Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
again,
1.) you couldn't've had a vaccine made, since you didn't have a tumor
2.) you could've just as easily been randomized to placebo, which would hurt trial results
3.) you're alleging international conspiracy, not just at KCH
4.) given you're expressing this outrage 9 yrs later and on a penny stock forum, it's more likely you're betting against this stock than your story being true (and again, if it is, it's truly whack and irrelevant)
In addition to all that, the global conspiracy would have to go further: all the "fake GBMers" like Nemesis would have to be randomized to the ITT arm, not the placebo arm, or all that illegal world-wide collaborating and career-risking would be moot. Nemesis is either really bad at fudding or a whacko that all the physicians and regulators start slowly backing away from as he goes on one of his conspiracy theory tirades.
how do you know you would’ve been randomized to actually get the vaccine? a non-gbm patient could’ve just as easily skewed the placebo group. your whole conspiracy just doesn’t make sense.
what would your testimony even say?
Nemesis: “Hi, I have a hole in my brain and never got DCVax.”
MHRA: “Okay?”
The fact that the application didn’t change since submission doesn’t necessarily mean there were no RFIs—it could be that RFIs were sent, MHRA & NWBO discussed and pointed to where info was in the doc, and MHRA agreed things were sufficient. Many times RFIs will spur discussion but no change.
Ex: "ATL-DC is not DCVax"
Nature: "Linda M. Liau is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc, which has licensed the DC vaccine technology"
Ex: (literally to Nature, cringe) "there can be wide confusion in this namespace I think it would be proper to update (or note) the formal name of the ATL-DC agent used"
While ex is "widely confused" (?), LL & LP march on to display the next generation of cancer care.
Bottom of article:
"Linda M. Liau is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc, which has licensed the DC vaccine technology."
Hmm.
a good reminder though that no one is really anonymous here
honestly no idea what this is trying to say.
can someone decipher?
wouldn't be surprised if tomorrow/Friday is a May 10th Part 2. they could bash it down to make the public think there was a bad leak out of the CHM meeting. don't be fooled.
my god the bears are working overtime in their cubicles today--8 of the last 10 posts:
Nemesis
iclight
learningcurve
iclight
iclight
exwannabe
Nemesis
exwannabe
and these are folks who state they have no financial interest in this company, and are only here "to warn us"
It kind of works well for you that you oscillate between lying and being dumb. Other fudsters are either constantly dumb (inquirig) so people ignore them or are always lying (nemesis) so people ignore them. But you keep us guessing. Here, with this 3-yr dose thing, you’re being dumb.
I think I’ve gleaned that he was perhaps misdiagnosed and therefore received unnecessary radiation—which of course would suck. But his anger is misdirected since that has nothing to do with NWBio or DCVax.
Yes, blabbing, because after all these posts of yours, I still have no idea why you’re on an obscure message board for a company you have no connection to.
It’s on you that folks here are still confused as to your purpose and your story. What you’ve said is tortuous and confusing—e.g., blabbing.
If you truly want a succinct reason & rationale for people investing, read the JAMA article.
If you were not part of the trial and did not receive the vaccine, what is your relevance here / what are you blabbing on about?
what is the inferred ulterior motive for them to find it last minute? what’s this mysterious benefit of stalling a 10k?
yeah this is literally nowhere. just weird to make something like that up.
femike seems desperate for relevance, and any more random fabrications like this and he joins inquirig, sir pumpernickel, and tickparatom on mute
fwiw i think this phase ii talk is moot—let’s be real, there will def be at least one rfi
is this where you work, with inquirg as your underling?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WKHS/comments/pvm8p7/info_confessions_of_a_paid_stock_basher/?share_id=j7iGGaIS_dHvLHUF6TMWq&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&utm_source=share&utm_term=9
I've been here way longer than you and have way more shares than you. Usually 10-q is out 45 after end of last quarter.
shouldn’t the 10q be out?
did you forget LL is on the board of NWBio?
agreed, it was meant more tongue in cheek / a jab at ex’s “DCs do nothing” nonsense
could this be considered as a second, confirmatory trial that ex has said is needed so badly?
“normal dev stage biotect (sic)”—look at ABEO’s chart lol
the only question I have for you is if you have an individual short position in NWBO (which can’t explain the 20,000 posts, my lord), or if you truly are paid to continually bash companies on OTC stock boards (which, as much as people accuse you of this, I still don’t believe it’s an actual profession / that it actually happens). neither option seem to make sense, and can’t think of a third.
Context and/or source would be much appreciated, thanks
how the F is a convicted fraudster not banned, let alone our board moderator?
the big difference being those were not rapid review. if NWBO is granted rapid review, 150 days. if not, next Dec is a good bet.
either way, other things will keep developing--the train is not stopping. it's always been slow, but it has more momentum and surety than ever, and you know it.
after 15 years and over 16,600 posts (my god), ex’s life is so entangled and entrenched in NWBO that there’s no way he could just “leave” the board even if he wanted to. Yes, he is at the point where stepping away from a penny stock forum would leave a huge void in his life. Let’s face it, he’s going down with his (slowly) sinking ship, he’s not leaving.
Okay, but when people say Stupp trial, the original 2005 NEJM is implied.
This is the Stupp trial, and the ITT group had a median age of 56 while the control group's was 57.
In your TTField paper, ITT median age was 56, and control was again 57. They then also break them into <&> 65.
In DCVax JAMA paper, the 78%-22% split between over and under 65 is pretty clear that this trial's cohort was actually on the older side compared to other trials.
also your link to the “Stupp trial” was to the TTField trial, not the original Stupp trial. median ages were 56 and 57 in the ITT and control groups there.
look at JTM table 1. not sure why JAMA decided to split groups at 65 and not show overall, but JTM has overall.
bottom line, DCVax trial group did not differ in age from comparative trials.
The median age was 56, which is the exact same as the Stupp trial. You can find this in Table 1 of Jama or JTM articles, and Table 1 of Stupp's NEJM article.
This is such basic stuff, holy cow.
The median age was 56, which is the exact same as the Stupp trial. You can find this in Table 1 of Jama or JTM articles, and Table 1 of Stupp's NEJM article.
checking in, man you’ve fallen. this is cringey stuff.
stop posting so much
+1 for no orbis
also +1 for MA and $4 by summer
I’m sure you saw UCLA call out their product as DCVax explicitly? https://www.uclahealth.org/cancer/cancer-services/brain-tumor/about-us
man, you arguing otherwise is cringe at this point. you can do better.
more likely the 2.5M newly minted shares