The Canadians are building up positions. LOLOLOL. What would be weird would be finra allowing CRGP to trade again. But would that be weirder than people from Canada buying a defunct stock HQed in Nevada, with supposed Mexican Assets, with no reported Financials in almost 10 years. But despite that CRGP to the moon.


$.0000000000001
$CRGP

If CRGP's trend is what you "call working out well," I would hate to see the rest of your portfolio. But I will continue to post about the lunacy I witness here.

Why not pray? You have millions if not hundred of Millions of shares of CRGP. You said it yourself, CRGP would change your family's life. If I were you I would be writing to the US congress, maybe getting your own Parliament involved. Hell, I would write to the the Prime Minister of France if that would help. But in the mean time while you wait for legal precedence, or the FBI, CIA, Congress, Or who ever to get involved with CRGP, you should continue to pray.

You still happy that you got that CRGP special dividend years back. Now you are here praying that FINRA allows trading again you and cohorts can pump it up.

Most of them didn't loose money either, they bought and got CRGP special dividend. Also they sold on the last CRGP pump when it when to .02. Now they are accumulating CRGP and trying to pump Canadians in to buying or praying that finra allows USA trading again.

This is foolish, who would manipulate CRGP.

someone told you that they are accumulating, he's in Canada buying more CRGP. He must really believe they have Mexican mines selling minerals all over the world.

yes those Canadians love CRGP more than Tim Hortons. Keep purchasing and saying your prayers.

Wow!! For those "bulls" who are going to be rich beyond measure when CRGP takes off, the tone expressed here has cynical and bitter. Sounds like they know deep down they've been living a lie and its eating them up inside. We can all do some group therapy! Let's use CRGP discussion board as our therapist. Tell the world that you made a mistake, let it all out. Thats the only way to get over regret.

$.000000000001
$CRGP

In America, there is a thing called the first amendment. We as Americans can exercise that right as we please, Coherently or incoherently. Just because I talk in manner some do not like about CRGP, doesn't mean I should be silenced or my rights be taken away. My thoughts shouldn't be dismissed as gibberish or other demeaning ways, I find that to be rude. CRGP is a polarizing topic to some people, and should be discussed with varying ideas.

FREE AMERICA

$.000000000001
$CRGP

Naked shorting in CRGP: the Financial BIGFOOT. No one has caught an actual glimpse, just grainy/shadowy footage.

Bigfoot, Bogeyman, Naked Shorts, And Other Myths

The world is full of mythical creatures. Some are born purely from human imagination to frighten disobedient children into compliance, such as the Bogeyman. Others are based on old legends but are given new life by cheeky pranksters, as happened with the famous 1967 Patterson-Gimlin "Bigfoot" footage. Some have a basis in reality, but have been so warped and twisted over time that they barely resemble that original reality. In the investing world one such creature is the "naked short".


In the mid-2000s after much study, the SEC implemented "Regulation SHO" which came into effect on January 3, 2005. With additional modifications and amendments over the subsequent years, Regulation SHO brought into force several modern and comprehensive short selling regulations including:

Implementation of a "locate" requirement for short sales. This requires short sellers to locate a source form which to borrow the security that they are selling prior to initiating the short sale.
Requirement for clearing broker-dealers to promptly close out any "fail positions". A failed trade simply a trade that fails to settle (e.g. because the seller could not deliver the securities for settlement.
Modification of the uptick rule. Under Regulation SHO, the uptick rule only goes into effect temporarily if a) fails to deliver on a stock are above certain thresholds, or b) if a security declines by 10% or more during a trading session (a "circuit breaker", thereby allowing long sellers to sell first in a declining market.
Daily public disclosure of trade failures and companies on the Reg SHO "threshold list".
Among other things, these new regulations where designed to curtail trade failures (generally people that buy a security expect its delivery!) and to prevent the potential for "abusive naked short selling". Trade failures and naked short selling are linked, as a naked short sale results in a failed trade (the securities cannot be delivered). However, it is important to note that not all failed trades are due to naked short selling - they can relate to back office errors (e.g. delivering the incorrect securities, wrong or missing account information, etc.).

The data confirm that these measures have been quite successful. A study conducted by the SEC's Office of Economic Analysis conducted after the initial Reg SHO implementation found that the average aggregate fails to deliver declined by 34% after the Reg SHO effective data. Notably after the adoption of Rule 204T in 2008 (the "close out" rule requiring dealers to close out failed positions by the next morning), a 2011 study by the SEC noted that average daily fails declined by a further 65.7% across all securities and 85.1% for threshold securities (just since the 2008 amendment). Below are a few charts from the SEC report that outlines the improvement only since 2008:


Excerpt from:
https://seekingalpha.com/article/1500012-bigfoot-bogeyman-naked-shorts-and-other-myths

I agree

I agree! this might test .85 this week coming

Lets see what the next few months have to offer.

