Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Latest from Penny Stock Chaser
Before taking the pro forma shots at PSC for being a paid promotional/pump service remember that just as even paranoids have real enemies, so to do pumper services sometimes call winners. Measure what they say by what you think you know and make your own decisions.
"The stars are aligned .This could be a monster week for ACLH
ACLH was alerted by PSC nearly two weeks ago. PSC jumped on top of this move and bought stock alongside our members. We are still hugely long on the stock.
Any members who are following ACLH have been making a bundle. All the pullbacks have been met with new buying.
Volume was especially heavy this week starting on Wednesday.
The market is holding it's breath and waiting for possible contract news in regards to the cleanup of the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
On Friday ACLH closed up 27.7% @ .06 on Friday on volume of over 50 million shares. The intraday chart on ACLH is very interesting. You will notice that the volume really spiked up @ around 2:30 PM. This buying @ the end could be shorts covering, it could be a leak of news, or it could just be anticipation.
Anyway you cut it, someone was buying a ton of stock and PSC thinks that buying should carry into Monday.
The technical outlook for ACLH really has us dreaming of big profits. www.stockta.com says the last resistance point is .06. If the stock can crush this resistance point on Monday we could be in for something very special.
This stock is perfect for anyone who has experience in the penny game. It seems to bounce well on pullback for traders. It seems to be anticipating a big contract which is good for speculators. Lastly, it is setting up as a great long term play for investors. If ACLH is successful in landing a deal for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill clean up, the stock could make large holders very wealthy.
PSC is looking for news this week. All that volume is not an accident. When news comes it will be like a bomb going off.
We want everyone to remember that there are no guarantees when you buy any stock. That being said, investors want to make sure the deck is stacked in their favour. ACLH is one of the rare situations where that is case. This disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is of historic proportions and ACLH is one of the solutions to the problem.
Our chances to make big money on ACLH are extremely good but do your own due diligence and make you sure you can pocket profits.
If ACLH happens to be one of those rare homerun stocks, you shouldn't kick yourself. If it doesn't, you will be happy you sold.
As for PSC , we are fully committed and we will see this one through to the end."
"Might and could are almost the same."
But neither of them are even close to "is imminent".
I do have a balanced viewpoint, I'm just not overweighting the possible negatives nor fighting the pps trend.
"There is an imminent r/s coming sometime which could cause a selloff."
There MIGHT be a r/s coming. That's what has been in dispute on this board since Friday night. So you now have a 'might' to accompany your 'could'.
There might also be a contract with BP announced at any moment and there might be confirmation that a previously scheduled r/s is no longer in play. Just saying that there's as much of a chance that things will unfold exactly the opposite of what you fear and that holding through to clarity, or adding to your position if pps backs off, may be the best course of action.
Considering how trading days have recently gone for ACLH, adding on the dip, if and when, may be THE best course of action.
"Well i know the R/S is coming."
"Its just so scary not being absolutely sure of anything..."
What should scare you is your inability to maintain a consistent
train of thought within one paragraph!
I'll take you at face falue on your final statement about "not being sure of anything."
Myself, I'll watch for news tomorrow RE possible contract and for clarity on this R/S controversy.
"So you weren't even in the other one?"
Are you kidding? He was one of the chief shills for BUGS while heaping ridicule on ACLH.
"Scottrade doesn't give info on Pinkies !!! They don't want their customers playing pinkies."
I dodn't have an account with Scott Trade. I asked them what info if any that they had on ACLH and a 1 for 30 R/S. They confirmed that there was a "mandatory split" in that ratio with no assigned date. They also gave me that new trading symbol
Now, I am long this stock and have no desire to muddy the waters with fabricated info.
I asked earlier if anyone had confirmation on this info from any other brokers. Someone earlier mentioned a split with their USAA holding. Fidelity had nothing and my share count is un-split.
Some on this board have a juvenile habit of claiming that others aren't telling the truth if the information is not to their liking. Lotta that going around in the Country too, so I guess it's not surprising to find it here as well.
"Unless a R/S happens...then somebody is not being totally truthful it would appear, either the interviewer or interviewee."
