Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm showing current at 19.62m, your data is from mid July ish on the 16th it closed above 4 Bucks.
The problem with the public short data is that it is always atleast 2 weeks old.
X
That is what I thought but Zyskind appeared to be a much more hands on and in control of the lab than I had imagined. It kind of felt to me like everyone in the lab reports to him, we were discussing it amongst us while walking on the lab tour saw. I don't know enough to try and micromanage the company. This new cat looks like a great addition to an end like I've always said, an outright buyout/merger consortium thing. These guys are always 2 or 3 steps beyond where they appear.
20k more buys than sells up 18 cents. OK using round numbrs lets use 20 Million shorts, there are 1,000 of those buys in there at 20 Cents x 1,000 buys = 200 Bucks a share. If I'm off by a factor of 10 $20 Plus $4 = $24 per share.
X With the short game it is not often the Buys Exceed sells. The shorts typically sell slightly more than the buys and cover dark off market trades (taking a lil hit here or a little profit) because they can let this get away from them.
Oh now 24k more buys than sells up 24 Cents. Funny how that 1k per thousand thing works.
Enlight of the testimony from the secret service today where 9 days later they are still struggling to determine who said what to whom and when did they say it, Draft One has an awesome opportunity here, they don't need tasers but the video and audio in an orderly fashion would be great.
Push a button and out it comes chronologically with video.
X
This board is hilarious.
Whatever, my bucks are on Lebby.
X. I kinda feel like it is an 8th grader against a yawner,,, MBA and double doctorate in computer science and photonics etc.. world class ish in a trillion dollar game changer, against total nonsense.
Yawner. Social media.
What type of products does Lebby list on his LEGAL SUMMARY OF TECHNICAL EXPERTISE: "understands and includes but are not limited to; Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs), Laser Diodes (LDs), photodetectors (PDs), optical waveguides, fiber optics, displays (LCD, LED, OLED), lighting luminaires, plastic photonics, optical polymers, sensors, LIDAR, solar cells, lighting, data communication, CMOS, and even new opportunities such as medical and life science applications for photonics. Dr. Lebby is internationally known for his work with integrated photonics, PICs (Photonic Integrated Circuits), silicon photonics, and semiconductor technologies such as InP, GaAs, III-GaN, silicon, as well as SiGe and silicon ICs (MOSFETs, FinFETs, bipolar), power FETs, RF FETs, various display technologies such as LCD, OLED, LED, cameras, as well as
micro-fluidics and nanostructures/wires etc. Dr. Lebby has worked with DC current as well as AC current, high frequency design, microwave design, and multi-wavelength, visible wavelengths, in addition to 850nm/1310nm/1500nm/NIR fiber optic communications. Dr. Lebby has worked extensively in fiber optics which includes Fiber based systems, chassis’, trays, modules, adapters, splice devices, connectors, transceivers, packaging as well as architecture and optical communication standards/protocols."
I just stumbled across this list of companies that Lebby has been used as an expert witness in. Many that post on here have a few of these in our resumes but this is crazy.
Lebby's EXPERT WITNESS EXPERIENCE
Understand that Lebby needed to understand the technology and businesses that he testified about. And a mind once stretched does not return to its original dimension.
Look at these players, he knows them all.
US-China Economic and security review commission on the optoelectronics industry. US Congress, Capitol Hill; Written statement on the status of the USA optoelectronics industry with aural cross-examination by the commission. Trial experience.
c. Technology: Optoelectronics (optical storage, fiber optic communications, sensors, high power lasers,
LED lighting, LED luminaires etc.).
Finisar Corp. v. Optical Communication Products Inc., No. 10-CV-05617 and No. 11-cv-00104 (retained by plaintiff - Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP).
c. Technology: semiconductor lasers/VCSELs, fiber optic transceiver modules
Ziptronix, Inc. v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd., and TSMC North America Corp., No. 11-CV-5235 (retained by plaintiff – Alston Bird LLP).
c. Technology: CMOS image sensors; design and fabrication
Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-798 (USITC filed July 15, 2011) (retained by respondent Samsung – Covington & Burling LLP).
c. Technology: LEDs, device design, color gamut, packaging, optical lensing, lead frames, surface
mount packaging.
Cheetah Omni, LLC v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., No. 11-CV-390 (E.D.Tex. filed July 29, 2011) (retained by plaintiff – Brooks Kushman). Deposition experience (x2).
c. Technology: Fiber optic networks, optical switches, ROADMs and optical filters (dielectric based).
Finisar Corp. v. Cheetah Omni, LLC, No. 11-CV-15625 (E.D. Mich. filed Dec. 23, 2011) (retained by defendant – Brooks Kushman). Deposition experience (x1).
c. Technology: Wavelength optical switches, optical filters, and optical components, liquid crystal technology.
Certain Optoelectronic Devices for Fiber Optic Communications,Components Thereof, and Prods. Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-860 (USITC filed Sept. 24, 2012) (retained by respondent – Mellanox, IPtronics and FCI Inc and counsel Alston & Bird LLP). Deposition (x2) and trial experience.
c. Technology: IC design, layout, and operation; especially laser driver chips for VCSELs. High speed laboratory testing.
Microscan Sys., Inc. v. Cognex Corp., No. 14-CV-6952 (S.D.N.Y. filed Aug. 27, 2014) (retained by plaintiff – Morrison & Foerster LLP). Deposition (x1) and trail experience.
c. Technology: Bar code scanners and associated optics such as imagers, lasers, LEDs, molded optics.
Laboratory testing.
Avago Techs. Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc., No. 10-CV-2863 (N.D. Cal. filed June 29, 2010) (retained by respondent – Alston & Bird LLP).
c. Technology: IC design, layout, and operation; especially laser driver chips for VCSELs. High speed
laboratory testing.
Regarding certain optical disc drives, Inv. No. 337-TA-897 (USITC filed Oct. 21, 2013) (retained by respondent – O’Melveny & Myers LLP).
c. Technology: CD, CVD, BluRay optical disk drives, optical components, laser diodes, and optical beam patterns. Laboratory testing of visible optics.
BMW of N. Am., LLC v. Innovative Display Techs., LLC, No. IPR2015-00933, IPR2015-00934 (P.T.A.B. filed Mar. 24, 2015) (retained by plaintiff – Crowell Moring LLP).
c. Technology: LED backlights for vehicles; LED package and optical module/LED luminaire design.
BMW of N. Am., LLC v. Innovative Display Techs., LLC, No. IPR2015- 00934 (P.T.A.B. filed Mar. 24, 2015) (retained by plaintiff – Crowell Moring LLP).
c. Technology: LED backlights for vehicles; LED package and optical module/luminaire design.
OneChip Photonics Inc., Pre-litigation IP Case No. TBD; (retained byplaintiff – Patent Monetization Inc. (PMI)).
c. Technology: Photonic Integrated Circuits using InP (Indium Phosphide); lasers, detectors,
waveguides, mux/demux, spot size converters.
IDT v. Hyundai Motor Co., No. 14-CV-201 (E.D. Tex. filed May 4, 2015) (retained by defendant – DLA Piper LLP).
c. Technology: LED devices, packages and modules/luminaires for vehicles.
Cree Inc., v. Honeywell Int’l Inc., No. 3:14-CV-737 (W.D. Wisc. Filed Oct. 28, 2014) (retained by defendant - Arnold & Porter LLP). Deposition experience (x1).
c. Technology: LEDs for mobile phones; LED epitaxial layers, device designs, optical lensing, packaging. Laboratory reverse engineering using TEM/SEM/EDAX etc.
Trs. of Boston Univ. v. Everlight Elecs. Co., Nos. 12-CV-11935, 12-CV12326, 12-CV-12330 (D. Mass. filed Oct. 17, 2012) (retained by plaintiff - Shore Chan DePumpo LLP).
c. Technology: GaN buffer layers for LEDs, and associated technical marketing, sales and import
process into USA.
LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., No. 12-CV1063 (D. Del. filed Aug. 22, 2012) and IPR2015-01659 (PTAB filed Jul. 31st 2015 (retained by plaintiff – DLAPiper & Nixon Law). IPR deposition (i.e. trial) experience (x1).
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials
LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., No. 12-CV1063 (D. Del. filed Aug. 22, 2012) and IPR2015-01642 (PTAB filed Jul. 30th 2015) (retained by plaintiff – DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials
LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech Corp., IPR2016-01677 (PTAB filed Aug. 24th 2016 (retained by plaintiff – DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials
LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., IPR2015-01678 (PTAB filed Aug. 24th 2016) (retained by plaintiff – DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials
LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., IPR2015-01644 (PTAB filed Jul. 30th 2015) (retained by plaintiff – DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials
LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., IPR2015-01653 (PTAB filed Jul. 31st 2015) (retained by plaintiff – DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials
Heptagon Pre-litigation IPR petition; (retained by plaintiff – Proskaurer Rose LLP).
d. Technology: Proximity sensors using LEDs, photodetectors and innovative semiconductor packaging.
