Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Great idea may use it as leverage to get CCC to do the right thing and include enzc long investors!
…
A temporary restraining order (TRO) is a legal document that a judge issues before a trial to temporarily prevent or force an action. TROs are often used in emergency situations, such as to prevent the sharing of a trade secret or unfair competition practices.
Here are some things to know about TROs:
When a TRO can be issued
A judge will issue a TRO if they believe the petitioner will suffer immediate irreparable harm without the order.
How long a TRO lasts
A TRO is in effect until a court hearing can be held to determine if a preliminary injunction should be granted.
How a TRO is issued
A judge may issue a TRO without notice to the other party and without a hearing.
How a TRO differs from a preliminary injunction
A TRO is similar to a preliminary injunction, but if it's issued without notice, it's only valid for ten days.
State rules
State rules regarding TROs vary, and judges' decisions on whether to issue a TRO are usually not subject to appeal.
Another way forward without the class action would be to get a TRO against ENZC because the SAGA deal has not legally closed. That would stop ENZC from diluting or doing any business for months while the very slow arm of the law does its thing.
That is what is happening in another company that I'm bagged up in currently.
That is good to know. Keep us posted!
Kinda' sad too, Dr. Chandra could avoid all of this, by just keeping a lite stream of worthwhile communication open.
That isn't close to being accurate - in Court the patent belongs to the inventor unless he assigns the patent to the company or another individual.
"Despite of the fact the IPs may or may not belong to CC and Chandra, any IP improvements and/or financial gains from the IP improvements that CC and Chandra did while they were employed at ENZC are legally BELONGED to ENZC shareholders."
In certain cases such as the owner/employer is named as the inventors on the patent application.
But the shareholders are never the owners of the patent.
IG
Caddell & Chapman, class action law firm based in Texas and California, highly recommended by one of my lawyer buds, just got my request for a case review. They may not even read it over much, but they have it. This firm was recommended because they're close to the top of the class-action food chain in Texas with offices in CA. This covers every true resource location even remotely tied in with ENZC. My buddy thought it smart to get a high-end firm that takes on major class actions, and a specialized small-cap class action attorney to provide both of their opinions on the case before anything gets started.
Getting all options and opinions as he put it, was the due-diligence of any smart plaintiffs group before any retainer money changes hands.
Just FYI, everyone is welcome to ask the same of any attorneys they want here.
I'm now checking on a local small-cap class action attorney, and I'll start with my own business law firm, one of the best in Houston, Texas, and I'll imagine they'll give me more than one recommendation for a small-cap attorney.
This may take time folks. Just FYI.
Why don't you post your DD to prove that Chandra has developed any AI for drug development.
"One example of that was his AI product. ENZC was consistent in putting out PR's backed by IP promises on IP's that ENZC as a company never owned."
What is the patent number?
No one owned the patent(s) because they never existed.
And Chandra doesn't have the technical expertise to create anything associated with AI.
Why do you pump this nonsense?
IG
Thanks MP, some really good guys over on 'X' are major contributors too. Most of them Chandra also contacted directly back in May. We seem to have all found each other there. which I guess may have been inevitable. It's both a big and small world over on X. We all had several folks trust us enough to get us all connected.
Thanks, Doc, for providing such valuable insights. You've shed a lot of light on the complexities of the situation, especially the legal gray areas and the ownership questions. It's a lot to process, but your explanation helps us understand the challenges we face and the uncertainties we need to navigate.
It's truly frustrating for everyone involved, especially the shareholders who are left in limbo. We appreciate your willingness to share your knowledge and perspective. Let's all stick together and fight through this mess!
$9 million shares sold and they're already back to .009 ? Pretty pathetic Harry...!!
I want to write Sharabura's next resume....lol...
Jeez, no kidding, that would bring in ANY class action attorney onto this case, even for a small-cap situation.
"We have almost 1/2 million retainer ready to go." Can you elaborate on this?
