Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You can get the entire filing here to read for yourself if you want it…
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175086960
Excellent post Rapz. I recall seeing a statistic on reconsideration hearings listing the success rate of getting the original motion reversed is something like 4-6% successful. Don’t hold me to an exact number as I’m recalling this from memory.
I agree but based on past experience with the courts, nothing is a given in at any level of the system. I’m cautiously optimistic the right decision will be made.
Agree. I thought Hudnell’s filing was outstanding. Let’s hope Albright isn’t “too proud” to correct the ruling.
No problem. It’s definitely a bit of reading but very informative.
For those trying to access the “Reconsideration Filing” link, it will only work with a Gmail account.
If you request access with any other type of email account, I will email the document directly to that account.
Did you get a notification back from me? If so respond to it and I can send it a different way.
Fact: read the reconsideration! You will see the points Albright allegedly got wrong in his summary judgement of non-infringement that Hudnell is asking for…wait for it….reconsideration on.
Read the reconsideration filing…it has all the info you’re speculating about.
Here’s a link to it:
Reconsideration Filing
Reconsideration motion filed in both T-Mobile & Verizon case tonight.
Nice work Mr. Hudnell!
And if T-Mobile asks for trial costs & attorney fees similar to the amount Verizon requested, assuming Judge Albright grants their requests, VPLM will owe just short of $ 1.7 million combined to both defendants. The court doc sure didn’t read like it was a clerk error but who knows.
The real question is, would Judge Albright approve the defendants request for costs & fees if there will be a motion for reconsideration filed by VPLM? Don’t know answer but sure does make you wonder what’s up if we see Albright approve the requests. To be clear…Albright has NOT approved anything yet.
So both of these new lawsuits are for the RBR patents. I didn’t realize there were new lawsuits filed back in May of this year for these patents after the re-exam. Let’s see the defendants wiggle out of these!
To the tune of 15+ million shares which is more than 10% of his total holdings!
lol. Na, go buy unobtainium futures. I hear it’s price is rising and closely correlated to all tech patents! 😂
So nobody can define “soon”. Says a lot about all the comments!
Define “soon”
You’re yelling into a vacuum here…
If you feel strongly & believe the company is violating their SEC obligations, the insider selling is illegal, or something nefarious is going on, go file a formal complaint with the SEC or FINRA and see how that goes.
Green Back Club posted links to the websites either earlier this week or last week.
Judges don’t need to cite why docs are sealed. It’s very common in patent cases and usually requests for sealing come from either the defendant, plaintiff, or both parties.
Not true again. Rich talks to a number of people who don’t shit on the company continually!
0 for 2 today bro!
lol…can’t see the forest for the trees!
As Mark Twain said, “It Ain't What You Don't Know That Gets You Into Trouble. It's What You Know for Sure That Just Ain't So.”
Way off base! Wrong on all assumptions!
How is that dismissal negative? “without prejudice” means VPLM can bring another lawsuit for the same claims if they so desire. Please explain why that is viewed as negative.
Statements without proof are just BS! Show your work!
Sure bro. That’s your take & opinion, which you’re entitled to share!
Without any legit communication from the company, NONE of us on this board or any other public forum KNOW what’s really happening behind the scenes or WHY the trials “have been canceled until further order of the court.”
- Could Albright be giving the parties time & space for negotiation give all the cards came out at pre-trial?
- Did the BS move by the defendants attacking the credibility of the damages experts work & give them more time to stall & drag this out?
- Are the trial cancellation for now connected in any way to the need for a new website domain due to any deals overseas?
All questions that NOBODY here can answer with certainty without any public statements from the company. Anyone saying different is just opining!
Verizon trial cancelled as well! What does “until further ordered by the court mean”…is this over or not. WTF!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. §
§ CIVIL NO:
vs.
§ WA:21-CV-00672-ADA
§ VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., §
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, VERIZON SERVICES CORP., VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
ORDER CANCELLING JURY TRIAL
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case having been set for JURY TRIAL on Monday, August 19, 2024 at 09:00 AM is hereby CANCELLED until further order of the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2024.