Why should I be the only one that stops talking? I think I have something to contribute also. CRGP has a lot of conspiracies involved. I believe I'm here as a voice of reason. Nothing wrong with alittle push back on any narrative. People that don't like what I have to say will call me a basher. I'm just expressing healthy retort to some of the rhetoric expressed on this board. I don't wish any harm. Actually GTLA.

$.00000000001
$CRGP

As for CRGP the proof isn't out there. I bet these expert traders, willing minds, technical analysis gurus and prediction specialists have a net worth to match their prowess. If CRGP is any indication of their current win percentage, I wonder if the "bulls" are in trouble? You never know these willing minds and due diligence gurus must be sitting on a hefty sum, CRGP will only be icing on the cake.

$.0000000000001
$CRGP

I'm sorry, but nothing will arise because someone feels it will. There is no DIRECT proof to any of the claims that have been made on this platform. All of these claims aret supported by ambiguous posts that can mean something or nothing. Here are the facts: CRGP has a checkered history of corruption and fraud, but by the management team. Someone believing something will happen vs. what will actually happen. I guess manifesting an outcome is a big part of the "bulls' philosophy.

Let me save you some time, nothing is going to happen. Have you ever made a right prediction?

CRGP is top 20 trending because of our conversation. Why are you upset?

You sound so certain, you must have a direct connection to CRGP management or something. It would have hard to believe that you are just some guy typing random things on the internet. 8 weeks from now breaking news LOLOLOL

They keep asking me why I'm here, but why are they here? If they are so confident, why does anything I or anyone else have to say matter? It's only a matter of time right? CRGP to moon right ? Maybe we are turning off future investors in Canada? I'm still trying to figure it out.

That would be amazing if I was a politician, hmmmm. maybe a member of congress? Maybe that's why I'm here, to monitor the CRGP story first hand so I can rectify the situation. LOLOLOL.

These CRGP members are either Lawyers or Journalist. One is arguing about Legal precedence another is saying watch out for the News. Quite comical to watch. keep up the good work.

I don't want it to go to the moon, I want to pass this discussion board topic down to my ancestors. I want the future generations to have a laugh at the "bulls" expense. The people in 2050 would be laughing at the idea someone is waiting on CRGP from 2015 to go private or "cover a short position". This is greatest farce is OTC history.

This is a discussion board, what do you have against healthy discussion. Free speach is a pilar in the American Way of life. Why do you want to silence anyone who has an opinion on a matter. This would be a boring discussion board if everyone in the comments were saying CRGP to the sky, moon, 13$, 1$. You people have a love/hate relationship with Janice and company. Be honest now. Also we are now back on the break out boards. Our chatter/Gibberish/etc has brought light to the Dead ticker CRGP. Thank me later.


$ . 13 zeros 1
$CRGP

Also there was screen shot with highlighted portions showing the case involving IHUB in Florida. This is the context of the case as quoted by securities lawyer website. The same website that quoted in previous posts.

***Just wanted to point out that this source was used previously by them, incase they try to discredit the source.

IHub also reminded COR that it had “alternative sources to trolling message boards,” though COR claimed it did not. In connection with that, it brings up the clearing firm’s still-active efforts to extract customer information from TD Ameritrade Clearing and E-Trade Clearing. IHub closed by suggesting that “this Court should reject COR’s attempt to enlist judicial assistance in this attempt to so grossly abridge the Posters’ constitutional rights.”
Charles Stampelos, a Magistrate Judge for the Tallahassee Division of the Northern District of Florida, ruled on the action, finding in IHub’s favor. On May 11, he issued an order denying COR’s motion to compel. Convinced by IHub’s argument that the anonymous posters whose identities were sought by COR were not parties to the case, he held:
The First Amendment right implicated here is not inconsequential, nor is the amount of monetary loss allegedly suffered by COR. Notwithstanding, the disclosure of entities who have made postings on IHub cannot be permitted because those postings are not sufficiently related to the wrongful actions of Defendants Calissio, Adam Carter, and Signature Stock Transfer as alleged in the underlying civil case. The motion to compel is denied.
Unlike many message board operators, IHub is willing to defend its members. Most similar sites simply turn over the information requested, or merely notify them that a legal action with which they intend to comply is underway. More than once, IHub has defended itself and its posters against individuals and entities interested in abridging those posters’ right to anonymous speech, or seeking to silence them altogether. Members seeking anonymity should appreciate its efforts on their behalf.

Source:
https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2016/ihub-cor-subpoena-calissio-case/

Since you are qouting securities lawyer web site:

Do you disagree with these series of events as reported by a post on the very website you quoted?