For anyone interested, here is the next CBDW online conference call for investors, for the company buying a big stake in Adnexus. Some think CBDW will become $AdnexusBiotech$ eventually. This kid-CEO looks to be full of fluff and not much business sense, but I could be wrong. Here is the link.
CBDW Conference Call
Keep us all informed. If there is a group email we can communicate through, or any other means, let us know. Silence, even justified silence, by either CCC or the Zhabilovs, is not okay at this point. They need to tell us WTF is going on, for better or worse. The share price might as well be .0001, so I don't know why they are mute at this point. My guess is that lawsuits between CCC and the Zhabilovs are incoming and neither want to make any public statements that could be used against them in court. This situation is going to get worse, unfortunately. All the I.P.s are going to be tied up in legal actions for years.
Understood and agreed. I already committed to $2K over on X, to the lawsuit effort if we get a decent attorney signed to an agreement.
I know all of that. That's why I, like so many others, are so upset. The PRs for years led us to believe one thing when the reality was the opposite. Now CCC are bailing with the A.I. and Clone 3 component, leaving ENZC shareholders high and dry. I invested in the first place because of Clone 3. ITV-1 is a shit product and everyone knew it was a placeholder for better drug treatments like Clone 3 in conjunction with A.I. finding the conserved sites.
If this continues to go south and we get no concrete, public assurances from anyone associated with this mess, then I fully support a class-action suit. I would be happy to donate funds, along with others, to get this going. I am done with this situation. They have been dicking us around for about 18 months now.
You're always welcome, we're trying. I believe a lot on here are also contacting Adnexus too, asking for the same info. You actually have to go to the AdnexusBiotech.com website to submit any questions and have them get through on the 'Contact Us' page.
Also, for what it's worth, rumor has it, Charles Cotropia's son, also a lawyer, may be taking over the legal work for Adnexus Biotech, MABS-Tech and any actions to come for or against CCC's interests. He may be the new point of contact for anyone wanting a legal response to questions about all of this now. We're trying to confirm that currently, but many reaching out to CCC over in Twitter/X, have come back with news that Charles is caring for his sick wife, and the son appears to be handling legal matters and communications.
No one is sure of that yet. Just FYI.
Strange, for about a solid month or two now actually, everyone has blamed both CCC and Harry, myself included. What brand of glue are you sniffin' for breakfast today kid?
I do agree, a public PR from ENZC would make it nice, or an announcement from Adnexus that they have these IP's outright would cement a lot of this together better for everyone.
BUT 3 things:
1) ENZC has no interest publishing anything that makes them sound diminished, nothing will come out of them.
2) Adnexus isn't even concerned about it, but it would be a great, beneficial move for them to take your idea, and put out their 'full legal ownership of the IPs' PR out to help assure new investors in Adnexus. The only reason I can see that they may not is, there's a LOT of talk going around right now, that the Clone3 final patent award is due very soon, and I could see Chandra missing out on your good idea and wait until the award is made and finalized for public consumption.
3) If one waits for a redundant, "we already knew that" kind of PR, they may miss the best opening cost of new Adnexus shares when Adnexus goes public, also coming soon, if any investor here wants to go invest there for a start, on whatever is to come from Adnexus Biotech.
It's more than waiting for a PR about past actions, many here have varying plans on how to work this thing. I have not even made up my mind yet.
GLTY
Harry this, Harry that… let’s blame Harry
The public PR's and press releases, public forum discussions other public disclosures already at hand, prove the defrauding of the investors. All Patent applications on the IP's never changed to ENZC ownership from Dr. Chandra or the Cotropias, AND the patent applications were never amended to include ENZC as a governing body. So, there's plenty of evidence out there now.
There are also no filed records at all, from ENZC showing any ownership or any funding by ENZC to the IP's being discussed. All Harry has ever had, with ENZC, is the ITV-1 product, that he did amend to include ENZC for legal protection, since Savov was after it on an original personal ownership basis over in Bulgaria.
