=daft delusions into something a little more concrete.
DD, to me, is:
1. Is the company what it says it is?
2. Do they have what they say they have?
3. Have they done what they've said they'd do?
4. Are their financials prettier than a train wreck?
DD says no to Wave more often than yes. This is not a DD stock. It is a speculative *possibilites* gamble.
Egos require it masquerade as DD.
WAVX revs will be circa 20K for Q4'03. /e
HhH,
Barge really should be played by Ron Jeremey.
Billy Connely can do Spin.
The notion of Peter Falk as Snacks is outright appalling. I know Homer Simpson is not a real person, but still a good insert for Snackman. Honest (at least he thinks he is) decent (at least he thinks he is) and smart (at least he thinks he is).
Sean Connery and Hugh grant have both been pestering me to get them place in this obvious block buster. Neithewr of them are either funny enough or tragic enough for a lead role IMO.
Howie,
So churak's use of "ie" (sic)(shouldn't that be "i.e." )instead of what he meant (e.g.) was all part of a professorial ruse?
Geez, I'll never ascend to the level of the savants here.
I was thinking Samuel L. Jackson as Spin ... I know, you think I've lost my mind ... or one can gender bend and go with Geena Davis (which is really a direct hit, 'cept that Spin is defininely a man's man.)
Which makes me think, Jamie L Curtis could play SPIN, my understanding is she is actually a XY genotype with a defunct testosterone receptor which usually results in outward she people with big breasts (infertile hence "her" adoptions).
Have I begun to wander here?
Alan Alda simply must appear in the flick. Alda could do SPIN, but then bargey is left uncast.
Who was that nose dude in Streets of S.F.?
Maybe Bill Cosby is bargey, and Spin gets the glamor role by Tom Cruise (after Cruie lifts a few weights).
This is hard work, I can't believe you took it on, and I thought unclever had a tough job.
churak, as the leader of people that you clearly are ...
Was it my failure to segregate a noun in direct address with a comma that culminated in your "shitforbrains" and "asshole" diatribe, or did somebody abscond with your donuts?
Don't let me get you down, there are plenty here to launch a sunshine enema your way on your every oh-so-clever guffaw.
Survey question of the day:
Did Matt hire a head-hunter to track down such quality rabble as churak?
HhH, lemme guess, that comes across as sneering?
Should I step up my game and pheign a phunny phart?
howie,
you are really pissing me off, I want to be William Dufoe ... the bloke can sneer with the best of them (but alas, he like Penn did Madonna ...so we are both casting me as a Madonna-Shagger, fancy that!)
I had barge as Ed Asner, but realized Snacks was a better fit for the amazing wit-bag Asner is (you see that is rhythm bargey, you've lost even your timing) (or should I say "you're" just to give the jailbirds some feeling of intellect?). Barge is the self absorbed screaming humour that was only funny before the screaming started ... hence, hands down, bargey is Alan Alda.
(edit: but please don't cast french bikini as madonna or vice versa, she is such a bitch, ... but xam321??? )
or should I say visa versa to please the brain trust in lee and give the phresh pholks some phun (they are soooo cleaver)
Matt, a case in point:
“internet” reflects in the following post
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2453775
that NSM agreements are worth more per unit than INTC agreements. As I do not know anybody that is aware of the per unit value of either of the agreements, I would like to briefly explore that with “internet”
quote as follows:
“2) NSM...Our agreements with NSM are worth MORE (per unit) than our deal with INTEL.”
On the flip side, and in the same post, there lies a restatement of what is obviously a very bullish observation by “doma”.
3) … "find from the weekend regarding TOSHIBA is the FIRST salvo..."
(the find being that Toshiba refers to Wave products as Toshiba copyrights in their TPM software support suite).
I’m not the devil matt, give me three a day. O.K.?
Matt, could we please cut the crap,
I would like limited posting status.
Please delete this account (dig space), reactivate my old account (BTK), and afford me 3 posts a day to talk stocks.
I simply do not have the time or the energy to be a dickhead anymore and will conform to the requirements ... or you'll have my head.
Sincerely,
BTK / Dig Space.
keV, HhH
keV, mix in a coupla thumps, tis always a pleaser.
