Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lpath plans to submit the necessary documentation regarding the new drug material to the FDA by June
DID THEY DO IT? CAN'T FIND IT ON FDA SITE
Merck partnered with LPTN back around 2008 thru 2010. But then Merck and LPTN parted ways. Seems LPTN CEO has a history of sticking to his guns when dealing with big pharma.
Thank Peete. But the fact that he bought DRL stock at all indicates that he expects the stock to go up, whether its a compensation package or a straight out common share purchase at market value. Am I wrong?
Why hasn't all those insider buys of last week moved the needle up?
The last time that happened in December 2011 the stock took off.
What are impairment costs? TIA
The answer is, happily, yes.
Looked at past statements made by CEO.
Great news!
Just wondering. Does HPGS have a footprint in construction and support services for the natural gas industry - and not just nat gas production - and not just oil and coal? Natural gas is the near term compromise between alternative and fossil fuels. That's where the $$$$$ is.
I waited patiently only to be burned by Washington Mutual suit with FDIC. Seems these government agencies can determine the pace of the judicial process...only to eventually win out over the banks. Judges also hate to issue rulings that alter the course of nature with regard to regulatory powers
Besides, I always wondered...how can the complainant's side or the court determine that the documents turned over by the government have or haven't been edited? It's seems OTS/FDIC holds
all the cards with regard to producing a smoking gun against them.
One thing for sure, FDIC and other agencies never settle quickly, if at all. And they usually don't lose. This can drag out for at least another year.
Then why did CEO Jesse Sutton sell 1,000,000 shares on 12/15?
Would be sweet if Apple bought Yahoo.
Turn Yahoo into a premeire property with cutting edge innovations.
Great pay back against Google, Microsoft.
Target price for Yahoo in 2015: $300.00
The market is absurdly oversold. Ridiculous to have a small irresponsible southeastern european country trump positive manufacturing numbers domestically. I wish I had more money to play.
Didn't you also consider that they can take this down to 0.14 and do another r/s? As much as I like your prediction...
any link to confirm this "major trading room?" Or is this just a WAG.
You don't call this a ride? Roller coaster going down down down
The report on fosbretabulin should have been delivered by now at ASCO in Miami.. Is there a news release coming today? How did the report go? Is the pps sinking an indicator or more manipulation and shorting?
it is looking better and better. and it will be pretty much perfect when the pps hits .035. Then no one can lose.
Please note my parameters. The low end should indicate some pragmatism.
I'll take anywhere between .12 and $15.00. But please nothing above $15.00. I couldn't handle it. Thank you G-d.
estimated time of JMW's ruling, anyone? TIA
Good response.
Fair enough.
This PSI does not help our cause at all. It describes WaMu as an out - of - control bank of greed of historic proportions and its regulator, OTS as an impotent and derelict body. It depicts FDIC as a victim who tried to stop the greedy WaMu but was impeded by OTS. And in the end it depicts FDIC and JPM as preventing a complete bankruptcy of federal bank insurance and a total collpase of all credibility in the financial markets by arranging the quick purchase of WaMu. Whose idea was it to enter this as part of the record?! Enclosed is the conclusion to the PSI on WaMu:
Conclusion. WaMu is the largest bank failure in the history of the United States. When
OTS seized it, WaMu had $307 billion in assets. By comparison, the next largest U.S. bank
failure was Continental Illinois, which had $40 billion in assets when it collapsed in 1984. OTS’
failure to act allowed Washington Mutual to engage in unsafe and unsound practices that cost
borrowers their homes, led to a loss of confidence in the bank, and sent hundreds of billions of
dollars of toxic mortgages into the financial system with its resulting impact on financial markets
at large. Even more sobering is the fact that WaMu’s failure was large enough that, if the bank
had not been purchased by JPMorgan Chase, it could have exhausted the entire Deposit
Insurance Fund which then contained about $45 billion. Exhausting the Deposit Insurance Fund
could have triggered additional panic and loss of confidence in the U.S. banking system and
financial markets.
3X the current pps of commons?
I disagree, repsectfully. It's important to advertise an account of the proceedings. No such thing as too much reliable information.
might as well say the stall in a public toilet.
Squeeze? Try reverse squeeze. Management is selling their stock! IMO EOM
That's because Marketwire.com is a paid service. IMO
Yes sir. I particularly like this Susman settlement with Waste Management Inc. @40X!:
In February 2005, settled a securities fraud case against Waste Management, Inc. on behalf of shareholders who opted out of a federal class action settlement. We filed suit in Texas state court and developed theories of liability and evidence that had evaded the federal class plaintiffs and every other group of opt out plaintiffs in the country. A few weeks before trial, we settled the case for more than 40 times what our clients would have received in the class action settlement. At Waste Management's insistence, the actual amount of the settlement is confidential.
If that's the case, then why does the calandar show a confirmation hearing of POR6 for next week?
Shouldn't this be scrapped for a POR7 or better...meaning a settlement which is much more attractive than what POR6 entails?
Three words: European Debt Crisis
My apologies. That PWC report if refering to another ticker.
I think YRCW feels comfy at this current price range ($1.11 - $1.30) until the PWC report comes out. And who knows when that will be. IMO
One major difference between ESLR and YRCW: YRCW had a major short scheme going on, so you knew a pop was inevitable. Not so with ESLR. ESLR is not being shorted. It is sinking becuase no creditors think it's worth saving and no shorters think it's worth shorting. The pps should find its true level about here and languish until the next pump or dump comes.
Perhaps JPM is next among the too big to fail banks to cough up the $$$
http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/29/news/companies/b_of_a_settlement/index.htm?hpt=hp_t2
Perhaps JPM is next among the too big to fail banks to cough up the $$$
http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/29/news/companies/b_of_a_settlement/index.htm?hpt=hp_t2
Bottom is in at about 1.23. But this will not go back up much if at all. And tommorow could be more correction. I hope I am wrong. ALL IMO
YRCW is a good gamble! PPS to $20.00 by the end of the year!
http://seekingalpha.com/article/253025-yrc-worldwide-a-calculated-risk
IMO of course
We all know the bad news. It's not new. YRCW restructuring is imminent and old news. The question is how much higher can it go intill shorts have covered? I say: the big short started at a pps of $2.21. So pehaps use that as a marker.
Any thoughts from the board?