The do have filings regarding the use and development of those IP's, but no proof of where that was left off or what was achieved in 4 years of working that over.
The IP's are now assigned to Adnexus Biotech and MABS-Tech legally, and ENZC can no longer claim any use of them, in fact, ENZC has publicly disclosed, (yes, on a lying PR), that they are using new mABS products from Bulgaria now (sick joke) and won't use Clone3/7 again.
You cannot move IP's like that, unless you have full ownership. It's pretty clear DD. You can look up Intellectual Properties ownership rules and regulations on your own, some legal libraries have that online for free. In the state of Texas, and added stipulation of 'written agreements must be legally drafted and signed before an IP can even begin a transfer to a new business entity or private ownership'.
In some other states, a new entity can be using an IP before the legal ownership transfer is fully amended or complete.
I'm really hoping so, but his recent behavior to a few folks on X lately worries me.
A lot of that is correct Achilles, but there is a lot of gray area we do not know about. I had two lawyer buddies show me what could be involved, and one was internal agreements about what work, say a Dr. Chandra did, while working with ENZC, that might not be covered by ENZC ownership or funding rules.
One example of that was his AI product. ENZC was consistent in putting out PR's backed by IP promises on IP's that ENZC as a company never owned. So when Harry attempted to sell all of CCC's IP's, illegally with the BGEN sub sale, the legal matters hit like a brick and CCC was gone with the IP's legally, overnight (virtually overnight anyway).
You and others here are talking public company norms, and those are not always the case if internal agreements allow for employees or ownership members to carry on other work not owned, funded or governed by the public company they have voting shares in. It's been said by Chandra himself, many times, that the Sutra AI, as they're now calling it, was his baby alone and not developed by ENZC. I believe that's the legal disclosure telling us it could leave at a moment's notice and go elsewhere. The defrauding comes in, on this point, where Harry's PR's kept letting stockholders assume, which he was always soliciting, that it was all under ENZC as the corporate entity.
Without the employment and work-product agreements for a ranking member of ENZC available for us to view, we don't know if the normal rules applied, at all even. Based on some other personal and public disclosures, even the original patent applications, ENZC never owned the IP's, and when Harry effectively dissolved BGEN, any binding agreements legally hit the dust at that time.
More gray area in our favor would be a dispute on what he owed shareholders, before trying to sell off BGEN illegally, and his stock dilution practices that escalated shortly thereafter. The case of fraud here is a simple one, but the agreement of punitive damages would be a little complex. Harry screwed up a lot of stuff, and CCC collectively shut their mouths tight for a safe exit. I'm pretty sure those terms were in writing so that CCC could maintain their shares and not have any court dates pending, arguing IP ownership or access by Harry.
Which is why I'm pretty certain CCC does have a plan to recover ENZC shareholders. They maintained all their shares, 100% of them in ENZC, still have voting rights that could become a majority, from now through August of 2025, (next court date on SAGA dissolution, if Kostiner even shows up for that,) Whether CCC's plan will work or even get off the ground, I do not know. This is the question no one knows, not bashers or pumpers or the concerned shareholders caught in-between, not now anyway.
Personally, I can't think of a single person involved with the shareholders wanting or willing to wait close to a year from now to find out.
The normal ethics of "being prepared to lose any funds you invest" does not apply in a real case of being defrauded by the public company you were invested in. BUT, if you can't execute the correct legal procedure, you have lost your funds resoundingly.
docsetc, I would welcome any equitable involvement with Adnexus. If Adnexus is as promising as Dr. Chandra suggests in his posts on X, it should be enough to accommodate the ENZC shareholders.
We've been discussing attorneys over on twitter. The one crux to the deal is getting a class action lawyer doing small-cap stock matters. They do exist. Unfortunately, most will require some form of retainer fee to get a hearing won and the case onto trial. From there, we might get lucky and get the case on a contingency from there, but that could be doubtful too. That's why I once suggested a crowdfunding or something similar, to show an attorney we approve of, the money in an escrow account for his/her services.
