Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
One would of thought A statement from GI first thing Monday Morning snubbing this once and for all.
Like I said imo you won't hear any statement
Not me! I expected the same thing to happen with the William Majcher situation where Hodges never mentions Majcher's involvement again.
Now if Hodges and Maheu have a private conversation where Maheu request Hodges cease mentioning PM/GI's involvement with this allege settlement deal, and if you never hear or read of Hodges mentioning it again, well......
However if this should persist, then you may see a statement from PM/GI.
Interesting info came out yesterday that Vissokovsky may be here in the States working with a defense attorney
Interesting.....
Someone is also working hard on Vissokovsky's defense using the message boards. For what purpose who knows. I have a theory but, it's only my opinion. ;)
After reading Deb's excellent post on Vissokovsky's background the possibility that he may be in the U.S. is even more plausible, imo.
goodolboy, thanks for bringing that little tidbit over.
Re: GLISSON RESPONSE to SEC EMERGENCY MOTION
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=988708
By: carmelbeach
17 Jan 2011, 08:17 PM EST
Rating: Msg. 988708 of 988848
(Reply to 988701 by carmelbeach)
GLISSON RESPONSE to SEC EMERGENCY MOTION
FILED 1/10/11
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:x9JHAgMUWPoJ:www.scribd.com/doc/46698126/Marcos-Reply+%22marco+glisson%22&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
DEFENDANT GLISSON’S RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION
RE: DISCOVERY MATTERS AND
DECLARATION OF COUNSEL,
ROBERT H. BRETZ
(Telephonic Participation Authorized)
Date of Hearing: January 13, 2011
Time of Hearing: 11:00 a.m.
MARCO GLISSON, through his attorney of record, responds to Plaintiff, Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Emergency Motion to Compel Attendance at Deposition and the Production of Documents (the “Motion”), as follows:
There is no basis, emergency or otherwise, for the Motion. The Defendant and third-party witness, Thidarat Tungswongsathong, appeared for testimony as called for by Plaintiff’s notice of deposition and subpoena, as previously agreed, on January 10, 2011 in Los Angeles,California, all documents called for by the subject notice to produce dated November 4, 2010,the subpoena dated November 1, 2010, and the Court’s Order dated October 29, 2010,[1] were
produced prior to such appearances. The depositions proceeded as scheduled, and will continue on January 11, 2011, as necessary.
[1] Order Granting Motion to Extend Time 90 days for the limited purpose of developing discovery and preserving evidence concerning Marco Glisson’s conduct in 2010.
See the accompanying Declaration of Bretz, Esq.
DATED this 10th day of January, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/:Robert H. Bretz, Esq.
Robert H. Bretz, Esq.
California Bar No. 55087578
Washington Blvd. #843
Marina del Rey, California 90292
(310) 578-1945
Attorney for Defendant
DECLARATION OF ROBERT BRETZ, ESQ.
I, ROBERT H. BRETZ, ESQ., hereby declare as follows:
1. I am attorney of record for Marco Glisson and I am otherwise competent to provide the within testimony based on my own personal knowledge.
2. On October 29, 2010, the Court granted the SEC’s motion to reopen discovery concerning Marco Glisson.
3. Thereafter, the SEC issued its notice and request for production of documents to Glisson and subpoena to Thidarat Tungswongsathong (Glisson’s wife) covering their appearances on December 10 and 11, 2010, in Fort Meyers, Florida (near where they live).
4. Prior to the Court’s October 29th Order, Glisson had timely appeared for testimony as requested by the SEC in Los Angeles on two prior occasions during the course of the investigation and legal proceedings.
5. Several days prior to the scheduled December 10 and 11th
appearance dates, I notified the SEC (herein Paris Wynn, Esq.) that Thidarat Tungswongsathong was forced to undergo(emergency) major surgery on December 8, 2010. which would naturally preclude her appearance on December 10th and that Marco Glisson wanted to attend to his wife’s medical situation requiring a continuance of the scheduled depositions and document production as a result of such medical situation.
6. Shortly thereafter, following consultation with Thidarat Tungswongsathong’s doctors,I was informed and notified the SEC that Marco Glisson and Thidarat Tungswongsathong would be able to appear for their depositions and production in Los Angeles on January 10 and 11, 2011(as they had previously offered to accommodate Los Angles based counsel for both parties).This plan was agreeable to the SEC and was confirmed by the parties in writing.
7. As requested, I provided the SEC with hospital admittance and discharge documentation evidencing Thidarat Tungswongsathong’s surgery on December 8, 2010.
8. Prior to the bringing of the SEC’s motion, I reconfirmed to the SEC that Marco Glisson and Thidarat Tungswongsathong had booked air transportation to Los Angeles for their appearances in Los Angeles on January 10 and 11, 2011, which would go forward as scheduled.
9. On December 27, 2010, I provided the SEC in excess of 250 pages of documents being produced pursuant to the notice and subpoena, and I informed the SEC at that time, and thereafter, that additional documents including e-mails would be forthcoming in advance of the appearances.
10. Prior to the appearances on January 10, 2011, I provided the SEC with an additional 350 plus pages of documents being produced by the witnesses.
11. I have no explanation as to why the SEC felt the need to initiate the instant Motion prior to the agreed upon appearances and additional/final production prior to January 10, 2011.
This Declaration is made and given under penalty of perjury. This Declaration is executed in Los Angeles County, California, on January 10, 2011
/s/: ROBERT H. BRETZ, ESQ.
ROBERT H. BRETZ, ESQ.
Six Measurable items in Al Hodges Update: 2 out of 6 fail so far ty Al!
Strike one
1. The very latest information indicates that it (dinar)has revalued,
Failed, lie, call it what you want, did not happen.
Strike two
2. (dinar) will be fully convertible in the US by Tuesday.
Failed, lie, call it what you want, did not happen.
Strike three about to be called
5. Michael Cottrell will be paid on or about January 21, 2011
The remaining three items are more World Reports gibberish. Krazy Al's next move will be to file the appeal, or after PM/GI put an end to Krazy Al's placing the blame on them for delaying the packets, place the blame on the Chinese. Xer madness will turn their attention on sending emails to the Chinese Embassy.
3. Joint Chiefs of Staff were appointed by the World Court to supervise the conclusion of the WGS
4. China, to take charge and supervise the conclusion of the WGS payouts
6. I have had direct response from the Palace
it's clear that some investors need a brain transplant, not education
LOL
Now the Xers are imitating World Reports.
By theraven
Re: Peter Mahue is said to be out
« Reply #4 Today at 12:30pm »
found this on a web pageGovernment Insider Says Iraqi Dinar and Massive CMKX Payout Linked
Jan 14
ocdUncategorized No Comments
http://www.free-press-release.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States of America (Free-Press-Release.com) January 14, 2011 –
A recent unnamed US Government insider has mentioned how important the Iraqi Dinar is to much of the penny stock investing community.
“This morning I have learned that it is in the interest of Iraq for the progress of their country in terms of trade that the IMF will be revaluing the Iraqi dinar on Jan. 14th. As a fellow investor of the currency of Iraq I felt as though I would share this with all of you to be proactive in your preparations for this. I have been a part of many briefings on this matter but not until now has anything been definite.”
This just on the heals of an announcement by an employee of California Attorney Al Hodges to address his recent statement of an expected payout settlement by naked shorters. The payout is an estimated $3.86 trillion. Hodges hyped the expectations of 50,000 CMKX shareholders just outside of a courtroom with his “if I were a betting man I would say we get paid by Christmas” statement approximately two weeks before December 25, 2011. The payout never came.
Many individuals invest in penny stocks due to the amount of shares one can purchase for so little. The speculation draws both innocent, optimistic investors and plenty of criminal minds ready to take advantage of the blue collar investor. Much fraud is allowed by the SEC because, as the agency states, “it doesn’t have adequate manpower”.
Those individuals desiring to stay informed of fraud and deceit towards CMKX shareholders while the SEC continues to sit idly by for the past 8 years should bookmark:
Here's an article in thestreet.com by Gary Weiss.
Thanks a bunch to medcal on RB for posting the story. medchal posted the excerpt about CMKX but, it is worth reading the entire article.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=988543
By: medchal
17 Jan 2011, 10:40 AM EST
Rating: Msg. 988543 of 988545
From an article on thestreet.com today:
http://tinyurl.com/4kz63mn
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10973626/1/50-cent-adds-to-internet-horrors.html
50 Cent Adds to Internet Horrors
By Gary Weiss
NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Do we need any more reminders that stock message boards are minefields for investors? That they are happy hunting grounds for stock promoters, paid stalkers and assorted shills? Just look at a news item that's been all over the press and you can see what I mean.
There were plenty of amusing articles in the press in recent days about a drug company's appearance before the Supreme Court. The company is Matrixx Initiatives, and the cause of the merriment was Judge Antonin Scalia asking a government lawyer if he believed in "Satan."
Matrixx is accused of not promptly disclosing reports of serious side effects for one of its products, and the company raised a parallel with the old rumors that Procter & Gamble(PG) was in league with the Devil. If Procter & Gamble didn't have to disclose those stupid rumors, why did Matrixx have to report on stupid, "unreliable" reports about the harm caused by its Zicam cold remedy, even when the dang things turned out to be true?
Funny, huh? Well, I guess you had to be there.
After laughing for several minutes over this, I remembered that there was something about this situation that was even more of a knee-slapper. One of the "initiatives" in Matrixx's corporate mission is its aggressive effort to get ordinary people to STFU about the company on stock message boards. To me that's as big a deal as not disclosing stuff to investors, but it wasn't before the Supreme Court. That's because there's no money in it for private litigators, and our government doesn't give a hoot.
