Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
sometimes i just crack me up!!
did you ever stop and think that "commercial phase"...means that products are actually being manufactured and shipped
howard used two different words ..because they are two different things.....economic phase means they are talking about a rate
commercial phase vs economic phase...there is a difference....read a little further instead of just choosing what backs up your statements...fast track negotiations almost automatically proceed to the "economic phase" of discussions...so slow track discussion obviously have two phases...economic and something else
dont know where i got that one from...it was somewhere deep in my memory banks
blocks are coming through 25k 75k 100k
you dont listen very well...the difference between fast track and slow track is that the discusion in fast track automatically proceeds to the economic phase.....can you be intellectually honest enough to see this at least...
wrong again moose breath...management has informed us that fast track means that the negotiations almost automatically proceed to the economic phase of discussions.....and there are no questions of patent viability....therefore liscences already in the economic phase can be assumed to be fast track negotiations at this point...even if they started as slow track
traders memory!!
the idea is to have knowledge beyond the obvious...lets see how this race ends...btw...my story about the change in analysts has been confirmed
btw...there were a dozen other stocks that piper assumed coverage on today...coincidence...or is walkley moving over his book to piper jaffrey
thank you for bringing attention to this matter...the screaming meemees have chosen to ignore my post
ive told it to everybody that has called and asked this am...as well as to morondas like yourself...the buyers are in...here is your chance to sell
fine...im wrong about something..what it is i dont know...all i said is that there were bids above 16..and that was true
repeat...its a change of analysts...and not neccessarily a downgrade
does anybody havce the report...lastchoice?
yeah....where is it gonna close?
you make the first move..how much?
the bid on the screen is 16.45...make the wager w/ the mkt...hit the bid ...if you are right you win!!!...its that simple
whose name is on the report...if we have had a change of analysts this makes sense...because walkley had idc as a mkt perform at rbc...the bloomberg blurb said that piper had assumed coverage of idc...this tells me we had a change of analysts
all i have is a blurb
we'll know soon enough...i think its walkley...and thats a good thing because changing jobs is an easy way to rid yourself of a stock thats a problem for you
looking at those two massive red mountains...tells me we've gone through a major distribution and reaccumulation of stock...and we've got some fresh faced new shareholders...maybe ones w/o so much baggage...bollinger bands are tight...pick a side!!!
bloomberg says coverage is being assumed by piper jaffrey...i guess walkley is picking it up in his new spot
then you could be on tho something
jai...did they remove those numbers from the 10k?....that would be of much more significance...the annual report is more of an "editorial" by idc...the 10k is the nuts and bolts
i"d deny infringement after i signed a liscence also
naturally...he's a long....da dum dum!!
businesses that have "no business models"...are doomed from the start....and if there ever was a business w/ no business model..wifi is it
there is no weasling out of an arbitration judgement...thats why nec settled
gab...when they "announced" [via 10k filing] nec arb amount of 400myn...they said that they expected to settle for substantially less...and not to expect anything close to 400myn....nokia's numbers where not "announced" via a 10k...and we were not told to expect substantially less...i think this is a substantially different situation...although i wouldnt mind the same outcome...2g settlement w/ a 3g liscence
ignorance is bliss....but stupidity can be passed along generation after generation!!!
i leave the "polite logic" to the lawyers...calling a spade a spade is more my style....is there anything you would like to add to further the knowledge of your fellow investors...ive noticed you only care to post to disparage me...
riighhhtt!!
your twisting words like the lawyer you are...idc did not state that they are exclusively in economic discussions...they stated that they are in a "greater number of economic discusions than they ever were at any one time before"...what kind of lawyer did you say you were?
why are u always looking for scapegoats for your own mistakes...i dont go to jail anymore...ive found i can be just as sarcastic,offensive and disagreeable w/o having to resort to curse words....btw...the day i AGREE w/ your krap...is the day ill put myself in jail
whose curve are they behind?...yours?...
comical!!
really!!!..im glad
3g sales actually began in 2002