Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I hope it is for you
I did not get any TGRR, but I can appreciate why you like it.
It has a good low O/S currently for one reason to like it in the short term.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TGRR/profile
I'm doing my own things privately these days with clients.
I wish you the best with TGRR.
(the other one EFFI, however, I'm not too fond of)
Thanks for the ideas.
I was watching GEQU already. Just too bad it already had that huge up move. But is worth looking at on a good dip
Unfortunately VCPS (re-entry since August) has been a total failure and likely will be one on the trading history record. I've been hoping for some type of news hype or short term pump to drive it, but no luck so far.
It serves to show why we always use low risk principle amounts of $$$ in each subpenny stock (spread out evenly, such as $300 per stock as I've always demonstrated for an example).
I will be updating my Trade Record in coming weeks after I get a few more trades accomplished for my private e-mail subscribers. Between August-September I was working on my service transition, so it's why I have a gap period in my trading.
As of early October 2017, I no longer put out trades on I-Hub or to the public (but instead only to my private e-mail subscribers).
I had a good trade on $TRVN (non-subpenny) in early November for my private service followers for a profit range of 20-32%, which is listed & eventually in due time I'll update my record (along with the VCPS re-entry at some point).
The $TRVN trade is an example of the fact that I'm not just trading subpenny trades since October 2017, but also mixing it up with other trades for client followers, in order to always provide consistent trading action & good trading choice diversity
Anyhow in any event, VCPS is certainly not your fault Poor trader. I take responsibility for that trade as I chose to re-enter it back in August & failed to abandon it before ti dumped to .0001.
Thanks for your stock suggestions & you also have a nice holiday season!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Made profitable trade on $TRVN of 20-32% range within 3 days for followers.
Alerted it morning of Tuesday November 7, 2017 @ 1.40.
Alerted to Sell (all shares) of $TRVN the morning of November 10 (Friday) while trading 1.76-1.84 (with that trading range remaining the rest of the day with good liquidity for sellers who were alerted).
Suggested Limit order of 1.46 or less was available for followers thru morning of 11/09/17 (Thursday) before it rose upward.
TRVN Chart {10/30/17 - 11/13/17}:
6 Months Live Chart:
Yes, thank you very much StockBull. It's very good of you & rationale.
Let's just move forward & put it in the past, like I said a short while ago.
I appreciate your commentary & confidence in me, but really it's all just anyone's guess with a reverse merger that would favor shareholders. Based upon the distrustful recent history of this company & poor management, I simply would not put good odds on it. such an idea has very small % chance speculatively.
I have nothing else to comment on VCPS (other than what I already recently posted).
We'll just wait and see if it pulls off a miracle & bounce back to .001+ ore more like some other .0001 OTC stocks have.
SOUNDS GOOD, that's perfectly fair. No problem with that.
'Agree To Disagree' as I said to you before.
Thanks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll know if it "absorbed it well" (the dilution) if it ever climbs back up high enough for a decent trade toward approx .001+.
I & some personal interests still own shares of $VCPS ~~ FYI.
But only low risk amounts of a few hundred dollars each invested (as I've stated all along).
>>>Objectively speaking, this stock likely is dead, but I agree it still has some chance to move upward. As I've said in weeks past, I've seen plenty of recent examples since Summer that were 2-3 Billion or more for total O/S that got sold down toward .0001-.0003 for a few weeks or months which later rallied huge.
>>>AZ*L is one comparable example that rallied this Summer-Fall from .0001 (& briefly had no bid at one point) before rallying to .007 area, & it had over 2.5+ Billion shares at that time with a similar multi-month chart as $VCPS (at this stage) before it ran up toward .007.
So anything's possible on $VCPS, but it is looking bleak.
I used to think a fair chance it might put out good 'Patent' news by 4th qtr, but latest report filing shows that is unlikely. $VCPS is one bis negative surprise after another. But anything is possible yet... We'll see.
>>>I also don't think a Rev Split is coming for a while yet. It's certainly not out of question, but I think they will wait a few months at least before filing a rev split (in my speculative opinion).
>>>A better chance the company hires a promotion to push the stock up a while so they can dilute more to fill that huge gap of their 9.9 Billion A/S before they'd do a Rev Split.
It's all just a guess. We'll see what happens next few months.
Thank you for your fairness in commententary & also to everyone else who posted
***Who knew they'd actually dilute a Billion shares in only 2 months(?)
That's why I have called this stock (re-entry) I attempted since August an unusual anomaly'.