But Matrixx sure gave a hoot, so it sued a bunch of people in 2002, including anonymous message-board posters, claiming that they were unfairly disparaging the company. The suits received little attention in the media while they were dragging through the courts. Why should they? After all, only small fry were involved -- a crummy little company and some ordinary people yapping on message boards. Who cares about their free-speech rights?
One of the message-board posters identified in the suit was a persistent Internet gadfly named Floyd Schneider. Floyd started posting about the dangers posed by Zicam, he tells me, after he found a Yahoo(YHOO) group composed of people claiming their sense of smell was impeded by use of the product. So he and others banged away on the subject long before the media picked up on it.
Here is a typical post by Floyd in 2003, while the suit was still under way. Matrixx vigorously reaffirmed the safety of Zicam in press releases like this from early 2004, denying a report by Carol Remond of Dow Jones News Service and specifically mentioning Floyd.
I tell you, these people are sweethearts. Aside from bringing its legal guns to bear against people in pajamas posting on the Internet, it sent its crackerjack legal team to badger an independent research analyst who also committed the crime of telling the truth about Matrixx and Zicam. Thanks to superb lawyering by the Matrixx lawyers and the resulting legal fees for the defendant, the analyst went out of business in 2005.
Got to admire Matrixx for its moxie. This fine example of American business kept up a brave front right up till the moment in 2009 when the FDA issued a warning telling people to chuck any Zicam they may have in their medicine chests --because it might destroy their sense of smell. Yep, this is the same thing that those message-board people were gabbing about years before.
The lawsuit against the message-board people was dropped, naturally, but it didn't matter. It had cast a nice, fat chilling effect on online freedom of speech, shut down an independent analyst and caused Floyd to incur legal fees of $30,000. Sure, you can sue for vexatious litigation in such circumstances. Try it sometime and see what it gets you. Floyd did, and the case was tossed out.
If you need any more evidence of the kind of horror the Internet has been for investors, a couple of other recent tidings come to mind. There's the tweet by the rapper 50 Cent that sent a penny stock called H&H Imports(HNHI) soaring the other day. There's the latest news from one of my favorite penny stock frauds, CMKM Diamonds. The feds are saying in court papers that millions of unregistered shares in this dumb little non-company were being sold as recently as Jan. 3 in an Internet chat room.
CMKM is one of the truly fascinating stories of Internet stock hype, an outright fraud (if you believe the federal indictment of its former CEO, the fugitive Urban Casavant) that won a devoted following of naive shareholders who blamed the company's woes on "naked short sellers." The SEC is pushing something called "investor education," but -- judging from the recent brisk sales of its worthless stock -- it's clear that some investors need a brain transplant, not education. And not just CMKM bagholders. There are the people who listened to this genius who explained on the shill-infested Investor Village message board how they could use credit-card advances to buy into NovaStar Financial, a disintegrating subprime lender.
Anyway, the sad and strange story of Matrixx is finally coming to court, if the Supreme Court lets the case move forward. The issue before the high court, which is hearing an appeal of an investor class-action suit, is whether Matrixx should have been more prompt in disclosing reports that Zicam caused customers to lose their sense of smell. Since this is a class-action suit, a legal victory is likely to mean massive fees for the shareholder lawyers and only a pittance for shareholders.
Floyd doesn't care. He has bought a share -- right, one single share -- of Matrixx, and is lead plaintiff in another class action that is fighting the company's acquisition by HIG Capital LLC. I hope this gets to the Supreme Court. Maybe this time Scalia will ask the lawyer for Matrixx if he believes in the Devil known as the First Amendment.
It seems to me that Hollenegg is being used by a person or several people to achieve their ends, whatever that might be
That recording explains a lot, like how evil Hodges is if he is using him in this way
What came first, the chicken or the eggie?
If you go back and read eggie's earlier posts, or listen to Smith's conversation with Barry, you will learn that eggie himself pushed this conspiracy theory all guns blazing. Apparently, more than once he called Hodges office feeding them a lot of this nonsense. IMO, it was eggie's actions that put him at the top of the list as one of Hodges plaintiffs.
Unlike the other plaintiffs, I was totally convinced that eggie would not sell ONE share of CMKX because he really is convinced that this sting crap etc, is true.
I suspect that the board persona is some sort of alter ego of his, like the international spy he claims to be, the numerous death threats he imagines, and the broker of world peace he claims to be.
Living in a world of make believe? hmmm
By BHollenegg
Jerry...Thank you. I just called the PA State Attorney's office and will be speaking to the State Attorney Corbett on Wednesday to make sure AG Corbett understands what is going on and verify that he received the correct facts.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
By wolfbela
Bob,
Save yourself a call.. PA is not involved at this time...Plus, Corbett is not in the office, as he was just elected governor.
I am still in the process of convincing PA to become involved as they don't see the situation as other states have seen it....
So it will fall on deaf ears.. but hey, it is your dime...
I am confident with what is going on at the present time..Just got some encouraging news from another state this morning...
Actually, Bob, by you calling, you may validate my concerns for the PA shareholders.. so have at it.. BTW, there is no way the Att. Gen personally will be taking your call.. It will be a staff member...I have been in contact with them for months...
The only facts the PA AG office received are the ones you and Att. Hodges have been presenting for a year.. in what relates to the Bivens and Trust..
There are more concerns for the shareholders as well...that believe it or not, do not concern you..
I am surprised you could even reach anyone on a federal holiday..
Sure about that??
J WB
I thought UC was living on the lamb
Judging only by appearance, he doesn't strike me as someone who overindulges himself eating veggies.
BTW eggie, Burrell is an idiot. So is the dentist. My God your "experts" stink.
Do I believe in Bud Burrell’s assessment that a component of a Sting occurred?…YES!
Typical Hollenegg post...
I just can't anymore..........lol
Hilarious! Thousands of shareholders and who does Krazy Al hitch his wagon to?
By fisher
Is this the same Tramp that used to be on the mic in paltalk and pass out drunk on the mic?
And the same one that said we were drilling for pearls in Canada?
That one's pretty ugly too
Just saying it's an improvement than the one in Vegas. That one was hideous looking.
He and Carolyn have bad taste. But that's no surprise.
Nothing beats that high rise dark dungeon Captain Fluffy and Babs lived in. My God what were they thinking? lol
Urban's Canadian digs are much nicer than the Las Vegas home. The LV house was ugly, imo.
From granny's board.
http://www.garyemde.com/details.php?id=4462419&view=photo&photoNum=1
Urban must be planning on downsizing and moving south again. ;)
Is the truck for sell too?
But he did say Others
What are the names of those "others"?
What offices are open on Sunday?? Sheesh
jimmy, while offices may be closed for business to the general public on the weekends, it is not unusual for employees to be catching up on some work.
Some people are also anal about checking their voice mail on the weekends.
how hard would it be to make up that email?
Krazy Al hasn't said one word about Majcher since that email was published.....not one word!
In fact, when it came to formally filing the lawsuit Krazy Al omitted Majcher's name completely.
ROFL
Ya gotta love it! That civil lawsuit complicated matters for Kimmy and Vinnie the Torch!
It would be nice if Peter made a stand, sought a cease and desist order and reported the Krazy One to the Cal bar. I actually have some hope that he will
It will probably end exactly the same as the Bill Majcher allegations. We have no idea how that situation eventually transpired, except that a plaintiff said in Paltalk that Majcher will remain silent about his allege role......yeah right!
If Krazy Al is told by Maheu to stop connecting his name/firm to this nonsense and Krazy Al agrees, the communication between the two will never become public. Krazy Al is not going to tell the faithful, just as his evasiveness with his allege communications with the Queen, POTUS, etc.. imo.
Hodges communications are a one way street.
From: Bill Majcher
To: XXXXXX
Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 4:59:15 PM
Subject: RE: lawsuit
Hi XXXXX,
I will be brief and to the point. I have never heard of CMKX. I have never spoken with Bob Maheu and I have never been part of any negotiations or discussions whatsoever in this matter. The statement you have highlighted concerning me is 100% false and a fabrication.
The issue of naked short selling was something that definitely I was aware of but during my tenure with the RCMP I never opened a single active investigation, although information about the practice was discussed on occasion by people who claimed to be victims of the practice. I definitely did not get involved in any negotiation of a settlement with anyone for any reason.
While I sympathize with victims of naked short selling and hope they find justice, I have zero knowledge of the allegations made out in the purported statement of claim drafted by Hodges and Associates. I would appreciate any further information you may have in this matter.
Thanks for the email.
Regards,
Bill
William Majcher, Managing Director
Consented to, facilitated, and supported the conferences between Robert A. Maheu and his associate/assistant Royal Canadian Mounted Police Inspector William Majcher on the one hand, and the wrongdoing short sellers on the other, all for the purpose of settling the potential liability of said wrongdoers with consent of the U. S. Government and a representation of no criminal prosecution for such illegal sales; By Hodges #12 During the period from November, 2004 through April, 2005, CMKM Diamonds, Inc. negotiated the sale of some of its Saskatchewan, Canada mineral claims to three Chinese domiciled corporations with the advice and consent, inter alia, of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Proceeds from the consummation of such sales were placed into a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time. By Hodges #13 During the period from March, 2004 through August, 2006, on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Robert A.. Maheu, with assistance from Royal Canadian Mounted Police Inspector William Majcher, negotiated a settlement with the illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AUCTION CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
KIM LO CASTRO,
Defendant.
