Hover, I mean no disrespect, but VPLM is a small company with no revenue. The bigs would stall as long as they can to bleed a small company of cash. Drag out as long as they can, go to courts, any judgments appeal…then make an agreement. No way a settlemt this early. The Verizon and T-Mobile not even making it to trial is a clear red flag. I am a long holder as I am a risk taker, The insiders are padding their own pockets, they only raise money in the private markets at .005 cents a share. Good luck to all, but this is a tax write off. I hope I’m wrong

Although I see red flags, Im holding and see it to the end!

I’m guessing insiders saw this coming and hedging their bets. Took a few million off the table. Smart move

https://www.law360.com/articles/1863278/albright-grants-verizon-t-mobile-wins-over-voip-pal

Albright Grants Verizon, T-Mobile Wins Over VoIP-Pal

Law360
https://www.law360.com › articles › albright-grants-ver...
3 days ago — A sealed ruling from U.S. District Judge Alan Albright on Monday might have put an end to patent lawsuits facing Verizon and T-Mobile that ...

i cut and pasted his exact sentence and Law360 came up for me. Not looking good.

For VPLM - NONE

INVESTOR RELATIONS: Working tirelessly on what? Hmm

With the cancelled trials and not 1 proven infringement that has been announced, hard for me to believe a surprise in imminent. Believe me, I wish for the best outcome possible, but who would fork over a few billion for a company that would then have to prove infringement. NLST has been fighting Micron, Samsung for years. They went to a jury trial, won and still going through appeals. When VZ and T-Mobile cancelled, to me all hope is lost. past PRs have been carefully worded and executed to perfection. What is the next move if no buyout? Insiders are the only ones making money at this point.

RED FLAG - NOT ONE TRIAL!

What's ole Carnac thinking Hay Day?

From a solid position with two known pending trials, to what now........Who the F knows? My enthusiasm is definitely waning!

Verizon will most likely be next. Like I said, binary outcome and looks like a major body blow with a right hook up next. Cut me Mick!

Response makes zero sense! This is not a $50 stock. That would be $250 Billion company. No one ever claimed such a value. Also, no-one outside this board is paying attention. The only buyers of the stock are on this board? I have a hard time believing that.

I’ve posted my share of the good and bad. Good luck to all Longs as we really do not know what will be the end game is as of now. This is a binary outcome in my opinion. Patents have been tested out the wahzoo! Hudnell and team have put the pressure on! Jury trials dismissed and/or cancelled or settled , ex-parte confirmation!!!! GBC keeping updated filings! I sincerely wish us all a HAPPY ENDING

Straightword, what the market value be at a $50 price? I’ll do the math for you $250billion…

Worth the read for all! Mentions monetary and The USPTO issued a reexam certificate for the '606 patent.
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/patent/1495130/voip-palcom-sues-t-mobile-and-verizon-over-previously-unasserted-claims-from-previously-asserted-patents

Lets get some of this!
https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-delivers-strong-wireless-service-revenue-and-broadband-subscriber-growth-q2

DB - This post of yours ranks high on my list! Great humor, great price target and yes, i did youtube the song of Happy Music.......great song. love that genre and brings me back to the roller skating days! Good Times back then, and looking forward to good times ahead.

Simple math again. As of May 15, 2024, the Registrant had 3,257,484,267 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Value at .75 price is.....drum roll please.......$2,443,113,200.25 valuation. That's almost $2.5 billion. A complete Failure! I wish i had a portfolio of complete failures

Who was this conversation with? Please do enlighten us who follow the fillings. I can do simple math and get to the .75/share. Please do tell us whom you conversed with.

A re-read from this PR from November 2023 I think is very positive, especially with most recent developments.
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2023/11/20/2783163/0/en/VoIP-Pal-Has-Successfully-Defeated-An-Ex-Parte-Reexamination-Challenge-Against-the-606-Patent.html

Just for fun and some napkin math for DBs .75. I went back and reviewed quite a few court FILINGs and pretty amazing how many have gone in VPLMs favor. Also, researched the monetary analysis. Pretty interesting scenarios. If you take the lowest award percentage wise which is VinetX at .48%, annual royalty should be in the ballpark of $200mm just for Verizon. Numbers get interesting really quick! Just for grins, 3 settlements put a $600mm in royalty income and lets us a round number of .10/share, put whatever multiple you want on that and you can get to .75 - $1.00 with a 7x or 10x earnings multiple. DB might be on to something. GLTAL

I refreshed my research on Huawei and after the favorable ruling, Mutual agreement to dismiss case I believe. For Verizon and T-Mobile, After VP files the exhibit C on Lodging filing, which is what’s laid out for Jury, case was cancelled for both. My gut feeling is telling me VP has a solid case against all, and special appointed advisor is working all angles from all sides for conclusion. VP has not even had a chance for a jury trial, and have sooo close. Why would they cave or a judge not allow them for the chance to prove in court after favorable rulings, especially Huawei.

Just had a thought! Assume VPLM was in someway a scam and settlement with Amazon, huawei, Verizon and T-Mobile, certainly the courts and SEC wouldn’t allow an NDA agreement to keep the scam going. I would think it would have to be disclosed and made public. I have to believe the SEC would shut this down. The 36 IPRs and settlements, why would Hudnell continue. I’m all over the place with thoughts of positive and negatives, but gotta believe that the end is close and a complex outcome is about to come to fruition. I am baffled how the 10Q and 10K are not reporting material events, but at the same thought, nothing monetary and final settlement have been material. I’m hoping Emil will have a PR soon that will push towards a conclusion

Quarterly filings

Amazon, Huawei, Verizon, t-mobile and still under .015/share. Not the best position from a price stand point. Hoping a larger number than $180k shows up on income statement. I was so looking forward to attending the trial and really get to see case presented. Im losing confidence as the day goes on.

Only other scenario could be the complexity of the case, however don’t believe that to be true. I think it’s checkmate and go figure out a solution or a mediation

The notice of lodging filed last night was exhibit C for Verizon. T-mobile had all 3 exhibits already filed. It might be clear cut for the judge and defendants that open/shut case presented. Let’s not waste anyone’s time here scenario. Just looking for closure either way.

Checkmate!

GBC posts are studly! On top of it. If it works out, I’m planning on attending trial! Time is closing in on Emil’s claims. Really liking T-Mob is lined up right behind.

Straightword, do you own any shares? Simple yes/no question.

Only 5 weeks til 8/19

I’m guessing someone bought in at the high and didn’t average down and even a billion dollar settlement won’t recoup losses.

Probably in at .30+ and didn’t average down and don’t see the returns. .03 is a 2X for some

I said it a few days ago, the T-Mobile right behind Verizon to me is HUGE for the stock price support at positive momentum. We've got 2 huge jury trials that are about to happen. Deerballs, as you say, VPLM and shareholders in THE BEST POSITION EVER! Buyers are thanking Sellers now.

Good Volume!

Fireworks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am really liking the fact that T-Mobile is lined up right behind Verizon. These next few weeks/months are going to be real fun to be a part of.

Pre-trial is where VZ is going to realize what they're up against. Pre-trial hearings are used to determine legal issues. Pre-trial matters are decided by the judge and in most situations both the defense and/or prosecution present evidence and/or witness testimony. At pre-trial hearings judges have an opportunity to hear evidence presented in order to determine what evidence is admissible at trial.