I'm pretty sure the cost of getting the case started is what has prevented papers from being served already. I don't have to manage the darn fund, don't even want to, but it's one way up and out, if you will. We're also looking for friends-of-friends lawyers who might get this started on the cheap.
Lastly, we are trying to see Adnexus go public first, in case there is already an operation on for CCC to reclaim ENZC and fold it back into Adnexus at a decent per-share value. That's what Chandra promised, but the odds are iffy at best, and that's just being honest.
CCC seems to think they have as long as they want to announce something, even a 'hang on shareholders' message as a decent hint. That's not necessarily the case. They're in a tight spot, but blind arrogance is not the best practice when you have about 2000 investors, maybe half that now, that lost a lot of money on a tangible case of fraud. Patience is a virtue, but it's not a well of unlimited water.
So we're still searching for prospective attorneys, open to anyone else that has one and more ideas, not trying to hide anything. I myself have 3 more old friend attorney's who may have an idea or two. Not sure what will turn up.
I want Adnexus to succeed, and to not leave us behind. If they come up with a terrible rip-off of a deal, or nothing at all, I'm ready to go full Kamikaze' on a legal action.
GLTA
Without an official word or PR from the parties involved, that is all conjecture, not due diligence. I want to hear it from the horse's mouth. If it's not official, then it's of little value.
Despite of the fact the IPs may or may not belong to CC and Chandra, any IP improvements and/or financial gains from the IP improvements that CC and Chandra did while they were employed at ENZC are legally BELONGED to ENZC shareholders. They used ENZC shareholders money to work on these IPs and took these IPs with them away from ENZC shareholders without any prior announcement or permission to their new companies. They used these IPs to create financial opportunities for themselves at the new companies and leaving ENZC shareholders empty-handed. They defrauded ENZC shareholders by not sharing with ENZC shareholders any benefits or financial gain from these improvements.
CCC never informed ENZC shareholders that they left ENZC as they are obligated or owed to the ENZC shareholders. They left like thieves. They probably did not want ENZC shareholders to sell and cause the PPS to drop so that they could benefit from selling shares at higher prices. ENZC shares dropped at least 20 times lower when ENZC shareholders learned of their departure and when CCC and /or their friends and families and Harry and his friends and families sold ENZC shares which cause the PPS to plummet to strips. ENZC shareholders lost monies because CCC and Harry lied and defrauded shareholders.
When CCC "colluded" with Harry in having announced to ENZC shareholders about the SAGA deal, they and Harry and all members of ENZC management are definitely guilty of defrauding ENZC shareholders. ENZC shareholders never gained any financial benefits from the SAGA deal. On the contrary, ENZC shareholders lost monies when the "BS" SAGA deal intentionally fell through, and the stock price plummeted.
These above are a few of many bad things I can think at this moment of what CCC and Harry did in having stolen ENZC shareholders money and advertentluy destroyed ENZC shareholders livelihood.
Legally bound, CCC, Harry and other ENZC management must return and/or make ENZC shareholders financially whole again as before ENZC PPS plummeted
docsetc, I’m behind any action like this… sounds like we need to get together and organized to proceed… let’s start the pressure now. Count me in…
Thanks doc ,I knew you could explain it .As difficult as enzc tried to make it, you cut through it like a SEC lawyer.The last step is to include enzc long investors with the new company.
It's possibly one of two things. One, some amateur raiders believe there is an Adnexus solution coming for ENZC shareholders, or two, Chandra's working with an MM, and someone may have leaked info that ENZC will get acquired by an outside party.
Some decent rumors are in detail over on Twitter/X about both possibilities.
You are correct, without any insider information, no one would buy a share, except for day-traders looking for a quick score. Harry knows how day-trading online companies look for PR's like his to get a 20% bounce and make their client's some fast cash. So, the 9 million shares could be gone tomorrow or the day after, sold off in a day-trader operation.