)))))))))
2:10-mc-49
MEMORANDUM ORDER OF COURT
Pending now before the Court is Plaintiff’s MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR
SANCTIONS (Doc. No. 4). On February 11, 2010, confessed judgment was entered in favor of
Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $530,424.33, plus interest at 18% per annum
and expenses and costs as shall continue to accrue, a copy of which was served on Defendant by
hand delivery on April 7, 2010. See Doc. Nos. 2 and 3. On June 10, 2010, Defendant was served
with a notice of deposition to be conducted on July 13, 2010. Doc. No. 4 at exhibit A.
Included within the notice of deposition was a request for the production of documents at the deposition. Id. On July 12, 2010, counsel for Plaintiff was contacted by counsel representing Defendant’s husband in an unrelated matter, the nature of which was not described in the motion to compel. The attorney for Defendant’s husband advised counsel for Plaintiff that Defendant would not be attending the deposition noticed for the following day. On July 13, 2010, Defendant did, in fact, fail to appear for her deposition, and has further failed to produce any documents. Plaintiff has moved to compel Defendant to attend and testify at deposition with production of documents pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 as incorporated by Fed.R.Civ.P. 69(a).
Rule 69(a) reads in pertinent part:
In aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment creditor or a successor in interest
when that interest appears of record, may obtain discovery from any person,
including the judgment debtor, in the manner provided in these rules or in the manner
provided by the practice of the state in which the district court is held.
Rule 69 authorizes a judgment creditor to use the federal or state procedural process to determine
whether and what kind of assets exist that might satisfy the judgment. The scope of
post-judgment discovery is broad, enabling judgment creditors to seek discovery of both current
assets and past financial transactions that could lead to the existence of fraudulently concealed or
fraudulently conveyed assets. See, e.g., Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil §
3014 (West 1973).
The limitations upon post-judgment discovery are those established by Rule 26(b). A
judgment creditor “may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant
to the subject matter involved in the pending action.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1). Under the Rules,
"relevance" is to be construed liberally, but not without boundaries. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v.
Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 351-52, 98 S. Ct. 2380 (1978). There appears to be no justifiable reason
why Defendant failed to appear for her deposition.1
1 The Court notes that a virtually identical action between Plaintiff and Vincent
LoCastro, Defendant’s husband, was initiated at the same time as the matter sub judice in this
Court at miscellaneous action number 2:10-mc-48. That action apparently involves the same
confessed judgement, a notice of deposition for Vincent LoCastro that was delivered on the same
day as the one herein, and the same phone call from the attorney for Vincent LoCastro indicating
that his client would not be appearing for the deposition. See Doc. No. 4 at 2:10-mc-48, Auction Credit Enterprises v. Vincent LoCastro. Similarly, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel seeking an order for Vincent LoCastro to appear and respond to the notice of deposition, and also seeking
sanctions. Id. On July 30, 2010, that motion was granted in part and denied in part. Id. at Doc.
No. 6, 2010 WL 3039180 (slip copy). There are two distinctions between the posture of Vincent
LoCastro in that matter and Defendant here. Vincent LoCastro was represented by the attorney who contacted counsel for Plaintiff, while Defendant is not. Further, Vincent LoCastro’s attorney indicated that if his client was ordered to appear, that he would most likely be invoking his right not to incriminate himself under the Fifth Amendment. Id. No such rationale has been provided to Plaintiff on behalf of Defendant in this action to justify Defendant’s failure to appear.
AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND
DECREED, that Plaintiff’s MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS (Doc. No. 4), is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant is hereby ordered to appear
and to submit to examination by oral deposition in aid of execution, as well as to produce those
documents previously identified with the notice of deposition, no later than August 24, 2010.
Plaintiff’s motion, to the extent it seeks sanctions, is DENIED without prejudice.
Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Terrence F. McVerry
United States District Court Judge
cc:
For Plaintiff: Elene M. Moran, Esquire
Email: emoran@thorpreed.com
Kerri L. Coriston, Esquire
kcoriston@thorpreed.com
Defendant: Kim Lo Castro
102 Standing Rock Drive
McMurray, PA 15317
Courtesy copy to:
John A. Schwab, Esquire
jas@pietragallo.com
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pawdce/2:2010mc00049/96104/6/0.pdf
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AUCTION CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
KIM LO CASTRO,
Defendant.
)))))))))
2:10-mc-49
MEMORANDUM ORDER OF COURT
Pending now before the Court is Plaintiff’s MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR
SANCTIONS (Doc. No. 4). On February 11, 2010, confessed judgment was entered in favor of
Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $530,424.33, plus interest at 18% per annum
and expenses and costs as shall continue to accrue, a copy of which was served on Defendant by
hand delivery on April 7, 2010. See Doc. Nos. 2 and 3. On June 10, 2010, Defendant was served
with a notice of deposition to be conducted on July 13, 2010. Doc. No. 4 at exhibit A.
Included within the notice of deposition was a request for the production of documents at the deposition. Id. On July 12, 2010, counsel for Plaintiff was contacted by counsel representing Defendant’s husband in an unrelated matter, the nature of which was not described in the motion to compel. The attorney for Defendant’s husband advised counsel for Plaintiff that Defendant would not be attending the deposition noticed for the following day. On July 13, 2010, Defendant did, in fact, fail to appear for her deposition, and has further failed to produce any documents. Plaintiff has moved to compel Defendant to attend and testify at deposition with production of documents pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 as incorporated by Fed.R.Civ.P. 69(a).
Rule 69(a) reads in pertinent part:
In aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment creditor or a successor in interest
when that interest appears of record, may obtain discovery from any person,
including the judgment debtor, in the manner provided in these rules or in the manner
provided by the practice of the state in which the district court is held.
Rule 69 authorizes a judgment creditor to use the federal or state procedural process to determine
whether and what kind of assets exist that might satisfy the judgment. The scope of
post-judgment discovery is broad, enabling judgment creditors to seek discovery of both current
assets and past financial transactions that could lead to the existence of fraudulently concealed or
fraudulently conveyed assets. See, e.g., Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil §
3014 (West 1973).
The limitations upon post-judgment discovery are those established by Rule 26(b). A
judgment creditor “may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant
to the subject matter involved in the pending action.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1). Under the Rules,
"relevance" is to be construed liberally, but not without boundaries. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v.
Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 351-52, 98 S. Ct. 2380 (1978). There appears to be no justifiable reason
why Defendant failed to appear for her deposition.1
1 The Court notes that a virtually identical action between Plaintiff and Vincent
LoCastro, Defendant’s husband, was initiated at the same time as the matter sub judice in this
Court at miscellaneous action number 2:10-mc-48. That action apparently involves the same
confessed judgement, a notice of deposition for Vincent LoCastro that was delivered on the same
day as the one herein, and the same phone call from the attorney for Vincent LoCastro indicating
that his client would not be appearing for the deposition. See Doc. No. 4 at 2:10-mc-48, Auction
Credit Enterprises v. Vincent LoCastro. Similarly, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel seeking an
order for Vincent LoCastro to appear and respond to the notice of deposition, and also seeking
sanctions. Id. On July 30, 2010, that motion was granted in part and denied in part. Id. at Doc.
No. 6, 2010 WL 3039180 (slip copy). There are two distinctions between the posture of Vincent
LoCastro in that matter and Defendant here. Vincent LoCastro was represented by the attorney who contacted counsel for Plaintiff, while Defendant is not. Further, Vincent LoCastro’s
attorney indicated that if his client was ordered to appear, that he would most likely be invoking
his right not to incriminate himself under the Fifth Amendment. Id. No such rationale has been
provided to Plaintiff on behalf of Defendant in this action to justify Defendant’s failure to appear.
AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND
DECREED, that Plaintiff’s MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS (Doc. No. 4), is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant is hereby ordered to appear
and to submit to examination by oral deposition in aid of execution, as well as to produce those
documents previously identified with the notice of deposition, no later than August 24, 2010.
Plaintiff’s motion, to the extent it seeks sanctions, is DENIED without prejudice.
Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Terrence F. McVerry
United States District Court Judge
cc:
For Plaintiff: Elene M. Moran, Esquire
Email: emoran@thorpreed.com
Kerri L. Coriston, Esquire
kcoriston@thorpreed.com
Defendant: Kim Lo Castro
102 Standing Rock Drive
McMurray, PA 15317
Courtesy copy to:
John A. Schwab, Esquire
jas@pietragallo.com
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pawdce/2:2010mc00049/96104/6/0.pdf
Darn, no where in that update did he say we could max out our credit cards
.........or Krazy Al's best buddy Tramp needs a new heater.
By cmc
Re: Update from Al Hodges 1/14/11
« Reply #86 Today at 11:36pm »
I'll be calling Global Intelligence on Monday, everyone should imo.
By lewis12
i tried to google their info, couldn't find it. can you provide the info?
The problem is that believing in such fantasy's hurts your IQ points
Hodges update isn't going over too well. Surprising some of the faithful who are now cracking jokes at Krazy Al's expense. Only the hopelessly delusional are believing Krazy Al.
It's going to be a tough job for board admins until January 21st. And twice as brutal after.
By: carmelbeach
14 Jan 2011, 09:52 PM EST
Rating: Msg. 987838 of 987852
(Reply to 987806 by mij13)
Stimulating Discussion @ cmkxunitedforum
http://cmkxunitedforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=14762&page=1#104976
Re: H and A Update 14 January 2011
« Reply #2 Today [1/14/11] at 10:18pm »
ChuckWheat
Administrator
First and only warning: ANY disrespect toward Mr Hodges from this point forward will earn the poster a break from the board.
Don't test me on this.
C-Dub
I wonder whether this will piss off Peter Maheu. Perhaps he'll make some kind of public response
Can you imagine what the poor staff at Global Intelligence are about to experience first thing Monday morning?
Xer Madness!!!
I have tried desperately to contact Global Intelligence to secure their agreement to authorize immediate release of the CMKX packages, as I believe that the reason for delaying their delivery has now evaporated.