Dentsply v. Am. Orthodontics Inc., No. 15-CV-1706 (D. Pa. filed Sept.1, 2015) and IPR2016-01652 (PTAB filed Aug. 19th 2016) (retained by defendant – Godfrey Kahn LLP). IPR
d. Technology: High power lasers (YAG, CO2) to engrave and scribe dental orthodontic brackets.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Elect-tech Int’l (H.K.), No. 14-CV-2737 (N.D.Cal. filed Aug. 12, 2015) (retained by plaintiff – Reed Smith LLP).
d. Technology: Trade secret MOCVD epitaxial growth techniques for high power GaN/InGaN LED technology, luminaires, modules and packaging.
Bluestone Innovations llc. v. E. Mishan & Co. Inc., Pre-litigation IP Case No. TBD; (retained by defendant - Notaro, Michalos, & Zaccaria P.C.).
d. Technology: GaN/InGaN LEDs on structured substrates with reverse engineering laboratory analysis.
Innovations Inc. v. HTC Am., Inc., No. 15-CV-1524 (E.D. Tex. FiledJune 30, 2016) (retained by plaintiff – The Davis Firm).
d. Technology: Proximity sensors for mobile phones.
Mellanox Techs. Ltd. v. Methode Elecs. Inc., No. 15-CV-3730 (N.D. Cal.filed Aug. 16, 2015) (retained by plaintiff – Alston & Bird).
d. Technology: Fiber optic transceiver modules.
Novanta Inc., v Iradion Inc., No. 15-CV-01033 (D. Del. filed Nov. 9, 2015) (retained by defendant – Barnes and Thornburg LLP).
d. Technology: High power gas laser design and operation.
Optolum Inc., v Cree Inc., No. 16-CV-03828; (D. Az. filed Nov. 3, 2016) (retained by defendant – Jones Day).
d. Technology: LED packaging for illumination. LED luminaires.
Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., 15-CV-00552 (W.D. NC. Filed: Apr 21st 2016), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP). Deposition experience (x2)
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.
Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00309 (PTAB filed Nov. 21st 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.
Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00330 (PTAB filed Nov. 24th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.
Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00331 (PTAB filed Nov. 24th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.
Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00332 (PTAB filed Nov. 25th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.
Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00334 (PTAB filed Nov. 25th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.
Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00335 (PTAB filed Nov. 25th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.
Macom Technology Solutions Holdings Inc., and Nitronex, LLC., v. Infineon Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies North American Corp., 16-CV-02859 (C.D. Ca. filed Apr 26, 2016) (retained by plaintiff – Baker Botts LLP).
d. Technology: High performance GaN based RF FET device design and operation.
Quanergy Systems, Inc. v. Velodyne LiDAR, Inc. (16-cv-05251; N.D. Ca. filed: Sep 13th 2016 (retained by plaintiff Velodyne) - Latham & Watkins LLP
d. Technology: Laser/photodetector based LIDAR design and operation for self-driving vehicles.
The Chamberlain Group Inc., v. Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd, Techtronic Industries North America et al., Challenge to U.S Patent No. 7,862,209 (retained by plaintiff – The Chamberlain Group) – Morgan, Lewis & Brockius, LLP.
d. Technology: LED based luminaire design for lighting.
Uber Technologies Inc., Ottomottto LLC., Otto Trucking LLC., v. Waymo LLC (Google), 17-CV-00939 (N.D. Ca filed: Mar 10th, 2017), (retained by defendant Uber Technologies Inc.) –Morrison and Foerster LLP.
d. Technology: Optical and electrical device, optics, and package designs for LIDAR based self-driving
vehicles.
Heptagon v. ST Mircoelectronics IPR petition; (retained by plaintiff Heptagon) – Proskaurer Rose LLP).
d. Technology: Optoelectronic based proximity sensors using LEDs and photodetectors.
AT&T Inc., v. Sycamore Holdings LLC., 16-CV-00588 (E. D. Tx filed: Jun 6
th 2016); (retained by defendant AT&T Inc.) - Kirkland and Ellis LLP.
d. Technology: Coding designs of optical digital signals for high performance optical networks.
Clearfield Inc., v. CommScope, ADC, Tyco, and TE Connectivity, 17-CV00307 (D.C. Minn. filed Jan 31st 2017); (retained by defendant Clearfield, Inc.) – Pepper Hamilton LLP
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.
Clearfield Inc., v. CommScope, ADC, Tyco, and TE Connectivity, IPR2017-02122 (PTAB filed Sep. 15th 2017); (retained by defendant Clearfield, Inc.) – Pepper Hamilton LLP
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.
Clearfield Inc., v. CommScope, ADC, Tyco, and TE Connectivity, IPR2018-00003 (PTAB filed Oct. 6th 2017); (retained by defendant Clearfield, Inc.) – Pepper Hamilton LLP
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.
Clearfield Inc., v. CommScope, ADC, Tyco, and TE Connectivity, IPR2018-00154 (PTAB filed Nov. 7th 2017); (retained by defendant Clearfield, Inc.) – Pepper Hamilton LLP
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.
Antunes Inc., Pre-litigation IP patent review; Case No. TBD; (retained by plaintiff – Antunes Inc. and Chapman Spingola LLP).
d. Technology: High power grating surface emitter laser diodes, and associated packaging and device
design for laser-based cooking ovens.
Core Optical Technologies LLC. v. Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.,16-CV-00437 (C. D. Ca filed: Mar 7th 2016); (retained by defendant Fujitsu Network Communications) –Morrison & Foerster LLP.
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optical communications for coherent technologies
Oyster Optics LLC v. Coriant America, et al, 16-CV-01302 (E. D. Tx filed:Nov 24th 2016); (retained by plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC) – Russ August & Kabat LLP.
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor component design and operation.
Oyster Optics LLC v. Infinera, Alcatel-Lucent, Fujitsu, Cisco Systems,Huawei, 16-CV-01295, 16-CV-01297, 16-CV-01299, 16-CV-01301, 16-CV-01303 (E. D. Tx filed: Nov 24th
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor component design and operation.
Including both direct detect and coherent communications, and encoding techniques such as PSK,
QPSK, AM, FM etc.
Olympus, Pre-litigation IP and Due Diligence; Case No. TBD; (retained by plaintiff – Olympus and Fish & Richardson P.C.)
d. Technology: High volume, low cost optical lens and optics technology.
Honeywell International, Inc et al v. Code Corporation et al., ITC No 337-TA-1061 (filed Jun 28th 2017), “Certain barcode readers, scan engines, products containing the same, andcomponents thereof,” (retained by respondent – Honeywell and Alston and Bird LLP
d. Technology: Bar-code scanners and associated optical/optoelectronic component performance and
operation.
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Intel Corp., 17-CV-00676 (filed Sep 29th 2017),(retained by plaintiff – Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1) - Ropes and Gray, LLP.
d. Technology: Fabrication, design, and reverse engineering of silicon-based FET ICs.
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. and Volterra Semiconductor LLC., v.Silicon Mitus Inc., and Silicon Mitus Technology Inc., 17-CV-03507 (N. D. Ca: filed Jun 16th 2017), (retained by defendant Silicon Mitus) – Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP. (Deposition and trial experience X1)
d. Technology: Fabrication, design, characterization, and packaging of silicon-based FET ICs for power
applications
Cree, Inc., v. Document Security Systems Inc., 17-CV-4263 (C.D. Ca filed:Apr 17th 2017), (retained by defendant Cree Inc.) - Jones Day, LLP
d. Technology: Design and packaging of high brightness GaN based LEDs for luminaires.
Weisen v., Ram Telecom International (RTI)., CGC-16-554331 (Sup Ca:filed 3rd May 2017) (retained by plaintiff Weisen, J) - Yetter Coleman, LLP.
d. Technology: Submarine and subsea fiber optic cables: technology, markets, economic impact, and
history.
Seoul Semiconductor., v. Document Security Systems Inc., 17-CV-00981 (C.D. Ca filed: Apr 17th 2017), (retained by defendant Seoul Semiconductor) - Latham and Watkins LLP
d. Technology: Design and packaging of high brightness GaN based LEDs for luminaires.
NEC Display Solutions Inc., and NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc.,v. Ultravision., ITC Case# 337-TA-1114 (filed 24th May 2018), “Certain Modular LED Display Panels and Components Thereof,” (retained by respondent Jones Day, LLP)
d. Technology: Large LED Panels, LED displays, LED modular panel design, LED thermal engineering
and color displays for outdoor environments.
IFT (Innovative Foundry Technologies) (pre-lit), retained by plaintiff MintzLevin, Cohen, Ferris, Glovsky, and Popeo PC.)
d. Technology: CMOS device (inc FinFETs) and IC fabrication techniques at 40, 28, 20, 16nm nodes.