Or, someone does have some inside info, maybe a pump from Chandra himself, or Harry - even worse, and they are accumulating. $20K is a lot to drop on this mess right now.
GLTA
No, that perspective loses any trial motion that gets a hearing. Motion Denied. What gets a trial date, is that "WE FUNDED a company based upon IP promises the company made for years, and now the company is defunct by illegal operations and mis-management by the current owner and past officers of the company." The promises of shareholder success were based upon future sales of medical treatments, based upon the same, exact IP's are now over at another company with the same owners that sat on the ENZC executive table, who skipped out on the shareholders and opened up shop at a new company, leaving ENZC shareholders damaged and holding debt because of the false promises of the plaintiffs in their prior publicly held operation.
That gets you a court date and with any decent lawyer, a judgement in your favor.
Count on it.
Well TJ, you're talking about 2 different portions of business law and application. One member here said that since ENZC has a right to the IP, they should be subject to some legal ramifications to make good on some shareholder value or legal repercussions. I've had to deal with intellectual properties in my software business as well and I can assure you this is not the case. No shareholder or group of shareholders could sue based upon the IP ownership or valuation of what ENZC used to have for use and development. Since the Cotropias and Chandra left with all of the relevant IPs, that is beyond any legal maneuver to make amends with.
BUT, Defrauding Shareholders is an entirely different kind of case. Defrauding the shareholders requires the valid points and published promises based upon the use of the IP's in a company. So, to have the IP's leave the company and be taken to another, leaving vested shareholders behind, and years of PR announcements that the IP's were to see success in ENZC only, then leave under suspicious circumstances to go be profitable in a new company, leaving the vested shareholders behind, now THAT is a case for defrauding investors. The defrauding case is a prosecution about scamming investors, intentionally or not, and with CCC's signing off and publicly endorsing the Sagaliam mess, and disappearing with the IPs just before disaster hit, makes all principals of ENZC, past and present at the time, liable for the Defrauding of the Investors.
One case is an asset-ownership case, that no longer exists in ENZC, because they left legally and Zhabilov signed off on it. So, there is no suing ENZC for proceeds to come off of IP's they no longer have in any way at ENZC.
The other is a scam, a theft by lying case for business owning shareholders. The latter can be prosecuted with these ENZC circumstances, the former there is no case on, because ENZC doesn't have squat except for the useless ITV-1 IP, from a chemist with not much medical history.
That's the difference, we were lied to for our investor dollars, and Harry's illegal attempt to sell off BGEN while it still held the IPs as a sub, without Chandra or Cotropia permission, lit the legal fire and gave CCC what they needed to leave ENZC, keep their ENZC shares intact, and take the IP's with them. They obviously had enough on Zhabilov, because he signed off on their removal, with the IP's in hand, back in late March.
Nevertheless, CCC participated willingly in the ENZC promotions and promises to all of this, right up to the point in late March when they departed, so they share full liability with Harry, even if its' all Harry's fault. Hope that explains it. One is a case of fraud and investor damages based upon false promises and some illegal events, and that works, especially because the same IP's were in ENZC that are about to make other people money after we invested in them. Since it's the same IPs over at Adnexus, it's an especially clear case of fraud if an ENZC shareholder remedy is not reached with CCC and all of us left here.
Said it before, tough case to file, easy case to cause hell over at Adnexus whose about to get underway. Chance of winning a case of defrauding investors over at ENZC, quite high. The Cotropias and any other counsel they'd want to include, would be begging to settle if this actually gets headed to trial.
GLTA.
OS nearly maxed, when's the R/S?
Thanks docsetc for your continued information.
I agree swamp boy. The next move from Chandra and friends it’s critical.
Why would anyone invest in enzc when the CCs own all the ips/patents and can leave with them anytime they want?