Re:Hodges and Associates
OMG! Absolute insanity! This World Reports gibberish is worst than I expected. Krazy Al is really off his rocker!
Leo Wanta = Krazy Al
My associate Dennis Smith recently advised that I would have some information for all on this date. Here it is:
1. Let me start by referring you to a message Tramp posted just this morning, as follows:
tramp
Administrator
member is online
GONNA HIT YOU LIKE A FREIGHT TRAIN..YOU READY?
Joined: Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,895
Re: Hodges and Associates 1/11/11
« Reply #79 Today at 5:02am »
________________________________________
There is a train for all this and the following is on the train... I have had this confirmed by one of the white knights who has been giving us information... you can believe this or not, it does not matter, but IT IS FACT... and matters not...
THE ENGINE...===THE WHITE KNIGHTS AND CHINESE...
they are pulling the train and the cars are:
WGS..---THE NATIONS
FIRST CAR====Prosperity Programs==Humanitarian Programs
SECOND CAR====THE DINAR===REVALUE AND TURNS ON THE NEW BANKING SYSTEM
THIRD CAR AND CABOOSE====CMKX...
and the white knight said i understand this and those who don't understand should pay attention to what i am trying to say and help...
LAST IS THE DINAR... that starts the new banking system which turns on everything... and all gets paid at once...
And all those who bought dinars, well they cash out... and thus more money to help out the economies of the world...
If this is not done now, the USA and Europe will collapse with the rest of the world in 4, 5 months the most...make 1929 a picnic...
this is very serious...
pixie gets it... and understands...
2. Tramp understands very well what’s been going on; he is not alone – Pixie gets it, Deltadon gets it, Chucky gets it, etc. etc. etc.
3. I understand that you may not be happy with what’s going on. However, it is a fact and we are only a very small part of the pay-out scheme. We have had a great deal of ‘headwind’ in the past 6 to 9 months. Unfortunately that is putting it altogether too mildly. We have confronted, with added pressure from the “lien-holders” without which we could not have succeeded, the vilest, most contemptible, well financed forces for evil on the planet – we have won! A life changing event it will be for CMKX shareholders; more importantly, the world financial markets will be essentially re-constituted from the currency level up.
4. To put it another way, the World Global Settlements, including the US Dollar Refunding Project, are real. They are the instruments of change. They are part of a world wide re-distribution of wealth which includes some 20 countries revaluation [up and down] of their currency, which will become asset-backed currency. Yes, this does include Iraq which is the cheapest of the lot and therefore had [to prevent unreasonable manipulation] to go first. The very latest information indicates that it has revalued, that it will be posted on Forex sites sometime on Sunday, and will be fully convertible in the US by Tuesday.
5. Although CMKX payments were not originally part of the WGS, they were included by attachment earlier this year. However, be assured that CMKX moneys are not currently part of the WGS; I understand from a number of different sources that Global Intelligence of Las Vegas petitioned the US Supreme Court, in camera, just after Christmas to separate CMKX pay-outs from any association or attachment with the WGS. I understand further that the Court issued an Order for the Trustees to pay-out the moneys within 48 hours, which time expired on or before December 31, 2010. I have received further information that Global Intelligence has not effected said pay-outs, has been fined some $150,000,000 on or about January 4, 2011, and is presently incurring additional fines at the rate of $13,000,000 per week. I have not been successful in any of my attempts to secure explanation from Global Intelligence.
6. Although at first blush this lack of performance may seem potentially criminal in nature, I believe there is a reasonable explanation. I am aware, for example, that many of those I have previously referred to as ‘miscreants’ have in the interim been duly relieved of the money they stole [which has now been recovered by the US], are still feared by the new-financial-order people; the fear is that to the extent they can obtain cash/financing, they would use the IQD revaluation as a means of replenishing their war chests. There are other reasons related to the big picture, which may also play a part in this delay. I know this will come as a shock to some and seems unfair on the surface, but the fact is that we are but a small part of what’s happening [and must happen] to correct the financial imbalance in the world.
7. Several months ago, due to the on-going delays and increased ‘headwind’ the Joint Chiefs of Staff were appointed by the World Court to supervise the conclusion of the WGS; they were given a deadline of December 31, 2010. Based upon this and the progress that was being made in early December, I opined [which has been widely reported] that if I were a betting man CMKX would be paid out by Christmas. Unfortunately, not even the JCS were up to the task. Accordingly, on January 1, 2011 the World Court appointed one of the lien holders, China, to take charge and supervise the conclusion of the WGS payouts. They are currently in charge and proceeding to bring the matter to conclusion. I am currently advised that all will be completed by January 21, 2011.
8. Prior to the recent change of process by the Chinese lien holder it was a requirement, based upon BASEL, that ER be obtained prior to the time that certain other payments could be made. As I have previously stated on many occasions we were waiting for Michael Cottrell and his companies to receive their payments as they were Number 20, the very last payee, on the BASEL list. Because the Chinese lien holder has changed the process, I now understand that Michael Cottrell will be paid on or about January 21, 2011, after all of the Prosperity Program money has been paid out which is estimated to take between 4 – 5 days. This is no way suggests that ER continues to be a requirement of the release of CMKX payments. As set forth above, I have tried desperately to contact Global Intelligence to secure their agreement to authorize immediate release of the CMKX packages, as I believe that the reason for delaying their delivery has now evaporated.
9. I have been told by three separate independent people, each of whom attest that they have personally viewed at least one package, that the CMKX packages contain written information as well as a preliminary payment in the form of a U.S. Treasury Check in the amount of $0.80 per share. The information that has been previously placed on the boards to the effect that the packages were prepared and were ready for distribution is accurate to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. I further understand that the packages remain ready for immediate distribution as soon as Global Intelligence determines, and/or is advised, that such distribution is approved.
10. Some have inquired whether registration with the Transfer Agent makes them a bona fide shareholder; in a word – YES. Some have asked whether I have had response to the letters which I have submitted to the Queen of England and others including POTUS; I have had direct response from the Palace and have seen rapid evidence of the efficacy of the other correspondence that has been submitted. Others have requested information regarding the identity and whereabouts of the CMKX Trustee and/or Trustees. This information can not be made public at the present time for security reasons; I am sure that you will hear more about this in the very near future.
A. Clifton Hodges (CSBN 046803)
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
4 East Holly Street, Suite 202
Pasadena, CA 91103-3900
Tel: (626) 564-9797
Fax: (626) 564-9111
E-Mail: al@hodgesandassociates.com
**Helen Bagley Docs Jan 14 2011**
Courtesy of nufced. Thanks again!
Helen Bagley Docs Jan 14 2011
« Thread Started Today at 6:31pm »
Happy Reading All~~~
Bagleys Opposition to Motion of Summary Judgement
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891082
Bagleys Declaration
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891482
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891483
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891486
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891497
Bagleys ATTY and Depos of Dvorak and Glenn
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891827
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891870
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891879
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891886
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46891858
Bagley Undisputed Facts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46892023
Bagley Exhibit List
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46892090
http://qbidtalk.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=7593
Too funny! Even Wendy is tired of Hodges crap!
Forget the Wall Street Journal. Their add is more suited for the National Enquirer!
By wodansbankerfriend
YOU HAVE TO READ THESE POSTS
« Thread Started Today at 2:54pm »
delete this if you want, I just had to post it.
These are the shareholders of CMKX! A collection of this mornings posts.
wondrwen03: if we get our usual stall from hodges I think it is time to collect funds for a full page ad in the times or wall street journal
pofolk: IMO the holdup is they haven't made enough money off our interest yet, so they're stretching it out.
wondrwen03: pofolk I agree
nadsnikliw: I think acca is a monkey wrench thrown in by the bad guys,, JMO
ny joe 343: I really don't give a rats patootie about acca. If we do NOT get news of ER today, it is, in my opinion, because the Dinar has not RV'd yet. I know some disagree, but in the end, we shall see that the Dinar will RV, and we will then be paid. IMHO.
ny joe 343: Why would they pay us, then watch us SKEW the Iraqi Dinar situation, by buying billions more than we (collectively) already have? Dinar RV first, then us.
ny joe 343: One thing to remember, in EVERY aspect of this Operation, is that things are not always as they appear.
ratnaraj: IMO the relationship between the dinar and cmkx is like that of the 10th car and 85th car of a 100 car train. Their NOT connected, but they share the same journey towards the same destination for the same purpose.
johninc: All cars in a train are connected.
gr8hiker: The agenda is , the longer we play music and exchange recipes , the longer we're gonna wait.
PJRace1B: Ok lol, to simplify the 'theory' floating around. Govt turns 7 trillion dinar (Worth 7 Billion currently) in to 7 trillion dollars if the dinar 'revalues' at a 1-1 ratio. The govt pays us back for what they borrowed of ''our' money (To help the banks/world, etc) and it only cost them 4 Billion dollars to do so..That sound right?
got_cmkx_1: alot of us just want to live large,, cars, houses, vacations etc... so the let downs hurt
rvcoming: why doesn't the sec say, ok folks the shows over , there is no money here
got_cmkx_1: we might be closer to payday than we realize; two "hanz and franz" type of bashers just attempted some subtle bashings in another room
Now, JARV went on to become Cash 4 Homes
Cash for Homes eventually became Barrington Foods and into GBDX, Turino's next scam.
By: best2listen
30 May 2009, 02:01 AM EDT
Rating: Msg. 46531 of 46595
B2B glad to heat that BBB testified
He does know a lot of details as in post #8599 (below). It gets better near the end.
"You all need to get your story straight!
