matt KNOWS
that Snackman is by far the most biased and least balanced of all of his board leaders.
matt also doesn't give a hoot, snackman brought a lot of paid subscribers to this place.
steak diners count, reasonable debate does not.
I STILL HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD OF MY TOU VIOLATION.
*cause there aren't any, short of a very very brief tirade when I and my family were personally attacked by some version of Snackman's henchman*
There are two things Matt and Snack agree on, dumb worlds full of due paying followers. How can you blame them?
The above content is my opinion.