Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
4G and the like operate in Mhz frequencies, Wifi operates in Ghz frequencies. Totally different spectrums. Higher frequencies like 2.4 Ghz and 5 Ghz have much shorter reliable distances than the low Mhz frequencies used in 4G communications. It explains why, generally speaking, handheld devices have greater range using 4G vs range with WiFi.
If you want to believe 4G and WiFi share the same properties, your wrong. But if you want to go on believing that, fine with me. You can believe whatever your heart desires.
"Spectrum has no bearing". Seriously, to suggest that all wireless frequencies or "radio waves" as you call it, have the same principals is just incorrect. You're comparing Apple's and Oranges. You can't really compare the 4G LTE spectrum to the WiFi spectrum. Totally different frequencies with different properties, and totally different radio's. The topic isn't even debatable for gosh sakes.
We weren't discussing cell towers, CDMA or 4G LTE cellular networks and the like. The discussion was about Wifi, 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. So if the topic is WiFi, why are you talking about a totally different spectrum? I certainly wasn't discussing anything but WiFi in today's threads. I think you're confusing the two, or don't understand the difference.
Still most active board because everyone is watching the TDEY car wreck over the last month.
Since you seem to like technical analysis, take a look at the chart you posted and tell me that's not the perfect head and shoulders top formation. Because you can see the left shoulder, the head, and the right shoulder formed. And if the Head and Shoulders formation is completed with that right shoulder, you know what happens next to complete the head and shoulders. Timmmmmmmmmmberrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Page 2 of this Cisco piece totally shoots down Wialan's own premise that an access point with a powerful transmitter and high gain antenna's is somehow better. The facts are the transmit range of Wialan's access point is meaningless if the client radios connected to the WLAN don't have the transmit power to send packets of info back to the access point. On page 2, Cisco states why Wialan's hyped up equipment is fundamentally flawed. Yes folks, a good WiFi connection requires a lot more than a powerful access point transmitter. As you increase distance, connected devices transmit power are the other half of the equation.
http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1613796&seqNum=2
Where is the proof that Cisco was bidding on anything that Wialan was bidding on?
Here is an interesting and informative piece on Wifi written by Cisco Systems. It seem to confirm exactly what I have been asserting all along......and that is that just because a access point has a powerful transmitter and it's signal can be received far from the access point, doesn't mean the laptop, tablet or smartphone's wifi transmitter has the power to send packets back to the access point. No real sense to have a powerful access point if it's transmit range is much longer than the transmit power of it's connected devices. Devices not only must receive packets, but must be able to transmit packets.
Read this informative piece on Wifi, and specifically on page 2 where it discusses wifi Range Considerations, scroll down and read the paragraph's directly below Figure 11-2 Titled, Transmit Power Increases Provide Greater Range by Increasing Signal Strength. Here they discuss the importance of the transmit power of all the connected devices, not just the access point. To quote Cisco in this paragraph, "To improve the overall communications of 802.11 signals, which occur in both directions between the access point and client radio's, you will need to increase the transmit power of the client radios as well. "In fact, it is usually not useful to increase the transmit power of the access points because the client radios are almost always operating at much lower transmit power."
http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1613796
ROTF..people have to ignore all the TDEY facts if they want to believe in the dream.
Just saying it makes no sense to manufacture a access point that has much more transmit power than the devices that connect to it, because both the access point and connected devices need to send and receive. To have the best signal, it's best to be close to the access point, and the few obstructions the better.
I don't disagree that a large gain antenna helps. But at the same time, while a laptop or tablet may be able to receive a signal from a Wialan access point from a long distance, that laptop or tablet doesn't have the transmit range of the access point. The large high gain antenna's of the access point helps, but it doesn't change the fact that the Wialan access point radio has a lot more transmit power than the devices connected to it. So what good is the high powered access point if you can receive the signal from 5 miles away but your laptop or tablet can only transmit 1 mile?
