Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yet here we sit under 3 cents, because of Franks reputation, and not having audited fins. I hope once this in CNRC's report, and Frank is head of WSHI maybe this will take off. Discouraging what no serious buyers can do to a co.
Yes I sincerely wish this tanks. I've lost a crap ton of money on this and wish LG loses his a$$. I'm bitter because I believed the lies and your pumping misleads orhers. Stating on 2/16 that you set up conversations with doug the next day (which was Saturday, really) when I have called multiple times with only voicemail machines to talk to, makes me angry. LG owned the security company for 20+ years yet he merged with his transport co so he could achieve m&a leverage - huh? Toxic financing to make it possible really tells me that LG is only interested in the money, definitely not shareholders.
I've made enough elsewhere to write this off, but I plan on sticking around to warn newbies about LG and his thieving ways. Maybe after this goes back to pink's and LG loses his shirt he'll learn not to lie.
4.3 mil in revenue, and 4 mil in cost of operations. At the end of the day without the tax credit, they would have lost money, what a gem! I still believe LG did this so he could get out from under, perhaps they're going to have to buy new vans soon or whatever, and as you said, no pr team, so shareholders can't ask questions. I am thinking more and more that LG is a crook looking to line his own pockets. I may soon be the one getting out.
How do you know it didn't have a lot of debt?
One thing that has bothered me is what kind of revenue will TransportUS bring to the table. The pr was full of platitudes but nothing concrete. It's one of the reasons I was skeptical because as far as I'm concerned, it may have been done to get rid of some debt they had. That's what has me concerned about the toxic financing that has just been taken on. I realize it was a private company, but I was hoping there would have been some clarity since the pr before now. Again I left a message on Mike's voicemail but I'm not expecting anything.
One that has bothered me is what kind of revenue will TransportUS bring to the table. The pr was full of platitudes but nothing concrete. It's one of the reasons I was skeptical because as far as I'm concerned, it may have been done to get rid of some debt they had. That's what has me concerned about the toxic financing that has just been taken on. I realize it was a private company, but I was hoping there would have been some clarity since the pr before now. Again I left a message on Mike's voicemail but I'm not expecting anything.
I get it as well. Been here a few years, when HRAA was being talked about merging with AGSS and heard the promises. Unfortunately I believed LG, then the reverse split. Man I lost a lot and am very bitter with LG. Tiger has said call, I have and have spoke to a secretary who puts me through to a voicemail. No response, LG doesn't care about shareholders that's for sure. No reply to email either. If I hadn't done so well on other investments, I would have bit the bullet and taken the loss which is about 90% by the way. As far as I'm concerned, as soon as I get close to even, I'm outta here cause LG is sh#!;:;!!!
You mentioned on 1/24 that you had been in contact with Mike with the intent to have some idea from Jason about the direction or future action of AGSS. I'm assuming you haven't heard anything. I haven't had any luck in contacting a person, I guess that was expected. As far as anything happening in the future, LG has shown that informing shareholders is of little concern for him. A 1.4 mil contact isn't squat for 6 months as their revenue has to be at least 20x that for the year before any movement in sp.
I am well under water but I am patient and willing to see what happens. I have a small percentage of my Roth portfolio in this, and I have done well in my 401k investment so I can wait.
My question was regarding Cunningham and it has and you know it. Now that hnrc is aquirinng Cunningham and changing the name to CNRC, I believe in the future that CNRC will be as well as they want to up list. Having a paid basher like you so quickly making silly statements by misreading my question on purpose makes me want to buy more.
Jan 3 pr says yes they are. I just hadn't read where the last 2 years are audited in preparation for up listing. So hnrc becomes CNRC with audited fins and increasing their net asset value to 1.70 per share. IT IS AUDITED, I should have read through the pr better before asking the question.
Does CNRC have audited finances? I would they would if their aspiration is to up list.
Sorry I got back to you so late as I was traveling. I got those numbers from a friend who said it was from Yahoo finance. I looked it up and that's what it says, but I knew it had to be wrong because of the source. I also had thought the outstanding was double what it is. Sorry for not checking before posting. I still don't see anything happening in at least a year with what has been communicated regarding any M&A as he had to get what I consider toxic funding, even if for short term. To think that this may have been needed just to meet payroll or pay monthly bills is not encouraging.
How could they not. NASDAQ says for small cap stocks, it is pretty hard and fast, especially since they don't have 5 million market valuation, & 750,00 income. If they RS only 10-1 that only gets 30 cents a share. Not near enough. Much more then they fall below 1 million public shares needed.
Saying 76 mil is "tiny" float is pure pump. I am planning on getting out, if there is some increase in sp so I can recoup some of my money.
Excuse my scepticism but it seems you're pumping awfully hard. 76 mil float is not tiny by any stretch of the imagination. I know what you said about LG but when I see posts like this, I see a paid pumper, and certainly not someone to listen to regarding this stock. As I've said, I hope to get my money back, maybe this year, but I've lost a lot and would be happy with just 25% return. LG is a crook as far as I'm concerned.
In addition to that to get small cap designation, they need 1 million public shares, a 5 million market valuation and a $4 initial price are a few other requirements. I just think Frank is blowing smoke. I haven't been able to talk with him, have you?
Do they have net tangible assets of 4 million?
Market cap is less that a million. NASDAQ seems to indicate that 1million public shares, net income of 750,000 and $4 price. I don't see how any kind of rs gets CNRC there.
With 30 mil outstanding there's not a huge amount to do a rs with. They would have to do at least a 100 to 1 to get to dollars, which leaves the outstanding shares really low.
And if the wdhi shares become tradable I expect any trading will be shorted as well. Frank has such a bad rep that it is expected that he will try to use wdhi as his own money printing enterprise.
I was hoping a otcqx listing and audited fins would come about with the CNRC name change. But it seems like they are shooting for NASDAQ which means at least a 10 to 1 rs but probably a lot more. It also means a while before any increase in valuation as it will be heavily shorted imo.
Just hope the restructuring doesn't involve a massive reverse split. I've always said that share buyback would be best approach, instills confidence and reduces dilution.
Me too. In the Jan 3 pr it also said that the restructuring to meet qualifications for a national exchange would also be completed in Q1. If these don't happen, then we know Frank has pulled another fast one. Time will tell.
MacBeth was speaking of Missling when he spoke of idiots full of sound and fury signifying nothing. He's all about pr's that only mislead and confuse, but I am betting there will never be a peer reviewed article on AD or PDD. No TLD for Rett, just more blather on anecdotal evidence, and we will hear about EMA in 2 years when he says they are "planning" to file imo.
Think it will come out before PDD review? I think not.
Definition of insanity, expecting Missling to come through when he has proven again and again he cannot be trusted. Why can't investors here admit that 2-73 would have a better chance to reach patients who need it, without Missling and his hyperbole. If he was straightforward, perhaps a big time partner might have appeared to help him through the approval process which he seems to be his Achilles heel.
According to your previous posts, I have higher expectations than just 2x or 3x. I am well underwater, and with what your conversation with LG say, I hope to break even this year. If any M&A action happens this year, I hope it is has a substantial impact on the sp as well as having some positive impact on the margins. As I said, I have lost my trust in LG that he will make it happen. If I can come close to breaking even, I'm outta here.
Yah, just like P.D.D. Not gonna happen.
Seeing the data doesn't mean all that much if any bp has serious doubts that Missling can get it across the finish line. They want assurances of revenue, with Missling that's a real problem.
What you call fud is real life. How interested will any suiter for possible partner be, when no AD peer reviewed article or rett data show up, not just end of this year, but for years to come, a.k.a. p.d.article. They will not believe Missling will have any semblance of getting his ducks in a row for EMA to approve anything. I have said this before, I believe any chance for 2-73 recipients as well as shareholders is a buyout, plane and simple.
When I first bought in I knew LG didn't think communication with shareholders was a priority, but it is becoming apparent that there will be little positive movement any time soon imo. I'm under water, but if we get up where I can break even, I'm out if it happens in 2024. If not I'll just bail in 2025. Not a lot invested and rarely check here, but I used to trust LG. Not anymore.
There will be no data this year imo, and when it shows up possibly in a year or two it will be like always, clear as mud and AF and his buds having a field day. I sincerely doubt that any peer reviewed article will ever appear either, but Missling will have his excuses and his hair...
Not real happy about the dilution just to put more money in LG's pocket...
Missling has been the reason for the snails pace of advancement of 2-73. Not the FDA. His incompetentence as CEO has been the reason there has been no partnership imo as he has no communication skills and cares little for shareholders. If there was clarity on any results, it would be already approved, but all Missling cares about is his hair.
Would Cunningham be audited?
I have a fidelity account, and they show up there.
I hope so, but until the MM's believe it, it will go nowhere. I still think in lieu of audited financials, a share buyback is needed imo. Too much bad history with Frank.
If HNRC is serious about up listing, then OTCQB requirement of audited financials would have to be met. Maybe it will happen this year.