We last wrote about the complex litigation involving Calissio Resources Group (CRGP) in February. It arose out of a controversy surrounding the company’s payment of a special dividend of $0.011 a share in August 2015. At the time of declaration, Calissio estimated that the dividend would cost about $1.3 million. During the same period, it announced that it would launch a stock buyback program.
The dividend was declared on 16 June. The company set a record date of 30 June and a pay date of 17 August. When FINRA processed the relative corporate action request, it named 19 June as the ex dividend date. The ex date is the first day on which a stock will trade without a dividend attached. The dividend will be paid on all stock of the class specified that is issued and outstanding as of the record date. If a shareholder sells his stock between the record and ex dates—that is, during the interim period—he will be selling his right to the dividend with it. A due bill will be attached, and the dividend will be paid to the person holding the stock as of the ex date. To sum up: the record date establishes what stock is eligible for the dividend; the ex date establishes what shareholders will receive it.


Special dividends, which are worth more than 25 percent of a company’s market cap, are relatively rare. When they do occur, they usually aren’t problematic. Normally the company sets the record and pay dates fairly close together, and does not issue any new stock during the interim period. Calissio didn’t do that. It set the record and pay dates nearly two months apart, and during that time, it issued hundreds of millions of shares of new stock. That new stock was sold into the market by Nobilis Consulting LLC, Beaufort Capital Partners, and Macallan Partners, who were holders of convertible debt. Nobilis and Beaufort sold through COR Clearing; Macallan sold through Alpine Securities Corporation.
COR and Alpine assumed that the stock in question was not eligible for Calissio’s cash dividend, as it had been issued after the record date. Unfortunately for both firms, no one told the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) that. When its dividend distribution department went to work after the ex date, it found it had a large shortfall. As a consequence, it informed COR and Alpine that it would be debiting their accounts to the tune of $4 million and a little less than $1 million, respectively. COR emailed DTCC urgently, explaining that a mistake had been made. Even “Adam Carter,” CRGP’s purported CEO, agreed in an email that a “huge glitch” had occurred. But DTCC was adamant, and went ahead with the debits. Alpine requested a hearing on the matter, but the depository refused.

SOURCE:
https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2016/ihub-cor-subpoena-calissio-case/

Anything with naked shorts in it will automaticlly get associated to CRGP. I wonder if any of the "bulls" have been in contact with any of CRGP previous or current management. I think any legal strategy should involve the people who control or at least use to control the company. Lockwood, Carter, Clement,

LOLOLOLOLOL. This one takes the cake.

After all these years, reading the same CRGP documents and still incorrect ? I wonder if dyslexia is involved.

Those Canadians really believe in CRGP. This stock is better than Shopify, more promising than Tim Hortons.

But there was screen shot about the past cases, and the prelude to future cases mentioned on this CRGP board. How do you explain the discussion that there is possibility for more CRGP legal litigation, and the preparation of legal precedent in regards to previous or "current" CRGP cases. I would hate to believe that people posting these things are just making random posts, they most know what they are talking about right?

With all these various federal jurisdictions, There might a be eventual plan on taking the CRGP case to the Supreme Court. I'm no legal expert, but that's amazing if this case will eventually be seen before the highest court in the Union. This naked short issue is a really a problem. Do you know know how long it takes cases to go before the Supreme Court, and what type of lawyer it takes to fight a case of this magnitude?? They will write law journals and maybe even text books about this one when its all said and done. Wow, and to think this was all first brought to light on Ihub. Amazing!

They have to be, I would hate to believe that they are just some person behind a computer with time on their hands. With all their predictions, and case law, this couldn't possibly be just some random person.

We have some of the best Harvard Juris Doctors monitoring this CRGP chat room . They way the terms legal precedence and how it applies is being thrown around in the CRGP chat; These members sound like the best legal scholars that ever existed. I truly hope they know what they are talking about and not just reading articles on the internet and forming their own jumbled up biased opinions.

My friend, he was speaking in the sense that if CRGP goes to $1 it the same odds as you having the winning lotto ticket out of the millions of people that buy lotto in Canada. Hold on to your golden ticket, maybe willie wanka might show up at your door step. Keep making those pray deposits and saying your hail Mary's, praises to Allah, Buddha or whoever is your deity.


$ . 13 zero 1
$CRGP

I was being sarcastic, speaking in voice and logic of the conspiracy folks in the chat.

The problem as that your voice of reason will go unheard in regard to this CRGP issue. They will find 3 ambiguous articles that will support their conspiracy. The issue of mental health has been brought up recently in this discussion board, and that's quite amusing because it's clear who is ailing from from something. The fact that we push back on the narrative of CRGP that they are trying to push makes us bashers or "crazy." We are just expressing healthy retort to the unfounded claims being mentioned on this platform.

Janice this is misdirection. How dare you use a left wing publication to try to discredit the work being done behind the scenes to fix the naked short issue in America. CRGP will eventually be the greatest correction of all wrongs done by malicious characters trying to rob the property of hard working Americans. Forbes isn't a real publication its just a distraction from what's really going on. Matter of fact, they are in cahoots with the evil and criminal entities that are trying to steal our property.

Love how some "bulls" think they know something, but really don't. It's a testament to what's going on with CRGP. Just wrong and strong. But lets get CRGP back on the top of the break out boards, CRGP to the moon.