Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
JPM CEO Dimon Says Regulations Have Gone Too Far Since Lehman
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2022-09-21/jpm-ceo-dimon-says-regulations-have-gone-too-far-since-lehman?srnd=all
agreed, Lehman Brothers is deeply engrained in the US "system"... regardless of my thoughts and beliefs on "The System"
understood, but are they really going to give up their US entity. I think not. Greed will rule.
All of that USA $$$.
IMHO
You can do better than that TG. "Say it with me one time TG."
Show me the money!!! "You got to Yell that Shit"
and big money that can be utilized during a recession $$$. Just hope we get a piece of something.
Lehman Brothers Followers: 296: Any other interpretations/opinions of Docket #61483? Joyce and others? I hear you TG.
POR is closing?, or remaining open and they are just covering up their tracks by removing old records? :P
https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentsbydocket/?docketId=962348&projectCode=LBH&docketNumber=61483&source=DM
and the signed order Doc 61497: https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4107145&projectCode=LBH&source=DM
LD might be correct based on the related document Docket # 61483... unfortunately... and don't tell me to sell lol. read Docket # 61483 and come to your own conclusion.
Docket # 61497
Filed Sep 14 2022
Order Granting Motion of the Plan Administrator for an Order Authorizing the Abandonment of Debtor Records (Related Doc # [61483]) signed on 9/14/2022 (White, Greg)
Docket # 61483
Filed Aug 10 2022
Motion to Authorize The Abandonment of Debtor Records filed by Michael A. Rollin on behalf of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. with hearing to be held on 9/15/2022 at 11:00 AM at Teleconference Line (CourtSolutions) (SCC) Responses due by 8/29/2022,. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 # (2) Exhibit 2 # (3) Exhibit 3 # (4) Proposed Order) (Rollin, Michael)
https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentsbydocket/?docketId=962348&projectCode=LBH&docketNumber=61483&source=DM
He's not dead, just hiding with highway. I'm a man of my word and if we get paid Joe gets paid as I will be sending $1.00 donation every year to Rockdale Art Farm Stockbridge, GA 30281
I'm not sure at this time... more info here: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Lehman-Bros-Cap.-Trust-VI-Pref-d-Series-N-LEHNQ-14907
gotcha, thanks stox.
? anyone: Doesn't this get squashed when the plan administrator is discharged and the POR is closed? what happens next? Lights off and we all go home? Sit and wait for many years wondering and hoping like WAMU/COOP?
and the BIG question is where are we? Hopefully not gone with the administrator.
I thought that as well, but wasn't sure. Thanks TG. Let's end this crap or start NEW
how about this? Mean anything?
ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF THE PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR AN
ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ABANDONMENT OF DEBTOR RECORDS
https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4107145&projectCode=LBH&source=DM
so another 14 years of nothing?
I think this is the location to check not EPIQ for this case. Let's end this saga.
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/35530408/In_Re_Lehman_Brothers_Holdings_Inc
GLTA
~dnoto
Preach it Cotton and please make sure you are EXTRA LOUD with your words as we need to be heard
Thank you Cotton and Rex. LFG!!!
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/6391X_1-2022-8-30.pdf
WTF, LBHI YOU issued the subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V. You need to pay up LBHI!!! and... I want interest too for your shady accounting.
How do you issue something, but NOT have any responsibility to what you issued.
ACCOUNTABILITY is required here!!!
Claims by LP IV and LP V against LBHI
4.30 It was LBHI and not LBH that issued subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V in return for
the payment of the regulatory capital that was raised by the issuance of the Securities
by LP IV and LP V. The LP IV and LP V Partnerships may have a claim for payment of
a dividend by LBHI in relation to the subordinated notes that were issued. This is a
matter that the Joint Liquidators are continuing to keep under review. However, it is the
Joint Liquidators’ understanding that LBHI’s subordinated debt holders are currently
not expected to receive any distribution. The Joint Liquidators therefore understand that
the prospects of any recovery from LBHI in relation to these claims are very low.
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/6391X_1-2022-8-30.pdf
WTF, LBHI YOU issued the subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V. You need to pay up LBHI!!! and... I want interest too for your shady accounting.
How do you issue something, but NOT have any responsibility to what you issued.
ACCOUNTABILITY is required here!!!
Claims by LP IV and LP V against LBHI
4.30 It was LBHI and not LBH that issued subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V in return for
the payment of the regulatory capital that was raised by the issuance of the Securities
by LP IV and LP V. The LP IV and LP V Partnerships may have a claim for payment of
a dividend by LBHI in relation to the subordinated notes that were issued. This is a
matter that the Joint Liquidators are continuing to keep under review. However, it is the
Joint Liquidators’ understanding that LBHI’s subordinated debt holders are currently
not expected to receive any distribution. The Joint Liquidators therefore understand that
the prospects of any recovery from LBHI in relation to these claims are very low.
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/6391X_1-2022-8-30.pdf
WTF, LBHI YOU issued the subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V. You need to pay up LBHI!!! and... I want interest too for your shady accounting.
How do you issue something, but NOT have any responsibility to what you issued.
ACCOUNTABILITY is required here!!!
Claims by LP IV and LP V against LBHI
4.30 It was LBHI and not LBH that issued subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V in return for
the payment of the regulatory capital that was raised by the issuance of the Securities
by LP IV and LP V. The LP IV and LP V Partnerships may have a claim for payment of
a dividend by LBHI in relation to the subordinated notes that were issued. This is a
matter that the Joint Liquidators are continuing to keep under review. However, it is the
Joint Liquidators’ understanding that LBHI’s subordinated debt holders are currently
not expected to receive any distribution. The Joint Liquidators therefore understand that
the prospects of any recovery from LBHI in relation to these claims are very low.
