Another noteworthy take away from the PR, is FINALLY, after years of banging on their door, getting a seat at the table with VCA!

It's just a presentation, but if these guys are getting ready to seriously talk/deal, that really would frame and foundation our house for everything else to come. MO

Bing-O!

You know the future, yes?

...until there isn't!

And guess what? Bill Gates didn't invent or discover computer programming or software. Did he improve on it? Without a doubt!

When Ted Turner revolutionized televised news, with a 24-hour, in-depth coverage format, he was in his 40s. Btw, neither did he "invent or discover" televised news. He sure as hell improved on it (arguably).

And luck? Well, as the saying goes..."luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." Was Bill or Ted lucky, or were they ready when opportunity presented itself.

Dude, give J. Few a chance. As Hog says, we shouldn't have to wait much longer to find out if we will add a new page in the history of American business!

Enjoy your weekend...

You know the future, yes?

No one knew Gates was Gates, until, well...

Think Microsoft/IBM. Stranger things...

Starting to think this guy is an attention whore.

Time the press walks away to cover something that's actually happening, this guy starts baiting the hook again. Shit or shut up, Machin!

Yeah, sometimes it's a race between company progress and the jokers.

"3 minutes 'til Judge Wapner" ; )

Not a distraction! 

Re-tweeting the rantings of some useless performative art chitshow, masquerading as a serious congresswoman, MAJOR distraction! Hope this NEVER comes up again!


Dear Xxxx,

Thank you for your email reply to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) regarding Cancer Moonshot funding.  We expect new information regarding Cancer Moonshot funding opportunities to be shared in the coming weeks.  You may wish to sign up for updates about Cancer Moonshot and grant announcements by subscribing to email updates.

Thank you for writing.


National Cancer Institute Staff

**Please do not take my word on this, feel free to reach out them @ nciinfo@nih.gov or (301)435-3848.

Pretty good read here:

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/09032022/carbon-capture-and-storage-fossil-fuels-climate-change/

Seems the only distractions associated with Rdgl, is the unwarranted fear mongering.

Go for it RDGL 2022!

Manchin's motivations are crowning...

https://qz.com/2130708/joe-manchin-wants-to-go-green-using-coal-and-natural-gas/

Crikey, this is some real strength going on here!

Also sounded like he had just laid down a marker for WV to be one of the CCUS hubs.

Any region that gets one of these hubs is sure to be the recipient of an economic boom to the region.

Guess in addition to lining his own pockets, maybe lot of his pain-staking postuering these many months has been about bringing home the pork (or the whole damn pig) to his district/state.

Thanks, Man!

Possible.

Just don't hear responses from anyone about where monies might come from IF needed. Or, what their comfort level may be with those alternative sources.

But hey, just as a reminder, I nor anyone else runs this company. It's all the Doc's show. And I wouldn't have it any other way. Period!

We just theorize, analyze, provide group therapy and kill time. And in the same vein as Cameron, I think it is inappropriate and unfortunate board behavior to profanely attack others as a heretic, that speculate, theorize, or imagine a credible financing scenario for the company.

Good Lord, should we all just dwell in the darkness of missed deadlines, uncommitted offerings, and slow progress, without uttering one hopeful solution or area of light? Alright, have at it. I'll turn the lights back off and get back to work.

Totally agree Cam, and like Longhorn, I thought this was a legit item to introduce to the board.

Who would have thought, discussing the introduction of a national conversation/campaign about cancer, by the president, that could mean non-dilutive funds for Rdgl, while we are right in thick of FDA review, could go off the rails in such a bloody train wreck.

Can I take it all back (smh & lol)?

Sure, some contracts (i.e. aerospace, defense contractors, national interests items, etc.) might be a more detailed affair. Granted!

Government inititiatives often times are a completely deal. You think the monies there gonna start doling out from the infrastructure bill is going to be designed to slow progress or nudge progress?

They re-introduce this Cancer Moonshot program to reduce cancer deaths glacially or might they want to see a few success occur before some elections?

Hey, again, I have not stated categorically there is no possible "politics" angle to this. Not saying there is either. But, generally your not gonna see this kind political grandstanding unless administrations are looking to prime the pump a little.

Long and short, however, I think we can all agree, no better to to have a national conversation/campaign, than while we are currently under review! Can we all, at least, agree on that?!

IMO.

The VERY reason we may need to secure additional funds. How are you going to react if/when those funds run out?

Ha ha ha! I know, I was just having fun with the good Doc. I may be more likely to twitter before he, and I do not indulge!

Well looka there, anyone can seemingly score these grants...

I hear ya DPep, I look to the sky often these days waiting to see a fire rock hurling towards me. My luck CANNOT be this good with this investment!