Eidolon Optical LLC., v. Haag-Streit AG., IPR2018-01311, (retained by patent owner Eidolon Optical LLC) - McInnes & McLane LLP
d. Technology: High brightness InGaAlP, GaP, AlGaAs, and GaN/InGaN based LEDs for use in medical
instruments
Voxtel Inc., v. Joseph Lachapelle & Luminar Technologies Inc., 18-CV27356 (D. Or. filed: Dec 18th 2017), (retained by plaintiff Voxtel Inc.) - Ater Wynne LLP
d. Technology: LIDAR optical and electronic component and system technology
Alta Devices, v. LG Electronics Inc., 18-CV-00404 (N.D. Ca. filed: May 7th2018), (retained by defendant LG Electronics Inc.) - Hogan Lovells LLP
d. Technology: Trade Secret GaAs based solar cell design, fabrication, manufacturing, and device
performance
Opterna AM Inc., v. Commscope Technologies Inc., Pre-litigation preparation, (retained by defendant Opterna AM Inc.) - Sterne Kessler LLP
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.
U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Preparation for IPR filing:
IPR2019-00508 (PTAB filed Dec 26th 2018); and support for 18-CV-00373 (S.D. Ca. filed: Feb 16th 2018)
(retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.
U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Preparation for IPR filing:IPR2019-00515 (PTAB filed Dec 31st 2018); and support for 18-CV-00373 (S.D. Ca. filed: Feb 16th 2018)(retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.
U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Preparation for IPR filing:IPR2019-00262 (PTAB filed Nov 9th 2018); and support for 18-CV-00373 (S.D. Ca. filed: Feb 16th 2018)(retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.
U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Preparation for IPR filing:IPR2019-00511 (PTAB filed Dec 28th 2018); and support for 18-CV-00373 (S.D. Ca. filed: Feb 16th 2018) (retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd., v. Bluehouse Global Ltd.,Preparation for IPR filing: IPR2018-01405 (PTAB filed Jul 18th 2018); (retained by patent owner SEL Co Ltd.)– Robinson Intellectual Law Office, P.C. (Counsel represented by Fish and Richardson LLP).
d. Technology: Semiconductor displays using active matrix LCD and thin film transistor technology.
Design, fabrication, and circuit layout.
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd., v. Bluehouse Global Ltd.,Preparation for IPR filing: IPR2018-01393 (PTAB filed Jul 13th 2018); (retained by patent owner SEL Co Ltd.)– Robinson Intellectual Law Office, P.C. (Counsel represented by Fish and Richardson LLP)
d. Technology: Semiconductor displays using active matrix LCD and thin film transistor technology.
Design and fabrication technology.
The Sloan Company dba SloanLED, v. Principle Lighting Group, LLC.,18-CV-06449 (C.D. Ca. filed: Jul 26th 2018), (retained by defendant Sloan LED.) - Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP
d. Technology: LED lighting, LED luminaires, LED performance, electrical and mechanical design and
construction.
HTC Corporation, v. Lemire Illumination Technologies., 18-CV-00021(E.D. Tx. filed: Jan 21st 2018), (retained by defendant HTC Corporation) - Perkins Coie LLP
d. Technology: LEDs for mobile phones
Frys Electronics, v. Seoul Semiconductor Co, and Seoul Viosys Co.,, 2:18-CV-00386-JRG (E. D. Tx. filed: Nov 20th 2018), (retained by defendant Frys Electronics) - Lamkin IP Defense
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging, LED lenses, LED luminaires, backlights, displays, and
televisions/monitors
Hanwha Q CELLS & Advance Materials Corporation, v. JinkoSolar,LONGi Solar, REC Solar, ITC 337-TA-1151 (filed: Apr 4th 2019), (“Certain Photovoltaic Cells and ProductsContaining Same,”), retained by patent owner and plaintiff Hanwha Q CELLS) - Covington and Burling LLP
Hanwha Q CELLS & Advance Materials Corporation, v. JinkoSolar and affiliates, 19-CV-00450 (D. Del. filed: Jan 21st 2018), (retained by patent owner and plaintiff Hanwha Q CELLS) - Covington and Burling LLP
d. Technology: Silicon solar cells and materials analysis of passivation layers
Oyster Optics LLC v. Infinera Inc, 2:18-CV-00206 (E. D. Tx filed: May 15th 2018); (retained by plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC) – Russ August & Kabat LLP.
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor component and transceiver design/
operation.
Nichia Corporation & Osram Opto Semiconductors Inc., v. Lighting Science Group Corp., IPR filing: IPR2019-01259 (PTAB filed Jun 28th 2019); (retained by petitioner Nichia and Osram Opto.) – Shearman and Sterling, LLP
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and ceramic thermal heat sinking technology.
Nichia Corporation v. Lighting Science Group Corp., 2:17-CV-08849 (C.D. Ca filed Jul 12th 2017); (retained by defendant Nichia) – Shearman and Sterling,
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and ceramic thermal heat sinking technology
Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Class Action Lawsuit, 4:17-CV-02399 (S. D.Tx filed: Mar 6th 2018); (retained by plaintiff Class Action Lawsuit) – Levi and Korsinsky, LLP
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor components, transceivers, and subsystems.
DNA Motor v. Kuen Hwa Traffic Industrial Co., 18-CV-05664 (C. D. Ca filed: Jan 15th 2019); (defendant DNA Motor) – Elizabeth Yang, Law and Mediation Office
d. Technology: LED design patent, and the design of an aftermarket LED based headlight assembly for
an automobile.
Nichia Corporation, Osram Opto Semiconductors Inc., Philips Lumileds,GE Consumer Lighting, Cree, and Signify v. Lighting Science Group Corp., ITC 337-TA-1168 (filed: Apr 30th2019), (“Certain Light-Emitting-Diode products, systems, and components thereof (III)”) (retained byrespondents Nichia, Osram Optoelectronics, Philips Lumileds, GE Consumer Lighting, Cree Hong Kong., SignifyCorp.) – Shearman and Sterling, LLP
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and ceramic thermal heat sinking technology (LTCC).
Amazon.com Inc, Bed, Bath and Beyond, IKEA, Target, and Walmart Inc.,v. Regents of the University of California, ITC 337-TA-1172 (filed: July 30th 2019), (“Certain Filament LightEmitting-Diodes and products containing same”) (retained by respondents Amazon.com Inc, Bed, Bath and Beyond, IKEA, Target, and Walmart Inc.) – Morrison and Foerster, LLP
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and light bulb filaments with transparent sub-mounts.
U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., IPR2019-00511 (PTAB filed Dec 28th 2018), (retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.
IKEA, v. Regents of the University of California, ITC 337-TA-1172 (filed:July 30th 2019), (“Certain Filament Light-Emitting-Diodes and products containing same”) (retained by respondents IKEA) – Flaster and Greenberg, LLP
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and light bulb filaments with transparent sub-mounts.
Hanwha Solutions Corporation, v. Longi Green Energy, Longi Solar Technology, Longi Trading et al., IPR2019-01072 (PTAB filed 13th May 2019), (retained by patent owner Hanwha Solutions Corporation) - Covington and Burling LLP
d. Technology: Silicon solar cells and materials analysis of passivation layers
Hanwha Solutions Corporation, v. REC Solar Pte. Ltd. and JinkSolar (U.S.)Inc. IPR2019-01145 (PTAB filed 6th March 2019), (retained by patent owner Hanwha Solutions Corporation) -Covington and Burling LLP
d. Technology: Silicon solar cells and materials analysis of passivation layers
Viavi Solutions Inc., v Optrontec Inc., ITC 337-TA-1187 (filed: 18thNovember 2019), (“Certain Electronic devices with Optical Filters and Optical Sensor Systems and Components Thereof”) (retained by complainant Viavi Solutions Inc.,) – Venable, LLP
d. Technology: Optical filters and optical sensor systems, design and fabrication of dielectric materials
for passband filters in applications such as optical communications, imaging, sensing, medical,
automotive.
Leviton Manufacturing Co., v. Corning Optical Communications LLC.,ITC 337-TA-1194 (filed: 19th March 2020), (“Certain High-Density Fiber Optic Equipment and ComponentsThereof”) (retained by respondent Leviton Manufacturing Co.,) – Morrison & Foerster, LLP
e. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and light bulb filaments with transparent sub-mounts.
subject to PO/NDA and engagement letter xxx v. yyy, Post Grant Reviewpetition for proceedings (US Patent # zzz), retained by Morrison and Foerster, LLP
d. Optoelectronics, LEDs, lead frame packaging, optics, optical lenses, GaN (Gallium Nitride), optical
transparency
Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung ElectronicsAmerica, Inc., IPR2020-00560 (PTAB filed 16th Feb 2020), (retained by patent owner Cellect LLC) – retained byKramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
d. Technology: Silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD technology
Panasonic, v. 3M Innovative Properties Company., Preparation for IPR filing, (retained by defendant Panasonic) – retained by Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian LLP
d. Technology: Touch sensor (resistive, optical, and capacitive) technology for mobile displays.