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/6391X_1-2022-8-30.pdf
WTF, LBHI YOU issued the subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V. You need to pay up LBHI!!! and... I want interest too for your shady accounting.
How do you issue something, but NOT have any responsibility to what you issued.
ACCOUNTABILITY is required here!!!
Claims by LP IV and LP V against LBHI
4.30 It was LBHI and not LBH that issued subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V in return for
the payment of the regulatory capital that was raised by the issuance of the Securities
by LP IV and LP V. The LP IV and LP V Partnerships may have a claim for payment of
a dividend by LBHI in relation to the subordinated notes that were issued. This is a
matter that the Joint Liquidators are continuing to keep under review. However, it is the
Joint Liquidators’ understanding that LBHI’s subordinated debt holders are currently
not expected to receive any distribution. The Joint Liquidators therefore understand that
the prospects of any recovery from LBHI in relation to these claims are very low.
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/6391X_1-2022-8-30.pdf
WTF, LBHI YOU issued the subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V. You need to pay up LBHI!!! and... I want interest too for your shady accounting.
How do you issue something, but NOT have any responsibility to what you issued.
ACCOUNTABILITY is required here!!!
Claims by LP IV and LP V against LBHI
4.30 It was LBHI and not LBH that issued subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V in return for
the payment of the regulatory capital that was raised by the issuance of the Securities
by LP IV and LP V. The LP IV and LP V Partnerships may have a claim for payment of
a dividend by LBHI in relation to the subordinated notes that were issued. This is a
matter that the Joint Liquidators are continuing to keep under review. However, it is the
Joint Liquidators’ understanding that LBHI’s subordinated debt holders are currently
not expected to receive any distribution. The Joint Liquidators therefore understand that
the prospects of any recovery from LBHI in relation to these claims are very low.
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/6391X_1-2022-8-30.pdf
WTF, LBHI YOU issued the subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V. You need to pay up LBHI!!! and... I want interest too for your shady accounting.
How do you issue something, but NOT have any responsibility to what you issued.
ACCOUNTABILITY is required here!!!
Claims by LP IV and LP V against LBHI
4.30 It was LBHI and not LBH that issued subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V in return for
the payment of the regulatory capital that was raised by the issuance of the Securities
by LP IV and LP V. The LP IV and LP V Partnerships may have a claim for payment of
a dividend by LBHI in relation to the subordinated notes that were issued. This is a
matter that the Joint Liquidators are continuing to keep under review. However, it is the
Joint Liquidators’ understanding that LBHI’s subordinated debt holders are currently
not expected to receive any distribution. The Joint Liquidators therefore understand that
the prospects of any recovery from LBHI in relation to these claims are very low.
agreed, may jimmy rest in peace. Have a Sinatra and roll tide for Jimmy.
Keep an eye across the pond as Jimmy would say.
Let's put this to rest. It's been a very long journey.
family is #1
Thanks for all you do Cotton. Same for Cheese and TooGood. I understand this takes a lot of time to research and I appreciate you guys sharing your findings. Thanks!
Let's put this to rest, so we can rest.
~dnoto
LOL, it needs more than tires after all of these years :P
Let's end this fiasco.
Chapter 11 Monthly Operating Report for the Month Ending: 07/31/2022
https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4098381&projectCode=LBH&source=DM
4.30 It was LBHI and not LBH that issued subordinated notes to LP IV and LP V in return for the payment of the regulatory capital that was raised by the issuance of the Securities by LP IV and LP V. The LP IV and LP V Partnerships may have a claim for payment of a dividend by LBHI in relation to the subordinated notes that were issued.
This is a matter that the Joint Liquidators are continuing to keep under review. However, it is the Joint Liquidators’ understanding that LBHI’s subordinated debt holders are currently not expected to receive any distribution. The Joint Liquidators therefore understand that the prospects of any recovery from LBHI in relation to these claims are very low.
of course: This one has more details. Please let us know your thoughts as this is way above my pay scale unless I'm holding GOLD. thank you!
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/6391X_1-2022-8-30.pdf
exactly, others have been paid. Let's end this crap.
Just in: Lehman Brothers UK Capital Funding V LP: Notice to the Holders of the Preferred Securities
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/08/30/2506988/0/en/Lehman-Brothers-UK-Capital-Funding-V-LP-Notice-to-the-Holders-of-the-Preferred-Securities.html
any good stuff in here...
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/6391X_1-2022-8-30.pdf
Cumulative Preferred Stock:
LEHCQ
LEHDQ
LEHFQ
LEHGQ
https://www.quantumonline.com/search.cfm
Had to dig deep for this email from 2015 when they removed LEHJQ. I scrubbed my name.
Yes, that is correct. I can confirm that as I own ALL preferreds.
Lehcq
Lehdq
Lehfq
Lehjq
Lehgq
Lehpq
Lbhgp
Can't speak for commons Lehmq as I don't own any.
The good old days lol. I was reading some of the old J posts in 2009 with Brikk and Coach Tequila. Coach Tequila is/was sharp with this crap.
Let's get this over.
yes, Js were removed for a period of time and we called (Joe) at Epiq to have them restored.
I remember them trying to cancel the CTs too.
All of the Js history is here: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Lehman-Preferred-Series-%22J%22-Preferred-fka-LEHJQ-14471
Not sure if this article is helpful or not: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/judgment-claim-and-lien-securing-it-7219808/