Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ya, sure... still SEC needs a different reason for another suspension--and even then it's only good for 10 days. It's just about dead in the water, anyway, with the DTCC freeze...
It was already suspended, last fall..
printing shares ===> electricity?
He's a nut, basically.
As I understand it, publishing such disclaimers does not provide any "safe harbor." In other words, when penny scammers use it, they are not protected.
Sounds like *providing* funds for a non-existent DIP account could land one in trouble, too...
...and there you have it. Conspiracy? *poof*
I'm just glad to see the Pike hat tossed into the ring, as opposed to slinking away into hedge fund oblivion...
wowza, that's great. Now there's a response...
agree--that can't stand.
That's a new one for me: never seen "declines to sign" before.
edit: oops, double post.
I can't believe, well, yes, I can--but I remain surprised that peeps think court cases will take up issues that are not being tried.
Good, Lord...NSS isn't part of any of the legal proceedings.
Someone else would have to file a case about such a thing.
I could care less.
Let the court find the best turnaround expert in the world--same result.
sure, but they weren't company agents
Why haven't they been shut down entirely yet?
Due process. Would you prefer chains on the office doors and a quick execution of the principals?
lol, that's some severely hinky chatroom software...wheeeeee
yow! That's the same squirmer who said this would re-open Pink...
yow! That's the same squirmer who said this would re-open Pink...
lol, Newsweek...
I noticed that, too.
I do know SEC says they are not under investigation.
How do you know that?
doesn't play very well for me, but what I saw looked scarily misinformed.
Maybe it will play better tomorrow?
You know? I'm really surprised that more underwater homes haven't burned.
Yes.
Well, OK, not precisely...
BUT, after 14 news-related NASDAQ halts, it will be revealed that the passion of the shareholders' petition--especially those anonymous--will have swayed the court to order the SEC to arrange the stock's open at [name your price] on [a real exchange], and further, you don't even have to actually own the stock, all you have to do is swear before a notary that you saw the ticker mentioned in a sports venue. Once that's verified (takes about 40 minutes), you get shares like old-timey homesteaders got 160 acres.
Dude? Party in Vegas!!!!!!!!!!
It's a beautiful thing...
Ann Coulter, moonlighting?
sorry--two cheap ones in a row. Here's the second:
Bartender looks up to see parading through the door a Rabbi, Priest, Black guy, Hispanic guy, Aggie, a blond, a guy with a fake eye, a horse...and a duck.
"What is this?" he demands. "Some kind of joke?!?!?!!"
Seriously, I *also* remember something about fruits 'n veggies ripening in plastic bags--sumpin' about a gas? ethylene? I don't go for that, but you surely can pick tomatoes a lil early and let 'em ripen indoors. I also do that with store-bought avocados: buy the "good one" to use quickly, the more firm, greener one to use later.
Update: Got two trailers' load of recently chipped tree mulch to use as paths, and have most of it deployed. Then today picked up a nice trailer load of mixed-age horse manure. Some is already in three, new raised beds, on top of several inches of aged tree-mulch compost; some horsey stuff already in the compost pile, with a bit standing nearby. Pretty exciting, from the urban homestead POV...
Sure, she's right.
Subset, sure, but the DIP lender jumps to the front of the line.
???
sorry, not following--loans from whom? Do you mean beyond the original DIP lender?
andele, senor
Personally, I can't see how they will ever get financing. We shall see.
Me, neither; and, yes, we shall...
That's why I say there *is* no DIP package--anything before the filing would have been incorporated in the filing.
*Somebody's* dough may have changed hands before...but that doesn't make it DIP. I certainly don't doubt that any number of "promises" may have been made...but won't go down that murky track.
its obvious the stock was shorted from dec till the end of april.
How is that obvious?
And, yes, it's technically possible that a shareholder(s) could be involved in a DIP deal, but, no, an informal group of shareholders forking over dough would not constitute a DIP package.
I think it's important in the sense that the judge will know that no DIP package exists, as none was included in the petition, and the court most certainly has not approved one.
I don't see any way to judge the timing, based solely on the phrase "have contributed to the DIP financing for the company"--although it is certainly strange to read "most have conducted extensive due diligence. . . ." The latter suggests that some chunked in some dough--to this unapproved "fund"--without performing DD. How odd, that...
Otherwise, we agree: no DIP fund exists, by definition.
Judging from what I'm reading, it seems possible that a stock promoter could be involved in a group that would be able to package a DIP deal--but highly unlikely.
Corey Ribotsky? sure. Furth? nah...not from the little I know about him.