Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
He should update in any case, not "if" anything.
What an absolute Hypocrite .
-------
As if all the folks that pump day-in and day-out on a variety of OTC stocks (and who are quietly selling off their positions while doing so) aren't the worst of hypocrites, especially when calling it "investing"...
Was that ever reported somewhere?
BTW another 150k shares traded today...
Was there not a joint project between either Gazprom or Rosneft and XOM in the Gulf of Mexico? something that began when Tillerson was still CEO?
Thank you for answering.
So at this stage of a RM (the stage that BABL is currently at), is it normal or not for the company to be named on a document such as this one?
Yeah, heard that all last year. No replies ever to any investor relations emails.
What would it say if it said the thing you think it should say?
So, TooFrank, (reprising my question from the other day)... are you satisfied that $CSLI is actually the owner of all the assets you thought MHK might have been secretly keeping for themselves?
I did a google search on that phrase (which you are reacting to):
"The consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or its parent) at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation."
(with quotes around it so that it would be found exactly as written)
So many results came up that it leads me to believe this is some kind of standard boilerplate used when defining "Change of Control".
Exactly. DE would not have been able to accept fees for their procedures knowing that the procedure could not be completed. That would be like charging for gas at an empty gas pump just for the privilege of squeezing the handle.
I am also ready for this one to "feel me up" and touch me inappropriately, to stretch the metaphor out like taffy.
Not Boston. Kansas.
Except they never explained WHY they were doing what they did. They claimed that for legal reasons they could not - that was utter BS.
And right up until the very last minute they were tweeting that (the CA) was almost complete. If they were having problems, they should have disclosed them.
But they never considered owners of $CLHI to be "shareholders". We were just people over whom they could leverage financial gain.
So utterly happy this one has NOTHING to do with the State of Delaware.
Are you satisfied after having read this report that CSLI really owns the assets we think (and hope) they do?
I don’t see that he has explicitly linked himself to $BABL yet… What is your opinion on this?
I grew up in Dallas and loved the 1970s Cowboys, but never liked the classless Jerry Jones.
Hope to still be alive when that day comes.
Looks like they may have a product that will treat the dark thoughts investing in the OTC has given me. How self-reinforcing!
Shares traded!
I have a subscription.
NYT article about psilocybin:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/31/well/mind/psilocybin-mushrooms-addiction-therapy.html
I don’t believe market makers ever throw 60,000 share blocks into the bid… They usually throw 1000 or two.
What turd sold at the bid?
Hmmm.
Anyone have a clue why this keeps falling?
The puzzling thing about them "not having cash" is the kinds of numbers they are reportedly throwing around (again, on Twitter, not in a formal PR) WRT the various business segments they claim to operate in. They are substantial, and you don't get such huge numbers instantly, just by completing a reverse merger into a shell. Which means they are likely a bunch of lies.
If they were just ramping up normally toward those projections, that would still mean plenty of current revenue to utilize for such purposes as, say, paying state of DE fees and such.
Stevenson must be one hell of a con artist.
I don't believe Synergy has anything left to do with $QENC at this point. Unless Ben retained a controlling chunk.
What was the cause of this one dropping from its high of over $1.70 a couple months ago?
What was the cause of this one dropping from its high of over $1.70 a couple months ago?
I swear, if I had the money to spare, I would depose Robert Stephenson in a US court and dislodge his trading records in order to sue him...
TDS said (at the time they dropped the ticker) that they could not comment as it was a legal matter. How come they can comment now?
Does Ben dispute this?
What does it say?… I am blocked…
Are you the "Ted" that has monopolized the Yahoo discussion board on this stock?
He was answering my question.
Who can even buy any?
What you are saying is that Ben intentionally kept us in the dark, that he knew something we had the right to know about and he failed to perform his fiduciary duty to us. If true, it would mean that he can’t be trusted on ANY of his tickers.
I just found one, but there's likely more:
$CLNV
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CLNV/profile
This is indisputably the same Christopher Percy as the one listed on $BABL's OTC Markets profile.