No WALL, couldn't even tell you what his email address is.

But I look at it like this, this man was appointed to DoD by the White House to work with Cap Weinberger, has national fingerprints througout his professional bio, and is currently waist deep in discussion with Biden's FDA - at a time when the president announced a "grand re-opening" of their Cancer Moonshot program!

WALL, if he needs an email from me, we are in deep sheet! Good news is, I have a feeling this little twitter freak Korenko is on top of it, and will be twittering soon about this, like a teenage girl! And nothing would make me more happy!

Seen a lot of people riding around in PPP financed Lambos and helicopters. Don't know what great undertakings they went through to get those fraudulent funds, but hey, at least they're in jail now!

The good news here guys is, if those low level crooks could get their greasy little fingers on 10s of millions from the feds, our nuclear scientist MD should be able to complete proposals and chew gum at the same time. No?

Even though it's probably just a 2-4 page application. But hey, if we do have to submit a proposal, like to think we could borrow a template from Mayo. I'm sure they've received a grant or two. Or, if that's asking is too much of the Doc, sheez, pay someone to do it. How much could that possibly cost?? Quite sure a hired grant writer has plug-n-play templates.

Besides that, for those resistant to even the heretical thought of U.S. grants (who incidentally, seem to be the ones that squak the loudest about the company's cash or other missteps), what would be an acceptable Plan B? Dilution? No Plan B, fly without a net into the sun? There will be no squaking if funds run low/out??

Well, I look forward to hearing the company's thoughts/plans in this regard

Didn't listen, but as the Doc likes to say..."Stay tuned." Who knows, could happen at some point.

Always remember those powerful words: "If we can reach it, we can kill it." That's some pretty compelling shit to hear!

Maybe this can be our 2022 fire starter!

https://news.yahoo.com/biden-aims-reduce-cancer-deaths-102953417.html

Got some! Jr. milly club (560K).

Let's go Korenko 2022!

...oops, I'm remiss in not thanking/acknowledging Xena's great work on this board. I love what you do, and how you do it!

Hey Johnny/Hog, terrific answers both, and I think important things to start thinking about in terms of how to value FCEL the days after some of this legislation is passed. And yes, I am in total agreement with you both that that ship has likely sailed on any buy out scenario. Actually, I can't even believe I typed that insomonia-induced word.

And I also agree with you Johnny, these policies will get passed. No one believes the AOCs/Manchins of Congress are willing to stand on an apocalyptic landscape in defense of their pride.

Apologies again, as I know many of these things are unknowns, and somewhat contributes to my insomnia - as I try to calculate this incalculable scenario with FCEL. One is for sure, however/whoever delivers this technology, it is going to be an intense ride.

You guys continue to keep the high-level standard going on this board. U guys are an awesome resource.

Again, thanks guys...

**behind the 6 in our sp**

Hey Johnny/Hog, hate to keep pinning my abstract questions to you both, but clearly you guys have the ongoing developments wired.

Question: How should investors current thinking be about how much of the upcoming U.S./world's CO2 emissions solutions will be addressed?

1. FCEL alone through parabolic growth
2. FCEL/XON through partnership/buyout
3. FCEL licensing its technology worldwide

Don't know if my question makes sense, or if I'm even asking it the right way. But this is a bit mind bending in the sense that, through legislative decisions coming on in the next 30-60 days could unlock untold change in FCEL's future.

Any help on this is appreciated, because any of the above and it seems (rather soon) there could be some zeros added behind the 6 in our so!

Thanks guys for all your great efforts!

Bravo!

Spot on! Thank you, Friend!

Great news on numbers longs!

Question though: i've never actually been part of a "short squeeze" before. Can some provide any insight on how exactly it can play out - and over what period of time?

Tia. And again, great job!!!

Gracias, mi Hombre!!

Hey Hog. First off, big fan of yours and when everything finally unfolds with FCEL, I might name my new dog after you.

Hog Dog. Nice ring to it! Lol

Second, for those of us off the social media grid, is it possible for you to post Few's Twitter comments.

Once again, thanks for all you do, Sir!

Forgive me for any wild speculation this may sound like, but, could this offering portend the budding stages of a partnership in any way (licensing, distribution, etc.)?

Sorry if I'm way off base with this, but if I'm going to speculate, I'm gonna get my monies worth! Tia for any thoughts.

Everyone have a sunny/safe long weekend!

Got it! Thanks for that.

Hey Hog, as a silent investor (to this board), love and appreciate what you do man!

Don't want to put you too much on the spot here, but what do you think a "sizeable" deal XOM could look like? Tia

Poor word choosing. Limited.