Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Really she was the director of the FDIC and now the FHFA and she doesn’t know the difference between and SPO and an IPO? Man that’s crazy glad you figured that out…
Bradford os the last person you should take investment advice from… he literally needs his dad to bail him out of loans he takes to invest…
I don’t know about you but years paying interest on loans with no payout isn’t my idea of a successful investment strategy…
Yesterday he was literally telling someone they should also take out loans to invest…
They haven’t tried to excercise the spspa yet so why would there be a lawsuit or injunction to stop it? Until they try it they are following their agreement…
Man you’re lost in many ways..
Nerdiest thing I ever saw.... Almost Kardashian level of "please pay attn to me". But, my opinion is skewed as I used to hang w/ a crew of pro-skaters that wouldn't do this on a dare.
Maybe he was hand-standing to his dad's house to get another loan re-worked and his allowance.
No wonder he can't get a date..
...."smarter people" don't take out signature loans to invest(and pay 7-8 years interest on them) and then need their parents to re-finance said loan so they can make payments? Am I right?
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Not sure why anyone would take the advice of someone that has been wrong for approaching 10 years on GSE outcomes do you?
Getting loans for stock purchases is being positioned accordingly? Nice
Means the market is wayyy overpriced and the low interest rates propping it up by the Fed is coming to a halt. The Fed is intentionally putting the housing market and the economy in a recession and stocks will drop to reasonable prices across the board.
I am bullish since I bought TZA at 29 and if the market tanks like it did for covid or in 2008 i'll make a killing... I'm already up 25-30% and it hasn't even dumped yet... wait for earnings and stocks are gonna tank.
Mike Wilson below is being diplomatic here... He doesn't want his investors to dump on him.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/world-top-stock-strategist-says-183122497.html
Rich by 2027…. Anyone got my dads number? I’m underwater on my signature loans i got to invest…
Huh? I bought at 29 I didn’t wait for a 36 dollar signal… this is setting up for a massive dump next quarter…
Got anymore sage investment advice?
This is just the beginning… a dead cat bounce… reality with earnings set in soon and the fed won’t support the market with cash inflows and low interest rates when the drop happens… in fact they are intentionally causing it…
Loving TZA right now...
Tza went down today but the shit storm is about to start next quarter…. Expect tye S&P to drop to the 3000-3300 range then a move back to the 4k range
....where do you get this nonsense from....?
.....it was never over $1.43 from 2008 until the NWS was placed.... EVER.
Can’t believe this board is inactive… no one bought? This downside is just starting
Please no more predictions… we are about to hit a recession you think Biden will mess with the foundation of the housing market until the market stabilizes?
Its a year away if at all then its an election year…
Magical thinking again…
yeah thanks to Chairman Powell - He's my boy!!
This is gonna dump next year and glad I held.... Powell has to bring the pain to get inflation down to 2-3%...
I knew this before the article but Ackman tells it straighter than most:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bill-ackman-fed-inflation-recession-225552079.html
Look for a 20% or more correction next quarter... than a fast upswing and i'll be in TNA then.
What did you get in at?
And what is FMCCs pps now with current capital?
Locked in at 29.33
Your statement was Biden imprisoned them which is what I commented on... Not sure why you didn't say something negative about the administration that did the actual imprisonment nor Trumps who was in office twice as long as Biden's. I guess Biden is easier to blame than the factual one... No worries I am well read on the topic so I knew anyway.
I'm be purchasing w/ in the next 72 hours
Actually George Bush "imprisoned them".....
Hard to believe at this point this needs to be clarified...
Always prudent to know basic facts before you invest right? Especially in a speculative stock...
Not sure why thanking this guy for disclosing information was so bad… its less work the SEC and the DOJ… wouldn’t law enforcement want all criminals to talk about what they did?
Anyone playing this for next year?
The NWS has been stopped so no money in Treasury being sent so no advantage for the Gov't to do anything but release in some fashion....
Is this a hard concept for you to grasp?
Nationalization can't happen w/out an act of congress and it will not happen lame-duck congress or not.
Admin reform is the only option here no matter what party is in office...
To say otherwise shows zero understanding of the political environment...
stockanalyze doesn't understand the politics here...
Glen have anymore "Rich by INSERT DATE" predictions today?
They are looking at all options, but, what other option has 93+ billion in cash reserves and spits out $$?.... My only guess that what is holding them back are these pending court cases and how to navigate that quickly before the election year... They also know the republicans once back in office might not release these in a way they want. This year should be the year we hear real rumblings...
Just like in the Trump WH they didn't want to do anything like this too close to the election and Calabria had like 6 months to do anything before that year and all he could do was internal reforms to stabilize the GSEs and halt the sweep.
