Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Steelers looking real good Art. Congradulations!
All the best
MDOR charts looking great here >>>
Daily chart continuing to improve day by day..
Nice volume level continuing, Higher lows every day for about two weeks now, MACD looking about ready to cross, and the pSAR getting closer to drop, We made the first attempt to break up through teh 20 day moving average yesterday, should probably break through that today or tomorrow, then on to the 50 DMA...
Weekly chart putting in a bottom >>
First green weekly candle since November, Weekly wick just touching under the 50 Week MA, Best Volume week in 3 months, and still have 2 days of volume yet to add this week, weekly MACD close to putting in the bottom of the trough here.
Looking at On Balance Volume and Money flow below, We see it's been net positive for the last entire year, particularly the Money flow for the last 6 months. Looking to see that manifest further in an increased share price here the next couple quarters.
Tell me about it.... time for old Bruce to starting to let the Market know what he's been up to lately....
MDOR, PURO. Nice ones Art. Your on a roll. Now kick DYMH in the arse. LOL
All the best
Magnum d’Or Resources (MDOR.ob) (0.65 x 0.70)
Undiscovered, low float, $131MM in contracts, solid internal controls, new JV opening new markets, beginning production today, 11/11/2008.
Ihub Board: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=2103
(relatively unknown, only 61 boardmarks)
Share Structure: (11/11/2008)
Authorized: 200,000,000
Preferred: (voting,non-convertible): 10,000,000
Common Outstanding: 22,416,637
Common Float: 8,914,043
Contact Info:
Magnum D’Or Resources Inc.
1326 SE 17th St. Suite 513
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316
PH: 305-420-6563
FAX: 305-395-4858
mdor@magnumresources.net
http://www.magnumresources.net
Business Description:
In simple terms, Magnum recycles scrap tires into reusable, marketable materials; nuggets, buffings, powders, and crumb rubber each having their respective applications.
Magnum has a five year contract with National Sales & Supply(NSS) http://www.nsalessupply.com for $131,000,000 worth of rubber buffings and nuggets for fulfillment of NSS’s contracts with retailers such as Wal-Mart, Lowe’s, Home Depot, and others.
• Production of Rubber Nuggets – http://magnumresources.net/files/rubber-nuggests.ppt
• Production of Rubber Buffings – http://magnumresources.net/files/rubber-buffings.ppt
• Production of TPE’s - http://magnumresources.net/files/elastomeric-alloys.ppt
Internal Controls:
Magnum is a reporting company, and their accountant, Weinberg & Company, P.A. is one of the best in the business http://www.cpaweinberg.com/news.pdf Also, Magnum has recently retained Canadian consulting firm Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton http://www.rcgt.com/Aboutus.aspx?NavID=117&CultureCode=en to assist with internal controls and revenue projections.
Joint Venture:
Magnum recently announced a new research & development program, long term partnership, and joint venture with Sekhar Research Innovations Sdn Bhd (SRI) http://srielastomers.com Magnum will receive immediate exclusivity for North America and future global rights to an array of next generation cost saving custom compounds targeted at a wide spectrum of applications. In addition, Magnum will have access to state of the art processing aids and new world proprietary rubber recycling equipment.
Production:
Per last Thursday’s PR http://www.magnumresources.net/view-news.php?id=102 (11/06/2008) and a conversation with management today, production of rubber buffings has begun. Look for upcoming announcements on production levels.
Chart:
The rising “Money Flow” and “On Balance Volume” indicate a great amount of accumulation has been, and is still going on.
Derivatives.
By Don Bauder | Published Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008
http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2008/sep/17/city-light-1/
One quadrillion. That’s 1,000,000,000,000,000 — one plus 15 zeroes, or one thousand trillion. It is incomprehensible. And that’s what’s terrifying. This summer, the Bank for International Settlements, the bank for the world’s central banks, estimated that the face value of derivatives floating around the world is $1.14 quadrillion. Derivatives are incredibly complex securities whose value is derived from some asset such as a bond, a stock, or a currency. They are used to bet on the weather and upcoming inflation, among many things. But derivatives aren’t really assets; they are crapshoots on the value of the underlying securities — a wager on another wager. They are based almost completely on borrowed money. And all too many are held by the nation’s largest banks and investment banks — yeah, one of those places where you may have parked your money.
Wall Street is now going through its greatest crisis in years. Over the weekend, Lehman Brothers went into bankruptcy, Merrill Lynch had to be bought by Bank of America, while insurance giant AIG tottered — all this following close on the heels of the government’s seizure of mortgage monsters Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. At the center of these storms are derivatives.
Of that $1.14 quadrillion of derivatives, $548 trillion are listed derivatives, or ones that are traded on organized exchanges, and $596 trillion are over-the-counter derivatives that are basically unregulated and, essentially, unmonitored. They are traded in a chaotic marketplace in which record keeping is sloppy. Institutions that own these over-the-counter derivatives sometimes don’t know who is on the other end because these instruments have been bought and sold so many times.