Analysis of display, electronic, and optical technologies.
Longi Green Energy Technology Co, Longi Solar Technology Co, LongSolar Technology (H.K., Kuching, Taizhou, Zhejiang, Hefei, US) v. Hanwha Solutions Corporation., IPR 2019-01072, (retained by patent owner Hanwha Solutions Corporation) – Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
d. Optoelectronics; solar cell design, fabrication, device performance, packaging, and interface issues
relating to passivation (both chemical and electric field enhanced).
Oyster Optics LLC v. Ciena Corp, 4:17-CV-05920 (N. D. CA filed: April22nd 2020); (retained by plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC) – Russ August & Kabat LLP.
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor component design and operation,
especially phase shift keying (PSK, QPSK) and phase based coherent communications.
Capella Photonics Inc., v. Infinera Corporation, Tellabs, Tellabs OperationsInc., Coriant American Inc., and Coriant USA Inc., 2:20-CV-00077 (E. D. TX filed: March 16th 2020); (retainedby defendant Infinera Inc.) – Baker Botts LLP.
d. Technology: Fiber optic wavelength selective switches (WSS), reconfigurable add-drop multiplexors
(ROADMs), and their design. Technical issues include polarization, wavelength selection, coupling,
mux/demux and operation in optical networks.
Longi Green Energy Technology Co, Longi Solar Technology Co, Long Solar Technology (H.K., Kuching, Taizhou, Zhejiang, Hefei, US) v. Hanwha Solutions Corporation., IPR 2020-00353, (retained by patent owner Hanwha Solutions Corporation) – Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
d. Optoelectronics: solar cell design, fabrication, device performance, packaging, and interface issues
relating to passivation (both chemical and electric field enhanced).
Appotronics Corporation Ltd. v. Delta Electronics Inc., 2:19-CV-00466 (E.D. Va filed: July 22nd 2020); (retained by defendant Delta Corporation Inc) – Pillsbury Winthorp Shaw Pitman LLP.
d. Technology: Light projectors for display and the color wheel, phosphor technology, high power visible
lasers for projection, and the associated packaging of the modules/projectors for efficient cost design.
Ideal Industries Lighting LLC (dba Cree Lighting) v. RAB Lighting Inc.,ITC 337-TA-1213 (filed: 15th July 2020), (“Certain Light-emitting Diode Products, Fixtures, and Componentsthereof”), (retained by plaintiff Ideal Industries Lighting LLC (dba Cree Lighting) – Quinn Emanuel Urquhart anSullivan, LLP
d. Technology: Visible GaN based LEDs and various packaging optical lens designs for directing and
re-directing LED light output with applications in street lighting.
Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung ElectronicsAmerica, Inc., ex parte declaration entitled, ‘Hand-held computers incorporating reduced area imaging devices’,for U.S. Patent 6,982,742 (control number 90/014,453), (retained by patent owner Cellect LLC) – retained byKramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.
Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung ElectronicsAmerica, Inc., ex parte declaration entitled, ‘Communication devices incorporating reduced area imagingdevices’, for U.S. Patent 6,452,626 (control number 90/014,455), (retained by patent owner Cellect LLC) –retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.
Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent 9,198,565 (IPR2020-00476), (retained by patent owner Cellect LLC) – retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.
Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung ElectronicsAmerica, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent 9,667,896 (IPR2020-00477), (retained by patent owner CellectLLC) – retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.
U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 3:18-CV-00373 (FiledFed 16th 2018), (retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – retained by defendant Perkins Coie LLP.
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components. Noise suppression using EMI between electrical
components and connectors.
Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung ElectronicsAmerica, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent 9,186,052 (IPR2020-00512), (retained by patent owner CellectLLC) – retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.
Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung ElectronicsAmerica, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent 9,186,052 (IPR2020-00475), (retained by patent owner CellectLLC) – retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. v. Verizon Communications, Inc., et al., 20-CV-030-JRG (TX E. D. Filed 21st April 2020), (retained by plaintiff Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.) – retained byplaintiff Caldwell Cassady Curry P.C.
d. Technology: Analysis of coding for fiber optic communications, specifically in relation to the
standardization process for the Telecommunication Standardization Sector of the International
Telecommunications Union (“ITU-T”), including the ITU-T’s G.709: Interfaces for the optical
transport network standard (“G.709” or “the G.709 Standard”). In particular, the technical issues that
relate to OTN hierarchy; functionality of the overhead in support of multi-wavelength optical
networks; frame structures, bit rates, and formats for mapping client signals.
IKEA et al., v. Regents of the University of California, ITC 337-TA-1220(filed: 29th September 2020), (“Certain filament light-emitting diodes and products containing same (II)”),(retained by respondent JDG: IKEA, Global Value Lighting, Signify, Home Depot, GE, Satco) – retained byFlaster Greenberg PC, Kirkland and Ellis, GT Law, Alston and Bird, Jones Day and Goodwin Law as JDGcounsel.
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and light bulb filaments with transparent sub-mounts.
Uber Technologies Inc., v. Anthony Scott Levandowski; Case No. 20-30242 (HLB) and 20-03050 (filed 16th September 2020), retained by defendant Uber Technologies Inc., retained byJenner and Block LLP.
d. Technology: LIDAR technology for motor vehicles that includes fiber amplifiers, LIDAR hardware,
laser diodes, photodetectors, fiber links, and free space communications.
CoSemi Technologies, v. Everpro Technologies, Fibbr Technologies,Logitech, and Facebook Technologies, ITC 337-TA-1233 (filed: 29th October 2020), “Certain active opticalcables and products containing same”, (retained by claimant Cosemi Technologies) – retained by Rutan & TuckerLLP.
d. Technology: Active optical cables with embedded silicon modulator ICs, copper cable, fiber optic
cable, VCSEL laser diodes, photodetectors and cable sheathing for consumer applications such as
gaming, HDMI, USB, etc.
Acuity Brands Lighting ,Inc. v. Heavy Duty Lighting (HDL), LLC., 20-CV-03648-SCJ (GA N. D. Filed 2nd September 2020), (retained by defendant Acuity Brands Lighting) – retainedby defendant Duane Morris LLP.
d. Technology: LED lighting, LED chips, LED packages and LED packaging technologies such as
molding, glob-top, substrates, die mounting, optical reflectors, and electrical interconnect layouts.
Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD and Obert Inc. v. CHLighting Technology co., LTD., Elliott Electric Supply Inc., and Shaoxing Ruising Lighting co., Ltd., 20-CV00018-ADA (TX W D. Filed 16th March 2020), (retained by defendant CH Lighting et al) – retained by defendantHolland and Knight LLP.
d. Technology: LED lighting and LED packaging technologies for T8 and T12 form factor tube lighting.
Technologies such as LED luminaire/tube packaging, mechanical structure, thermal heat dissipation,
electronic circuitry, printed circuit boards, and LED chips.
ASUSTEK Computer Inc, v. KT Imaging USA LLC, 20-CV-00300-ADA(TX W D. Filed 20th April 2020, (retained by defendant ASUSTEK Computer Inc) – retained by defendant TurnerBoyd LLP.
d. Technology: Image sensor modules, cameras in PCs/laptops, consumer products, tear downs, optical
lenses, optical packaging, optical alignment.
Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD and Obert Inc. v.Maxlite Inc., 19-CV-04047 (CA C.D. Filed 8th May 2019), (retained by defendant Maxlite Inc) – retained bydefendant Holland and Knight LLP.
d. Technology: LED lighting and LED packaging technologies for T8 and T12 form factor tube lighting.
Technologies such as LED luminaire/tube packaging, mechanical structure, thermal heat dissipation,
electronic circuitry, printed circuit boards, and LED chips.
Feit Electric Company Inc., v. Nichia Corporation, 20-CV-00359-GW,(CA C. D. Filed 13th January 2020), (retained by defendant Feit Electric Company) – retained by BeneschFriedlander Coplan &Aronoff LLP
d. Technology: LED lighting, LED chips, LED packages and LED packaging technologies such as leadframes, molding, glob-top, substrates, die mounting, optical reflectors, and electrical interconnect
layouts.
Samsung Corporation vs TBD, Pre-patent litigation, (retained by plaintiffSamsung Corporation), - retained by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP).
d. Technology: TV displays, OLEDs, LCDs, color gamut, and quality of RGB/white color as per CIE
charts and colorimetry (NTSC, sRGB, AdobeRGB etc,.). Analysis of CHL (constant hue locus),
quantum dots, nano-crystals, nano-devices, nano-structures to improve light quality output.
Holochip Corporation v, Edmund Optics, Optotune AG and others TBD,Pre-patent litigation for ITC, (retained by plaintiff Holochip Corporation), - retained by King and Spalding LLP).
d. Technology: Fluid lenses, and optical lenses with controlled focus facilities. Packaging of fluid lenses
using piezoelectric actuators, and hermetic chambers. Deformable surfaces using micro-fluidics.
