Then there must be something wrong with your broker because there were shares avaliable at both .0002 and .0003

Company willing to sell shares at .0002 maybe ?

This means nothing IMO. BLOC isnt the problem the fact that the company is not completley explaning things and diluting is the problem. 682 million dollar loan closing is huge news dont you think the company would have PRed it ?

Exactly and another questions I have Frogg is they supposidley funded the 11 million loan in house.

How is this possible...Looking at their 2007 financials where did they come up with 11 million dollars in order to fund the loans in house ? What is your take on this ?

It is common sense to see the writing on the wall of the dilution king HCPC.

They should hang a sign outside of their office that says HCPC 6 billion new shares served in the last year.

Yep lots of time to sell more shares with a few more carrots along the way im sure.

How many weeks in a row have you been posting this nonsense ?

Im still waiting for an answer.

What is heritages definition of Closed and funded ?

I havent twisted anything merely stating the truth as to what is going on. Answer this question how is HCPC funding them in house or is this a lie and all thats really happened is the paperwork has been done and nothing more ?

I dont own a single share of this POS.

IMO this stock is one of the biggest POS's on IHUB. Show me another one that has treated shareholders so poorly when contacting the company for info, dumped billions of shares onto their shareholders, and now is posting things on a website without a PR or explanation.

Wheres the PR that braden said was coming this last week ? HMMMM

Thats not my question.

How did a company that lost money every quarter in 2007 come up with 13 million to fund the loans in house ?

Are you referring to the fact that they have been funded in house but havent been given to the borrower yet ?

Why if they are funded have they not been given to the borrower ?

How did they fund 13 million in loans in house ? They have been losing money every month how did they come up with this kind of cash ?

I bet they dont have an answer. They have changed their story as to what is going on many times.

Im wondering if they arent putting the info in PR's purposely because there is less legal remifications putting it only on a website.....Anyone else share this idea ?

These are the type of posts that really make me chuckle. This one is ever worst then the one mentioned. They have been putting out info through a website that looks like it was created in the stone ages.


13 million funded in house by a company that has no cash flow based on the 07 financials and by a company that had to dilute billions of shares in order to keep afloat but now they have 13 million layin around to fund the loan in house. DO you guys really believe this ? If this was the case why did it take them years to fund their first loan and why did the have to dilute billions of shares ?

You dont find is strange that they didnt PR the huge milestone of the 672 million loan being closed ?


Sure seems weird seems like if the company was really concerned with keeping their shareholders up to date they would have done something more then put it up on a website that it looks like a child could have created.

What does it mean that HCPC is funding these loans in house ?

How do they have 13 million "in house" their financials for year end 2007 were awful so how did they suddenly come up with 13 million ?

Try to twist it how you want but a .0002 print when the bid is .0002 is someone dumping.

The A/S is 100 million supposidley.

Mines sore from Morley having his way with us........

I consider the amount of shares that HCPC has created over the last few months to be pretty toxic but to each their own. Im done here for the day.

Have a good night all.

Cant get much worse then 6 billion over a 5 month period with 2 A/S increases.

I think the prefered shares are toxic so they have both going for them. I dont think that toxic financing would have been any worse with the rate that shares were being added.

I think people should use common sense and ask themselves how much of this information is true because IMO not too much of it is.

So your saying the 11.1 million hasnt been funded yet ? If thats the case these are some misleading statments made by the company on the website.

Riddle me this....Why did the company have to dump billions of shares if they had 700 million laying around to fund the loans "in house" ?

I cant show you many examples where companies have not dumped billions I repeat billions of shares onto their shareholders.

Im not dicusssing last year either I said in the last year.

In the last year dilution and lack of execution has dropped this stock from .025 to .0001. They have gone from a manageable float in the 200 million range to a diluted pig with a float in the 7 billion range and it very well could be higher as the company hasnt updated the share structure in about a month.

Youd actually be down 99% if you bought this stock last year not up 300%.

Doubt myself ? I along with a few other saw right through this POS.

And claiming its up 300% and some stocks take years to do that. Do you really understand what you are saying at .0001 with no bid this thing had nothing to do but go up. If we want to talk about percentages this thing is down a huge percentage in this year look at the chart. If this loan product was so extraordinary they wouldnt have had to dilute like they did they would have been able to get funding via a Private placement or other means. Not to mention the CEO's husband has already had charges brought against him in the past. The term Red Flag doesnt even begin to explain this one IMO.

From a high of .025 this year to .0001 I would say most companies would have a difficult time to do this cause it either takes a ton of dilution or even more incompetence.

Doubt myself ? I along with a few other saw right through this POS.

And claiming its up 300% and some stocks take years to do that. Do you really understand what you are saying at .0001 with no bid this thing had nothing to do but go up. If we want to talk about percentages this thing is down a huge percentage in this year look at the chart. If this loan product was so extraordinary they wouldnt have had to dilute like they did they would have been able to get funding via a Private placement or other means. Not to mention the CEO's husband has already had charges brought against him in the past. The term Red Flag doesnt even begin to explain this one IMO.

Lets keep it real, the float has gone up considerably here in the last few months and the company still hasnt PRed anything about the 672 million dollar loan.

Depends on how many more shares the company wants to sell at .0002. IMO the company is still selling. They wouldnt have raised the A/S to 10 billion if they werent planning on using them.

Your post was making it seem as if the stock ran. It didnt all it did was make a move from 1 to 3 and then the dumping began again.

Look the stock is still wallowing in the same trading range. If all these things being posted were true dont you think someone would be buying all these shares up like crazy ? Yet you have many MM's on the ask at .0003 and a lot of people willing to dump at .0002. Makes ya wonder doesnt it ?

Just great... You ?

And the 11.1 million dollar PR did what for the price ? Thats right now much and they still continued to dilute.

I am free to post on this board all I want and will continue to do so.

How is a sale at 2 not a sell ? Someone is supplying the shares at .0002 its basic market knowledge.

Its the same thing. These are the kind of posts im talking about. It is people willing to sell at the bid and a lot of them.

Lot of dumping at .0002 going on 15 million shares in the last half hour or so.