It simply was an honest mistaken bad trade that duped practically just about anyone since August. I've been in numerous amounts of subpenny stocks that had more than 300 million O/S when I first entered them (which was more than VCPS had at early August start) & they mostly turned out fine, and that's a major reason why I abdicated for holding it and adding to it (from .0008 and lower). It was a major screw up, but who would've believed they'd go from under 300 million O/S to 1.5 Billion in 2-2.5 months.
None of them I've ever traded diluted 1+ Billion shares in 2 months approx period.
There are those who chastise me for this trade, but truth is that it is an unusual predicament and an honest mistake, and some are not fairly seeing everything I do in the big picture regarding my full track record (that is good) & my strategy I apply.
Anyone who says otherwise about me is distorting truth or simply don;t understand, because all my posts generally back me up in all I state here.
...I've always suggested low risk on each trade. Any post (or e-mail) on subpenny trades I've ever put out always emphasized a low risk strategy.
My typical suggestion to anyone following has been a few hundred dollars per trade.
I even have posted examples of using $300 as a basis for every trade.
$300 in all my subpenny trades since last year have net yielded fine. It's not spin, it's simple fact.
The post below shows this example following my allocation strategy (thru August 1, 2017):
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134295662
If anyone has followed me a long while, they're doing fine even after this latest VCPS re-entry loss.
If someone put in $300 in my first VCPS trade back in late July, the typical yield range was 130-230% & they made between $390-690 net profit, & if they followed my standard allocation strategy and re-invested similar principal amount, then they are down no more than $300 on this re-entry (assuming a -100% loss), meaning net profit following me on 2 VCPS trades is +$90-390. If someone independently doubled down and re-invested past profits by putting in $600 (instead of $300) for example, then they could be down as much as -$210, but up near +$90 or close to break even... AND THAT'S THE REALITY scenario in terms of real numbers of anyone following my strategy with even principal allocation or even if they doubled their investment into the 2nd VCPS trade (loss).
If anyone has ever invested mush more than what I have stated repeatedly in all my alerts, then that is not my fault. I've always clearly outlined strategy for risk/Reward in each subpenny trade & all my trades have been honest without promotions or pumps. I never told anyone to 'load up', etc, like a pumper or promoter would say.
Overall my track record is good and this re-entry on VCPS is the only trade I ever mistakenly held with any resulting 'bag-holders'.
I've always taken responsibility for this latest VCPS re-entry foul up as stated in posts here in past weeks, but to be fair it's one trade & my last VCPS trade was excellent & my track record overall should speak for me, not this one fouled up trade.
Anyone can try to tell me I should have stop-lossed out or what ever (like a 'Monday Morning Quarter Back'), but it simply was a mistake & I thought (given my low risk investment suggestion) in weeks past we might get a rally back up toward .001+ while taking the chance on a low risk re-entry.
Most of my past trades were very successful and some involved averaging down, but in this instance VCPS (re-entry) was an unusual anomaly that surprised many by diluting over a Billion shares in only 2 months while not having even one decent trade-able rallies back up toward .001+.
Outstanding Shares = 1,177,082,560
(a/o Oct 10, 2017)
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VCPS/profile
It finally updated.
My thinking has been thru Sept 30 it might be as high as 900 million area, so 1.1-1.2 Billion is close to on track for Oct 10 based on its excessive weekly rate since August.
Truly amazing how it diluted so much from August. It's one of the worst dilutions in 2 months period I've ever seen. It certainly surprised most people coming from a low O/S not long ago.
When I took advantage of the last trade in late July for over 200%, I highlighted how low the O/S was and that this could be a nice repeat to enter again on a good pullback, & usually such a thesis would be correct.
It's hard to believe it would have 2+ months of relentless dilution without a solid reversal back above .001+ to trade on. This $VCPS since August truly has been an unusual 'anomaly' as I've said in the past here (in regards to what I trade with a stock in the good situation this was in back in early August).
This doesn't mean it's over with certainty.
Been saying in past posts that plenty of stocks have rallied in this type of situation from .0001-.0003 area with much more than a Billion O/S.
(crazier things have happened)
It looks dismal, but it has a chance to do something yet. If only the stupid company would put out a news update, it would have a nice pop.
DrCleopard, you need to follow thru with "quitting trading forever" that you posted yesterday... $LAHO went back above .001+ today.
