![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, February 15, 2008 9:56:21 AM
so let's say, hypothetically (but certainly not well beyond the limits of possibility), an MM is short a substantial amount of ISBL and cannot cover by the end of the day. They would be short of BGGR by 1/30 of their ISBL short count, but being as though they'd be naked shorting, how are they not walking into a trap that could be a lawsuit against the shorting MMs? their position is evidence that they've been naked shorting in such a manner that could be detrimental to both ISBL and BGGR.
Simple Stock Loans Announces Unique Solutions For Investors Looking for Alternative Liquidity Amidst Recent Small Cap Rally Sep 6, 2024 9:30 AM
Reliant Coffee Debuts at #271 on the Inc. 5000 List of Fastest Growing Companies - Coffee Service Industry Disruptor Brews Up Exponential Growth Sep 5, 2024 11:51 AM
VAYK Confirms Receiving Revenue from First Airbnb Property with 1.4 Million Annual Revenue Goal • VAYK • Sep 4, 2024 9:34 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Expands Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: New Lens Intercepts 21.75 m at 5.25 g/t Gold & 515 ppm Cobalt • MFL • Sep 4, 2024 9:02 AM
Integrated Ventures Acquires 51% Stake In GetTrim.Com (TM), Telemedicine Platform With Focus On Expansion Into Booming GLP-1 Powered Weight Loss Market • INTV • Sep 4, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Announces Strategic Review Process Intended to Maximize Shareholder Value • AVAI • Sep 4, 2024 8:00 AM