What do we actually KNOW at this point?
I called Scott Trade and heard what has been posted here....."mandatory R/S @ 1 for 30...no date confirmed...and new trading symbol ADFJF...no date for trading under."
I spoke with Fideltiy, where my ACLH shares are held and they could find nothing to confirm Scott Trade info.
Has anybody confirmed Scott Trade ACLH info through anyone other than Scott Trade?
Regardless of the accuracy or inaccuracy of the Scott Trade info, the testing of ACLH process by BP and a possible contract with BP remain the most critical events driving the pps through this past Friday. Rumors about the split were in play during the afternoon and did not appear to impede the pps climb.
"id rather be fearful with profit than fearless holding bags."
False choices. A third choice is to calmly assess the risk/rewards in seeing how the pending contract/'pending R/S' and unfolding disaster impact ACLH pps. In other words, falling back on courage rather than giving into fear.
You've rationalized that your fear driven response is "using your brain" and that my response is not.
You've also overlooked whether or how much profit I've already taken, and how much that helps to control fear.
So, false choices, rationalizations and careless asumptions. Other than all that...spot on!
"just taking profit. ths has become a very unstable situation i mean think about it. people are letting there emotions get involved in this stock. people are losing there rationale."
Thank you for posting an object lesson in one of those emotions....FEAR.
"Penny newsletter/email claims vs. Posters' Claims."
I suggested in my post three ways to take the PSC email.
That said, all any of us have are the analaytic skills we bring to the table when it come to analyzing posts or emails.
Throw out the hype and the baselss asertions and make up you own minds.
As for what has happened the past few days? This part of the email makes a lot more sense to me than stubborn asserstions about who BP can or cannot do business with or a R/S that may or may not have occurred.
"Members have asked us about the probability of a BP contact for ACLH and our only comment is "don't fight the tape". The best predictor we know for business development is the trading price of a stock. If a BP contract were coming you would see a sustained move higher in the PPS of ACLH's stock price and thankfully so, ACLH has been climbing for three days now on gigantic volume."
"The morale that I get out of that article is that the flippers are making off well playing the stock the way you should(not marrying it)."
The moral I get is that when you pretend to be the sharpest pencil in the board box it helps if you can spell and if you refrain from assuming what other investors/traders are doing with their shares.
Like I said we're probably not 36 hours from knowing if you'll be back here as a posting 'magpie' sitting down for a cannibalistic repast.
Here is the substance of a PSC email that arrived moments before the time stamp on this post. Take it worth a grain or a tar ball or as gospel, I don't care. But if you don't have contradictory evidence to what is stated here, don't waste my time or yours by starting another running gun battle about authenticity of sources, ESPECIALLY in light of some of the nonsensical speculation that has appeared so often on the board.
"Despite two pullbacks yesterday, ACLH has rebounded solidly and made members some trading profits by buying any dips. ACLH had another crazy day on Friday. The stock closed up 27.7% @ .06 on staggering volume of 50,778,100 shares.
ACLH has a solution to deal with some of the clean-up efforts which will be essential to getting the Gulf of Mexico back on it's feet after the BP oil spill disaster.
President Obama is getting more forceful with BP in the press and the entire mess threatens to become a political football as well as a financial and environmental nightmare for all the involved parties.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64E1UU20100515
BP and the government are going to have to pay billions to clean this mess up. An army of workers have been mobilized to deal with the clean up. All they need now is ACLH's product.
http://blog.al.com/live/2010/05/job_available_for_oil_spill_cl.html
The market keeps looking for a contract for ACLH from BP. Rumours abound in chat rooms and trading rooms that ACLH is about to get a BP deal. Rumours sometimes turn out to be true. Members have asked us about the probability of a BP contact for ACLH and our only comment is "don't fight the tape". The best predictor we know for business development is the trading price of a stock. If a BP contract were coming you would see a sustained move higher in the PPS of ACLH's stock price and thankfully so, ACLH has been climbing for three days now on gigantic volume. The market is telling us that something big is coming. PSC is watching and waiting like all longs for a BP deal. We are not sellers of stock @ these levels and we are looking for BP updates to send the stock into a .10 to .12 trading range.
