Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Of course you could question my motives and I have no problem with that but I do not post opinion as fact in order to sway the opinion of others without any defined purpose and, further, I certainly do not post lies. Have to go now. Maybe speak again.
Just block the name out of the e-mail I suggested you ask him to send you to confirm what he said. Simple!! Aren't you able to do that? Seems pretty suspicious to me.....imo. It must be the same as when you said Paypal had released Monk's account information to you.
Thanks for your pm on the "other" board. My apologies to this board for replying in this manner.
Would you be kind enough to ask Ryan to send you an e-mail to confirm your conversation denying his e-mail. Would you then please post the screenshot to confirm. Thanks very much for your co-operation in this.
Neither does my employer and it is a multi national company
The company has already publicly stated that they are not authorising the release of the merger company's identity through the TA and they have also publicly stated that the share structure remains unaltered.
I don't know any more than you do what the company intended, whether it was a mistake or whether it was intentional or clumsy. We will just have to rely on what the "authorities" say about all the issues involved if, as indicated by some, there is a full investigation in to this company. On one side there has been contact with the SEC re misleading information etc and that has been rebutted and countered with the NSS complaints and the data on these have also been sent to the SEC as far as we are aware. I think I may be out of messages.
Nothing released with the intent to defraud. Hence the investigation, if it is ongoing, in relation to EIGH. It is pretty certain that EIGH made no material gain from the pr's they issued, and, as I have said before, we will all have to wait for any outcomes. IMO
Yes, really. EIGH has employees, of course, whether on contract, consultancy or direct payment. Even the signature on the dispatch note was claimed to be Bryant until verified to be different. There is a store, part of a publicly traded and duly formed and incorporated company; there are employees; there are legal associations, all in the public domain. This is a start up business like so many in this market and, as such, its valuation is in relation to its potential. If it had retained profits in millions (rather than access to draw down loans, for instance) it wouldn't be in this market. It is the speculator/investor's choice whether he buys stock at 000 hoping it will go to dollars based on their own dd rather than based on misinformed conjecture. IMO
I have limited posts and may have to cut it short but, in any case, it really serves very little purpose discussing your conjecture. I remember a posting saying the company had sold only one T shirt and then a release of inventory and sales figures that proved the contrary was met with a whole load of unfounded postings claiming they were falsified records. As I say, pointless. JMO
No scam or pump and dump by EIGH has been proven. We will have to wait and see what the outcome may be but there is no doubt that the company is moving ahead with its business plans and, despite attempts to de-stabilise it, has been very open with its objectives. JMO
The town is hardly obscure and Barbados is a global centre of commerce like much of the Caribbean and many of their small, obscure islands. You are also only talking about one small part of a much bigger business plan. JMO
No, not as I recall, but a few banks have in both the US and UK the repercussions of which have been felt globally. No-one is necessarily squeaky clean whether they are a multinational or a small business and certainly not in the market we are in. JMO
But the store is not a confirmed scam as you previously stated!!Rather, the reply from Patricia Kublalsingh confirms the existence of the store in the Limegrove Centre the opening of which appears to be delayed generally. I suggest you make the same inquiries of Ralph Lauren, or are they a scam, in your opinion.
Never heard of Patricia Kublalsingh before. Is she from Limegrove, in which case, the delay appears to be out of the company's hands? Can you confirm please?
Thanks for your opinion. Got to go now.
Thanks, Janice, and I understand and agree that could be a scenario. However, in my opinion that is not the case with EIGH with regard to volume and price. We'll have to agree to disagree until we have definitive proof - not far away imo
Thanks for your opinion. In my opinion, independent people were attempting to buy shares which would normally lead to an increase in pps (with the increase in buying), and, yet, the price dropped. There have been a lot of posts on normal market activity so I will wait for the outcome of any investigation in to this based on the considerable data submitted to the SEC by the company.
Of-course one should invest based on one's own dd. However, in my opinion and, as pointed out, there has been activity with this stock in the market that is unusual to say the least. Perhaps you can let me have your opinion as to why there is such activity on this board for such an insignificant stock (in the grand scheme of things). I don't understand why there are so many opinions on EIGH from those who do not even hold shares. Also, can you let me know where I mentioned Monk? And, further, please explain and expand your comment re the Monk cult; I am afraid I don't understand.