What fundamental lack of understanding are you referring to exactly?
Cisco uses more access points so that the handheld devices using the WLAN have the transmit power to reach back to the access point. Totally different WLAN architectures. As I said, it makes no sense having a super powerful wifi access point, if the devices on the network can receive the wifi signal, put lack the power to transmit to the access point. You have to remember both radio's need to send and receive. The big wireless networking companies understand that it makes no sense having a powerful access point, if the connected devices wifi radio's are too far away to transmit back to the access point.
High powered access points have little use if the connected device radios lack the power to transmit packets back to the access point. Makes little sense to have a powerful access point when handheld devices lack the transmit power to send packets back to the AP. Both the access point radio and handheld radio need to have the transmit power to reach one another. People buying into Wialan don't quite understand this basic concept. With Wialan equipment you might be able to receive a wifi signal from a long way away from the access point, but depending on the distance, your laptop or tablet might not be able to transmit back to the access point. Better to have an access point in close proximity if you want a reliable connection because the transmit power of many portable devices is usually much weaker than the access point. Partially explains why a powerful access point has major limitations. Major WLAN equipment companies seem to understand the concept. Wialan doesn't quite get it.
Just because you can receive a wifi signal doesn't mean your device will be able to transmit back to the access point. Both the access point and connected devices need the ability to transmit packets as well as receive packets. Often times the access point has more transmit power than handheld devices, and access points may use omnidirectional or dirrectional high gain antenna's to boost it's signal further. So while your Ipad may receive a wifi signal from an access point, it doesn't necessarily mean your IPad or connected device will be capable of transmitting back to the access point. In terms of getting better wifi range, it's often better to use an alternative wireless adapter.
According to Wikipedia, authenticity is a major problem with Thomas Kinkade artwork. Wikipedia states, "Kinkade reportedly is one of the most counterfeited artists today".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Kinkade
**NEWS IS OUT NOW..read
The 3rd leg of the "Trifecta" is out. Clark's company SWRF just released it's Quarterly Report and is available to read at otcmarkets.com
SWRF's ACQUISITION OF IPOINT TELEVISION WAS CANCELLED!!!!
SWRF reported revenues of $0.
SWRF now has liabilities of over $6.6 million.
Sorry folks....Clark scammed you.
So the "Trifecta Companies" all reported revenues of $0 this week.
How is that for Clark's "transparency"?
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=9628847
According to SWRF's Quarterly Report, it's acquisition of IPoint Television has been cancelled...lol.
Revenues were $0. Total assets are valued at less than $10,000 and liabilities are over $6.6 million.
Folks....Clark scammed you all.
TDEY lost 38.3% of it's value this week.
People can read right? Attached is a link to TDEY's Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity.
As you can see, on December 31, 2012 TDEY had 29,905,271 common shares outstanding.
By March 31, 2013 TDEY had 595,187,339 common shares outstanding.
There were no new share issuances between March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, and so on June 30, 2013 TDEY still had 595,187,339 common shares outstanding.
By September 30, 2013 there were 1,241,187,339 common shares outstanding.
Therefore, in less than 1 year, the amount of TDEY common shares outstanding have gone from 29,905,271 shares to 1,241,187,339 shares.
This my friends is massive dilution of the highest order. If anyone wants to actually take a second and read TDEY's filing from earlier this week, it's attached below.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=TDEY&id=113726
The United States Department of Labor had to sue Eddie Vakser to protect Eddie's employees. Eddie's own employee's can't trust him. I've always said, once a cheat, always a cheat.
http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/pr061505.html
See? TDEY's CFO looks like a deadbeat too. What's the matter, TDEY's Chief Financial Officer, James Tassan wouldn't pay his credit card bill so Capital One had to sue him in Denton County Court in order to get paid?