HhH, easy to miss, what with the message decay rate being just a wee bit faster than a strange quark.
and Howie, I just LOVe this other site the cadcam hype venue sponsered by the cadcam "journalist" oh geez, but more imporessive, look at the names.
you've got countryboy, telstarjohn, wildman, xam321, bigtim, even a steve r ... all the old favorites lining up to sign in (though they ain't been posting) this is the gang from the Priority One E-mail List (seriously Matt, not that you are reading, but what the hell is *that* about)
and barge took a bruising over here (not for *what* he posted as stated by Snackman, but really for *where* he posted it.
Me oh my.
Matt, for what its worth I never multialias posted even though it seems that is why I am here. I requested to have an account closed, waited a month and then opened a different one.
Your TOU states using aliases at the same time.
that aside, I think I found what you've got against btk ...
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: BTK who wrote msg# 12808
Date:10/6/2003 8:37:06 AM
Post # of 12837
OT, end of participation,
my security has been breeched.
I have received what I perceive to be number of threatening communications from what most loyalists in this neck of the woods would consider to be a decent an upstanding leader in this venue.
This decent and upstanding leader wins. Their intimidation is successful. I lack what I consider to be the disposable resources to adequately pursue and prosecute what I feel to be a clear violation of the laws oven my nation and community of residence.
It doesn't matter here. Wave means, all. Even the "moral leader" (my emotion now is that words have never been more abused WEBY!!!) has called for and condoned this behaviour.
So who cares if I feel my babies are threatened, weby feels his investment is threatened and calls for no-holes-barred investigations. But it doesn't matter; weby has likely had a fine tea with he whom I believe to violate the laws of his state and mine. It doesn't matter to weby anymore, its all about, in weby's words, "a legitimate right to protect one's investment." I guess his kids are pretty old and he doesn't worry about them. O.K. so his grandchildren might be young, but weby has an investment to worry about and the grandkids seem cute enough.
There was somebody that could have spoken about this INVESTIGATION trend running through WAVX. And that person did. That person was Weby. And Weby said he thought it was a decent and lawful thing to do. Moral leaders have their chances. Some walk away, some stand up, and some vote their pocket-books.
This pocket-book voting has emboldened, in my opinion, Andreas W. Kuhn to behave in a manner I find to be personally threatening. I am in the process of collating and securing all commutations that I believe Mr. Kuhn has ever had with anybody as far as I can discern, and am similarly making similar archives of all individuals that are providing haven, establishing venues, or otherwise colluding or participating in what I perceive to be personally threatening behaviour towards me and my family, and behaviour which is in clear violating of the laws where I live.
I am certain, and have real clarification that AN individual attempting to identify themselves to me as A.W.Kuhn has, without a doubt, clearly participated in a violation of law in order to harass me.
Pick your friends people, but pick them now.
I feel certain that weby, snackman, and the collective rif-raf of wavoids o-certainty will line up with awk ... I'm just wondering if they are doing it because they have participated in what I perceive to be a clear and absolute violation of the law, and find strength in numbers, or whether he just seems friendly at an SHM.
Btu who cares, you got rid of me. Its all about community and all views welcome.
Bye-bye.
But, I have, and will continue to keep notes.
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: awk who wrote msg# 12811
Date:10/6/2003 8:47:05 AM
Post # of 12837
Awk, I fully accept it could be an Imposter,
so ...
what's your wife/partner's name?
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: waverider who wrote msg# 12812
Date:10/6/2003 8:49:10 AM
Post # of 12837
waverider, you don't think I've lost it ...
You NEED to think I've lost it.
Sort yourself out, deal with threat with apparently clearly identifiably source names, and then talk to me about losing it.
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: awk who wrote msg# 12814
Date:10/6/2003 8:51:52 AM
Post # of 12837
andy, then it goes like this:
one of your long buddies (or a long that is not your buddy)
IS DOING THAT!!
Given the general demeanor of your content towards me, and the hugely pro-investigation zealous nature of the snackman-weby tandem, you will forgive me if I'm somewhat skeptical.
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: BTK who wrote msg# 12817
Date:10/6/2003 8:53:48 AM
Post # of 12837
so again awk, what is your wife/partner's name?
And trust me, I have permanent, backed up 4 times a day records!
Real records, governement records.
Just in case you can't tell, I am really pissed off.
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: bowWAVE who wrote msg# 12820
Date:10/6/2003 8:57:34 AM
Post # of 12837
bowWave,
you are scum. be that known (if only for a millisecond).
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: awk who wrote msg# 12821
Date:10/6/2003 9:02:31 AM
Post # of 12837
awk, I am in a mood now,
some cleaver ass has nailed my personals, I believe it came from here, I believe, some component of Snackman's access and indescretion is central and pivotal, and I am really really pissed off.
Go to hell bowWave. You appear to satnd in support, seems a good place to start.
A bunch of two-bit wimps that can't take a bit of criticism about their beloved Wave.
Weby leads, and the investigation follows.
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: waverider who wrote msg# 12823
Date:10/6/2003 9:06:30 AM
Post # of 12837
waverider, you fool,
not on this board, something MUCH more closer to home.
What a freaking idiot you are, I've been in mudfights "here" for YEARS (like about 20) and they have never showed up at home.
My personal feeling is that awk is lying.
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: awk who wrote msg# 12827
Date:10/6/2003 9:12:31 AM
Post # of 12837
awk, I as well, I believe that it is a reasonable possbility that colusion betwen you and Snackman has breeched mypersonal details and resulted in such harrassment.
But heck, perhaps anybody could be using "awkuhn"
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: None
Date:10/6/2003 9:15:55 AM
Post # of 12837
this is the dirt-bagism that Snackman recruits and encourages,
that is all there is to it, matt will of course delete all content to protect his bottom line.
snackman has alreadyt stated and demonstrated that he supprts such action.
Voids will be happy becuase matt will delte BTK giving all a happy end to participation.
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: Doma who wrote msg# 12830
Date:10/6/2003 9:20:05 AM
Post # of 12837
doma, I'm sensitive about what I consider a threat, which may be why some are running and hiding.
But laws are laws, and personal details of mine that must have been accessed were simply not legaly available.
In the end I see Snackman.
He is after all that the bloke that clearly fabricated this Hitler E-mail nonsense (and what was it, he couldn't give the ID of the sender becasue of forumn rules but that the sender called him "Snakeman" with me being the only person I know that has done so, of course he was posting liberally at venues where he could name, calling the disclamer into serious doubt ...)
Slime, but duck short of prosecutable libel.
Pick your friends. I know who yours are.
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: Mbledug Dewe who wrote msg# 12836
Date:10/6/2003 9:26:21 AM
Post # of 12837
mudbug, get away. In thisw place moral and managerial leaders like weby and Snackman have turned the wrokl on its head. Normally I would agree with you. But not here.
Posted by: BTK
In reply to: None
Date:10/6/2003 9:36:48 AM
Post # of 12839
This approach reminds me of Yasser Arafat,
and the way the blke claims to not edorse violence,
occupies a role of leadership,
and then feigns bewilderment when the well cultivated mob attacks.
Weby should do the decent thing and ask his alma matter to recind his degree.
Snackman should do the decent thing, ... and, well, what does one do with the likes of a Snackman?
Matt,
Was that to me?? I mean you do KNOW that I am also HhH (as verified by board moderators at a variety of sites).
I too, however, will decline the offer and simply petition for 3 posts a day out of jail.
Gee Matt, you have variably demoted or jailed those that badgered me in the first place (although you will note that dig space never did a TOU violation).
So what do you say, 3 posts?
dig
geez howie,
Oh how the callous hand of the casting director can turn a rib-slurper like myself into an anaemic Marlboro-boy is a fate hard to handle.
You know, I was thinking of begging for a reprieve from Matt based on the TOSing of the moderator, awk, and others in the last interval … but me thinks Matt really actually detests me. I think that makes it Matt, KeV, Snack, Awk, and ButtFlossHyper (FB) that really seam to think I’m a true POS. I’m sure there are others but I would hate to trample on their wit. He (Matt) kinda likes you though , ah … but don’t we all?
Fact is Matt doesn’t have a tou-viol on me, and I’d be happy to reach any sort of agreement, but talking to a wall is only good for a few chapters.
The cult has transcended, Snack has a secret board that he says everybody is welcome to view (well, ‘cept for the secret part) , a subtlety similar to the published notion that Milberg wins or forces settlement in 80% of its cases. Can that be true? So much for “most of these things just go away”. I’m not going to say that Snack and Awk are handling this like a couple of snivelling Marlboro-boys … that would strike to close to home
Its starting to smell like a Wave exec insider blew it and used “embed” off the record, and if so they lose. All of course, IMHO. And I Could Be Wrong. But Milberg has bigger phish to phry (see Matty!! … I did the jail-jig!!!!, yawn, … I know, its really cleaver , but … yawn.)
