Ruin
Try harder
So any company buying Amarin buy it to make profits from it... so the losses within can be used against future profits according to Irish Tax Law and not only that but corporate tax rates in Ireland are one of the lowest worldwide...it doesn't matter who tbe owners are or where they are based...at present most institutions holders are US based so in a BO its just a change of name on a share certificate.
Stop soft playing

Hey mister come afterwards
Laws are laws and board directors are well aware of where Bernie Madoff ended up...of course companies short but Sarissa Denner in this case cannot. You know zero about what I have held or not held, you of 0000's of posts on 1 stock...
Why would you only discuss one stock if you actually knew trading...with graphs handles tails of yours but only 1 stock..
We know what you are ..

Rainy

Just go away
Soft sly bashing
Anyone connected in any way with Sarissa / Dinner would be put away for years for that.
Consistently you suggest the most idiotic unbelievably stupid ideas as if you had intellect.
To school boy now

Rose

Yes exactly
BOD must declare irrespective of the size of their holdings. It would plainly be insider trading as they would have knowledge before anyone else.

Ruin
Nope
Sarissa as an investment entity may short declare able shareholdings which they state in their company information. Once they take up board positions they become insiders and as such if they were to even intend to short or go long they must declare that intent in advance.
Ruiny back to school boy.

Ruin

You use words like "I believe " "I think" etc your usual soft bash bs..how about a "fact"
Like
Because Sarissa has sought and got not only boards members but board control they are prevented from shorting by the fact that their fiduciary duty is to work in the best interests of the shareholders. We see many idiots commenting on what Sarissa should do...when they have the ability to invest to that level.then they can advise on what Sarissa should do ...the idea that a know all can give advice to an investor with multiple 000's of the know alls shares is embarrassing. CBB knows what needs to be done telling us every day the same idiotic bs, it's sad.

Try Rune

Once again you are selective...only in Fat land are generics allowed. This will make Europe very different where there will be no generic competitors. Soft negative undertones just like the whale lad with his hospital porter wife.

Nuke

You will be waiting...look at the huge amount of messages he posted yet mostly negative, he wants to know everyone's medical history and what they had for breakfast. Pretends his wife is a hospital porter...his doctor never said any such thing. A pretend intellectual...

Whale
Make public a copy of his comments so it can be used for infringement. If you say he said it verbal get him to put it in writing so it can be used against Kaiser. Proof is always a winner.

Whale you pretend to be knowledgeable, you pretend to know medicine, you want to know everyone's business, your slippery comments about amrn are clearly negative. Rather than back up your stupid comments about share buybacks you go searching for anything else to avoid proving your lack of intelligence. Viet du caused amrn harm but at least stupid obese yanks have less access to Vascepa which their legal system caused. Is your wife still financially supporting you ??

Yes Whale you have very little understanding ok share buyback ... can you show where you reviewed this bs from. Share buy backs have always been used where mkt price undervalued share value. No bank has any say on AMRN and UK regulators do not frown on buy backs to boost share price. Whale its better for a fool to suffer in silence than talk and prove stupidity. Be silent

Ruin
I doubt that you are confused in any way.
In 2 years 2172 messages on a single stock always with a " spread doubt angle" .
If you spent 1% of the time you spend on this message board doing research on your "confusion" you would have answers.
Why bother telling board members you are confused.
2172 messages in 2 years ......???
Fud

JROON

Ruin

Where do you get these ideas
"The New
Articles require all directors to retire and seek re-election at each annual general meeting of the Company"
This simply is good governance as each director is up for voted on or off every year.
And especially for you
"The Company has built up a substantial capital reserve in its share premium account through the issue of shares at prices in excess of the nominal value of
those shares"
"By undertaking the proposed Reduction of Capital, the
Company will cancel the balance standing to the credit of the Company’s share premium account and the sum so cancelled will then be treated as
distributable (subject to satisfying the claims of the Company’s creditors, if applicable) for the purposes of returning cash to the Company’s shareholders in
the future.
Such distributable reserves arising on the
Reduction of Capital will support the Company’s ability to return cash to its shareholders, either through the payment of dividends or the repurchase of
shares. "
returning cash to companies shareholders mmmm nice.
In just 2 years you have posted over 2100 posts on a single stock....me thinks you have alternative intentions. we see you for what you are

JROON

Ruin

Where do you get these ideas
"The New
Articles require all directors to retire and seek re-election at each annual general meeting of the Company"
This simply is good governance as each director is up for voted on or off every year.
And especially for you
"The Company has built up a substantial capital reserve in its share premium account through the issue of shares at prices in excess of the nominal value of
those shares"
"By undertaking the proposed Reduction of Capital, the
Company will cancel the balance standing to the credit of the Company’s share premium account and the sum so cancelled will then be treated as
distributable (subject to satisfying the claims of the Company’s creditors, if applicable) for the purposes of returning cash to the Company’s shareholders in
the future.
Such distributable reserves arising on the
Reduction of Capital will support the Company’s ability to return cash to its shareholders, either through the payment of dividends or the repurchase of
shares. "
returning cash to companies shareholders mmmm nice.
In just 2 years you have posted over 2100 posts on a single stock....me thinks you have alternative intentions. we see you for what you are

Its fud because you keep repeating what you know is wrong.
I quoted UK repurchase "LAW" ....you keep showing us what AMRN said, AMR

Now you show us UK repurchase legal requirements.

As an aside the several hundred million raised by previous board is "profit" and can be used.