The last PR from the company set off this flood of buying. Members should re-read the PR to get a feel for the upside for ACLH.
British Petroleum (BP) Requests Field Tests of ACT Clean Technologies, Inc. Fluids for Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Remediation
http://www.stockwatch.com/newsit/newsit_newsit.aspx?bid=U-prCL03376-U%3aACLH-20100512&symbol=ACLH®ion=U
As an inside some members have asked if there was a R/S coming on Monday. We spoke to ACLH today and we can confirm that there will be no R/S this Monday.
Please remember to do your due diligence on ACLH.
"No you guys are talking about the water and the sand and the now the ships. I can read.
if you really could read then the sticky post on the press release
should help you, regardless of what you think "people are talking about".
As for your assertion that 'pinkyland' ipsso facto renders the press release a likely fabrication, you've got nothing to back up you inference that this particular PR is false.
When news of a contract with BP is released will you return for a helping of oil soaked crow?
"American Petroleum Solutions, Inc., has been requested by BP to conduct field tests of ACT's patented cleaning fluids for the removal of oil residue from hard surfaces, including such things as the hulls of ships and barges, docking facilities and rocks along the shoreline."
"Look at the new previous post. You don't throw money to the wind.'
Begs the question about BP's request for a test of ACLH product.
"Edit: Keyword being "logic" in the business sense"
Your speculation on liklihood of business contracts awarded as a linear relationship to size of awardee is simplistic guess work.
BP is well aware of the size of the company whose product they asked be tested. Really imagine that they would waste their time testing if a business relationship was impracticable?
The product being tested by BP is NOT an underwater, chemical dispersant but rather a non-chemical hard surface oil remediation product. Every reference to dispersants on TV has been to chemical dispersants, and most recently...underwater chemical dispersants
As for the National Contingency Plan Product Schedule, Would BP be 'testing' a product that they couldn't use in the present crisis? And how to explain prior use?
"Current APS clients using its technologies have already included some of the largest oil and gas companies
in the US, including:
Conoco Phillips, Exxon Mobil, Avon Petroleum, Valero Petroleum,
BP (British Petroleum) and the US Navy Petroleum Reserve."
May 12, 2010 - New Orleans, Louisiana - PRNewswire-FirstCall -- ACT Clean Technologies, Inc.
(Stock Symbol: ACLH, Web Site: www.ACTCleanTech.com) announced today that British Petroleum
has requested field tests of ACT Clean Technologies, Inc. fluids for remediation of the Gulf Oil Spill damage.
Ancon Marine, Inc., a contractor which sells fluids for ACT's wholly-owned subsidiary, American Petroleum
Solutions, Inc., has been requested by BP to conduct field tests of ACT's patented cleaning fluids for the
removal of oil residue from hard surfaces, including such things as the hulls of ships and barges, docking
facilities and rocks along the shoreline.
ACT Clean Technologies, Inc. CEO, Russell Kidder, stated,
"If we successfully remove the oil residue from these hard surfaces as we have previously done in
other remediation projects, we believe that BP will order our fluids to assist in the remediation of the
continuing damage occurring from the recent oil well explosion in the Gulf of Mexico."
" And I think one of the prices eventually is fewer foot soldiers and more automation."
On the other hand, Ike believes that the local businesses well below the Fortune 1000 are going to be among the best prospects.
Currently there is a 'promo code' for each reserved company brand or key word. I would expect that it will be advantageous to retain those codes and have them linked to individual Ambassadors to encourage continued propecting and residual business.
Additionally, as we become more knowledgeable, it may be helpful to customers to have personal guidance in the choice of key words, changing key words for time sensitive promos and who knows what for future 'phases'.
"It will be a great oppty to add more to our positions. I'm hoping for some serious panic selling as I and loads of other smart people will be graciously buying on the cheap."
"Smart people" don't presume to know what others are in a position to do let alone tactlessly include themselves among the smart. Love it when the self absorbed think their 'hopes' for panic selling are widely shared.
"look at the board the sentiment is dead now..."