Skip to Main Content Logout My Account Search Menu New Civil Search Refine Search Back
Location : All Courts Help
Register of Actions
Case No. J10-0311J5
Capital One Bank (USA) NA vs James Tassan §
§
§
§
§
§
Case Type: z-Justice Court
Date Filed: 11/18/2010
Location: Justice of the Peace Pct #5
Judicial Officer: Bateman, Mike
File Custody/Location: Justice of the Peace Pct 5
Party Information
Lead Attorneys
Defendant Tassan, James
10019 Maple DR
Providence Village, TX 76227-5410
Plaintiff Capital One Bank (USA) NA Michael R Castro
Retained
15851 N. Dallas Pkwy, Suite 245
Addison, TX 75001
877-689-7966(W)
877-492-5185(F)
Events & Orders of the Court
DISPOSITIONS
02/15/2011
Default Judgment to Plaintiff (Judicial Officer: Bateman, Mike)
Judgment of $2,160.26
Awarded To: Capital One Bank (USA) NA
Awarded Against: James Tassan
OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
11/18/2010 Plaintiff's Original Petition
11/18/2010 Citation Issued (Judicial Officer: Bateman, Mike )
to be picked up by Marlene Cox for service
Party: Capital One Bank (USA) NA
11/18/2010
Citation
Tassan, James
Served 11/24/2010
Response Received 12/02/2010
Returned 12/02/2010
12/02/2010 Citation Returned
returned served by PPS
Party: Tassan, James
01/25/2011 Notice of Hearing
mailed to pltfs atty
02/14/2011 Default Judgment for Plaintiff
pltfs motion for default judgment; file to judge
02/15/2011 Default Judgment for Plaintiff
mailed copies to all parties
Financial Information
Plaintiff Capital One Bank (USA) NA
Total Financial Assessment 31.00
Total Payments and Credits 31.00
Balance Due as of 11/22/2013 0.00
11/18/2010 Transaction Assessment 91.00
11/18/2010 Payment Receipt # 122213-2010-JP5 Castro, Michael R (31.00)
Clark needs to shut up. Stop it with the rapid fire Tweet's, the 24/7 pumps, and just deliver a Quarterly Report that people can't criticize. That's all Clark needs to do....let the Quarterly Results do the talking. All these over the top promo's by Clark severely hurt shareholders by raising people's expectations to a point that sets the stock up to disappoint. Therefore the best thing that Clark could do is shut his mouth, stop the crazy promotions, and let his financial results do the talking.
The "Trifecta Initiative" TDEY, PBHG and SWRF are bleeding bad. Code Blue....get the crash carts ASAP.
When I look at the symbol MWIP, I can't help but think it should stand for Money Wipe.....or Money Swipe.
TDEY's outstanding shares have doubled in the last 90 days alone. Anytime a CEO doubles the amount of shares the equity is eroded by 50%. That's getting slowly priced in.
The amount of shares isn't huge but the equity pie has been split by more than half in the last 90 days alone because the number of shares have more than doubled. No matter how you cut the pie, that is some serious shareholder dilution in a very short period of time.
TDEY will just keep issuing millions upon millions more shares because they have no revenue. That is Eddie Vakser's scheme on every company he's ever run.
Since TDEY's outstanding share count has doubled in just the last 90 days, the more than 50% shareholder dilution is just getting priced in.
The PBHG shareholder dilution scam explained here. First, download PBHG's Quarterly report the company filed with OTC yesterday.
https://www.otciq.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=113748
Once you've downloaded the filing, please refer to page 5. On page 5 you can see that on June 30th, 2013 PBHG reported 84,872,536 common shares outstanding.
But just 90 days later you can see from this new filing, PBHG is suddenly up to 184,037,540 common shares outstanding.
So over this 90 day period we can see that new issuance is up over 100% alone, diluting shareholders by over 50%....in just 90 days alone. That is some major erosion of equity in a very short period of time. If people only knew.