Home Depot USA Inc., v. Lynk Labs, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent10,757,783 (IPR2021-01368), (retained by petitioner Home Depot USA, Inc) – retained by DLA Piper LLP
d. Technology: LED products, LED circuits, including both DC and AC circuit design. LED color
emission, white light, color mixing, CIE charts, and black body radiators for color temperature.
Home Depot USA Inc., v. Lynk Labs, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent10,492,251 (IPR2021-01369), (retained by petitioner Home Depot USA, Inc) – retained by DLA Piper LLP
d. Technology: LED products, LED circuits, including both DC and AC circuit design. LED color
emission, white light, color mixing, CIE charts, and black body radiators for color temperature.
Home Depot USA Inc., v. Lynk Labs, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent10,091,842 (IPR2021-01540), (retained by petitioner Home Depot USA, Inc) – retained by DLA Piper LLP
d. Technology: LED products, LED circuits, including both DC and AC circuit design. LED color
emission, white light, color mixing, CIE charts, and black body radiators for color temperature.
Home Depot USA Inc., v. Lynk Labs, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent10,517,149 (IPR2022-000023), (retained by petitioner Home Depot USA, Inc) – retained by DLA Piper LLP
d. Technology: LED products, LED circuits, including both DC and AC circuit design. LED color
emission, white light, color mixing, CIE charts, and black body radiators for color temperature.
Present; Everlight Elecs. Co. Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., 6:21-CV-00906 (W. D.TX filed: August 31st 2021); (retained by defendant Amazon.com) – Morrison and Foerster LLP.
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging with metallic electrodes, flip-chip solder bumping, and
doping of semiconductors for electrical conduction.
Hanwha Solutions Corporation and affiliated companies including Q-Cells,Boviet Renewable Power, Boviet Solar, Canadian Solar International v. Advanced Silicon Group Technologies,ITC 337-TA-1271 (filed: 14th October 2020) “Certain silicon photovoltaic cells and modules with nanostructures,and products containing the same.” (retained by joint defense group consisting of Quinn Emanual Urquhart &Sullivan, LLP., Morgan Lewis and Bockius, LLP., and Sidley Austin LLP.).
d. Technology: Silicon based solar/photovoltaic cells and modules that include fabrication techniques
such as deposition, diffusion, wet/dry etching of nanostructures, nanowires, and nano-structures, nanofeatures, black silicon, monocrystalline wafers, and polysilicon fabrication.
Dell Computer Inc, v. KT Imaging USA LLC, Declaration for IPR with patentnumber 6,876,544 as petitioner, (to be filed), (retained by defendant Dell Computer Inc) – retained by petitionerFarella, Braun, and Martel.
d. Technology: Image sensor modules, cameras in PCs/laptops, consumer products, tear downs, optical
lenses, optical packaging, optical alignment.
Cree Lighting, Wolfspeed, Ideal Industries Lighting, v. CAO Lighting,Declaration for IPR with patent number 6,465,961 as petitioner, (filed 8th April 2022), (retained by defendantCree Lighting) – retained by Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, chip-on-board, heat
sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum Gallium Nitride)
epitaxial layers, active regions, cladding layers, optical mirrors, DBRs
Cree Lighting, Wolfspeed, Ideal Industries Lighting, v. CAO Lighting,Declaration for IPR with patent numbers 6,634,770 as petitioner, (filed 8th April 2022), (retained by defendantCree Lighting) – retained by Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, chip-on-board, heat
sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum Gallium Nitride)
epitaxial layers, active regions, cladding layers, optical mirrors, DBRs
Cree Lighting dba Ideal Industries Lighting, v. CAO Lighting, 1:21-cv-00634(MD NC filed 12th Aug 2021,), (retained by defendant Cree Lighting) – retained by Kilpatrick Townsend &Stockton LLP.
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, chip-on-board, heat
sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum Gallium Nitride)
epitaxial layers, active regions, cladding layers, optical mirrors, DBRs
Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. SensorElectronic Technology Inc., (SETi), 6:21-cv-00322 (WD Tex filed 12th Aug 2021,), (retained by plaintiff LiteOnand Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LEDcladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs
Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. SensorElectronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00395) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiffLiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs
Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. SensorElectronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00396) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiffLiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs
Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. SensorElectronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00397) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiffLiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs
Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. SensorElectronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00406) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiffLiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs
Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. SensorElectronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00419) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiffLiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs
Panasonic Corporation, v. Magna International Inc., 21-cv-00319 (WD Texfiled 31st Mar 2021,), (retained by plaintiff Panasonic) – retained by Sidley Austin LLP.
d. Technology: Automotive sensors, cameras, electronic circuitry, controls, packaging, surround view
camera systems.
Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD and Obert Inc. v.Maxlite Inc., 19-CV-04047 (CA C.D. Filed 8th May 2019), (retained by defendant Maxlite Inc) – retained bydefendant Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP.
d. Technology: LED lighting and LED packaging technologies for T8 and T12 form factor tube lighting.
Technologies such as LED luminaire/tube packaging, mechanical structure, thermal heat dissipation,
electronic circuitry, printed circuit boards, and LED chips.
Advanced Engineering Services LLC., v. Lumasense Technologies Inc.,and DOES 1-50, 21-CV-03279-WHO combined with 20-CV-07905-WHO (CA N.D. Filed 23rd Feb 2022),(retained by plaintiff Advanced Engineering Services LLC) – retained by plaintiff SAC Attorneys LLP
d. Technology: Thermal, gas, and flow sensing for use in designing and manufacturing equipment used
in semiconductor chip manufacturing. In particular, review of data relating to the simulation of finite
element analysis (“FEA”) and computational fluid dynamics (“CFD”) data for gases, temperature, and
stress with actual sensor data that could be intelligently integrated, customized, installed, tested,
verified, and validated.
Frontier Communications v. Charter Communications, Pre-litigation IP andDue Diligence; Case No. TBD; Retained by Frontier Communications, (retained by Mayer Brown LLP)
d. Technology: Optical PON for high-speed data FTTH evaluation, testing, and analysis.
Russ, August & Kabat, Pre-litigation IP and Due Diligence; Case No. TBD;(retained by plaintiff – Russ, August & Kabat LLP)
d. Technology: High volume fiber optic transceivers for EPON/GPON with: CDR circuits, ‘Intelligencein-the-Module’ and ‘M-ary’ families.
Signify Holding B.V. v. GE Lighting Solutions LLC., Declaration for IPR(IPR2022-XXX – in draft form for US patent #7,497,973) as petitioner, (retained by petitioner Signify HoldingB.V.) – retained by Alston and Bird LLP
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips that emit in the UV and visible, LED arrays, LED
packaging including phosphors and encapsulants, and the type of phosphors utilized for different
emission. In particular, phosphors that are activated by dopants such as Europium (Eu), Manganese
(Mn) and the associated ions for these materials e.g. Mn2+, Mn3+, Mn4+, Mn6+, etc. Included
analysis of InGaN and AlGaN based epitaxial material systems, and the use of phosphors in high
pressure mercury vapor lamps.
Canon, Inc., and Canon USA Inc v. WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a BrazosLicensing and Development., Declaration for IPR ((IPR2022-XXX) for US patent #7,493,030 as petitioner,(retained by Canon Inc) – retained by Orrick LLP
d. Technology: Digital camera operation including optical focus, image sensing, optical train, depth of
field, exposure time, different focus and focal areas of a portion of the image, general photography
and optical principles.
Canon, Inc., and Canon USA Inc v. WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a BrazosLicensing and Development., 21-CV- 00166-ADA-DTG (W.D. TX.) Filed 29th Sept 2022. (retained by defendantCanon Inc) – retained by Orrick LLP
d. Technology: Digital camera operation including optical focus, image sensing, optical train, depth of
field, exposure time, different focus and focal areas of a portion of the image, general photography
and optical principles.
Fujifilm Sonosite., v. Butterfly Network, Inc., 1-22-CV-00309 (D.Del) Filed 29th Mar 2022), (retained by defendant Butterfly Network, Inc.,) – retained by defendant Akin Gump LLP
d. Technology: Ultra-sonic equipment that includes displays, especially OLED displays. The electronic
circuits and how displays are electronically controlled.
LedComm LLC., v. IKEA US Retail LLC et al, 6-22-CV-00302-ADA (W.D.Tx.) Filed 21st Mar 2022), (retained by defendant IKEA US Retail LLC et al.) – retained by defendant FlasterGreenberg LLP
d. Technology: LED surface mount packaging, LED GaN/InGaN chips, and associated LED lighting
performance specifications.
NXP Semiconductors N.V. and NXP USA Inc., v. MediaTek Inc,, Amazon.comInc., Belkin International Inc, Linksys USA Inc., et al, ITC Investigation 337-TA-1287 entitled “Certain integratedcircuits, and electronic devices and products containing the same” (Filed 1st Dec 2021), (retained by respondents Amazon.com Inc.,) – retained by respondent Morrison Foerster LLP
d. Technology: LED surface mount packaging, LED GaN/InGaN chips, and associated LED lighting
performance specifications. LED Luminaires.