Dead my *ss, that's you projecting your own fears. No objective reading of these posts would confirm YOUR 'sentiment' as reflective of the majority sentiment.
My broker is Fidelity. No change in my share count. Rep could confirm nothing about any kind of split.
"of course, from an investor point of view, whatever American Petroleum Solutions does, given that it's a "private" company, an investor of ACLH.pk would be left off of the bus...oh well... nice try..."
http://www.actcleantech.com/project.html
"American Petroleum Solutions, Inc.
Wholly Owned Subsidiary"
oh well... nice try...
"the Company does not anticipate that it will effectuate a future stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, erger, acquisition, spin-off or reorganization."
Does not 'anticipate' as in they didn't anticipate the oil spill and resultant contracts with BP.
We have no idea what a contract might entail or whether there is a merger deal or buyout in the works.
But if we open at a buck eighty and with big news there's no reason to think that pps won't rise with many newly aware buyers entering the mix.
"So, let's get our game on, BUGS, and get this damn PPS up into Pennyland!!!"
Time for a reality check, seriously. How many people didn't get into this stock thinking that it would be an oil spill remediation play?
Damned few would be a very reasonable guess. Look at the activity on the ACLH and MOPN boards. That's what it WOULD look like here, IF anything was going on. Whatever you thought DD told you about the three comapnies, one of them has been a bad guess.
I'm not even suggesting you cut your losses here, it could bouunce. But if at all possible, for either investment or altruistic reasons, consider taking advantage of what is playing out elsewhere during this developing disaster.
Stubborness is not an investment nor a trading strategy.
"I imagine...
But who knows..."
Why didn't you just leave it at that?
I doubt that there is anything but 24-7 activity going on in all phases of BP negotiations with all potential suppliers. IF a contract between BP and ACLH is announced over the weekend then your 'imaginings' are even more baseless. IMO!
"Welcome to two days ago."
Glad to read that you've been 'debugged'.
No Harm......No Foul Rule
Wouldn't any artist(s) and their agent distill a decision down to the simple questions "if this venture doesn't 'take off' will artist(s) career be materially damaged...reputation, bookings canceled and revenues hurt?"
NO?
What's the cost?
What's the upside?
" A word commonly used like the words opinion and speculation.'
Yeah, that works. But most of us know the connotation of a rumor to mean 'unsubstantiated' and 'flimsy' as opposed to a "well informed" opinion.
Etymology: Middle English rumour, from Anglo-French, from Latin rumor clamor, gossip; akin to Old English reon to lament, Sanskrit rauti he roars
Date: 14th century
1 : talk or opinion widely disseminated with no discernible source
2 : a statement or report current without known authority for its truth
"There are two things that have been weighing heavy on my mind about BUGS and these are IMO:'
Forget about Katrina, as no 'business' was conducted then and they've been unable to monetize microbes for oil spil remediation since that time.
The 'business partenership' is highly unlikey to provide any kind of a contract that could impact this stock.
"Point is; BUGS has the contacts/ patents/ and past contracts. ACLH doesn't even have a boat dock !"
Point appears to be that ACLH has THE contact, to be followed by THE contract, and that BUGS' boat won't be leaving the harbor anytime soon.
"Go800 Belgian English New Math Dictionary"
And I thought that I had the funniest post this morning.
Unf*cking believable! If the posts on this board are not an argument for getting to bed before 1:00 am CDT I don't know what a stronger one would look like.
So far we've got the mysterious "Belgian R/S", the Caveat Emptor which if applied to the NYSE and NASDAQ would probably shut down trading immediately and ACLH playing 'Where's Waldo?' with info about the T/A.
This is all going to look even more stupid at 8:30 am EDT tomorrow.
"I think they gave this rating due to the attention theses pinks are getting and the 'buyer beware' is understandable due to not having info on hand.'
And for that matter where were the 'warnings' about Enron, WorldCom, AIG, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Bros, GM and Goldman Sachs?
Or maybe they SHOULD get the scrutiny the pinks get?
"Uh Oh"
First of all, not unusual for Caveat Emptor labels to appear with penny stocks. Which ONE, remember only one, of these devastating 'reasons' would you guess applies?
