Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
GG: AS to the Pensley and Abato thing. I do not know where the absolute truth lies, nor do I care. If true it is some peripheral or tangential issue, not connected to the current business operation of spnge and its reauldit, and filing of 10Ks, and proceeding to the nasdaq ASAP. If untrue, then it is completely irrelevant for anything. In the end it not important to find the truth of every little thing that pops up with respect to spnge. Naysayers will dwell on it on course.
We do know as a FACT that in the Extension document spnge filed with the SEC on 8/31, it was stated that spnge for FY 2009 had Revenues of approx. $50m and a profit of $11m. That IS FACT filed with the SEC already. So those figures will be no surprise when the 10k for 2009 is filed as we have advance notice of them since 8/31. Everyone seems to forget that.
All we are looking for is a reaudut of 2008 in which spnge had but $5.6m in revenues and $1.6m in profit -- not a biggie, IMO. And I assume that the 10K for 2009 is already done to be filed when 2008 is done.
So, we wait for a little time and relax. Spino
GG: I liked the letter to S/Hs.
As to leaks, in all due fairness, over the months I have been here there have been "rumors" time and time again, 20, 30, 40, or more, which did not pan out. Some may call it a leak. You may call it a leak if some "rumor" actually comes true. It does not mean that there was actually any leak. It means that someone got lucky with their guess of their "rumor", IMO.
So, it is a matter of interpretation and perspective, IMO, as to whether one classifies some "rumor" or leak of some guess being correct. That's how I see it. GLTY.
Spino
Probably yes. In Calif. not in Bk. cases there are what are called Coordination Cases whereby the California Judicial Council coordinates cases involving the sames parties, issues, filed in different courts across California, or even in different states.
similarly, in the interests of justice and saving money basically and time, one Fed. Ct. Judge can tr. jurisdiction of his case to another -- the main situs of the litigation, in this instance Delaware. That's my take on it. Let soeone else reply if they have a different idea. Spino
Thank you. I'm sorry to see wadi go.
Thak you very much.
Thank you very much.
A total of 17.7m shares!! Wow!!
Thank you.
That's it. THANK YOU. The 1 Yr. Anniv. Date and Omnibus Hearing at 10:30am
Cabroncita: Could you please tell me what the court hearing is this coming Friday?? Thank you very much.
I can't find it in the DD in iBox or elsewhere.
ACtually Dora the Explorer is a pretty darn program on Nick also my grandson when he was I don't know 3-4 used to watch it. Actually an excellent kids program.
Who is "she"? And why should we believe her or this rumor above all others which have hit the board in the past 5 months? Thank you in advance.
Eric: Good Job. Just like you said.
POST TO NO ONE: Promises, promises, rumors of this and that. Good things coming this and that, 10K this and that, a r/s or no r/s, someone talked to this person or that person. Bla, Bla, Bla.
I will not believe anything anymore until it actually happens. Because to date so many promises and nothing has happened.
I'm going to sit back and TRY to relax and hang in there -- due to the fundamentals of this company. There I have had my say. Spino
I guess i'm dense, I do not understand your reply to what is the purpose of this Friday's Court Hearing.
Where do you get the spongetch zap pens?
Is the court Date on Friday when the Judge will announce his ruling on the Summary Judgement Motion? Or something else? Thanks in advance.
And is that around $12+ or what do you think? Thank you in advance.
You think so, huh?
Which is correct: 30m or 3 Bil.?
3 Bil. KJ posted 30m. What's the deeal? What's the correct figure?
This would be A/S as filed with Del. SOS? Correct?
I do not understand what you just posted??
Read NY Times vs. Sullivan a 1964 US Supreme Court Case requiring proof of actual malice by Post for spnge to prevail in any legal action. It would be both a waste of time and legal resources on the part of spnge to file such an action. No company would do it.
The best thing for spnge is to come out with its reaudit and filings ASAP, IMO.
COOL! Thank you.
I'm so confused now I could just ...........
Instead, I'll try to relax and go to bed after reading a few more posts.
The price is only twelve cents. I don't know if the price supports anything at this point. JMO.
phrantic: Well I'll be. Nice post.
I for one as people know have been here for the fundamentals. If the fundamental were not good, and projected sales, profits, growth were not positive, I'd be gone. In a heartbeat.
The fundamentals is what distinguishes this company head and shoulders above so many others on nasdaq presently, IMO. Nasddaq is where spnge belongs to rid itself of the constant daily BS from here and there.
I will not discuss the particulars of the fundamentals as others should know them by now. Plus, the presence of Deloitte & touche -- no matter what anyone says is a very positive and giant plus for me, IMO. A confirmation that we are going to be doing bigger things.
Thaks again phrantic, and I'm pleasantly surprised, by your post. Spino
Happy: In other words you are talking Rod Serling's "Twilight Zone" --
no qulification as to time AFTER split..hour..week.month? Definitely the Twilight Zone.
This is all very encouraging. The answer is no one knows for sure -- which is why we are still stuck at .$12, I guess.
It might be white flag night for them -- I wish! Enjoy the momentary quietness of the spnge board.
Are you talking about Alfie or stox?
What is it are you trying to say? I do not understand the point you are trying to make. I'm a simple person, make it simple for me. Please. Thank you
risk: Verrry.....intersting, But (Not) Stupid! Arte Johnson.
To split or not to split, that is the Q!
I guess z already corrected you. It is what I said it was.
I totally agree with you. I think it presently both sides equally. I would think that the shorts do not like it because it indicates that there is probably a very large short position and that position is stuck. That woud lead some naysayers to be cranky about the article. thank you for your posting.
WEll, if that is the rule, then thanks.