***A deal's a deal, you must honor your words, regardless of where it goes after today, it broke back above .001+ after your post***
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DrCleopard 10/10/17 ~ 01:57:27 AM
"HAHAHA I WILL QUIT TRADING FOR EVER IF THIS MAKES IT ABOVE .001 AGAIN OR HIGHER STRAIGHTRIPPIN DOWN TO SINGLES"
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=135269368
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three_Day_Trader@Yahoo.com = E-Mail for information on joining service.
{Also listed at my I-Hub profile}
========================================================================
*****ALL MY TRADES NOW ONLY GIVEN PRIVATELY & not shared here publicly anymore as part of a 'Transition' I have done into a new platform as of October 2, 2017.
Only private subscribers receive my trades (see my profile for info).
*****I will only be posting on I-Hub my results after they happen from now on with this alias.
The good news is I still provide trades --- Just not in same public format as in the past.
FYI ~~ I didn't put out any new trades since August because I was busy August - September reorganizing my transition. But I'm active again with new trades since October 2 for my private subscribers on my new service transition.
People can expect to see good results who are part of my new service transition, I assure you all that!!
...And not all my trades will always involve subpenny stocks. Sometimes they will involve bigger board stocks such as 1.00 area Biotechs or 3x Funds when ever necessary, but my large focus will be on OTC & subpenny stocks because of the overall good historical success with them.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Results of sold trades below as of August 1, 2017:
******Subpenny Stock Trade Record Tracker******
My trade record will be updated in the future as all trades develop (officially sold & concluded).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
My Best Wishes to everyone & thanks for your support.
3-D-T
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sometimes a stock can have churning with high volume with little price movement before a move up. That includes all stocks, especially diluted ones like VCPS where such scenarios happen to diluted ones under .001.
I'm not saying that is a prediction, just the best explanation I can give you.
It could easily do nothing for some time yet, but there was good activity on Friday in terms of the bid/ask shift & it's possible for a stock in a situation like $VCPS to grind and churn like that yet before a move up, and given the recent pressure on the Ask (dilutive impact) it is not a surprise that it did not have any higher price action.
Just wait and see what happens this coming week or perhaps some time later. The future is undetermined.
I'm on to new stocks anyhow while I wait out this turkey, to see if it does anything. I've got low risk capital suggestion for it (as typical for my subpenny stock strategy), so I will wait it out in this one instance. Usually I do not wait these out for this long while sinking so much.
when it comes to successful trading, it's about the overall net gains over time, rather than an emphasis of risk on just one stock.
I'm doing great overall.
If $VCPS ever recovers into profit territory (miracle it might take), then I'll have very-very few losses on total with all my subpenny trades.
If this re-entry on $VCPS becomes a net loss in the end, then it'll still only be the 3rd subpenny trade I've lost on overall.
*****ALL MY TRADES NOW ONLY GIVEN PRIVATELY on e-mail & not shared here publicly anymore as part of a 'Transition' I have done into a new platform as of October 2, 2017.
Only private subscribers receive my trades.
*****I will only be posting on I-Hub my results after they happen from now on with this alias.
The good news is I still provide trades --- Just not in same public format as in the past.
FYI ~~ I didn't put out any new trades since August because I was busy August - September reorganizing my service transition. But I'm active again with new trades since October 2 for my private subscribers on my new service transition.
People can expect to see good results who are part of my new service transition, I assure you all that!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Results of sold trades below as of August 1, 2017:
******Subpenny Stock Trade Record Tracker******
My trade record will be updated in the future as all trades develop (officially sold & concluded).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
My Best Wishes to everyone & thanks for your support.
3-D-T
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the increased bid activity support, the VNDM & BMAK no where to be seen on .0003 ask (or near it) & also the CDEL share ask got way thinner down to a few million compared to past large size it had.
If those guys on Level 2 can get out of the way, $VCPS would have a fair chance to move up nicely.
240+ Million bid on .0002 with only 13 million on ask of .0003.
Quite an improved shift after that post saying it was done for.
This thing can still rally yet.
I've seen recently worse diluted junk than VCPS move from .0001 to much higher.
Went from 1-2 million size on the bid for .0002, then a short while later the bid went to 78+ Million on the .0002.
Only wonder how long that'll last.
Yesterday despite that trade conversion at .0002 it held up well, meaning that at that time until close the bid size stayed large with no drop, which is a fact, not an opinion. I think actually you're the one who wasn't watching the same stock as me at that time yesterday.
I was not cheering that VCPS was doing great, I was pointing out the fact the bid size did not drop after that large .0002 conversion yesterday October 4.
Today, however, I can't say the same thing. But at the time at end of day yesterday it was true what I stated.