How has it impacted trading?
Did BP authorize a field test without knowing which one of these reasons applied?
When the stock bursts out of the gates tomorrow will you be back cluck clucking and Uh Ohing?
Pink OTC Markets has discontinued the display of quotes on pinksheets.com for this security because it has been labeled Caveat Emptor (Buyer Beware) and because adequate current information has not been made available by the issuer of the securities. It has been labeled Caveat Emptor for one of the following reasons:
•Questionable Promotion — The security is being promoted to the public, but adequate current information about the issuer has not been made available to the public.
•Spam — The security is the subject of spam promotion having the effect of encouraging trading of the issuer's securities.
•Investigation of Fraud — There is a known investigation of fraudulent activity involving the company, its securities or insiders.
•Suspension/Halt — A Regulatory Authority has halted or suspended trading for public interest concerns (i.e. not a news or earning halt).
•Disruptive Corporate Actions — The security or issuer is the subject of corporate actions, such as reverse mergers or serial stocks splits and name changes, without adequate current information being publicly available.
•Unsolicited Quotes — The security has only been quoted on an unsolicited basis since it entered the public markets and the issuer has not made adequate current information available to the public.
•Other Public Interest Concern — There is, in Pink OTC Markets' view, a public interest concern.
Consequently, Pink OTC Markets has removed the quotes from this website until adequate current information is made available by the issuer pursuant to Pink OTC Markets Guidelines for Providing Adequate Current Information (PDF) and until Pink OTC Markets believes there is no longer a public interest concern. Investors are encouraged to use care and due diligence in their investment decisions. Please read our Investor Protection page for more information.
"Know the type, they do not do it for the good of us holders."
Here's a novel theory on the 'bashers'.
First let get this out the way. They are way over estimated in their alleged ability to drive down pps. Think about it.
Are ANY of you influenced to sell by anything they post?
No, I didn't think so.
So I guess that leaves all of those so called 'weak hands' who head for the exits when someone posts 'BOO'! The need to believe that baseless critical posts are made by devilishly clever traders is really pretty weak in itself.
Bashers are mirror images of pumpers. They share a blind certitude
in the accuracy of their opinions fueled by the need, above all, to be right. Some are just uncertain about or disappointed with their investment. That's all that's going on.
To believe otherwise is to believe that these boards are the core of the investing universe for the pennies and that the MM's are trading wih one eye on these boards. Again, over estimation. IMO
"I can try and do it on Friday at the earliest."
If you photograph champagne corks, party hats and streamers lying around we'll know that you were too late for the pictures to make any difference to anyone!
"If this information is correct, then we have an obvious dilution.."
Uh, no, there is no EVIDENCE of dilution but rather the potential for dilution. We don't know what their cash situation is or whether any contract will fund manufacture and disperal/application of ACLH products.
Neither can you conclude from today's trading volume that there is dilution, as one person who day traded pointed out in an earlier post.
You can work this 'angle' like a dog working a bone, but it means nothing in light of the news and the hype and their effects on pps in the coming days.
"Sly, Are you saying that IR has no clue who the T/A is? LMAO'
Yeah, that's THE most important 'tree' in the 'forest'.
"If people only new the truth about what's going on here in BUGS."
Gee, that cryptic statement wasn't too well received! Wonder why?
The 'truth' is reflected in the current pps movement and not in any self-serving "if people only knew" nonsense.
"BUGS enviromental technology should have direct uses in remediation of the oil spill and/or its effects."
I don't say that it shouldn't, based upon the efficacy of the technology. I'm just saying that BUGS has no business platform to take advantage of the opportunity and to deliver product. If they did we would be reading about it on the website or in PR's and, most importantly, we'd see it reflected in the pps.
"...U.S. Microbics, Inc. should take a lesson!'
There is no lesson to be learned. BUGS is not a player in oil spill remediation. Anybody invested for that purpose had best look eleswhere with what is left of their BUGS holding.
"....They didn't have to,,,exspecially if they thought there was a chance of failure"
Brilliant. Wouldn't it then be reasonable to infer that by "telling the whole world", they DON'T think there's a chance of failure?