LitFiber, Inc. (LTBI) made its public debut in February 26, 2004, when it went through reverse merger with Trim-A-Lawn Corp. (TLWN), a fully, SEC-reporting public company, after TLWN went through a painful 1 for 2000 reverse split. As far as I know, the previous President and CEO of Trim-A-Lawn Corp., Dallas Jones, has no affiliation with John D. Jarvis Jr., who became the President and CEO of LitFiber, Inc.
It is of some interest to see that Dallas Jones was kept on the LitFiber payroll in an advisory capacity (see next):
"Tomball, TX (PRWEB) February 29, 2004--Litfiber Inc. (Pink Sheets: LTBI) Board of Directors is pleased to announce that the company has formulated a new board of directors that consists of John D. Jarvis Jr. Chairman / CEO and new Secretary David Tabb as well Dallas Jones staying on as a Director in a advisory capacity to the board."
Interestingly enough, it is this same Dallas Jones who is reported to have paid Pinkpicks some shares for a Pump they did in March of 2005. It is curious to see this Mr. Jones stay on as a consultant. But then again, so was John D. Jarvis Jr.; he was likewise also kept on the Grifco payroll, whenever LitFiber became Grifco (see next):
"As part of the acquisition, John Jarvis has tendered his resignation as CEO of Litfiber. Grifco International CEO Jim Dial will assume the role of Chief Executive Officer and President of Grifco International, Inc. Please note, Grifco International retains all Litfiber assets, including but not limited to telephony equipment, accounts, accounts receivable, contracts, Letters of Intent, representations, and agreements. John Jarvis will remain as a consultant to the company on telephony related matters."
But then again, this could all simply be used as a means to a consolation that is typically given in order to graciously allow the exiting President and CEO a minimal measure of personal dignity. It sure seems to be the norm, here, such as when fired executives are said to be "leaving to pursue other interests."
By the way, Trim-A-Lawn Corp. had made its public debut in January 1998, when it went through reverse merger with Anova Capital Corporation. Interestingly enough, Trim-A-Lawn still exists today under private ownership (Leonardi Manufacturing, 800-721-4852, www.leonardimfg.com).
As far as I know, John D. Jarvis Jr.'s earliest conquest was Jarvis Entertainment Group, whose shell ended up becoming Westlin Corporation (WSTN). However, Mr. Jarvis (as of March 16, 2006: http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/060316/0113429.html) is currently one of two directors for Infinity Acquisition Corp. (IFQJ). IFQJ infused almost all of the assets of Jarvis Entertainment Group ($5,000,000 worth), which were likely given back to him after he "voluntarily" surrendered all of his WSTN shares. You can see this asset infusion if you take a look at the last paragraph under "Investment Highlights" here: www.allpennystocks.com/apsc/us/stock_profiles/ifqj.htm. Here is its web site: www.infinitycorpusa.com.
For shear grins, how many companies has John Jarvis tainted? Well, going from oldest to newest (now, I don't pretend to have mentioned all of the companies that were touched by this master mind, as these are just highlights):
1) Jarvis Entertainment Group (JRVE) came into existence on 02/01/01, when it reverse merged with Hannibal, Ltd. (HNBL). JRVE went on to acquire Cyber Mark International, Inc. (CMKI), as of 07/30/01. JRVE and CMKI were kept as separate entities, much like GFCI and CTBG are kept today. JRVE owned the majority of CMKI shares, and Jarvis was the CEO of both companies. Later, these two companies -- JRVE and CMKI -- spun-off of their combined production, gaming, and laser tag divisions and/or assets as part of a spin-off and reverse merger into Co-Media, Inc. (COMC), as of 01/08/02. The new, resultant company was The Jarvis Group, Inc. (JARV). After CMKI was scalped of all its virtual reality assets, that empty public shell was then bought by the Casavant family and went on to become Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (CMKI), as of 11/25/02. Of course, most investors have come to know this public company today as CMKM Diamonds (formerly CMKM, now CMKX). It has a very interesting story!
Now, JARV went on to become Cash 4 Homes 247 (CSFM), as of 05/23/03. Now, as for the parent company, JRVE: It went on to become Westlin Corporation (WSTN), as of 11/21/03, and prior to that, on 09/26/03, John D. Jarvis Jr. "voluntarily" stepped down as the President and CEO to pursue other interests (Right! We now know what that means), and he was then succeeded by a Peter Rospond. It is interesting to note that Peter Rospond also quite "voluntarily" stepped down as of 10/28/05, after WSTN came out of some bankruptcy court proceedings.
Strangely, the same Peter Rospond was at one time President and CEO of some Infolife, Inc., a Lois Newman company, as of December 2005. Peter Rospond is obviously intertwined with the group represented by John D. Jarvis Jr. and Lois Newman.
Now, as part of Mr. Jarvis' own "voluntary" resignation from the WSTN, most of his personal assets, including the Tomball Bowling Lanes, were given back to him. And as part of their departure, both Jarvis and Rospond were required to give back all their shares to WSTN (Very interesting! I wonder why!). About $5 million worth of JRVE assets given back to Jarvis by WSTN then got rolled into Infinity Acquisition Corp. (IFQJ), as of 03/16/06, an existing company for whom John D. Jarvis Jr. currently serves as member of the Board of Directors.
Now, LitFiber, Inc. (LTBI), a Jarvis company, whose recent history is carefully given above, no longer exists, as of 11/19/04, as its name was changed to Grifco International, Inc. (GFCI). LTBI was then exchanged for another, Summit Entertainment Group (SETG).
SETG, which no longer exists, was purchased by Jim Dial for some undisclosed amount on 10/01/04. Seeing as how SETG was not an appropriate vehicle for taking Grifco International, Inc. public, Dial soon after relinquished his entire control block of restricted shares, as well as his important position as the President and CEO of SETG, to John D. Jarvis Jr. on 11/01/04. And Jarvis did the exact, same thing with Dial, relinquishing his entire control block of restricted shares, as well as his important position as the President and CEO of LTBI on 11/19/04.
NOw, all the assets and shareholders of SETG eventually got rolled into Karma Media, Inc. (KRMA), as of 07/22/05, leaving SETG but an empty shell with no shareholders nor assets, only treasury shares. Shortly thereafter, Pit Boss Entertainment, Inc. (PBSS) was then born on 07/27/05, when a simple change altered the name and symbol of KRMA. PBSS went through rough times, and the defunct shell was taken in a reverse merger with US Energy Holdings, Inc. (USEH), as of 03/08/06.
Now, a recent President of USEH, Tim Foust, was also a part of PBSS, and he is also a shareholder of IFQJ (mentioned above), owning an equal number of shares as John D. Jarvis Jr. Subsequently, the empty SETG shell then became Extreme Innovations, Inc. (EXTI), as of 09/28/05, and EXTI became Silverhawk Entertainment Group, Inc. (SVHG), as of 07/27/06.
Spotlight Homes, Inc. (www.spotlighthomes.net - SPHM), the affordable home building company, which Evan "Nick" Jarvis runs as CEO, is also connected to that same Peter Rospond with whom John Jarvis was working in Westlin Corp. (WSTN). WSTN was once Jarvis Entertainment Group (JRVE); in fact, JRVE became WSTN in November 2003. However, earlier that year -- September -- John Jarvis, the President and CEO of JRVE was forced to step down, after which Peter Rospond became President and CEO.
Apparently, JRVE started having trouble and changed to WSTN. WSTN then began to go through bankruptcy proceedings. As a result of those bankruptcy proceedings, which ended December 2005, Peter Rospond was forced to step down as the President and CEO of WSTN, for reasons still undisclosed. As a matter of fact, both John D. Jarvis Jr. and Mr. Peter Rospond were forced to hand over ALL their shares of WSTN.
Now, this same Peter Rospond was also President and CEO of Infolife, Inc. (pre-2003), a position Lois Newman now holds with the same company, as of December 2005. It does seem peculiar that there are quite many both former and current connections between John D. Jarvis Jr., Evan "Nick" Jarvis, Lois Newman, Peter Rospond, Tim Foust, Phil Willits, Leonard Kopelenz and Ryan Kirsch. But what is most interesting to me in all this is that I can find but only one solid connection with Jim Dial and the rest of this seemingly wickedly crafty and sinister group -- LitFiber to Grifco.
By the way, remember that Infolife, Inc. company -- Peter Rospond's and Lois Newman's company? It's an IAP (Internet Access Provider), right. It seems that although the public shell of the Infolife, Inc. company was sold off, forming the debuting public company China Marketing Media Holdings, Inc. (CMKM) -- not to be confused with the infamous CMKM Diamonds -- the private company still remains to this day, and Lois Newman and Peter Rospond are still involved in some way.
Been_Burned_Before"
SEEMS LIKE COOK AND DEVORAK WERE THE SAME TWO ATTORNIES FOR CMKX AND BARRINGTON FOODS, AND BB WORM FARMS , WOW WHAT A LINK TO THEM...
Joined: Jan 2006 ..Read and learn the cons MO!
Posts: 114
Karma: 28
[ Exalt | Smite ] Gary Walters chimes in on the Vegas Gang
« Thread Started on Today at 2:54pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m going to try and keep this simple, so it’s easier to read and understand, but let’s take a “excerpted” review of how Gary Walters chooses to describe his cohorts in the “Vegas Gang”, noting that he himself is charged with some 30 counts of stock forgery and securities fraud. Keep in mind that Walters “ran” Nanosignal – it’s where his personal priorities lie.
Walters has been hung out to dry by his cohorts, and he’s been firing back with both cannons for about a year now. Is it all true? Doubt it. But it is an interesting read. Note: the timeline goes back pre-CMKX and carries forward into the present.