Amazon.com Inc., v. Epistar Corp., 6-22-CV-00526-ADA (W.D. Tx.) Filed 24thMay 2022), (retained by defendant Amazon.com Inc..) – retained by defendant Morrison Foerster LLP
d. Technology: LED surface mount packaging, LED GaN/InGaN chips, GaN/InGaN epitaxial growth,
fabrication, device design and packaging. LED luminaires.
Present; Amazon.com Inc., v. Epistar Corp., 6-22-CV-00526-ADA (W.D. Tx.) Filed24th May 2022), (retained by defendant Amazon.com Inc..) – retained by defendant Perkins Coie LLP
d. Technology: LED surface mount packaging, LED GaN/InGaN chips, GaN/InGaN epitaxial growth,
fabrication, device design and packaging. LED Luminaires.
Qorvo., v. Akoustis Technologies Inc., 1-21-CV-1417-JPM (C.A.) Filed 4thOct 2021), (retained by defendant Akoustis.) – retained by defendant Pillsbury LLPa
d. Technology: acoustic wave filters, BAW filters (bulk-acoustic-wave) filters for RF applications,
devices, fabrication, and character.
X Absolutely impressive.
Well, I have you on iggy but saw a link to your post. You are entitled to your opinion, fine, but as for me, they have enabled me to file 7 - 7 figure form 8282's that I wouldn't have been able to do without them, there are other things but I won't list them.
I'm not worried, a bit impatient, perhaps, but unlike others I don't wear my heart on my sleeve.
We all thought they could supplant silicon photonics before it maxed out, obviously it didn't. Silicon is finally maxed out, and with the AI demand I think we will see some movement. The shorts still have sold about 20 million shares that will need to be returned at some time, or pay cash or buy an NVDA like stock to satisfy the deal, I think that some do not factor that in to the price.
It is always easier to criticize, and harder to do. Let me look for and read Lebbys bio again to see just how qualified he is in this trillion dollar industry. I certainly know that I'm not.
Good day, some prefer to walk around miserable, I don't.
For Newbies!
I've been here for over 20 years. From conception to fruition. Originally the founders had an idea and in order to fund it they took it public. Back in the day it was on the pink sheets, as it moved along it bumped to the nasdaq. Back in the day they would issue shares through a private placement with warrant. Now they fund the company strictly through sales of the common stock and always keep a years cash in hand. Cool by me that is what shares of stock are for. Zero debt, that is right, cash in the bank with no loans.
Fast forward to today. They have foundries that can put 10,000 modulators on a silicon wafer. This is dropped inside a modulator. They have 3rd party vendors now offering transcievers to test drive. Understand that transcievers both send and receives data and a modulator sends the data. Lightwave is on the sending side. When applied to Silicon it Triples the speed and does so without a driver using 1/10 the power.
The shorts here have themselves in a pickle. They have about 20 million shares that they have borrowed and sold, now hoping to convince longs to sell. Well I've been here since the beginning, and I'm not leaving.
X good luck to all the honest folks in life, this world has certainly changed.
AI is putting pressure on silicon photonics and it simply can not keep up, Enter Perkinamine only available at Lightwave logic.
I would not be surprised to wake up on anygiven day to see a takeover offer from an NVDA like company.
I toured the expanded lab in May, met many of the employees, saw a working modulator in the conference room, (eyes wide open) held a wafer with thousands of modulators, saw diced wafers, met board members. I'm being told by the shorts not to believe my lying eyes.
Good day.
Short count looks like 19.63 million, which is down from about 20 million. Using round numbers the stock price increased $1.50 on those 350,000 shares covered.
At that rate there are 55 of those 350k covers in the remaining 19 million shares.
55 x 1.50 = $82 additional dollars per share. If I'm off by a factor of 10 that adds 8 bucks to the current $4 or $12. That is without news just on the imbalance of borrowed shares being returned. That is why Ted is making up stories trying to convince others to sell. Beware as it has been proven by ihub that he uses multiple ID's.
Expect the shorts to make another go at it to make some squirm. I use those opportunities to buy cheap shares.
This company will be bought out. But wait Dr. Lebby (he's da man) said he didn't want it to be controled by 1 company. How can both things be true. What if say 3 tier1's formed an entity? (A constium if you would).
I thought everyone was looking at Perk 3, now we discover someone has been using Perk 5 A for a while? Cool, cool, Perk 3 passed all the tests with flying colors, Lebby is showing how this will dominate going forward. On the lab tour I was talking to the lead chemists, they said that in addition to producing the Perk for the current demand, that they mix up new improved (faster etc) batches for other areas of the lab to experiment with and the improvements appear endless because nature is with them (whatever that means)
Buyout? Deals first? Name drop? What will be the catalyst?
The stock market forces will have their way until the obvious improvements Perk can make to Silicon photonics becomes widely understood.
Yawn, I'm guessing we open down today. I recommended that the shorts cover long ago and still do. That is being honest, I wonder what other versions of Perk have data sheets and are being used for things like Lidar?
X
Perk 5A under 1 volt, I was like what?
I would not want to be an advisor of the shorts.
They do not play nice, may be a good chance tomorrow for some of those shares.
I know nothing, recommended consulting punk for expert advice.
X
This board is nonsense, no offense to anyone, funny as funny is. The only one that speaks the truth is proly proto and he can't say it enough.
Told ya it would happen years ago
Money on LWLG.
X
The shorts sat this one out today up 5%. ASTS (up 10% today, I only have 1 k shares there) is what I watch 20m short there, they are trying to hold out the longs to make a Vein like poster complain. The shorts had shopped for longs to file a law suite as they will do here, oops the problem is it was followed by news, same will happen here.
Good day guys, see what happens.
It is a game, until it isn't.
Xster long on LWLG. I love when they give me cheap shares.
Shorts returned 16k today up 32 cents. They won't be happy. Perhaps tomorrow I can get a few cheapy's. I don't need em but hey I'll take some.
I always said this board will become nonsense, lately tis a hoot watching the board, this board makes no sense logically anymore. Believe who you will, watch the supply demand curve.
X
In bear country for a couple days, those dang engineers brother in laws that left the lab are at it. Yawn.
Storms a comming.
My orders didn't fill today. oh well.
X
Kinda happy with the mess the board has finally become.
Nothing makes sense, I've watched this forever.
Sold some axon at 304 to buy some lwlg at 3 bucks or so. Before axon hits 500 bucks this will be at the 5 buck management award level. Same thing.
This is a publicly traded company that is shorted for 20 million shares, cool cool.
Watch asts. Did that in the 2.50 to 3 buck level, that's a hold em
Whatever.
X apparently I'm not smarter than some.
You mean like this.
What was the date of that post? I want to look at something.
Yes, it is funny how the paid basher types can turn normal folks into micro managing know it all critics,,, or whatever in order to push their cause, I haven't quite figured out what is lacking in their confidence of their due diligence or what their internal motives are but that is one thing I've certainly learned that apparently their is something lacking in some folks character,,,, uh not old scholl human nature for sure,,, mysery loves company, um I guess, watching the games play out here Has certainly been interesting, so close to the finish line and some step off the field and brag about it, like they are proud they couldn't finish. Mock those still in the game, weird.
I'm not sure who the bashing longs will high five if the shorts win. They won't they have 20 Million shares to buy before the next leg up.
Yup, we are in the right place at precisely the right time.
"he believes the real market wins center on today’s unprecedented demand for high-performance transceivers, which are based on silicon photonics and PICs and can support the massive data rates required by AI accelerators and data centers."
X
Funny how smart we thought we were in our 30s and 40s at our jobs. My daddy always said, it's a job, could be gone tomorrow, then what? You can lead a horse but you can not make them drink from it. Oh to become smart as I wE in my 40s. How cocky we get when we rely on others for our pay check. I've seen it a million times.....
Don't burn bridges, respect them. Sometimes connections with wisdom and cash are good.
Funny to see how just as Lebby is courting tier 1's some appear to be believing the gas lighting by the shorts that have borrowed and sold over 20 million shares into the market , remember that they still need to purchase them back (from someone) so they can be returned to close their position, that is their goal. So they spew nonsense and try to confuse those holding the shares they need to buy.
I'll be holding mine for the grand finale.
Today's world of gas lighting by all sides in all areas of life is not good, soon no one will belive anyone about anything. AI bot arguing against AI bot, crazy.
Oh some are talking about Polariton, um as info Claudia was seated behind me at the SHM, I also heard that she was working in the lab doing something (I didn't see her on my tour). If she was, anyone who thinks that wasn't by design is smoking Crack.
X short day, market closing early, may be an interesting day, especially the last few seconds may be a great buying opportunity at 12:59 ish EST.