BIG trouble! Please remember the facts regardless of what you are told, WE ENZC investors FUNDED the "IP"... This is nothing short of illegal, no doubt about it.
If you missed one episode in netflix enzc movie you may have gotten lost ,I will let doc explaine but CCC misled enzc investors with numerous statements and videos .They knew exactly what they were doing ,today knowing the facts if I was sitting on a jury I would find them guilty of theft/fraud it was a simple plan to misdirect /play unsuspecting investors. The CCC ,s are guilty and they need to make their next move carefully or they will find themselves in more trouble !
Doc, I'm confused.
You seem to be saying that ENZC has no legal right to the IP that CCC moved out of ENZC and into CCC's two companies (Adnexus and MABS).
But you also say that ENZC shareholders were defrauded.
If ENZC has no legal right to the IP, then how were ENZC shareholders defrauded?
docsetc, As always, I truly appreciate your efforts on providing updates and incite as this “soap opera” continues. Hopefully, Dr. Chandra’s new collaborators will allow him to do the right thing for the ENZC shareholders. GLTA!
Yeah, sucks right now, but might work out for the best. IF we do get some form of shareholder entry into Adnexus, having them clear and free to operate, no legal bog-downs in sight, could really lead to something. When I first found out about the still-individualized IP ownerships, I began to wonder just how many ENZC PR's were fraudulent to begin with.
If Chandra is telling the truth about a legal takeover and absorption of ENZC and the shareholders will be covered, that's great. To me, with the last 'Space' recording over on Twitter/X, I'd say the odds just dropped to mean 50-50%, no more 55-65% optimism for me. It wasn't what the X account holder said, it was the reaction to it that was troubling.
Not sure if Chandra hates me for telling the truth or appreciates my being up-front an honest about the situation at hand, for as much as we know of it. Being supportive of his new venture at Adnexus, but also reminding him of CCC's ethical and legal responsibility to the ENZC shareholders is a tightrope to walk. Personalities under stress can be fickle things, and I don't believe he handles stress well. I appreciated his communication back in May, but it's been run and fluff since then.
There are some pumpers over on 'X' that are just blind or disingenuous in not being honest about it themselves.
GLTA
docsetc, Well, that just sucks. I didn’t realize that Zhabilov had signed it over to him. Wonder what Harry got in return?
Someone just bought 9M shares. Impressive. But only $18900. Something up?
There was a recording, it was taken down by the Twitter/X account owner not long after it was posted.
Have to disagree partially Wick, however it was done. Chandra had the patent ownership on it, and the material code of it too, all under his ownership. Whether this was a deal between ENZC or Zhabilov and Chandra, I do not know, but Chandra wound up owning that work product on his own.
There were several mentions that Chandra did the AI assembly and directed the coding of his AI on his own, what ENZC really paid for is the Conserved Sites mapping with Intel, that also somehow wound up with Adnexus Biotech on their website too.
When it came to the computer/AI processing materials, Chandra left with them all in his pocket, and Zhabilov signed off on it. So ENZC, unfortunately, has no claim to it whatsoever. That also leaves shareholders with no claim to it.
BUT, In a potential case of defrauding shareholders, there is plenty of cause to prosecute all parties involved. This is what CCC better understand, because some attorney will pick this up eventually. Just by the numerous claims of the company's past IP benefits and purchasing of shares promise, to dissolve assets promised to the shareholders and then further dilute the shares, leaves all present and past parties of ENZC liable for prosecution. (Especially in light that a new company is about to claim profits and funding off of those same IP's with the same ownership of IP structure. This makes the case of defrauding the shareholders a fairly simple case to prosecute, but difficult to get filed.)
GLTA
Hey MP, not sure by whom, and some comments made are still under wraps. I saw and read them, and I'd say, to resume communication, the big cheese in question. I don't have private messaging right now, so I'll post later.
This was posted before, but you were being too much of an insulting @$$ to read it apparently.