Also, at my own liberty, I’ve corrected several spelling and syntax errors, so Walters ramblings are easier to follow. I also left long and unrelated “ramblings” out. However, I did not take out any references to UC. Walters words are in green.
Recall that Exxcode merged with Nanosignal. Some lawsuits ensued back and forth. Dvorak wrote a letter on behalf of Exxcode concerning “shares due” to about a dozen trusts – 8 or 9 of which have (A) been linked to Edwards, and (B) appear on the CMKX shareholder list:
RICK TAULLI AND SHAWN HACKMAN DID THE BOX JOB ON EXXCODE , THEY HAD BRIAN DEVORAK DO THE LEGAL OPINION , IT WAS SHAWN HACKMAN AND RICK TAULLI WHO DID THE S4 AND HAD BRIAN DEVORK SIGN OFF ON IT AS THEY PREPARED IT IN HACKMANS OFFICE
RICK TAULLI FORWARD SPLIT THE COMPANY SHELL EXXCODE INC AND USED PHONY TYPED CHEAP STOCK CERTS ETC.
THEY CREATED JOHN EDWARDS GROUP OF NOMINEES THAT THEY PAID INTO MICRO SIGNAL
MAT M. GOT 150K RICK CREATED 25 MILL FOR EDWARDS GROUP AND THEN 25 MILL FOR HIM RICK TAULLI , SHAWN HACKMAN , AND BRIAN DEVORAK.
WHEN EDWARDS DECIDED HE WANTED OUT HE HAD HIS MUSCLE MEN VINCE AND ? THREATEN ME TO RETUN 200K TO THEM. BOBBY MCALISTER DOWN IN FLORIDA KEPT 2.5 MILLION SHARES AND EDWARDS KEPT 1.5 MILLION SHARES.
JOHN EDWARDS WANTED OUT BECAUSE HE SAW THE FUED BETWEEN RICK TAULLI AND THE OTHERS HEATING UP.
LATER EDWARDS STAYED WITH TAULLI AND TAULLI ENGINEERED AND CRAFTED MORE BOX JOBS..I SUED EDWARDS IN STATE COURT IN NEVADA AND JOHN EDWARDS CAME TO THE TABLE FAST. WE MET OUT AT THE CONTRY KITCHEN ON RAINBOW AND THERE HE GAVE ME A BROWN ENVELOPE SEALED AND SAID DID YOU BRING THE CASH , HE HAD A MUSSEL GUY WITH HIM NAMED ?? ANYWAY EDWARDS COUNTED OUT THE 250K AND THEN GAVE ME THE ENVOLOPE AND SAID NICE DOING BUSINESS WITH YOU IT IS ALL THERE ALL 25 MILLION SHARES. WELL IT WAS NOT ALL THERE.
Note: I believe I’ve read an article by Lee Webb suggesting that John Dolkart is John Ed Dhonau (if I’m wrong, someone please correct the record)
I WAS FREAKING OUT , SO I CALLED JOHN DOLKART HE HELPED ME IMMEDIATLY DRAFT A LAW SUIT AGAINST EDWARDS AND HIS STOCK HOLDERS ETC THAT EDWARDS CLAIMED WERE HIS CLIENTS.
For recollection, recall that the Zamans (who are connected with BBX Equities) were connected to a huge pennystock scam and charged and convicted in the Sky Scientific stock fraud. Cook is our past attorney (Thomas C Cook, the one who was to be holding UC’s shares in escrow).
SEEMS LIKE THE GRAND JURY WANTS ANOTHER INTERVIEW WITH TUALLI, ZAMAN, GARCIA, SCARA AND A FEW OTHERS - HACKMAN TO. NOW WE ARE GOING TO THROW COOK IN THE MIX WITH CONVITED FELLONS.
[speaking to Tualli]
ROBERT GARCIA IS THE ONE WHO SOLD YOU HIS OWNERSHIP IN THE 2808 COWAN CIRCLE RESIDENSE IS HE NOT? AND HE TRIED TO SCAM AN INSURANCE COPMPANY OUT OF MONEY ON THAT SAME HOUSE YOU TOLD PEOPLE YOU BOUGHT FOR 800K . YOU ALSO SAID YOU PUT 150K INTO THE HOME , BUT YET YOU SHOW TO THE IRS THE VALUE OF THE HOUSE IS 4OOK. ARE YOU FRAUDING THE IRS TOO, RICHARD A TAULLI?
YOUR GROUPIES AND THE EDWARDS GROUPIES - THE FEDS HAVE YOU ALL NOW COMMING IN AND, BY THE WAY, WAIT TILL YOU SEE ALL THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN LAWYERS BUDDY PLANS TO WRITE EACH OTHERS GHOST STORY...
Note: Desormeau participated heavily in the B&B Farms scam – also it’s interesting that he walked away with all of B&B's computers...
SEEMS LIKE COOK AND DEVORAK WERE THE SAME TWO ATTORNIES FOR CMKX AND BARRINGTON FOODS, AND BB WORM FARMS , WOW WHAT A LINK TO THEM...THEFT IS JUST AT YOUR DOORSTEPS NOW!!!!! HOW CAN YOU BE PAID BY A COMPANY AND YOU NOT ONLY PLOT TO STEAL THERE BUSINESS AND CLIENTS BUT YOU EVEN FABRICATE PHONY STOCK AND STOCK HOLDERS.
Ok, I’ve posted this previously – it’s seemingly the same rendition of many of the events listed above, except here Walters is making a defensive response to my interview with John Jarvis, where Jarvis claimed Walters was the main promoter in the CMKI deal. (In other words, Jarvis said it was Walters who flew to Houston to pitch the CMKI deal - Jarvis said the plan was to merge several shells into CMKI, with CMKX being only a holding company). Now, which one’s telling the truth? Are either? Both Jarvis and Walters are scum, I’m sure of that.
GARY WALTERS NEVER EVER TALKED TO JOHN JARVIS ABOUT ANY SHELL FOR CMKX.
THE REAL MATTER IS THAT DON DICKSON INTRODUCED JOHN EDWARDS TO JOHN JARVIS.
THAT DEAL WAS BOUGHT BY JOHN EDWARDS LONG BEFORE ANY CONSIDERATION OF THE CASSAVANT DEAL CAME INTO PLAY.
GARY WALTERS AND MIKE MYERS MET URBAN CASSAVANT ONE MORNING IN A HOUSE BELONGING TO BETESTA IN SPANISH TRAIL.
THERE THEY WERE SHOWN MAPS AND THE LIKE OF DIAMOND MINING CLAIMS BY URBAN CASSAVANT IN SA. CANADA ,
IT WAS GARY WALTERS WHOM TOLD DON DICKSON ABOUT THE CASSAVANT MINING DEAL
IT WAS DON DICKSON WHOM INTRODUCED JOHN EDWARDS AS THE MERCHANT BANKER THAT WOULD MOST LIKELY PROVIDE THE SHELL TO DO THE DIAMOND DEAL
EDWARDS AND COFFEY CONJURED UP THE STOCK ISSUANCE PLANS AND RECORDS WILL PROVE IT ALL.
URBAN GAVE GARY WALTERS 200 MILLION SHARES FOR HIS INTRODUCTION AND OTHER CONTACTS, AND TO HELP WITH THE IR.
WHEN JOHN EDWARDS GOT MORE INVOLVED, HIS PARTNERS FROM THE PCBM MANAGEMENT GROUP JEFF AND VINCE AND ARE THE ONES THAT ACTIVLY PROVIDED THE RETAIL OF THE CMKX STOCK
EDWARDS WAS THE ONE REALLY DUMPING AT THE TIME.
LATER EDWARDS CALLED A MEETING AT CESEARS PALACE WITH GARY WALTERS VINCE AND JEFF. IT WAS JEFF WHOM BLAMED GARY WALTERS IN SHORTING THE STOCK OF CMKX AND STEALING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS THEY CLAIMED WAS TO BE THEIRS. IT WAS HEATED AND YELLING AMONG ALL OF THEM.
THE NEXT DAY JOHN EDWARDS CAME OVER TO THE COWAN CIRCLE HOUSE AND WANTED TO SEE THE 2 CERTS GW HAD FOR A 100 MILL SHARES EACH , GW TOOK EDWARDS UPSTAIRS AND SHOWED HIM HE HAD HIS CERTS INTACT.
THEN JOHN EDWARDS ATTEMPTED TO WANT TO TAKE THEM BUT GW ONLY ALLOWED HIM TO MAKE COPIES AND TAKE THEM WITH HIM.
THE NEXT DAY URBAN CALLS GW AND SAYS WE WANT TO BUY YOU OUT COMPLETELY , WE HEAR YOU ARE VERY UPSET, GW SAID YES I AM UPSET YOU SQUANDERED 2 MILLION DOLLARS AT HARAHAS AND OTHER CASINOS ETC , AND THIS MADE GW FERIOUS.
THE FACT IS, IT WAS JOHN EDWARDS WHOM HAD ALL THESE NOMINEES AND LOTS OF CMKX STOCK TO SELL. GW BELIEVES JOHN EDWARDS STOLE ALOT OF MONEY FROM THE OTHERS IN BED WITH HIM AND THEY WERE MAD.
THEY BOUGHT GW OUT FOR A HEAFTY SUM. CASH DEALS WERE MADE AND PAID TO GW AT THE COMMUNITY BANK ON RAINBOW.
GW EVEN HAD TO DO RADIO SHOWS FOR URBAN BECAUSE HE WAS ALWAYS DRUNK ETC,
THERE WAS A BOBBY MACALISTER WHOM TOOK ALOT OF SHARES BELIVED FROM EDWARDS AND NEVER DID ANYTHING FOR THEM AT ALL.
THEN WHEN GW CAUGHT SHAWN HACKMAN AND RICK TAULI AND BRIAN DVORACK BOXING STOCK AND COUNTERFITTING IT TO GET LOTS OF AQ SHARES FREE TRADING.
3 DAYS LATER SHAWN HACKMAN WAS INDICTED FOR THE VERY SAME THING RICK TAULI DID - BOXING STOCK PUTTING IT IN THE NAME OF HIS GIRLFRIEND AND OTHERS IN THE BOXED STOCK, KNOWING DAM WELL THAT THEY HAD NO MONEY OR CHECKS INVOLVED .
RICK TAULI IS STILL DOING DEALS WITH JOHN EDWARDS, AND CIRCUMVENTING, CHEATING, LYING, BACK DATING DOCS, FABRICASTING THEM FOR THE HIS CHEATING OCCASSIONS AND FOR OTHERS’
I'm guessing 8 to 10 for Edwards and Casavant. 1-3 for the others
That is roughly the same amount of time I thought, but first they need to be found guilty. lol
The game already ended
mretgnol, maybe not the entire game. Did you see my recent post about the legal woes of the old Jarvis Entertainment Group gang?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58628506
The post below is interesting because Gary Walter completely disputed Jarvis account of how the events took place.
bizjournals .com/houston/stories/2003/12/15/story3 .html?page=1
Jarvis, who also made headlines for turning a former nuclear fallout shelter in Montgomery County into a data center, was chairman and CEO of Jarvis Entertainment Group Inc. until September, when the public company divested its entertainment assets. Those assets included a bowling alley in Tomball.
On Nov. 17, the company announced it was changing its name to Westlin Corp. The company's new plan is to focus on data services in its 70-foot-deep bomb shelter, which was built during the early 1980s by a relative of former Taiwanese President Chiang Kai-Shek.
Peter Rospond, formerly the company's network administrator, took over as CEO in September. Rospond, who has been with the company for five years, has also held the position of CEO at InfoLife, an Internet service provider.
Rospond says the board of directors made the decision to change the leadership, as well as the direction of the company.
"Sometimes things take a turn and you have to do what's better for the company," Rospond says. "We're a much more serious company."
Rospond would not discuss the circumstances surrounding Jarvis' departure from the company, saying only that it was not Jarvis' decision to leave.
Jarvis, however, says his exit from the company was a mutual decision.
The split occurred because members of management had different visions for the company's future, Jarvis says.
"We didn't see eye to eye," he says. "We're happy about the split."
///////////////Part II
More connections:
============
From Rbitulsa
For those who may not see or recall the importance of the connection here, you may wish to review the notes from my interview with John Jarvis from last August. Note: I'll leave the comments below my notes that I originally sent, although parts of it are no longer accurate [For example, I now understand that the Vegas Group controlled the shell through all 3 "transitions" - from Singal to Jarvis to Urban, and I now understand that Singal's financiers were Urban's financiers].
From: [rbi]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 8:34 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: FW: 8/19/05 Notes from Conversation with John Jarvis
Importance: High
On Thursday, I emailed Jarvis requesting information relative his acquisition and subsequent sale of the CMKI shell. On Friday afternoon, he called me at my office. He was very congenial and forthright, and appeared to be sincere with his answers. He did ask up front if I was with the SEC or any other government agency. I explained to John that I was independantly researching strategic delivery failures, that my overall interest was to gain a better understanding of manipulative trading and financing, and that CMKX was quite the fascinating case study. The conversation lasted about 30 minutes.
Jarvis described Cybermark as "basically a laser tag company; a warehouse in Canada, with some technology and a few people". Jarvis said the company had some "VR technology that I was interested in". When he initially reviewed the company, it appeared that the "liabilities were balanced - the assets and liabilities were basically a wash". Jarvis said it was not long after his acquisition that he learned that there had been some "let's just call it creative financing", some "debts that were not recorded" or disclosed at the time he acquired the shell. He also made referrence to two S-8 deals that he inferred were initiated by Singal. Jarvis said "it didn't take long for us to figure out the shell was a bust. They had raped the community and the public." Jarvis said the filings were deliquent when he bought the shell, and had already spent "a whole lot of money" getting the books current. But the past "creative financing" deals were going to cost him "hundreds of thousands to clean up". Jarvis said during this time the O/S had grown to over 50 million shares, and "shareholder value went down by over 70%". Jarvis said he "sought counsel from the SEC" but they "couldn't care less", and "suggested I find a good securities attorney". Never-the-less, Jarvis had the "VR technology" that he needed, and began meeting with potential buyers for the shell.
According to Jarvis, he was approached by an "outside agency" from Las Vegas. I asked him for the name of this outside agency, but he would only reply that it was "really a group, a conglomerate of people". He said several other people had interest in the shell, but the Las Vegas group showed the greatest "financial capability" to maintain the shell. Jarvis added that he was assured that they would "stay on the OTC", and he was "shocked that they would even consider a forward split" and, Jarvis assumed, if anything, they would reverse split, noting that he felt 50 million shares was too many.
At this point, Jarvis referred me back to the email I had sent him the previous evening, specifically to the list of names I had included (John Edwards, David Coffey, David Desormeau, Chris Jenson, Gary Walters, and NevWest Securities). I had also written the following in my email to Jarvis: "If there were “up-front” agreements or conditions at the time of Urban’s acquisition of CMKI, or if there were pre-existing or concurrent equity financing arrangements, or share-structure conditions, your advice would be appreciated." Jarvis repeatedly emphasized the point that, while Urban Casavant was "mentioned in the presentation", and his claims were to be "part of the deal", Urban was never present at any of several meetings between the parties, which took place at Jarvis' attorneys office, nor did he ever speak to Urban at any time during the sale of the shell. Jarvis says that at all of the meetings, Gary Walters was the "promoter of the deal". In addition to the meetings, all phone calls made relative the "conglomerate's presentation and acquisition" were between Jarvis and Walters. Jarvis further explained that deal, as presented to him, was for CMKI to "be a holding vehicle for several entities that would be pulled together". He commented that he was surprised when the "diamond mining basically took over CMKI". He was surprised that the FALC claims ended up (directly) a part of the CMKI shell. He again stated that this was not how the deal was pitched to him.
As I recollect it, here is a rundown of the q/a when I asked Jarvis about "the other names":
Edwards: "There were always several people at the meetings, so he may have been one of those there, but I don't remember him being there"
Desormeau: "Never heard of him" (note: he even badly mispronounced his name)
Coffey: "Never heard of him"
Jensen: "Never heard of him"
NevWest: "I know of NevWest, but have no idea if they were involved somehow"
I brought up the cusip change, and the cancellation of the preferred shares that occured after "the conglomerate" had bought the shell. Jarvis replied that he was not involved at all with the company at that time, and had no idea why that happened. He added that it is common after acquisitions to "draw a line" between the old and the new shares, and speculated that it could have also been done to get out from under "those old creative financing deals".
There was some small talk that followed. Jarvis said that I was not the first to have called him about CMKX. He also said, as if he was surprised by it, that he has never been contacted by the SEC or any other agency, about CMKX. He advised me that, if I really wanted to get more information on CMKX, I should contact the SEC.
My Comments:
Jarvis makes his case that the CMKI shell was corrupt from the beginning, but it still looks unlikely (if Jarvis is being forthright), that any current problems are linked to problems that existed prior, or during, the latest acquisition. However, I believe that Samual Singal should be looked into, along with the "sophisticated investors" mentioned in the early CMKI 10Q's, on the outside (an unlikely) chance that the original "creative financeers" might be linked to Edwards or Walters or Hackman.
It is, in my opinion, very significant that Gary Walters, not Urban, was the lead in the purchase of the CMKI shell. I never could understand how or why a "Rupert Perrin" would be named to the board of a diamond mining company. It does not appear to me that Urban has ever been in control of CMKI/CMKX.
In terms of Jarvis' description of this deal, it leads me to look at other filings, PR's, and other D/D, and surmize the following: It is my opinion that CMKX was to be a holding (parent) vehicle for at least the following shells: Microsignal (Nanosignal), Barrington Foods (USCA), Mirador (later replaced with SGGM), Juina Mining, CIM, and PCBM/SRCI. I would further assume that it was not long after the acquisition that the claims in the FALC became larger than the conglomerate as a whole, and the "strategy" was changed accordingly, and possibly to the chagrin of some.
The question I find most important, is as follows: What is it that links all these different entities together. What is the common element amongst all of them. Did they all share the same lender? The same broker? The same attorney? How did it come about that the above mentioned companies became linked together in a plan to be held under CMKI as a holding vehicle (who really owns the holding vehicle? I think the T/A data helps answer the question.
Noting that these notes and comments assume that Jarvis was sincere and forthright, I hope it helps with the general "big picture", and helps to put other issues in context.
Other Notes:
8/29/01 - Jarvis signs unaudited 10Q as president.
11/15/01 - Ian McIntyre signs NT10Q as president.
4/29/02 - David E Coffey first shows up as auditor for CMKI.
The CMKI shell has been controlled by three different groups: The initial group appears to have been lead by an individual named Samuel Singal. Jarvis later purchased the shell and then sold it to the "current owners".
It appears that Ian McIntyre served as the initial president under the “current ownership” regime, from November 2001 to November 2002, at which point Urban Casavant was named president. Among others, Ian McIntyre was President of a company called First Colony Merchant (linked to Can Cal Resources Ltd, Environmental Monitoring and Testing Corp, WFD Partnership, Timothy Cammel, ActionView International and Eton Properties). First Colony’s address is 7500 W LAKE MEAD BLVD.
An amended 8-K was filed on December 17th 2002, which is the first filing to indicate Urban as president. The next filing was the famous DEF 14C, filed 45 days later.