ALAN D ALBRIGHT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
T-Mobile trial of finally cancelled in court docket! Wonder why?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. §
§ CIVIL NO:
vs.
§ WA:21-CV-00674-ADA
§ T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE USA, §
INC., T-MOBILE USA, INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
ORDER CANCELLING JURY TRIAL
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case having been set for JURY TRIAL on Monday, November 04, 2024 at 09:00 AM is hereby CANCELLED until further order of the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2024.
ALAN D ALBRIGHT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Interesting…URL just created on 7/14.
Non issue…this is just a clean up in the docket cancelling the original pre-trial scheduling order showing 7/15.
Filing today…Tmus potentially liable for only $ 132.9 million based on new Brida damage report?
How does that math work?
Nice work Rapz. Thanks for the great post!
Link to info on US Cellular investor relations…
https://investors.uscellular.com/news/news-details/2024/UScellular-and-TDS-Announce-Sale-of-Wireless-Operations-and-Select-Spectrum-Assets-to-T-Mobile-for-Approximately-4.4-Billion-in-Cash-and-Assumed-Debt/default.aspx#:~:text=Information%20Request%20Form-,UScellular%20and%20TDS%20Announce%20Sale%20of%20Wireless%20Operations%20and%20Select,May%2028%2C%202024
Who’s the dude with the Bird Logo? Screen name?
Excellent post as always Rapz. Thanks for pulling all that info together into a clear & easy to understand post.
Bird logo?
Verizon issued notice to court for requested transcripts of all trial proceedings. Seems like defendants are getting ready for a trial & not any kind of settlement!
Obviously nothing is set in stone but why ask for transcripts ahead of the trials if you have no intention of ever going to trial? Hmmm….
—————————
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., §
§
Plaintiff, § C.A. No. 6:21-cv-00672-ADA
§
v. §
§
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., §
et al. §
§
Defendants. §
NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR DAILY TRANSCRIPT AND REAL TIME REPORTING
Pursuant to the Court’s Docket Control Order, Defendants Verizon Communications, Inc.,
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Services Corp., and Verizon Business
Network Services, Inc. (“Defendants”) hereby provide notice to the Court of their request for a
daily transcript and real time reporting during the trial proceedings of this matter. This notice is
timely under the Docket Control Order.
A copy of this Notice is being provided via e-mail to the Court Reporter, Kristie Davis at
kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com.
Dated: June 17, 2024 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Deron R. Dacus
Deron R. Dacus
State Bar No. 00790553
The Dacus Firm, P.C.
821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
Tyler, TX 75701
Phone: (903) 705-1117
ddacus@dacusfirm.com
Well said P2P.
What ever happened with the unjust enrichment lawsuit that was brought against Emil? Does anyone know the details? Is it still going?
Not sure I understand your point.
The optics suck with continued insider transactions at this price level but they’re not doing anything illegal.
Yes he exercised his options…otherwise known as his salary. What would you do if you had those options? Not exercise them?
New insider buy…
VOIP PAL.com, Inc. director just picked up 3,529,412 shares
Dennis Chang, a director of VOIP PAL.com, Inc., recently acquired 3,529,412 shares of the company. The buys took place at prices ranging from $0.01 to $0.02 per share, on June 07, 2024. Chang now owns 5,710,892 shares of the company. Chang operates out of Seattle, WA. Some additional info was provided as follows:
TOTAL WARRANTS AS REPORTING PERIOD TOTAL OPTIONS AS OF REPORTING PERIOD Reflects 1,470,588 shares withheld by issuer at the market price of $0.017 per share less an exercise price of $0.005 per share to fund the cashless exercise of 5,000,000 warrants owned by the Reporting Person pursuant to the Common Share Warrant Agreement dated 05/30/2022
The above information was disclosed in a filing to the SEC. To see the filing, go to:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1410738/000175021924000025/0001750219-24-000025-index.htm