So put up or shuffle off.

JRoon
You stated this before, no idea why you keep spreading fud


UK share buyback rules
Company share buyback rules
The company uses its post-tax distributable reserves

Once the company has reserves and is tax compliant it can repurchase once it has shareholder approval.

The company must have sufficient distributable reserves to fund the share buyback. If the funds are not paid from distributable reserves liabilities can arise.

Know the difference between profits and reserves

BB
Let’s be clear Generics didn’t destroy any lives, Vietdu did with her ruling, so fat ant the obese are denied medication that might help…long live the US justice system

No need to check in on him.
Himself and ralphey have opened up a pretend pharmacy where a pretend doctor attends

Teeter totter he he he

What happened ti I iwanderer and teetertotter Ralphy the phony doctor. The price rises they disappeared and now I see those who engaged a lot with them are also a lot less active

You question Denner's reason for moving now ??
Just very recently you asked this question re among management
"Has there every been a fraud cause successfully prosecuted where the management of the company has been paid off to bankrupt the company? At this point I am just wondering if this is a possibility."
Denner put his money where boards directors haven’t, if I remember correctly some past senior employees sold their shares as fast as they received them.

You question Denner's reason for moving now ??
Just very recently you asked this question re among management
"Has there every been a fraud cause successfully prosecuted where the management of the company has been paid off to bankrupt the company? At this point I am just wondering if this is a possibility."
Denner put his money where boards directors haven’t, if I remember correctly some past senior employees sold their shares as fast as they received them.

You are Ralph on about that

Sorry I meant right on
Hehehe

It seems I hit a nerve with you.A medic using childish terms and always there to reply to an idiotic Punk ...teeter totter hahaha ha
Why would a real doctor be here to always be negative and only use the language of a fool. So is Amrn dead in the water as you declared last week. More than happy to send you some "how to speak grown up" until then get mamma to change your diaper. You are so full of it

Dr. Reddy’s Icosapent Ethyl Capsules, 1 gram is approved for the following indication: as an adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride (TG) levels in adult patients with severe (≥ 500 mg/dL) hypertriglyceridemia.

Please note that Dr. Reddy’s Icosapent Ethyl Capsules is not approved for the following indication: as an adjunct to maximally tolerated statin therapy to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization in adult patients with elevated triglyceride (TG) levels (≥ 150 mg/dL) and established cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus and two or more additional risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Limitations of Use: The effect of Icosapent Ethyl Capsules on the risk for pancreatitis in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia has not been determined.


https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/dr-reddy-s-laboratories-announces-launch-of-icosapent-ethyl-capsules

https://www.drreddys.com/pi/icosapent-ethyl-1g-pi.pdf

For the first time ...Amarin have the less to lose in this case, the asymmetry of risk reward is firmly in Amarins favor.

If this case goes to trial it will no longer be about Vascepa for Hikma, it will be about every generic drug they market and how they label it and how they get around patent protections and that has every generic company worried.
But its even more difficult for Healthnet if they risk going to trial and lose then every insurer will then realise that they must now take action to ensure that every drug they cover does not favor generic over brand patent.

If either party loses in a trial the costs re Amarin will fade in significance to the future costs of every drug sold by every generic company and every drug covered by every insurance company.

Hikma and Healthnet may just have walked into the biggest mistakes ever made.

Nobody will watch an ad about medication, I worked on the sales of Kerrygold butter one of the most successfull brands from nowhere...did we advertise butter no we did not....the most watched ad was about " who is taking the horse to France " butter was the sideline, advertising is about catching the attention....the message is contained within.

Murphy was suspended from this board last year for threatening Amarin employees on this board. He said he knew people in Ireland who were scum he said.

Whata

Amarin is an Irish company and if they can move the European and elsewhere sales to such an extent that supply becomes an issue then they have no obligation to supply a country where a slanty eyed corrupt operates. And the generics still would have no legal right to supply...the PR could then point out that "hey fatso's enjoy your justice system"

Knownothing

He can't be far behind you, BS wise you lead all others follow

I fully agree that infringement can be proved with captive statistics.
My point is that time and time again people compare the script numbers and when gv exceeds V they shout infringement which is useless comment.
Gv scripts could be twice the number of V and still be entirely for the Marine indication.
The only thing that will prove infringement is actual facts of what the script was for or and false labeling

And Vascepa is approved for that market as well (marine) so comparing generic v V means nothing unless it can be proved what each script is for

And Vascepa is approved for that market as well (marine) so comparing generic v V means nothing unless it can be proved what each script is for

R
We Need to be very clear...Hikma could have 10 times the scripts that Vascepa has and still not be infringing.The total high tryg market is huge and once Hikma's scripts remain in single digits % of the total high Tgl the only way forward against them is to prove that they induce infringement and evidence of usage for CVD treatment. The % of generic scripts v Vascepa does not mean anything on its own.

D
For f sake we have spoken many times about Amrn and how you are mopping up their shares as hard as you can...just last Friday you grabbed another 4500 share6

When we spoke on the phone last week you were laughing at your friend who you described as an idiot for taking generic v. You swore that the real Vascepa was the best thing you ever took and that you were buying more shares in Amarin as hard as you could, your only whinge was how could you scare people out of their Amrn shares.

You told me previously that your friend was a fan of generic vascepa and you thought it was that that gave him heartburn and that you knew 100% that Vascepa produced by Amarim had no side effects

Did you not say your friend took generic vascepa anally and got heartburn