I think your comments are fair; we have seen increases in such activities with the SEC and institutional investors wrt EIGH. JMO
Absolutely correct, Alan. We will have the definitive confirmation of this very shortly, in my opinion
How do you surmise they were fleeing the stock when there is an increase in buying activity? It was all pretty transparent on L2. The situations were the converse; people buying the stock in increasing volume but a drop in pps. Also, at the times to which I refer there was no bad news, rather, to the contrary, it was usually following good news and, equally important, prior to any of the current conjecture. However, in my opinion, I think this issue has been covered by many professionals to explain how a market operates and should be kept orderly through "supply and demand".
I mentioned the numerous previous instances, prior to the greys. Would you expect a significant increase in volume to be accompanied by a major drop in pps in an orderly market?
EIGH: each and every day more and more information appears to be released on this forum, and others, regarding manipulation and rebuttals (by opinion) of posted facts. Consider this: As an investor, in the case of EIGH you cannot rely on pps and volume of shares in circulation as information for decision making. Everybody has witnessed substantial increases in volume of this stock at times with an immediate drop in pps. A level playing field? I don't think so. Market manipulation? A very real possibility considering the float and sell/buys figures that have been posted over the recent months. Someone other than the free market is in control of the creation of these vital pieced of information.
They are operating under rules written by the DTCC and
approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The so-called free market forces are handcuffed and unable to defend issuers and investors and the mix of shorts and loans combined with the system?s tolerance for settlement failures creates a situation that damages issuers and drags down ordinary investors. However, this is all coming to a head very shortly and we will know the truth. In the meantime, remember, every stockholder is entitled to have a duly signed stock certificate. Maybe you should check if you have real shares in your account. I will.
It didn't look any different to the photographs to me. However, I didn't go in to the store - it was not open - but looked through the door windows. I am not a store fitter, it looked pretty tidy and completed to me. No apologies, and, if I was mistaken I was mistaken but the store was there, is there and is aboout to open - FACT. I was told by many on this board that it didn't exist - unsubstantiated OPINION. Ah well, fact and fiction again!! Another person was in Barbados recently and said he couldn't even bother to check it out - I wonder why. Perhaps that was the measure of the integrity of that poster.
I am a shareholder of EIGH and recently returned from a holiday in Barbados, a holiday arranged prior to the “Barbados Connection” and the SEC suspension of EIGH. However, it did give me an opportunity to carry out some due diligence on the Limegrove Centre and the “T shirt store”. My visit was as late as I could make it before my return on 23rd January and I found Limegrove to be an upmarket shopping centre with a host of stores offering luxury goods and services, boutiques, market leaders – yes Armani, Ralph Lauren and Louis Vitton etc are all there, as is the 8000Inc store. The centre did not appear to be far off completion and a few of the smaller stores (3 or 4) including Hallmark had opened for business and a few others, including an art gallery were fully fitted and stocked in preparation for opening. The 8000Inc store appeared complete with fixtures and fittings and is ideally sited in a prime position opposite the entrance to this mall that is going to attract many shoppers. I can re-assure investors that this is not a T-shirt stall in a downtrodden market area; Limegrove is a sophisticated, stylish centre with delicatessens, restaurants, sited in St. James and near to the Royal Westmoreland, Apes Hill and Sandy Lane complexes. Advertising says that there are cinemas, night clubs and contemporary accommodation under construction. While I was on holiday, the AC Milan junior camp was announced, front page of the national newspaper, and the details were also on television although I didn't see it. I had the pleasure of “having a beer”, at the Sandy Lane Golf Club, with a former England football international, a former Ryder cup captain, a current top three world professional golfer and a cricketing legend, notwithstanding the Desmond Haynes endorsement and all were well aware of the 8000Inc initiatives and very supportive and complimentary. Back to the T shirt stall: I liken this company's business plan to a very successful company, Cotton Traders. Founded by an ex England Rugby Union international, selling, initially, football shirts. It now sells, via small stores in shopping malls and via the internet, all over the world, especially in places that play rugby union, such as Canada, UK, Argentina, France, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Fiji etc and now has associations with such as Barbour...all from small beginnings. I am now more convinced than ever that this one part of the 8000Inc business has tremendous potential and that the proposed manufacture from Bajan cotton is inspired. I wish this company every success and ask that any potential investor does there own due diligence on this company and this market. Consider: where in the world can you go without seeing someone wearing a Manchester United shirt? We all buy sports and leisure clothing.