Without the facts, I prefer not to try and second guess Lebby or try and micro manage what/how they are getting this technology adopted. It is a fact that the industry has a huge problem, many will try, many will succeed because after all there are many devices and areas of opportunity. I still see NVDA as a key partner going forward, but with their pockets I think they will just buy us outright.
This time last year poet was $4 I go way back there before the 1 for 10 reverse split. The Chinese partnership freaked me out so I bailed.
Good luck to that crowd as they certainly deserve it.
Last time I looked they were strapped for cash, fun to watch how fast that doubled, I only glanced but it looked like 100k shorts covered there over the past few days, but they will be back.
My orders all filled here yesterday, cool by me.
I remember some on here saying when this was 60 cents and poet jumped to a buck that is what we needed to do. But then they went silent when this moved to the nasdaq without a reverse split but poet did the 1 for 10. So all things being equal move the poet decimal point 1 spot poet at $3.00 is 30 cents. Just saying.
Debating on buying a little more here today.
X another nice day, our time will come, if you play have fun, Im going to sit poet thing out meanwhile that ASTS is fun to watch.
Okie dokie, I put in 6 buy orders at various prices, let's see if they fill.
X, I Don't really need them, but the timing feels right.
Beautiful day, time to play.
Best of luck to the honest folks in life for all important things that really matter.
It is hard to believe just how far we came from thinking, hey let's support this technology to take a stable polymer (plastic) and make it turn light (laser) on and off because in the future they will need it (that was over 20 years ago).
Funny I went to Home Depot and bought 42 items all in plastic bags yesterday, when I asked for a bag they said all we can do it sell you one of these cloth bags or one of these paper bags with torn handles, lol. I guess it is a good thing that I didn't invest in plastic bags to be used at checkout. One would think that they could invent a plastic bag that is biodegradable absorbs oil and provides nutrients to sea turtles to strengthen their shell from boat strikes.
Please let the company manage the news. Loose lips sink ships. I do not know anything, but it is best not to point out events before they occur. It takes the wind out of the sail.
As info, guys, next week has another U.S. holiday July 4th. That is one of Lews favorites!
I would love to be a fly on wall over the next few events.
Thanks, and good luck to the rock steady longs here.
X
Slim = Bot, a test bot.
Bot= an AI posting technology.
AI posting will ruin message boards just as robo calls ruined our faith in having home phones. Towards the end, home phones were free, but we all canceled the free phones anyhow as they became an annoyance, as these message boards will soon be, yawn. Rely on real people that you know personally, thank goodness the actual longs here have established an actual investor base. True, and it will argue that it is not a bot, yawn, sure.
All good things come to an end.
How do I know, its ID was just established with no track record anywhete and just posted every few minutes on multiple boards that it did due diligence at lightning speed cherry picking multiple unrelated negative subjects on multiple companies. It will soon learn that a a credible poster is real with hand shakes and that my friends takes years.
Over the years I've met numerous accredited investors here, going forward we will do multiple deals, real people do real things, most of which is not on a message board.
Folks that rely on bots for info will get smoked, if you can not shake a hand, it ain't real, just saying.
And for every single looser there is a winner.
We have done our homework, trade away if that is what you think the future is with AI's demand we longs are sitting pretty.
I'm in here, homework is done, let us see how this plays out.
Xster confident, until there is true news, it is just trading though so have at it. Ask any true investor how they made their money and how they handled downturns. La te da (If you describe someone as la-di-da, you mean that they have an upper-class way of behaving, which you think seems unnatural and is only done to impress people.)
I'm long term, a gap up will be brutal for the traders.
Camping, so some folks pull up in a 50amp 1 million dollar RV.
Check it out, a big RV might use 30 amps. Testsas pull up hook up get free 50 amp charges overnight.
X. Whatever, they think it's free.
They are so green, wait what?
I'm such a good person, um? Ateast they where masks,
Lebby is dragging the industry forward. Only those that have it know and, they ain't saying nuttin. Meanwhile, the sky is falling crowd is saying well , um "the sky is falling and will try and time it in 2 weeks. yawn, mature investors vs. Shiny object,, Im so smart (this week) crowd. Real money is accumulated by those that do homework, not influenced by whatever......
Even when you help some all the sudden they forget whest they came from.
X
Speaking of NVDA, I'd be all in for changing tactics to permit an exclusive deal with Nividia for a single vertical, for cash and a requirement that a public PR be announced.
Currently this message board is only focused on discussing a single use of 1 of Lightwave's Polymers (of which there are many) and also multiple devices in multiple markets. But there is much more gray matter sitting on the board of directors than on this message board, so who knows.
X Have a good day guys.
33k shares at 3 bucks vs 10k shares at $10, Do the math on that $20 per share that is $660k vs. $200k. It is not a matter of if but when......
Options expiry day tomorrow, yawn, some will blaim or credit Lebby for the recent up/downs
Nuttin for nuttin.
X
I don’t read Ted's posts because they are total 1/2 truths but it sounds like he is playing you. We know what we saw on the lab tour, not even close to what MrSmith saw on the tour a few years back. Laying on a desk I saw various sizes of diced wafers as if for a display. When I asked if the 1cm x 1cm was a single they he said no it was 20.
Working 200 Gig modulator, we saw it. Hard to believe that some are going to try and time this as if everyone can buy shares at the same time.
X. Some get shy at the weirdest point in an investment asd some will say anything to try and make a quick buck, I couldn't sleep with myself.
It doesn't matter what we say, the pieces are finally in place.
IMO This is how LWLG will play out when a tier1 deal is announced. Something to watch while we wait so ASTS had a fair amount of shorts so some here were watching it, it then had a legal filing (shorts) against it and then they announced a deal with AT&T.
It was around $2.50 at the time.
X
Google axon (taser) deep Marcelli connections. The dad Phil is deceased. However, the boyz are still around. I could go into the history but I won't, deeply undervalued here.
Believe whom you will.
X. I'M sure some will.
So I am an honest person, unlike shorts that will try to convince some that they need to sell. I do not. I guess I'm weird. The shorts and longs (that didn't do the lab tour) believe who you will. The shorts have big money, but apparently do not understand the science. We are good, they can throw down millions of shares to drop the price, some think that it's the market, BS.
Whatever guys. We are there, those engineers from the Tier 1's get it.
Polymers controlling light, it worked.
The Tier 1s are going to start to buy. Believe who you will.
Just an honest decades old investor. Good luck on timing it.
Watch for a gap up.
X
I'll take that bet about the stock being $1 stock price at the end of the year.
$10k? I say no way.
X
No news, perhaps that it what you hope for. I wish you had made the lab tour this year. Wafers comming from all over, or something like that. Comments from the chem lab were quite interesting as well. Nose pressed against the cleanroom window was priceless.
Pretty sure the current demand for the most part is domestic and will end up paying short term capital gains as this is taken over in the near future.
Many of the original individuals that put faith (money) in taking a polymer (plastic) and believing that instead just making a plastic bottle or grocery bag that it could be modified to control light. Well looky, looky, they did it and it works, now they are actively working with 25 companies and yet some say that there is no progress, LOL, not only do they want to quit but they want to say the nastiest things they can in hopes of making others miserable. That is just weird. Folks can believe what they want but to take up the cause of the shorts with the intent to hurt another is just plane evil. I’d say that most of the original shareholders from decades ago still hold their shares. Many of the Johny came lately types come and go.
Here we are, silicon photonics has hit a wall at a time when demand is going through the roof. If folks do not think that companies like NVDA will utilize the speed and power gains available by using Perkinamine are truly not thinking. Apparently, some investors thought that they could time the exact month and year this trillion dollar market would adopt this technology. I know that I thought it would happen more than 10 years ago, oh well it didn’t, wrong again, but it is going to happen, and I say that soon enough a big fish will swallow us up. I cannot imagine the complexity that goes into trying to write partnership agreements to cover a single use of Perkinamine and there about 10 different verticals. Lightwave is currently only focusing on 3 or 4 uses, and we on this board are only focused on a single use in a single vertical.
Then just as they increase the labs output and announce a place that the industry can order chips produced by a foundry and are going after the big fish Tier 1’s some have soured and say no its not going to work. You could not make up such a tale of disbelief if you wanted. And some of those think they need to try and convince others that Lightwave is not going to succeed so they feel that they made the right decision, so they bash away. LWLG has cash on hand over a year, no debt, lab expansion complete, we saw a working modulator on the conference room table, we see 25 companies vying for attention, we’ve just heard that 3 will be sending engineer types to the lab in the next few weeks, we seen recent new chemists, QC and engineer hires over the past year, some are finance and purchasing manager types and some doubt where this is headed, just doesn't make sense to me. I'm here until I see this through and not sell my shares to shorts that are doing their best to get to the weak-kneed types.