Massive TDEY shareholder dilution explained. First, download TDEY's Quarterly linked below to follow along.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=TDEY&id=113726
Now on page 1, you can see the amount of TDEY common shares outstanding on June 30th, 2013 in the amount of 595,187,339 common shares outstanding.
But just 90 days later on September 30th, 2013 Quarterly Report TDEY filed yesterday, we can now see that TDEY's common shares outstanding stands at 1,241,187,339.
So in just the last 90 days alone, new issuance is up over 100%, diluting shareholder equity by over 50%.
Yes that's true. As of today the outstanding share count is likely a lot higher. Since PBHG had issued 100,000,000 million new shares in the last 90 days of the 3rd Quarter, they probably issued another 50,000,000 million more in the last 45 days. PBHG is a shareholder dilution machine.
New share issuance was off the charts last Quarter. New share issuance in PBHG more than doubled in the last 90 days alone. Total dilution scam. Total shares outstanding now more than 186 million shares up from around 86 million shares.
Massive shareholder dilution this Quarter. There were 84,872,536 shares outstanding at the end of last Quarter. In the latest Quarter the outstanding share count is up to 184,037,540 shares. Therefore in the the last 90 days alone, over half of shareholder's equity has been wiped out, but shareholders might not realize it yet. See page 5 for current share counts.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=PBHG&id=113748
After TDEY reported $0 in revenues this evening, I think Clark and Fast Eddie are in trouble. In my opinion they are running extremely low on working capital. With $0 in business, the only financing left is debt or more share issuance...both highly dilutive. That's the problem with continued $0 in sales. See the TDEY's Quarterly Report filed this evening link below. Not only did Clark and Fast Eddie's company TDEY report $0 in revenues but Eddie and Clark's other company PBHG just reported $0 in revenues tonight too. With the nonstop spin from Clark specifically, and a lot of other "promotors" touting TDEY, how do you spin $0 in business for both Vakser/Ortiz companies? If Clark wants to spend all his time Tweeting and pumping his stocks during his conference calls, he's going to first need to generate more revenue than the kid who cuts my grass.
TDEY's Quarterly Report
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=TDEY&id=113677
PBHG's Quarterly Report
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=PBHG&id=113748
PBHG's 3rd Quarter Report is out...just filed and there is a link to in below.
PBHG is reporting revenue for the Quarter of $0, a cash position of $456 dollars, and newly issued shares during the Quarter are up over 100% in this Quarter alone. PBHG ended last Quarter with 84,872,536 shares outstanding and according to tonights Quarterly Report the outstanding share count is up to 184,037,540.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=PBHG&id=113748
LOL.....I think Fast Eddie Vakser and Clark Ortiz have some explaining to do. What a scam.
TDEY's Financial Statement was filed this evening and it's attached below.
After all of Mr. Ortiz's touted Tweets, and all his stock promotion with this conference calls, how in the world can Mr. Ortiz explain TDEY's Income Statement for the Quarter? How does Clark explain $0 in revenue? $0 in business might be a tough spin. Looks like Clark has lost all credibility.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=TDEY&id=113677
Hi Tom...hope you've been doing great. Was getting a good laugh at Vakser's latest PR on the $66 million dollar art valuation scam. Sounds awfully similar to Vakser's scam he ran on his revoked company ARTS. I'm thinking Vakser and Ortiz are going to run into trouble on this pump because anybody can go read PBHG's financials at OTC Markets and see the company is broke. Does Vakser and Ortiz think people are really that stupid? They must.
See PBHG's most recent Quarterly Report filing and ask yourself if PBHG's PR is to be believed, how did Edward Vakser acquire artwork worth $66,000,000 when the PBHG has a cash position of $300 dollars, $0 in revenues, $4,250,000 in shareholder deficits, and an equity deficiency of $1,797,342 ???? PBHG's own financial statement tells the real story. And PBHG's PR is pure fictional nonsense.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=PBHG&id=110079