I don't have a huge amount of risk $$$ in VCPS, which I've said in past here and in alerts, and is same suggestion for anyone I ever alerted it to (like with all subpenny trades), so I'm therefore in no hurry or at huge risk no matter what it does.
That said, @ .0002 bid area (or less possible), I'm not willing to sell so low & abandon this one at this time. Anyhow, I think it still has decent chances even though it is not looking good, so keeping some shares, so long as risk is not excessive on it.
***Personally, I think $VCPS may surprise the holy crap out of people one of these days, so my suggestion is to keep some shares, so long as it is not an excessive amount of risk.
As for my other trade(s) recently started you asked about, that's a matter in private that can be discussed later via other means.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, I basically already said what I think earlier in recent posts on that subject.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=135070185
In any event, price action and Level 2 is in question & looks doubtful (Cross Trades or not).
Still has potential, but I'm just waiting yet to see what happens with a hopeful & open mind set.
...And as said before, if $VCPS would put out news (which is over due), it would likely easily blow thru the Ask and get to at least .001+ area.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
My trades almost never are in a situation like $VCPS has become (on re-entry since August), whereby there is a dependence on hoping for news. I usually (successfully) trade Entries & Exits in short term on technicals.
But once in a while #%#% happens (nobody is perfect 100% of the time), which is why I apply the unique risk/reward & allocation strategy I do on all my trades, so that these screw ups are minimized. Overall I'm doing fine with all of my trading for net profitable consistency while some losses are minor among the big picture (and that's the reality of how trading works).
I have a new trade I entered recently (privately), but can't post about it here because this is $VCPS board & also because of my platform for followers.
Anyhow, that's all I can say for the time being on this stock.
GLTU.
Yeah that large volume area chunk appears to be it (for cross a trade), separate from regular & actual buys/sells today. I did not witness it live, which is why I was asking about it earlier in prior post.
Hopefully the close out of a debt converter position via the 'cross trade' will mean an upward move soon on VCPS
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/vincompass-corp-VCPS/trades
I thought I also noticed a 'cross trade' on $VCPS earlier today.
When did you see it and approx how many shares were involved from your perspective?
I liked overall what I saw today, seeing some stability with more net buying buying today @ .0003's compared to sells @ .0002.
Finally seeing some increased potential for this thing to move upward soon
No company is exactly same for R/S tendencies, as they are all hard to predict with absolute certainty, but VCPS should have quite a while yet before needing to enact a rev split.
Thru end of September it could be 750-950 million O/S when it next updates.
Not good, but doesn't mean it can't run with O/S nearing 1 billion.
I've seen plenty others recently (as stated in past posts) that ran up from .0001-.0003 in similar predicament as VCPS with even more O/S than that.
So, we'll see what happens yet.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VCPS/profile
The O/S total reflects any share split.
They can alter or increase the A/S regardless of that based upon regulatory & company approval (via board &/or shareholders).
But keep in mind that most companies sub .001 have huge A/S regardless of O/S, & with VCPS specifically in months back even before the last run to .0027 (from .0007/.0008) in late July it already had A/S of 4.9 billion, making the point that these can run up on high A/S and that A/S was really high long before latest increase to 9.9 billion a few weeks ago.
Therefore A/S means little compared to O/S and daily rate of dilution pressure when it comes to short term trading.
I've traded many subpenny stocks (as you know) in past that had huge A/S in billions which turned out to be profitable trades.
VCPS is showing so far to be contradictory to that compared to my past trades similarly (being almost 2 months without a major run up), but it could prove still a good trade while only taking a few more weeks in comparison to past trades of mine. Which refers back to recent past language I've said, that VCPS is an anomaly and not typical of what one should expect since August.
Furthermore, my point is that O/S and rate of dilution is what mainly matters when trading these subpenny stocks, especially under .002, etc. It's just a given that they have constantly increasing A/S that usually is in the billions down at these sub .002 levels.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buying during the 'fearful' times is buying an opportunity according to contrarian view point.
I don't understand your mindset when questioning the fear being too high.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Is the fear too high to buy right now?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok, it is great to see you have re-thought things, and thanks generally for your post StockBull.
But realize I am accountable on selling in all my trades.
My e-mails have had 100% sells with buy suggestions (with copies posted on I-Hub), in case you have not been following along there.
I don't know where you are getting the idea that I'm misleading on selling & that I don't provide clear selling points with alert timing on that.
That's another aspect that you are totally wrong about with me, you must realize.