So, just for fairness, here it is again.
The IP's turned out to never be 'owned' by ENZC, they were assigned to development and commercial use by ENZC from the 2 individual owners of record., Chandra and C. Cotropia. This is what made Harry Z's attempted sale of BGEN illegal, and CCC wound up getting the clout the CCC group needed to exit ENZC and maintain their shares in ENZC both. To date, not a single share of CCC share volume has been sold out of ENZC. The CCC group is out of ENZC, and their shares there in ENZC, voting shares that may increase to controlling measure, are still there in ENZC. (Which is why Zhabilov is still diluting preferred share counts.)
So just as fast, Cotropia and Chandra opened their new shell companies, and assigned the same asset rights to Adnexus Biotech, about to go public, and MABS-Tech, still a holding shell of a company only. Both are filed in Texas, and less than 30 miles away from Harry's old Allen, Texas office. The IP's were quickly and easily transferred over, no contest can be offered by ENZC or any other current shareholders of ENZC. Ownership is outright and maintained. Something old web pages and PR's from ENZC never mentioned, where the IP ownership actually was.
THE ONLY IP ever owned by ENZC, is Zhabilov's ITV-1, which is dead on the market now, nobody wants it except Dimitri Savov, over in Bulgarian and here in US courts right now. Nobody cares. One thing folks do care about, is that Chandra promised there are legal actions and operations underway to recapture ENZC as a whole entity, and toss Harry out. Whether that is true or not, no one really knows at this point. Chandra recently got a bit uppity and disavowing of ENZC shareholders over on a Twitter/X space recently, which sent off more alarms. Again, no one really knows the status for the ENZC shareholder. Hope is that Chandra just has an insecure temper, and is not abandoning the shareholders. Nothing is certain at all on this last point, not for bashers or pumpers or just plain concerned shareholders. Got that?
So that's how. Look it all up. It's called DD.
Followers
|
1251
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
199635
|
Created
|
01/07/10
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators Homebrew Timing101 archilles SeniorApollo |
Independent Valuation Report Pre Clinical Studies
Investments
___________________________________________________________________________________
Press Release July 20-2021
Enzolytics Announces the Signing of a Letter of Intent with Creative Biolabs, Inc.
for Licensing and Commercialization of anti-HTLV-1 Monoclonal Antibodies
https://www.creative-biolabs.com/
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/enzolytics-announces-signing-letter-intent-113000339.htm
________________________________________
Press release July 21-2021
Enzolytics and Lonza Bioscience Combine Technologies to Fast-track Development and
Production of Anti-HIV and Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies produced by Enzolytics
https://www.lonza.com/
https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2021-07-21/enzolytics-and-lonza-bioscience-combine-technologies-to-fast-track-development-and-production-of-anti-hiv-and-anti-sar
_________________________________________
July 22 INTERVIEW
with
James Hicks, Charles Cotropia and Gurav Chandra
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdljO9VLgj0
______________________________________________________________
COLLEGE STATION, TX August 25, 2021
Important Excerpt from this news progress update.
>>>>>><<<<<<
"The monoclonal antibodies being produced by Enzolytics against the CoronaVirus target 19 conserved immutable sites on the virus, sites which the Company has now confirmed are conserved sites not only on the initial virus strains but also existing in the Delta and Lambda variants, as well as in the Alpha, Beta and Gamma variants."
Enzolytics Inc. and Samsung Biologics Announce
Development and Manufacturing Agreement for Anti-
HIV and Anti-SARS-CoV-2
Important Excerpt from this news progress update.
>>>>>><<<<<<
"Samsung Biologics (KRX: 207940. K.S.), a leading contract development and manufacturing organization and Enzolytics (ENZC), a drug development company committed to commercializing multiple proprietary therapeutics to treat debilitating infectious diseases, announced the signing of a strategic CDMO partnership agreement."_______
2000 North Central Expressway
Plano, TX 75074
972-292-9414
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |