is...(lightning strikes only once unless you remain standing where you shouldn’t be.)
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes sub $3.00 is an unbelievable opportunity to enter the PIC market with a company that really has no competition in regards to polymer hybrid modulators.
A chance of a lifetime….
L_R
A hero in his own mind and a zero in everyone else’s. Is that what you were trying to say?
L_R
Get lost TP. I was corresponding to Dice. Be a gentleman and only respond when I address you.
You have too much to say.
L_R
Dice.
Full respect but the $3.00 is not a measure of Lightwave’s real progress.
I definitely will come back to quote you on your post when this is at $10
Remember this day. ….. June 28 2024.
A few more rolls of the Dice and we will be at $10.
Have a good weekend, Dice
L_R
Only if Marcelli proves his connections to the industry will result in deals.
Otherwise..........
L_R
Expand your mind a wee bit. If your only universe is the press releases and 10Q’s (and your interpretations of them) then you confine yourself to your self imposed confines of a dwarfed imagination.
All of the information exchanged at the ASM and in various private conversations is not part of your universe and sadly the bigger picture eludes you.
So be it. “There are none so blind as those who cannot see.” (And will not see).
L_R
Go learn about PDK's.
200 mm wafers loaded with "polymerized" modulators sent off to some of the world's largest transceiver companies tells you all you need to know.
L_R
It should be quite obvious why a “select few” are viewing the demos in Englewood. Lebby is in the envious position to choose who to demo their technology to. You would want the cream de la cream to be the first to sign a deal. Then everybody else would want to and need to follow the leaders or be left behind.
Just saying
L_R
Waisting your time responding.
I never said NVDA is working with LWLG. Putting words in my mouth!.
In future I will only read the first 4 lines of your post.
You are being largely ignored. Don’t bother replying in future. I wasn’t. Engaging with you anyway….so get lost.
L_R
Like always I read the first 4 words or so and dismiss all the other words thereafter as I know you have no background in science or technology and don’t know what you are talking about.
Stop pretending you know anything about the manufacturing of PICS and transceivers. You are embarrassing yourself.
I believe what is true…… lightwave is working with the biggest transceiver companies in the world.
NVDA is looking to anybody that can provide the specs they want for transceivers with miniature PICS inside.
NVDA knows about Lightwave.
I rest my case with confidence.
L_R
I believe it is true because LWLG Lebby said they were working with the largest transceiver companies in the world. No reason to doubt that unless one has decided he is lacking integrity which I refuse to believe until he proves otherwise.
NVDA is looking at what transceiver companies are working on for pluggable transceivers.
I believe what is true.
L_R
The statement is public. Lightwave is working with the largest transceiver companies in the world.
NVIDIA is working with the largest transceiver companies in the world looking for the PIC that will do the job.
It is not possible that LWLG's technology is not known by NVIDIA.
I rest my case,
Believe what you want but I believe what is true.
L_R
Most certainly NVIDIA is aware of polymer solutions and they are not ignoring any technology that offers high speeds, low power, and of a small form factor. They need pluggable transceivers such as what LWLG is set to provide through some of the largest transceiver companies in the world.
There is no way that NVIDIA is not cooperating with these large transceiver companies who are currently working with Lightwave.
There is your connection.
L_R
Excellent thoughts MarcoPolo.
L_R
Unbelievable place to pick up shares.
I fully agree...... should we hit these prices.
A chance of a lifetime.
L_R
Excellent Jeunke22.
All the characteristics that LWLG will be able to supply.
L_R
TP 99 now.
For months TP had a score of 88…. Unmoved.
And since I put up MarcoPolo’s score suddenly TP’s score rises to 99.
What an ego!
This is all an ego trip.
Emotionally dependent upon the attention.?
I dunno really.
What does everyone else think?
This is my last post for another month or two. Going dark once again.
L_R
SARCASM TP…….. complete and unadulterated sarcasm I assure you.
L_R
I don’t read your junk. Never read your sticky. Useless piece of garbage.
I might read the first few words of your post but never go beyond that.
You have no science background, never attended an ASM, won’t and don’t know how to do proper research and have no idea even what a PDK is or how poling works.
Yet you try to comment on the things you have no experience or knowledge about.
D**fus
L_R
MarcoPolo4 +112 positive posts on his sticky. Incredible post.
EVERY NEWBIE should read his post.
TedPeele -79 negative posts. I can give you 79 reasons why you will waste your time if you read that sticky.
L_R
I stand corrected .
It has nothing to do with merit whatsoever then.!!!
L_R
Score:
TedPeele -79
Marcopolo4 +108
And why is Ted’s sticky still up there?
Because HE put it up there.
Speaks for itself.
L_R
98 points for MarcoPolo4’s sticky and we are at 100. Go go go.
L_R
Does he know that he lies?
L_R
-79 is the real score for TP’s sticky.
And it is still up there?
There should be a rule for stickies.
Total score cannot be negative.!!!!
TP’s new name should be:
-79TP
L_R
Wow. 92 points for the Marcopolo4 sticky. Let’s drive it over 100 folks. It was and is a great post.
L_R
TP:
I am sitting here laughing my a** of after reading this:
Anyway, it's time for me to sit back and allow you guys to spin your webs -- I hope you push this thing over $20 if possible so I'll make a ton when it crashes down by year end.
I don’t worry, won’t worry,
It is the shorts who will worry must worry, should worry.
L_R
Once more an excellent post.
We have the polymer
We have the team
We have the reliability, stability, and small form factor, the low voltage, and the speed.
We have the tier 1 engagements.
We have engagement with the world’s largest transceiver companies.
We have the prototyping on going.
This is the time to place your solid bets on the future of polymers.
L_R
Ted is a short for sure.
Perhaps just short on brains.
You are going to PUT yourself into a lot of trouble.
L_R
Ted is a short Ted is a short Ted is a short.
How you going to make money as it crashes down by year end?
Ted is a short. Ted is a short. Ted is a short.
His intentions are clear.
Anyway, it's time for me to sit back and allow you guys to spin your webs -- I hope you push this thing over $20 if possible so I'll make a ton when it crashes down by year end.
Marco:
Well said. Your last post was excellent and summarizes the progress with LWLG.
Clearly you are well informed. Hope to meet you next year at the ASM.
L-R
Ted did a trade and sold too early.
He wants to drive it down and do another trade I suspect.
L_R
Sticky
L_R
Yes. Great Post.
L_R
Never thought you would rise to the challenge. You cannot prove your claim that PDK’s eventually reach “completion”. You provide No references, no footnotes, no links. No knowledge about PDK’s and what is meant by a “complete” PDK.
The onus remains on you to prove your claims. But you won’t and can’t provide any reference to prove your case. Surely there must be something out there to prove your case that complete PDK’ exist!!!!
L_R
TP:
You are not able to provide clear un-inferred evidence that a "complete" PDK exists anywhere with any foundry.
Not from any scientific papers or any fabrication facility reports.
Therefore I conclude you just make stuff up.
What is an open source PDK TP?
If you don't know the answer to this question or don't know what open source means then you don't know what you are talking about.
I rest my case.
D**fus
L_R
Can’t find an article anywhere about a “completed” photonic PDK can you?
The onus is on you to PROVE there is such a thing. You claim there is but can”t prove it.
I have to prove nothing because I make no such claim.
L_R