My alerts provide full trade executions and anyone who follows my e-mails has complimented me many-many times in the past on providing full clarity & transparency with help on sells and buys.
If you know me even a little bit you would know in the past I am always condoning to take profits.
My post history here proves that 100% as accurate.
In fact with my past trades sold, I'm usually one of the few people posting on I-Hub to take profits while many others are hyping & pumping the stock.
I even have a suggested scale-out strategy typically provided early on with all my Buy Alerts & I provide info to people in my subscriber alerts about the eventuality of when to take profits with a strategy, etc.
GLTU,
3-D-T
$VCPS is very dependent now on news to help move it up at this stage, and it is possible news can be put out soon or by 4th qtr end of 2017 as a consideration here with $VCPS to keep in mind (such as patent approval supposedly likely 4th qtr 2017).
That said, it can move up on technicals without news.
Because I focus on very oversold technically based trades for short term reversals higher, most of my trades historically have moved without news & in months previously $VCPS itself moved up frequently without news...
However, I admit in this case specifically, after recent dilution it needs news more than the average trade to attract enough money in able to help break thru the recently increased large Ask size (which I've stated in recent past posts).
You ask me about upside, but it's any one's guess where it will possibly pop up toward given the circumstance here.
I've recently moved my minimum down to .001+ area, but if news hits or a decent amount of money decides to suddenly rotate into this without news (like has happened in month past), anything can happen up to .002-.01+ given how oversold this pig is and given how long it has not had a major trade-able move up (making it over due for a run up statistically).
This thing might never move up, but don't be surprised (news or not) if this thing goes to .001-.002 or even much higher one of these days. Crazier things have happened lately in contrast to other stocks (with and without news). After all, in the OTC subpenny land anything can happen.
In contrast I've seen many tickers re-surge much higher after lingering similarly down to .0001-.0003 for a few months and having appeared dead, and which were in much worse predicament of dilution & which had 1-4 billion O/S at the time.
I still continue to support holding a reasonably low risk sized position here, which I usually suggest as a standard strategy anyhow when following my subpenny trades (for proper risk/reward on each trade)
The CCI indicator is becoming the most oversold it has been since July (before that last major move to .0027). Perhaps it has less application now given the recent dilution as an impending negative factor, but it is a good contrarian indicator to watch that helps support added chances technically of a reversal move higher to follow in the eventual short term.
$VCPS TECHNICAL CHART******
CCI very oversold near -162 as of Sept 26
It still has plenty of potential to get back to at least .001+, despite that this stock looks worse lately & is also frustrating to hold.
I could easily show you plenty of subpenny stocks much more diluted than this $VCPS that recently made nice upward moves, & in contrast many other stocks that also got similarly diluted down to .0001-.0003 area that did nothing for 2-4 months, then got a resurgence much higher afterwards, so it's not over for $VCPS yet.
As I have said before---- Just keep risk allocation on this stock reasonably low, such as based upon your individual tolerance & finances.
All things to consider above while holding this turkey at this stage.
Regards,
3-D-T
So, you criticized a few others here earlier about trashing this $VCPS stock & others for pumping it, yet here you are trashing the stock hard core with an agenda in multiple posts, just like the many others around here that you criticized.
You're no different than them with your actions. LOL, can you say outright blatant hypocrisy(???)
****Those who do one extreme or another (trashing, pumping) with an obvious extremist agenda are all the same in my experience.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL, just keep risk allocation (of $$$$) low on each trade with subpenny stocks and then there is not an enormous stress while holding.
I always emphasize a strategy on these that applies proper risk/reward per subpenny trade.
It's also funny that anyone would sell all out suddenly based on one random person's post (or perhaps you were being sarcastic--- I'm not sure).
My alternative suggestion would be only to trim your position if you have an excessive amount of money into $VCPS, rather than selling all of it at this point.
While this stock looks worse lately, it still has plenty of potential to get back to at least .001+.
I can show you plenty of subpenny stocks much more diluted than this $VCPS that recently made nice upward moves, & in contrast many other stocks that also got similarly diluted down to .0001-.0003 area that did nothing for 2-4 months, then got a resurgence much higher afterwards.
It's not over for $VCPS yet. Just keep risk allocation on this stock reasonably low, such as based upon your individual tolerance & finances.
Things to consider above.
Regards,
3-D-T
$VCPS is not failed until it is resolved or sold. It's not looking good now, but it's not resolved yet. I also do not sit on penny stocks a long time usually, as my past avg hold time is 2 - 2.5 weeks with avg net gain of 86% per trade (including losses)... But anyhow, occasionally one stock trade takes longer than usual--- It's part of reality of trading.
