is...(lightning strikes only once unless you remain standing where you shouldn’t be.)
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don’t read your junk. Never read your sticky. Useless piece of garbage.
I might read the first few words of your post but never go beyond that.
You have no science background, never attended an ASM, won’t and don’t know how to do proper research and have no idea even what a PDK is or how poling works.
Yet you try to comment on the things you have no experience or knowledge about.
D**fus
L_R
MarcoPolo4 +112 positive posts on his sticky. Incredible post.
EVERY NEWBIE should read his post.
TedPeele -79 negative posts. I can give you 79 reasons why you will waste your time if you read that sticky.
L_R
I stand corrected .
It has nothing to do with merit whatsoever then.!!!
L_R
Score:
TedPeele -79
Marcopolo4 +108
And why is Ted’s sticky still up there?
Because HE put it up there.
Speaks for itself.
L_R
98 points for MarcoPolo4’s sticky and we are at 100. Go go go.
L_R
Does he know that he lies?
L_R
-79 is the real score for TP’s sticky.
And it is still up there?
There should be a rule for stickies.
Total score cannot be negative.!!!!
TP’s new name should be:
-79TP
L_R
Wow. 92 points for the Marcopolo4 sticky. Let’s drive it over 100 folks. It was and is a great post.
L_R
TP:
I am sitting here laughing my a** of after reading this:
Anyway, it's time for me to sit back and allow you guys to spin your webs -- I hope you push this thing over $20 if possible so I'll make a ton when it crashes down by year end.
I don’t worry, won’t worry,
It is the shorts who will worry must worry, should worry.
L_R
Once more an excellent post.
We have the polymer
We have the team
We have the reliability, stability, and small form factor, the low voltage, and the speed.
We have the tier 1 engagements.
We have engagement with the world’s largest transceiver companies.
We have the prototyping on going.
This is the time to place your solid bets on the future of polymers.
L_R
Ted is a short for sure.
Perhaps just short on brains.
You are going to PUT yourself into a lot of trouble.
L_R
Ted is a short Ted is a short Ted is a short.
How you going to make money as it crashes down by year end?
Ted is a short. Ted is a short. Ted is a short.
His intentions are clear.
Anyway, it's time for me to sit back and allow you guys to spin your webs -- I hope you push this thing over $20 if possible so I'll make a ton when it crashes down by year end.
Marco:
Well said. Your last post was excellent and summarizes the progress with LWLG.
Clearly you are well informed. Hope to meet you next year at the ASM.
L-R
Ted did a trade and sold too early.
He wants to drive it down and do another trade I suspect.
L_R
Sticky
L_R
Yes. Great Post.
L_R
Never thought you would rise to the challenge. You cannot prove your claim that PDK’s eventually reach “completion”. You provide No references, no footnotes, no links. No knowledge about PDK’s and what is meant by a “complete” PDK.
The onus remains on you to prove your claims. But you won’t and can’t provide any reference to prove your case. Surely there must be something out there to prove your case that complete PDK’ exist!!!!
L_R
TP:
You are not able to provide clear un-inferred evidence that a "complete" PDK exists anywhere with any foundry.
Not from any scientific papers or any fabrication facility reports.
Therefore I conclude you just make stuff up.
What is an open source PDK TP?
If you don't know the answer to this question or don't know what open source means then you don't know what you are talking about.
I rest my case.
D**fus
L_R
Can’t find an article anywhere about a “completed” photonic PDK can you?
The onus is on you to PROVE there is such a thing. You claim there is but can”t prove it.
I have to prove nothing because I make no such claim.
L_R
Marco:
I have no intention of winning of course. That is not my objective.
I have accomplished what I have set out to do…….
L_R
TP:
I gave you a very simple task. Find an example on the internet of a “completed” PDK. I asked you to prove that there is such a thing as a final “completed” PDK.
Here is a major clue. Have you ever heard of open source software? How about it’s equivalent in open source PDK’s?
If you understood what an open source PDK was you would never have suggested that there has to be a “completed” PDK that could be utilized universally across the industry for mass production of modulators.
You are a complete open source d**fus!
L_R
TP:
I called you out and you can’t provide one example anywhere on the internet of a completed PDK for a photonic modulator.
It should be easy TP. A simple Google search will do the trick or will it?
L_R
TP:
I have called you out!
Give me one article anywhere on the internet using google if you want about “completed” PDK’s. Just one!
If you can’t do it is clear you have fabricated the concept of a “completed” PDK.
I am calling you out TP.
Put up or shut up!
L_R
Your ego is so big you think you should advise posters on how to make arguments.
You have no idea what a PDK is and that is why you keep saying no one has “completed a PDK.
I don’t mind advising someone on how to make arguments if in fact they know what they are talking about but if they don’t have any idea what they are talking about well I am not interested in hearing from them about how to make an argument.
All one has to know is that if a producer is sending out end products to customers it is because there is a PDK that is being used in a foundry to make the modulators on wafers for the producer.
I don’t need to or have to explain anything else.
I would advise you to start reading up on PDK’s. Once you have done a serious study of the factory processes come back and we can have a serious discussion about the issue. Until then all you do is make irrational conclusions from a 10k. That is NOT the place to go to learn about “completed” PDK’s. I have yet to read anywhere about “completed” PDK’s as you attempt to describe them. Define that term and give me a reference or just plain shut up!
Now here is the challenge. Show via a reference from a foundry what a “completed” PDK is. Just one reference please and then we can start a serious first argument on the matter. Your failure to do so tells all of us on this board that you absolutely have no clue.
You want a pleasant discussion and a serious argument?. Start with the suggestion above.
Until then no one will take you seriously. NO ONE.
Kaboom
L_R
You clearly don’t understand PDK’s and don’t pretend that you do.
L_R
You still know NOTHING about PDK’s and I mean NOTHING.
If you can send Modulators out to transceiver companies so they can construct their devices then whatever PDK was used to manufacture the modulators is proof of a kit that does the job.
You are such a doofus.
And while I am at it… such modulators would not have poling issues.
Incredibly a real doofus indeed.
L_R
North of 12 Billion.?
L_R
Ridiculous as usual.
L_R
Your last 2 paragraphs are quite helpful. Thank you.
L_R.
It’s a PHOTONICS foundry and by virtue of this is is most certainly a leading private foundry in the photonics industry.
Give your head a shake!
L_R
You missed the point completely.
I rest my case that AMF was not one of the 2 foundry’s that even had a completed PDK last year otherwise the.number of foundries on the slide deck with completed PDK’s would have been 3.
This tells me lots. The probability is high that there > 3 foundries now ready for commercialization of wafers.
L_R
The slide deck from last year indicated one European and one USA foundry had successfully completed PDK’s.
Furthermore the same presentation indicated that they were receiving modulators back from the foundries. And they were looking very good . This could only mean that our Singapore foundry was not a part of this presentation.
L_R
Ha Ha
L_R
The reports coming out on Perk 6 are telling us that the performance parameters of the modulators are all showing improved results.
We are clearly on our way to creating a new ecosystem and platform for the internet.
Just my very humble and very biased impressions.
L_R
You mean a "wake" or a "wake- up" moment.
L_R
Carlin:
Any PR with a big name would immediately cause this stock to rocket big time. Double triple quadruple.
L_R
Have you ever seen a stock lay in a bottom pattern. This is exactly the way it happens. No one is buying and no one is selling.
L_R
Good summary. Worthy of a sticky and so it is.
L_R