Adious.
HhH,
it was MATT's statements that indicated
membership = steak dinners. he reinstated somebody on some board becuase they bought a membership and that was buying him a steak dinner.
if you think matt does this for free, there are a few things my mouse would like to teach you.
(to chowder)
and obviously, wavx is a mega-cult, and chowderhead cites edig (perhaps unaware that the chief proponent of edig was joe trippi, the chief proponent of wavx was joe trippi, and the campaign manager for dean IS joe trippi) ... i have long thought that trippi was the KOD (seriously, wasn't it gary hart and walter mondale on his cv.?, and then wavx and then edig??) trippi has skills, but the distance between trippi and the pulse is HUGE.
so spare me the edig comparison clam-man
matt KNOWS (not sure how the last one posted)
that snackman is by far the most biased and least balanced of all of his board leaders.
matt also doesn't give a hoot, snackman brought a lot of paid subscribers to this place.
steak diners count, reasonable debate does not.
I STILL HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD OF MY TOU VIOLATION.
i suspect that staying on topic and not insulting people is not allowed on the wavx board. matt has a new recipe for lots of beef, and it involves facilitating some truly poor exuses for stock discussion. yea, sure, there are those that want to discuss stocks, but you can't believe what one can make facilitating a tabloid.
there are two things matt and snack agree on, dumb worlds full of due paying followers.
how can you blame them?
people LIKE it.
this is the "Running Man" of stock message boards, only because they feign legitimacy. ... i suspect matt likes horseradish with his prime rib.
he'd like to thank the voids directly, but, well, the facade of balance must be maintained.
i offer for evidence a random selection of my last posts ... the stuff of disruption it is argued I am simple grabbing the last post and then every third post before that (1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 etc.) this is what put me here ... then visit the rubbish on the "wavx" board (it occasionally wanders towards wavx and away from snackman with his pompoms and oh-so-awful skirt, but rarely so)
balanced debate brings new steak dinners ... so let's run with it.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1890146
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1889892
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1889774
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1889559
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1888787
the last post is an important one, again, plurality of discussion does not exist, you censored the poster of post #1888787 from the wavx board because you believe that individual may have posted under a different self-terminated alias in the past (non of which is a tou violation.
Yawn,
So how’s the steak?
and yes, i have learned that the notion of the jailhouse as a vetting ground is …. well, somewhat contrived at best.
matt KNOWS (not sure how the last one posted)
that snackman is by far the most biased and least balanced of all of his board leaders.
matt also doesn't give a hoot, snackman brought a lot of paid subscribers to this place.
steak diners count, reasonable debate does not.
I STILL HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD OF MY TOU VIOLATION.
i suspect that staying on topic and not insulting people is not allowed on the wavx board. matt has a new recipe for lots of beef, and it involves facilitating some truly poor exuses for stock discussion. yea, sure, there are those that want to discuss stocks, but you can't believe what one can make facilitating a tabloid.
there are two things matt and snack agree on, dumb worlds full of due paying followers.
how can you blame them?
people LIKE it.
this is the "Running Man" of stock message boards, only because they feign legitimacy. ... i suspect matt likes horseradish with his prime rib.
he'd like to thank the voids directly, but, well, the facade of balance must be maintained.
i offer for evidence a random selection of my last posts ... the stuff of disruption it is argued ... i am simply grabbing the last post and then every other post before that (1, 3, 5 etc.) this is what put me here ... then visit the rubbish on the "wavx" board (it occasionally wanders towards wavx and away from snackman with his pompoms and oh-so-awful skirt, but rarely so)
balanced debate brings new steak dinners ... so let's run with it.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1890146
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1889892
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1889774
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1889559
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1888787
the last post is an important one, again, plurality of discussion does not exist, you censored the poster of post #1888787 from the wavx board because you believe that individual may have posted under a different self-terminated alias in the past (non of which is a tou violation.
Yawn,
So how’s the steak?
and yes, i have learned that the notion of the jailhouse as a vetting ground is …. well, somewhat contrived at best.
matt KNOWS
that Snackman is by far the most biased and least balanced of all of his board leaders.
matt also doesn't give a hoot, snackman brought a lot of paid subscribers to this place.
steak diners count, reasonable debate does not.