Nothing is as political as the GSE and it's a ton of $$ involved now and long term... I do see Biden as going forward w/ a release framing it as a "housing crises" is how you swallow this pill and w/ them ramping up these meetings a week after mid-terms something is brewing. Good thing is a house led GOP will not reform these this will be an admin release if anything. Putting a restructuring bill in a divided congress will never happen.
https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/og6durjxiie41kawguzljw2
yep right after midterms as called... barely a week......
Where you at Bradford w/ your predictions?
What nonsensical planet do you get this from?
Rich by May 21st right?
Why would anyone want to join that chat? Lot of bad advice I’m sure….
What does “Arbitrary or Capricious” Mean? Grabbed this from a Nevada Bar group but it gives a good overview of the meaning... Link at bottom....
Unless exempted, government agencies in Nevada are bound by the Nevada Administrative Procedures Act (“NAPA”), NRS Chapter 233B, and federal agencies are bound by the federal Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”). 5 U.S.C. 500 et seq. Among other things, the NAPA and APA establish uniform standards for formal rulemaking and adjudication, and define the scope of judicial review.
NAPA instructs courts to invalidate any agency action that is “[a]rbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion,” NRS 233B.135(3)(f). The APA instructs courts to overturn an agency action that is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). Unless judicial review is further limited by legislation, this arbitrary-or-capricious test is one basis to challenge a final administrative decision.
What makes a decision arbitrary or capricious?
These concepts are nuanced and hard to grasp.
The Supreme Court of Nevada has announced that “[w]here an agency’s decision is challenged as arbitrary and capricious, this court will uphold the decision if it is supported by evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate.” Desert Palace, Inc. v. Nevada Gaming Comm’n, 130 Nev. 1170 (2014) (citing United Exposition Serv. Co. v. State Indus. Ins. Sys., 109 Nev. 421, 423–24, 851 P.2d 423, 424–25 (1993)). Conversely, an agency action is arbitrary or capricious if the decision is “‘baseless’ or ‘despotic’ and ‘a sudden turn of mind without apparent motive; a freak, whim, mere fancy.’” City of Reno v. Estate of Wells, 110 Nev. 1218, 1222, 885 P.2d 545, 548 (1994) (internal citations and quotations omitted). Thus, in Nevada, the substantial evidence test is intrinsically a part of the arbitrary-or-capricious standard.
Federal courts have enumerated that, under the APA,
[a] decision is arbitrary and capricious if the agency [1] has relied on factors which Congress has not intended it to consider, [2] entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem, [3] offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency, or [4] [has offered an explanation] so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or product of agency expertise.
George v. Bay Area Rapid Transit, 577 F.3d 1005, 1010 (9th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation and citations omitted).
Why does the arbitrary-or-capricious standard matter? Because the standard can shape government law and policy. Recent decisions include:
Endangered species
In 2018, a federal district court ruled that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service violated the APA by “delisting” grizzly bears from a threatened species list: “all available evidence demonstrates that the Service made its decision not on the basis of science or the law but solely in reaction to the states’ hardline position on recalibration. The Service cannot negotiate away its obligation to make decisions ‘solely on the basis of the best available science.’” Crow Indian Tribe v. United States, 343 F. Supp. 3d 999, 1018 (D. Mont. 2018) (remanded on other grounds) (quoting 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(1)(A)).
Contraception and religious exemptions
In July 2020, the Supreme Court upheld regulations enacted by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) that allowed for-profit groups exemptions from the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate. The Court held that HHS’s new rules were implemented lawfully and all pertinent legal authority was considered. Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. Ct. 2367, 2384 (2020) (”If the Departments did not look to RFRA’s requirements or discuss RFRA at all when formulating their solution, they would certainly be susceptible to claims that the rules were arbitrary and capricious . . . .”).
Immigration
In 2020, the Supreme Court overturned a September 2017 Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) decision that would terminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program:
We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. ‘The wisdom’ of those decisions ‘is none of our concern.’ We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients. That dual failure raises doubts about whether the agency appreciated the scope of its discretion or exercised that discretion in a reasonable manner.
Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of California, 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1913 (2020).
Accordingly, although the standard can be “squishy” and highly-fact based, it can be both a powerful tool for both litigants and government agencies implementing policy.
What does “Arbitrary or Capricious” Mean?
Verdict tomorrow afternoon. Jury wanted plain English on arbitrary and capricious. Good question after DeMarco testified he consulted no one. ~ Per ACH Analytics
Only of you have FMCC and I do believe you do…
FNMA commons get nada…
Every word fantastical rubbish...