Nope, only those drowning in Kool-Aid!!!

Only way for many to get out in the green is to cash out when/if some hype spikes the share price for a fleeting few days before continuing its slow steady decline to $0.

Very little I assume. Basically for material and maybe brand license. Either way very little since Omega dive watches aren’t volume items. I have a few dive watches w/ ceramic bezels but haven’t had a need for the numerals on it to be liquidmetal. If all this “transformative” material is good for is watch dial numerals and guitar bridge pins, we’re in big trouble.

Yup. This is a Blog post from April 2018.

Trademarked or not, does it really matter? This is just like the bridge pins. How many phones has Asus sold? I'd bet not many enough. This isn't the product to lift any boat and share price agrees.

Does Martin have exclusivity? Would there be benefits to making tuning nuts out of Liquidmetal as well? Asking as I have no knowledge on guitar

Thanks

Nope. Apple was forced to settle because Intel is exiting smartphone 5G business,

Very well said!

So according to your reasoning LQMT should see substantial revenue for Q1?

For those of us expecting meaningful revenue to show up in LQMT’s books in Q4 or even Q1 may be being too optimistic. Yes, there’ll be a slew of new phones revealed in the next several days but non of these are expected to go into production till late summer at the earliest. If indeed LQMT gets a cut of revenues from these new phones, it may not materialize for another 6+ months.

Thanks. I was under the impression LQMT never had the capacity to produce millions of parts ??

I have a question regards to your post. Who made the "millions" of parts for Samsung flip phones? Just curious.

Cause that's how you create financial opacity.

Vivo Apex 2019 - a dud IMO. No selfie camera (I personally don't care that much but a few billion FaceBook and Instagram users do), no wireless charging but proprietary magnetic port, seamless, buttonless design might be no more water or dustproof then conventional design, etc, etc. Do most people other than those on this board care midframe might be BMG? NOT, I think.

$376K

Why would Liquidmetal HK want to allocate revenue to Liquidmetal LF for supposed 46% share and not retain all of it? Fact that co X owns 46% of co Y is a benefit to co X, not so much for co Y.

Like Eagle noted in a deleted msg, the math is 0 x 0 = 0 until substantial revenue shows up in LQMT's books.

Huawei or any other co isn't going to divulge detailed sales by location to its suppliers. Your example will be recorded as sales in China. Just my 2 cents.

Hopefully someone with good knowledge of the cross licensing agreement can answer this.

1) Does LQMT make any money if Eontec etc. sells liquid metal components to a Chinese co (e.g. Huawei) which in turn sells products in NA and Europe? In this case liquid metal component sales occurred in Asia regardless of where the final product was sold.

OR

2) Does the co buying liquid metal components have to be based in NA or Europe for LQMT to realize any revenue?

When do you figure all this will show up in LQMT top/bottom lines?

I agree with you. In my limited experience companies build a “maze” to create financial opacity, not transparency.

Eagle,
PE = (Share Price) / (Earnings per share)

$68k

Can you clarify for me if any royalties accrue to LQMT if Eontec sells parts to Huawei in China which sells some phones in EU/NA?

Do I understand it correctly? As long as It doesn’t infringe LQMT/CIP patent, Eontec can sell CE products anywhere in the world w/o paying anything to LQMT?

Yup that’s the one. I recall there was quite a discussion on iHub regarding the notify party of Salas.

Yes there was a delivery to a Salas couple months back to an address in garment district.

I guess Bromage forgot to mention back in August that city permit hadn’t been granted, just So Cal Edison. Jeez. More of the same. More fluff and no concrete info on what they’re producing or for whom.

Ok Eagle, please put me down for May 10, 2019. Thanks.

Since I’m new to this prediction game I have a question. Are we predicting a sustained share price of $0.60 and above or even a nano second blip to $0.60?

Apparently not cause it’s been what, 30 yrs of branding?

Are you saying John/Jane Doe cares whether their iPhone mid-frame is Liquidmetal or Glassimetal? Or the patient with pacemaker or the Tesla owner. NOT!!!

True that! Most if not all so called pat-yourself-on-the-back DD here is BS in terms of moving the share price- only thing that matters.

You only need to keep your eye on $0.17 and pathetic volume. Nothing else really matters.

Can you explain to me what Apple Watch ECG has to do with LQMT. Thanks in advance.

Liquidmetal, liquid metal, jibber jabber. Who gives a rat arse. $0.188, that’s all you need to know!

Oct 17th

Do you believe TSLA is richly valued? Its at 3.5x revenue. But I can go along with your 10x revenue which puts LQMT revenue at $300 million. Still Kool-Aid territory to sustain $3 SP. Heck, they only have to increase quarterly rev by 1500x

At a rich valuation of 5x revenue, LQMT will need revenues of $600 million to sustain a sp of $3. You believe it as long as one keeps drinking the Kool-Aid.

But then again, some people are predicting TSLA will go to $4000. Must be drinking from the same Kool-Aid fountain.

Staring at reality of $0.185 and 0.1% of float in volume. Everything else is just jibberish amounting to square root of shiiit.

Wow, that’s a lot of posts to read from this weekend. I won’t pretend to know which are real and which are jibberish. All I know is stock price is forward looking and tells me more than any supposed DD and $0.1965 doesn’t get me to write home about it.

Down load the Apple Watch app or go to link and scroll down the the screenshot of the app where liquid metal face is described.

https://www.iphoneincanada.ca/watch/new-apple-watch-faces-ios-12-gm/

The article quotes Apple...

For Liquid Metal, Apple says it was “inspired by the materials that make up Apple Watch” and “each film was shot in a custom model to capture the motion of the liquid metal as it interacts with the edges of the dial or display.”

So unless you’re saying it’s fake news, you gotta take the writer at his word.