InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 207
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/12/2007

Re: mainuh post# 24039

Friday, 02/15/2008 9:56:21 AM

Friday, February 15, 2008 9:56:21 AM

Post# of 26529
thanks mainuh

so let's say, hypothetically (but certainly not well beyond the limits of possibility), an MM is short a substantial amount of ISBL and cannot cover by the end of the day. They would be short of BGGR by 1/30 of their ISBL short count, but being as though they'd be naked shorting, how are they not walking into a trap that could be a lawsuit against the shorting MMs? their position is evidence that they've been naked shorting in such a manner that could be detrimental to both ISBL and BGGR.