NVDA is processing data at unimaginable speeds in the GPU’s using electrons and need to move that data around not wanting to upgrade links between the GPU’s to 3 times the speed, using 1/10th the power and 1/30th the size, yet some here would have us believe that they don't want to do that. They are a $2 Trillion Dollar Company, if they don’t it they will loose out to someone that does. Look how small NVDA's GPU's are, imagine what they could do with the thumb sized space freed up by a modulator chip 1/30th the size.
Once this is spread across all markets and verticals it may be the biggest thing since the transceiver.
Still say we get bought out, tried to grab a chunk yesterday but only a small portion filled.
Lebby doubling down is a good thing, no way on God's green earth he would say it if he didn’t believe it.
X Reading this board constantly is not good for the mental psyche, rather than reading what the AI bots are writing on this board IMO my time is better spent reading about Nividia, studying the roadmaps to understanding just how fast AI is going to change the demand for data. Wow they are going to have a digital duplicate of everything from the planet earth, every city, building, factory etc. Don’t let the bots get you down, they are designed to depress and convince you to sell them your shares. Sounds crazy but study it, look at it, remember it, look at the progress. Whatever guys.
Just back from some off the grid R&R, no cell phone, no computer, no stock ish, nice and relaxing. Doesn't look like much happened here, my head did a double take when I saw NVDA then I remembered the 10 for 1 split. Just looked at 4 posts, no need to read anymore, it's not going to accomplish anything. 6" @ 300 yards metal, ting ting ting.
Proly roll a little at the bell.
X
Just to carry this documentation forward. The shorts covered 110k of the 210k during the day yesterday prior to the close, then overnight that 100k simply disappeared (naked?).
As of now at 10:12 EST 6/6/2024 I see about 450k shorts, where are they or have they been?
Mark .129
These next 2 Finra reports are going to be interesting.
X
I just had a small buy order in that filled and towards the end of the day if favorable weather (price) exists I may do a lil rollover.
2 People know why I post this
Oh sorry 10:21 forgot 30k more sells than buys down 18 cents 100k total 49k sells 19k buys and Dark pool 32k.
Maximum Impact deal structures going forward.
Anomalies galore. That is what I’m seeing on the short side reporting, sometimes I’ll see 50k, 100k. 500k shares reported during the day, then when it resets to the same old 20.5 million shares that it has been for + or – 500k shares for months. I think this is a case of naked shorting finally convincing some longs (not I) that the company is not there yet and they can time it. Well, I pushed my nose up against the glass in the clean room (LOL) and I say that they are super close, the shorts should be covering and that is the truth. Curious to see how the next 2 Finra reports look.
So as of 10:22 I see 210K shares reported as being shorted (today) bringing the total to 20.73m
I doubt that we will see those shares covered they will just evaporate..
I’ll bet they disappear overnight. I just want to mark moment in the day this along with the coordinated short posting attack, to make it easier to find a good focal point.
Mark 129.
X
Oh 65k more sells than buys noted dark pool is at 43.5k total shares traded 192k
I have most of the short posters collaborating on Ihub on Iggy who should I add to this list?
The Great Pumpkin 5/15/2015 to Present
1/1/2014 to
perkipooCHAUNCE x12/12/2013 to 12,31,2013
pawnzi
bsmith
Ponzi
JLPTNG Moderator
TedM to TedPeele to AdamN.
TEDPEELE (New AdamN)
AdamN 3/26/2024
Teds Latest JSilver Numerous ID's
Garbone
236T568
WooptdooU
mr5874
Lurker3
DLucky
Robbie1001
DanM51 ???
Civ5
Reanimator
Jacksonjohn
MvdL
Vitamin310
Shilo1
Koog
lineItemVeto
bar1080
chsmoke
tat4tat
kinzaman
Sonata
BSmith72
Rubes0908
Eppo
Thugmuffin
Trustbutverify
Fullbirt22
Polymer Paul
If you feel that you shouldn't be on there let me know I'll note it in the file.
Time to get on with my day, I put in an order to buy but it hasn't filled, rolled some more yesterday.
Your post is so important to understand! I watched the NVDIA presentation on Sunday and was at first concerned to see the 200G Electrical lanes in communicated then it took me back to one of the lab tours and the (Keysight? Serial Number 2) testing device, I asked what does that 100 indicate, Marcelli said that is currently set on the electric side. In other words in order to encode the data at 100G or 200G it has to roll out off at 100 or 200 less than 1 Volt enables Direct drive.
Fantastic Presentation, it is 2 hours long but well worth it, if you do not keep up with this technology you will be left in the dark, not just here but in life in general, things are about to get very crazy. I'm thinking about ordering a PC with AI.
https://videocardz.com/newz/watch-nvidia-ceo-jensen-huang-keynote-at-computex-2024
Electrons E-E-E-E-E-E (01101100 01101100 01101111 00100001) to the Metal conductors
Laser Light passed Straight through the waveguide in the modulator
Lightwaves Polymer embeds that 100G or 200G into the Laser and changes it to 01101100 01101100 01101111 00100001 in Photons (Light).
Off it goes and is converted at the other end to 01101100 01101100 01101111 00100001 Electrons E-E-E-E-E-E.
01101100 01101100 01101111 00100001 = Hello
NVDIA will in fact work something out with Lightwave, it is a Board of Directors Decision and not our call.
I cannot break it down any simpler than that.
Look at the infiniband (NVDA) roadmap on slide 36 and let that sink in to the ol gray matter.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/xbpewjieit3zluomfe04f/Updated-May-LWLG-Investor-Presentation.pdf?rlkey=nch506pm9h7gg2movd0vs9jec&dl=0
Excellent Post Mr. jeunke22, Most excellent post Dude.
I’m one of the original individuals that put my faith in taking a polymer (plastic) and thinking that instead of making plastic bottles or grocery bags that it could be designed to control light (call me crazy). Ooops, they did it and it works, they are actively working with 25 companies and yet some say that there is no progress, LOL, not only do they want to quit but they want to say the nastiest things they can in hopes of making other miserable. That is just weird. Folks can believe what they want but to take up the cause of the shorts with the intent to hurt other is evil. Probably my biggest mistake was pointing out to pumpkin the flaws in a company that he was invested in and lost his money, somehow, he holds that against me, I tried to help him he wouldn't listen, lost his shirt then blames me. Then with no dough I think the shorts hired him. True, True and in his heart and when he lays his head down, he knows it. I'd pay to see him have a discussion with Lebby.
Silicon photonics has hit a wall at a time when demand is going through the roof. If folks do not think that companies like NVDA will utilize the speed and power gains available by using Perkinamine are truly not thinking. Apparently, some investors thought that they could time the exact month and year this trillion-dollar market would adopt this technology. I know that I thought it would happen 10 years ago, oh well, wrong again, but it is going to happen and I say that soon enough a big fish will swallow us up. I cannot imagine the complexity that goes into trying to write partnership agreements to cover a single use of Perkinamine and there about 10 different verticals. Lightwave is currently only focusing on 3 or 4, and we on this board are only focused on a single use in a single vertical.
Then just as they increase the labs output and announce a place that the industry can order chips produced by a foundry some have soured and say no its not going to work. You could not make up such a tale of disbelief if you wanted. And some of those think they need to try and convince others that Lightwave is not going to succeed. They have cash on hand over a year, no debt, lab expansion complete, we saw a working modulator on the conference room table, we see 25 companies vying for attention we saw recent hires over the past year and some doubt where this is headed and to think that those who waited are giving up that investment just doesn't make sense.
Just makes Zero sense, I'm here until I see this through. Most give up on the cusp of success, not I.
NVDA is processing data at unimaginable speeds in the GPU’s using electrons and need to move that data around not wanting to upgrade links between the GPU’s to 3 times the speed, using 1/10th the power and 1/30th the size, yet some here would have us believe that they don't want to do that. They are a $2 Trillion Dollar Company, if they don’t it they will loose out to someone that does. Lebby may soon be pressured to sell off the use off a Vertical, I'd be fine with that there are many others. I still say forming a third party venture and issuing shares or cash while creating that venture would be awesome because the shares loaned to the shorts do not get either shares not cash, so the shorts would have to come up with it and if the venture is private, Ooopsy Daisy.
This is most likely once spread across all markets and verticals the biggest thing since the transistor.
Watch the ratio of Buys and sells vs. the share price throughout the day. We the retailers on not in charge there are many other forces that can.
In the market moving timelines forward is ALWAYS better than pushing back a timeline.
So I started looking at the Infiniband roadmap and ended up on this Jenson Huand keynote at Computex Yesterday.
https://videocardz.com/newz/watch-nvidia-ceo-jensen-huang-keynote-at-computex-2024
Still say we get bought out, grabbed some this morning.
Lebby doubling down is a good thing, no way on Gods green earth he would say it if he didn’t believe it. NVDA is on fire.
X 30k more sells than buys and yet the price is up, could you imagine what would happen if it were the other way around? It will happen, someday, I'm not good at timing the market, folks most likely can do it with 500 or 1,000 shares but not 100,000 shares or 1,000,000 shares.