I couldn't help but notice that nobody had answered my question so I'll reword it...are the shorters going to EVER be expected to cover with this? It seems pretty naive to believe nobody was shorting prior to the suspension, and now that ISBL is moving to the greys, are they not forced to cover?

so what happens to anyone who's short right now?

As crazy as it sounds, the fact that the pps drops virtually every single day serves as proof that no one in recent months could have been selling. Given the way our chart looks, a) who would buy and b) if someone did buy, why would they not hold for long since the short term is obviously a bad idea.


This board in it's entirety has become pretty frustrating for me, and I've just decided to stop looking at it for a while. It's just too hard to digest all the bashing that's done by some, and the perpetuated sense of blind hope that seemingly always counters reality done by others. Quite frankly, it all lacks a basic sense of genuiosity that a board should sustain for the sake of credibility.

i'd say that i'm pretty PO'd about being at .0008, but what's the point. we'll only be even lower tomorrow, and if not that, then the day after >:O

im with you, i wish i never bought into this. im way too red now to sell, so i have to just wait. im fed up with having virtually every instance I check on the pps, its down for no viable reason, giving me the impression theres nothing AERP can do about share price. what a joke.

what is going on here?

how did you go about calculating a 1:15 worst case split?

can anyone please answer my standing question as to why we close red everytime there's a PR released?

Just another attempt to paint the board with false information..

LOL

LOL

lol, what does all that have to do with anything?

lol...isnt that a shame?

right.

sort of like the guy at your local sports bar who feels the need to announce the score whenever your team is behind, lol.

congrats

So much for your credibility..


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26851104

thanks mainuh

so let's say, hypothetically (but certainly not well beyond the limits of possibility), an MM is short a substantial amount of ISBL and cannot cover by the end of the day. They would be short of BGGR by 1/30 of their ISBL short count, but being as though they'd be naked shorting, how are they not walking into a trap that could be a lawsuit against the shorting MMs? their position is evidence that they've been naked shorting in such a manner that could be detrimental to both ISBL and BGGR.

Does anyone know how the dividend works out for those who get caught short at the end of the day? Are they expected to 'cover' BGGR shares as well?

why is he banned? let me guess, conspiracy?

don't get me wrong, I'm not one to turn away anytime someone posts something negative on the board, but you're "educating" the public with a source that has proven to be illegitimate. that's why I directed my previous post to the mods.

question to the mods -

what is the point of being banned, if someone else can just forward their posts?

haha, that was what I was originally going to post!

Either that, or he's got one monster of an engine and a really crappy baseline muffler.

lol

i think part of the problem is that, in pinks, you can't really tell if its the company thats screwing shareholders over, or if its the MMs. So I don't really see how anyone could get 'revenge', muchless seek it.

plus, let's not forget that prior to all the dividend hype, ISBL was making pretty steady progress. I remember when this thing was struggling to hold onto the 2's, and now we've got strong support at 55

I don't know about bailing at this point, its not like this dividend is the only thing ISBL's got going for them, I'd like to hang around for a few more months to see how this Fight Co. thing turns out.

It is, its just a different promotional company within the same industry.

maybe not...the volume is only 100 shares there.

if I wanted to gamble, I'd go to Vegas. At least then I would understand why I'm losing money and be able see the person taking it from me.

lol, true. i have really got to stop putting my money in pinks.

why do i have a feeling tomorrow will be no different than today..

he's got a point, lol. i'm waiting for the uplist, because MMs seem to have a vendetta against AERP at this level. for pete's sake, the damn thing closes red everytime theres a PR.

why the hell are we still at 55? is this *ever* going to run?

It'd actually be in BGGR's best interest to see to it that the price sky rocket on Friday since the amount of shares they give up in common stock is proportional to ISBL's O/S. If these MM's keep $!@%ing around with these lowball pps values, tons of people are going to be able to claim dividend shares for cheap.

so let me get this straight, the MM's walk this down because it's convenient for them to cover. and now the 'run' that everyone expects is only going to take it back to its original pps? give me a &^#&ing break.

this is theft, flat out theft.

upgraded to "very bullish" according to stockta.com

http://www.stockta.com/cgi-bin/analysis.pl?symb=ISBL&num1=1&cobrand=&mode=stock

another green day :)