My research with Nevada State and the International Incorporator and Registered Agent show that the reverse mergers of these companies was facilitated by Nicholas Ellwood and Christine Hill, who were both shareholders. Do you know who these people are? I didn't find any reference to Bryant.
How do you know he hasn't? Proof please! I'm sorry I can't provide proof that he has but unless you can provide proof of your statements there is very little purpose to perpetuating discussions.
lying is not fraud!! Lying is telling an untruth or to mislead whereas a fraud is a deliberate intention to gain an intrinsic advantage. As far as we know EIGH have not benefited in any way from their errors and have publicly clarified the situation with all of them, some before the SEC. So they may well not have lied in the truest sense of the word, in my opinion.
What an arrogant statement without foundation. You have yourself stated the tardiness of information, one way or another, from the SEC. And to say the investigation will not be concluded until Bryant is deposed! Well, that just about sums it up about you for me, but, you have greater knowledge in these litigation matters.
I am just stating that neither you nor I nor anyone else, unless they are directly involved, knows what is happening and I am not suggesting anything either way. However, I don't believe that the Company would issue a statement that they weren't aware of any investigation in to the company in view of their position. My opinion is that they have answered all questions asked of them in relation to the suspension and have heard nothing further from the SEC. It is quite obvious that EIGH and the SEC will at some time have to discuss the short sale position exposed by stamped and verified audit from the TA but I was only talking about the pr's and Monks Den position
I think it's probably because many people have carried out real due diligence and have posted fact rather than unsubstantiated opinion about events here. We know for a fact that the stock audit figures don't add up, and I have only just returned from Barbados on holiday (I posted a report on this board that wqas unfortunately deleted) when I was able to confirm what had been publicly stated in the company releases, so, until I get confirmation from the SEC I would rather just post facts.
I thought it was agreed he would give his "submissions" by afidavit, may have even done so as far as I know. Do you know whether he has or not and would you verify the source of your information, please, I am rather pedantic about fact and opinion.
Hi Nicole. Yes, but I can't recall the figures; Is my memory correct in this? - there were approx. 60mm trades of which 52mm were buys and only 12mm were sells. As I recall it, these figures were from the TA report, stamped and verified, so where did they buy the stock from??
I was just thinking 2ndEldestone, in view of what is being posted here, it is very likely that EIGH is speaking with the SEC about the stock audit. Do you know the actual figures released by the company where they showed the possible short position?
You are correct with regard to the suspension and you have confirmed what I stated. However, neither you nor I know what is happening at the SEC. Has the investigation concluded? Are they investigating only Monks Den? Have they completed their investigation in to EIGH? etc. etc. It is a well known fact that there is often a long delay following the conclusion of investigations before they publish the findings or further instruction, if needed. If you have further fact to add that confirms any knowledge of what is the current situation between the SEC and EIGH and/or Monks Den please let me know and, also, let me know your verifiable source of information
Why are you mystified? EIGH has publicly clarified all of these positions. Further, with regard to the takeover of Monks Den, as you must be aware, this was part of the suspension and it has been publicly acknowledged by EIGH that they have co-operated fully with the SEC and sent full details for their examination. The suspension has been lifted and we have no knowledge, at this time, whether any further investigation is ongoing.
Great dd. Nice to see FACTS posted on this board.
Hi Connie, long time no see. I understand the position with the shares but I am looking for indisputable means of confirming the position in EIGH without any contradiction from either shorts or longs - what would be necessary? Btw, I know you like the sun, the weather in Barbados was 86F for the whole three weeks.
This business - property etc -doesn't remotely relate to 8000Inc (EIGH) but looks a typical marketing stock scam. I am sure more will come out about this in the very near future but I can't see any connections with the present co. I am sure that whoever perpetrated this are very worried. Did I understand that htis is being reported to the SEC and may be part of their investigation?