Even if later on $VCPS does fail on my 2nd entry attempt, you are putting too much emphasis on it because you are not understanding my allocation & risk/rewards strategy, with all due respect.
You are are apparently missing my strategy in regards to allocation with applied risk/reward per trade. Look over my e-mails or what I posted here.
No one should get "wiped out" on one trade if people follow my subpenny strategy.
I have posted about my strategy many times in the past (along with in my e-mails), so this should not even be a debate that we are having here.
The way I trade subpenny stocks allows for some losses as a consequence to be less significant because of the risk/reward ratio strategy I promote on them & because of the standard of even allocation amount per trade (whether one at a time or 3-4 at a time). In any event, losses are part of reality of trading. No one is 100% right all the time.
What makes one trader better than others is not simply % rate of profitable trades, but also how a trader applies a strategy while trading that can be a huge difference. The best trading will apply a disciplined strategy that makes a loss less significant when it happens & that overall affects the trading outcomes (respective of % rate of profitability)
Most people load up on one stock at a time with excessive risk, particularly when it comes to subpenny stocks.
***Instead, I promote a strategy of lower risk per trade and an even spread out allocation among all the trades. When a loss occurs it is usually insignificant because of that.
Look at my trades sold from just late July - August 1 alone. OPMZ lost -50% or more on an individual basis, but if anyone followed my strategy of allocation, etc, then the loss was insignificant and the net gains were huge despite OPMZ.
Please go look at the results applied with $300 per trade, for example, that I have posted here, then you should see things better and perhaps you will be less critical of me, ok?
Perhaps your extended break of many months has made you forget how I trade these.
Please re-evaluate how you think of what I do here after you review my strategy info & stats.
StockBull--- Good to hear from you after nearly 4 months. I understand your concerns about $VCPS currently. But keep in mind that pumpers at some boards are not necessarily a bad sign. These things happen invariably. I saw pumpers over on VCPS board back in late July before it moved from .0008 low to .002's on our last successful trade of it, for example. I saw pumpers at other stocks I traded that usually were successful & often saw bashers big time on successful trades before they eventually were successful, so what ever one posts (bash or pump) is going to happen invariably regardless. Presuming about a stock based upon some various random pumpers or bashers is usually just speculation that really does little good in terms of the trade itself in my experience.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyhow ~~~
It's too bad you missed all of my good trades in months past if you took a break and switched to other stocks. You especially missed by best Trades from June thru August 1 if you were on break. There is no reason for that, especially when you saw my improving performance from them starting back in November 2016. You need to realize that you can trade along with those of mine while you trade other big board stocks. It's actually better for sensible allocation of risk to trade both or many areas simultaneously, and it's especially sensible when considering that the subpenny stocks I trade apply a low risk amount per trade anyhow, so there is no reason for you to choose to trade one area over another.
You've missed my good trades in the past on more than one occasion because you would 'take breaks'.
Maybe you should learn from that and realize it is time you started applying everything I try to show you.
Simply follow the trades while you do other things. No reason to take so many 'breaks' which usually means you miss out.
My strategy is designed flexible for traders to be able to apply my trades along with other trading that they want to do or to help enable them to trade my stocks while on vacation or perhaps having busy lifestyles such as work, etc, especially if you equip yourself with E-Mail Widget Apps & Broker apps on your smart phone, so you won't miss e-mail alerts & have ability to make trades on mobile phone/computer.
Look at my stickies posted here at this board, etc, which summarize my strategies to apply, along with my current trade record, & my post for stats applied with real Money that use very low risk amounts (such as $300 per trade).
All that tells the true story & lesson of why you should stay regular with my trades and not take excessive breaks
****See Here My Profit Stats Using Realistic Money ($$$$$) as of August 1, 2017****
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
StockBull
Sunday, 09/24/17
02:37:25 PM
Re: THREE-DAY-TRADER post# 4174 {$VCPS board}
Post # 4199 of 4205
Hey TDT, long time no chat. Been taking a break from the pennies and focusing more on blue chips.
VCPS has been hammered since the last time it reached .0008. Hopefully it recovers, but it isn't looking so good atm. I have been seeing a lot of pump posts talking about "making you rich" and "load and hold", which usually throws up red flags for me. I did, however, get into this at .0004 and sold at .0006-7 last time it ran. Not sure if I should buy back in or wait till the massive dilutions stops.
Usually you have a good track record so I'll keep watching this.