Maybe she agreed not to fight extradition on the condition she be allowed bail
Possibly.
She could have also felt trap in an European existence that was going nowhere. She relied on Turino for her previous lifestyle. That financial help may have come to an end, along with the torrid love affair/emotional support.
Perhaps being on the lam is not the most romantic lifestyle.
This person while stocks scams were up and running with our known crooks did not need money.
He even worked for a few of these scams, received free shares, and income must have been good as he never complained
To be fair, you also have to take into account that his family is in the real estate biz, and his income was probably affected by the slump.
**Melissa Spooner was extradited**
Courtesy of Deep Throat
01/11/2011
123
Warrant Returned Executed on 1/7/11 in case as to Melissa Spooner. (ASB) (Entered: 01/11/2011)
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/xjbbzc
01/11/2011
124
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS -
Initial Appearance/Arraignment & Plea as to MELISSA SPOONER held on 1/11/2011 before Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. Crtrm Administrator: Kris Schulke; AUSA: Michael Chu; Def Counsel: Jason Carr; PTS: Erin Oliver; Court Reporter/FTR #: 3:00 p.m.; Time of Hearing: 3:23:47 - 3:44:10; Courtroom: 3A; Defendant is present. Financial Affidavit filed. The Federal Public Defenders Office is appointed as defense counsel. Attorney Jason F. Carr for Melissa Spooner added. Defendant is arraigned on the Second Superseding Indictment. Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY to count(s) 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, & Forfeiture Allegations 1, 2, 8, 0, 10, 11, 12. This case has been designated a complex case and the parties will follow the local and federal rules regarding complex cases. The parties concur for release on PR bond with special conditions. The Court canvasses Defendant's mother, Kitty Eves, regarding serving as 3d party custodian. ORDERED Kitty Eves will serve as 3d party custodian. Defendant is released on PR bond with PTS Supervision and conditions as stated in open court. (See bond for specifics). Written bond form executed. CALENDAR CALL is set for WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2011, AT 8:45 A.M., COURTROOM 6C, before Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt; TRIAL is set for MONDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2011 AT 8:30 A.M., COURTROOM 6C, before Cheif Judge Rober L. Hunt. Defendant is joined for trial with co-defendnts pursuant to the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act. Defendant is released on bond. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DES) (Entered: 01/11/2011)
http://qbidtalk.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=7549
I wonder if Krazy Al will talk to Edwards
Hodges probably learn his lesson when he spoke to Norris. Reporters want facts/evidence not World Reports gibberish. If Edwards discovered Krazy Al's letters to the Queen or Story's WR site maybe we would get another story from Edwards. ;)
Speaking of the World Reports gang, look what 4profit found.
Re: Dennis Says Al Will Speak
« Reply #27 Yesterday at 3:55pm »
i hope Al writes about this. Dormant.
http://bizzy.info/uk/companies/cottrell_securities_limited/co_no/06918914/
By 4profit
Re: Dennis Says Al Will Speak
« Reply #29 Yesterday at 5:37pm »
Welcome GOB. No annual reports, which would include financial accounts. hmmm. We all know the address for Cottrell Securities Limited is World Reports. Christopher Story was Secretary & replaced by Secretary Appointed MR DOUGLAS WILLIAM HEYDON 11/25/2010. Alice & Joanna Story, Michael Cottrell are Directors.
Am going to retrieve a couple of those reports. Probably Dormant since Dec 31, 2010. Am curious if Cottrell was a currency trader...as in Dinar? Treffry & Hodges both admit investing. Treffry said Hodges found out United States Treasury holds $12 Trillion dollars worth of Dinar. At one time ratio was 4,000 Dinar per Dollar. i don't want to be paid 5 storage units full of Dinar. lol
http://qbidtalk.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=7550&page=2
By johnjrambothe2nd
Re: enough with the dinars.......
« Reply #9 Yesterday at 2:21pm »
Someone who needed to dump some CMKX shares a few months back..(cough cough), is pumping Dinars now, but I do not know if he was able to dump those Dinars....
Clue: He is an A T-torney... (woops exuse my spelling and grammar).
Topic: Reporter John Edwards emails.....
wolfbela
Reporter John Edwards emails.....
« Thread Started Today at 12:10am »
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had enough of reading about Mr. Edwards rehashing of the old CMKX story ad nauseum and emailed him if he wanted a real story why not check out this lawsuit and trust that has been devouring the shareholders for the last year.. I gave him all the info and then all of a sudden he wasn't interested. The rest is presented below..
Let's see if and how Mr. Hodges responds...
Jerry WB
From: JEdwards@reviewjournal.com
Subject: Re: Mr. Edwards, regarding CMKX...
Date: January 11, 2011 2:31:13 PM EST
To: jerryXXXXX
If you've got a copy of documents or a lawsuit that merely alleges that Mr. Maheu was doing a sting for the FBI, I would like to see it.
To the best of my knowledge, Maheu's only position with CMKM was as a director and he never served as CEO.
From: JEdwards@reviewjournal.com
Subject: Re: Maheu...co-ceo
Date: January 12, 2011 2:39:09 PM EST
To: jerryXXXXX
Thank you for the information. It's really not important to me at this point whether Maheu was CEO.
Several people say that Maheu did a sting operation on CMKM for FBI. That would be interesting, but so far I have not seen any documentation. I've got to assume that the sting operation info is just somebody's speculation that became a rumor.
If you have any reliable documentation on the alleged sting, that would be great. Otherwise, I think I will put CMKM aside and revisit again a little later.
Thanks, Jerry
John Edwards
From: jerryXXXXX
Subject: Re: Maheu...co-ceo
Date: January 12, 2011 3:09:35 PM EST
To: JEdwards@reviewjournal.com
Mr. Edwards.
I am surprised that you are dismissing this so easily. I have provided you with federal court testimony from an attorney stating there is a trust represented by this sting operation. Isn't that worth a phone call to the Hodges' office. He has stated he has a witness to the sting. That would be a form of reliable documentation. I have to say that if this isn't worth investigating, reporting on CMKX as a whole really isn't necessary..
If I had reliable information on the sting, I wouldn't be going to a reporter, I would be in court. I find your response here very disappointing.
Jerry
From: JEdwards@reviewjournal.com
Subject: Re: Maheu...co-ceo
Date: January 12, 2011 3:29:22 PM EST
To: jerryXXXXX
What's his number?
From: jerryXXXXX
Subject: Re: Maheu...co-ceo
Date: January 12, 2011 3:34:28 PM EST
To: JEdwards@reviewjournal.com
Mr. Edwards,
Info below and website..
I would appreciate hearing back from you the result of your call..
Thanks in advance..
Jerry
http://www.hodgesandassociates.com/
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
4 East Holly Street, Suite 202
Pasadena, California 91103-3900
Tel.: (626) 564-9797
Fax: (626) 564-9111
From: JEdwards@reviewjournal.com
Subject: Re: Maheu...co-ceo
Date: January 12, 2011 9:29:47 PM EST
To: jerryXXXXX
I called your attorney and left a message on the answering machine. No one has returned my call.
I wonder how many shares Egghead sold from the comfort of whatever country is unfortunate enough to have him as a resident?
To be honest, it is very doubtful eggie sold one share. That dude is so delusional that he really believes every word by Krazy Al and Smith.
He and his acolytes have made money off of this almost assuredly
Well, if the dummies want to send him handouts, than what can you do............
very_tired15: AH has informed me that the Dinar gets listed on the Forex and immediately thereafter, we announce CMKX
Not bloody likely!
Unbelievable fantasy world they live.
Edit: They really are pushing folks to the limit with this nonsense.
briwadd
Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Reply #483 Today at 10:03pm »
The post below is right on the money. The dinar RV has zero to do with CMKX, it is just the most recent excuse. Assuming the dinar does RV, another excuse will present itself.
ssu
DIAMOND JEDI
Re: Weekly Buzz Chat 01/10/11
« Reply #225 Today at 7:36pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today at 7:24pm, bigdaddie wrote:
Quote:a question, How did the Dinar ever enter into the CMKX equation??
Funny you should ask. It did just like the clearing of the snow, just like the passing of the health bill, just like the passing of the financial reform bill, just like waiting for the Black farmers and native Indians to get paid, just like waiting for the newly elected officials to get updated on our situation, just like waiting for Cotrel to get paid, just like waiting for the money to clear the west coast bank, that one was very good by the way, and like many other excuses.
Any one expecting big news from Al's update is setting them self for big disappointment. IMO
http://millionaires.proboards.com/index.....d=36572&page=12
If he was STILL selling shares on 3 January, he's still so dumb he'll never realize what's hit him till he's behind bars
LOL
Jail may be the ONLY thing that will stop Deli from violating regulations.
The uncertainty as to the timimg of Hodges' update pretty much confirms that. ER or file... and we know it ain't ER
If the rumors are true about Bonney's return to Richmond, than there may be some World Reports type gibberish included in Krazy Al's update too.
Bonney probably has another phantom meeting with the Feds this week. LOL
WHY can't they understand that it has nothing to do with the shares? It has to do with Deli acting as an unlicensed broker.
Which was explain by the bashers from the very beginning. They thought bashers accusations of Deli acting as an unlicensed broker was joke. They thought the article about the woman who accused Deli of wrongdoing was joke.
What was Deli's explanation for changing certs for sell to "cookies" for sale?
This is a problem for Deli also. He states he gave shares away to family, and THEN he turns around and tries to broker those same shares. tsk tsk
Glisson said he gave 678 million shares to friends and family, not counting 256 million shares he gave to his wife.
Drunken Troll, go back to the Zoo board where you belong.