I STILL HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD OF MY TOU VIOLATION.
*cause there aren't any, short of a very very brief tirade when I and my family were personally attacked by some version of Snackman's henchman*
There are two things Matt and Snack agree on, dumb worlds full of due paying followers. How can you blame them?
Matt, when and how can I get out of the Jailhouse?
hi mikey, seems you invest in true barf bags,
that is something i can respect.
this is the best argument to dump Wave i have seen in some time.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2104612
not that i would go into it among grandfathered inmates.
hi matt, what do you want to hear?
Matt, o.k.,
so you are ignoring me.
wiser people have done sillier things.
its seems my last two deals didn't make the grade.
here's my thrid offer:
i'll try not to be a butthead
matt, o.k.
i am really really sorry for breaking the decorom,
i got threats and i freaked out.
it is with fortune that i have my current employer and such threats are more or less automatically pursued without so much as even bringing my supervisor into the loop. i believe the situation to have been satisfactorily resolved. i am not privy to those details however. the persistant presence of certain individuals and their willingness to continue to hate my colleague, btk, indicates that they are not likely the principals ... and i am beyond checking on motivators and their ilk.
so all is clear matt, as the feline voice of a 6 year investor and a former most-valued loyal-long type ...
can i get 3-a-day and within any posted day requiring a durable post on the recipe board (i.e. meeting the recipe rules) and NO posts on the wavx board
meow
p.s., seriously i really did freak out, but you weren't even close to booting me before that. i think you yanked one message, and on appeal asked for a toning down of 10% of the message that involved more inflamatory and confrontational rhetoric. and i did that. and it worked. and then some bastard went after me. and i went all men-in-black.
you can't possibly think anybody feels more the fool for losing it than i do, correct?
three posts. i want to post twice on alea's board and one on the recipe board.
good heavens matt,
you will definitely wear me down,
it seems to me you are totally out of sorts with yourself that my colleague btk asked to be removed from this forumn, and i'm thinking you should get over it.
but that's beside the point as i cannot impose any sensibility on you on that matter.
so, how about this as a deal:
1. as per the first proposed deal, i will not post on the wavx board as that is clearly where i and my colleague have a problem
2. i request 3 posts a day
and 3
3. on any day that i post i will contribute at least 1 post to the recipe board. i may not have manners, but i can cook. (and it cuts my posts in any other space down to 2! on any given day).
seriously, i'm spooky-good in the kitchen.
gee matt,
how bout i post like cpa? can i get three a day?
cpa, my experience is matt can't be bothered
to cite a tou violation or provide a path towards egress from this den of so many grandfathered luminaries.
so it goes.
derf, you seem pleased by the third definition,
know that i used it (as exemplified by context) as definition 2.c.
fan·tas·tic ( P ) Pronunciation Key (fn-tstk) also fan·tas·ti·cal (-t-kl)
adj.
1. Quaint or strange in form, conception, or appearance.
2.
a. Unrestrainedly fanciful; extravagant: fantastic hopes.
b. Bizarre, as in form or appearance; strange: fantastic attire; fantastic behavior.
c. Based on or existing only in fantasy; unreal: fantastic ideas about her own superiority.
3. Wonderful or superb; remarkable: a fantastic trip to Europe.
thanks derf,
although i am likely errant in my use of "venue" from your perspective,
i can safely say that my colleague btk posted in the wavx venue (on any board) from 1998 to 2003 as, variable due to the functionality of various accounts as:
ByTorKing and then the big switch which i'm sure fooled everybody ... ByTorKings ... get it!!! by using the "s" they lost my trail, and as the first was signed BTK and the second was signed BTKs ... i did the ultimate in identity switching ... i came here and used BTK !!! ohhhhh, such a crafty charlatan btk is.
my opinions at RB re:wavx mean nothing with repsect to my opinions at SI re:mo (e.g.) that, to me, constitutes a venue change, but talking to the same 'oids regardless of the space requires the use of the same identifying moniker. i have adhered to that at a number of different boards.
if you think that is running from board to board (5.5 years as btk) then my colleague is guilty as charged.
perhaps you should consider that your fantastic conclusions and fantasies about who and what people are in presumably the non-"real world" of message boards is only that, a fantastic fantasy.
most folks are more real that you think.
do you get this rubbish from matt?