Warren Buffett, America’s richest person, says derivatives are “financial weapons of mass destruction.” And that’s just what savvy economists and analysts fear: a financial nuclear reaction, with one institution after another failing after one party can’t meet its obligations. “The foot bone connected to the ankle bone, the ankle bone connected to the shin bone. Oh, mercy, how they scare!” Especially when the bones all start becoming disconnected. Early this month, the federal government seized mortgage behemoths Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They have $1.6 trillion of debt outstanding, and derivatives called “credit default swaps” guarantee payment of that debt. Those debt-guaranteeing derivatives motivated the government to seize the entities. There could have been a chain reaction.
On a weekend in March, the Federal Reserve rushed to keep Wall Street’s Bear Stearns from failing. It was committed to $13.4 trillion worth of derivatives. That’s chump change compared with a quadrillion. But our leaders justified pouring $29 billion into the rescue because, they said, the Dow Jones Industrial Average would plunge 2000 points if Bear went bankrupt. JPMorgan Chase took over Bear and now is a party to $90 trillion of derivatives. What would happen if Morgan came asunder?
We may find out. Last weekend, two brokerages disappeared because of excessive derivatives exposure. (Two years ago, thebanker.com named Lehman “Bank of the Year for Credit Derivatives.”) Here’s the bottom line: Derivatives with names such as credit default swaps, collateralized debt obligations, and mortgage-backed securities are the villains in the problems of Bear Stearns, Lehman, AIG, Merrill Lynch, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other financial institutions that may disappear.
The total annual output of the U.S. economy is around $14 trillion. The total output of world economies is around $67 trillion. Those who defend derivatives say that the notional (or face) value of derivatives — the $1.14 quadrillion — is misleading. The gambles between two parties net out against each other. Actually, only 1 or 2 percent of the notional value may be on the line, claim the optimists. So? Are you comforted that $10 trillion to $20 trillion could be at risk when total U.S. annual economic output is $14 trillion? Even if only a small portion of that $10 trillion to $20 trillion is actually at risk, as some claim, it is an almost inconceivable amount of money.
“The risk of a [chain] reaction is significant,” warns James Hamilton, economist at the University of California, San Diego. “The magnitude of these things is just staggering. I would have thought that the last year would have been a time of winding them down, battening down the hatches. We need to unwind these derivatives — we need to deleverage [cut down excessive debt].” But it’s not happening. “It’s more than a can of worms. It is a world full of tangled worms.”
Apologists argue that it’s not that institutions like Bear Stearns are too big to fail, it’s that they are too interconnected to fail. “But who is going to bail out the Federal Reserve? Who is going to bail out the federal government?” asks Hamilton. “Everybody wants to put their head in the sand. The derivatives are so complex. Sometimes the institutions don’t know what they’ve got.”
Indeed, the essence of white-collar fraud is contrived complexity. Derivatives are concocted by Harvard and MIT math Ph.D.s so that nobody can understand them.
Hamilton says they should be regulated. “If you are too big [or too interconnected] to fail, then you are too big not to be regulated,” he says. Following the Bear Stearns calamity, there have been moves to inject some orderliness in the over-the-counter derivatives market. There has been discussion of regulation.
“The possible compounding chain reaction to the failure of one or two major financial institutions is real and concerning,” says Arthur Lipper III, a Wall Street veteran who now lives in Del Mar. “The possible problems are vastly greater than any single or group of regulating bodies has an ability to manage.” Lipper suggests one route to reform: board members of institutions borrowing heavily to gamble on derivatives should not be indemnified against personal responsibility. Such a move “would have the immediate effect of financial institutions becoming more conservatively managed.”
Ross Starr, economist at the University of California, San Diego, says that if one party can’t make its obligation, “It causes the whole house of cards to come down. It’s not that the instruments themselves pose a systemic risk but rather that they redistribute financial losses in an unpredictable way. If it causes illiquidity to the rest of the economy, we have a problem. It’s something we haven’t quite figured out.” Amen. How can we figure out something we can’t comprehend?
The derivatives are so complicated that any regulators will have a hard time understanding them: “There’s not a lot of transparency there,” says Starr. “Regulators will not be able to focus on that. It’s a source of concern. We have not adequately come to terms with this.”
More than ten years ago, University of San Diego professor of law Frank Partnoy wrote the first exposé of derivatives abuses, F.I.A.S.C.O.: Blood in the Water on Wall Street. At that time, derivatives were not big potatoes. He admits to being surprised that the notional value has climbed to a quadrillion dollars. In a recent article for the Financial Times of London, Partnoy says that today’s derivatives crisis is similar to that of the 1990s, except it involves much more money. The crisis that forced Orange County into bankruptcy looks small by comparison with the mortgage write-downs of big financial institutions today.
He sees the end of this calamity on the horizon. “We will emerge from this crisis, and then another will hit in a few years,” he says, greatly because of moral hazard: if we keep bailing out the gamblers, they will continue to take egregious risks with borrowed money. For several reasons, including the fact that they are privy to information that others don’t have, Wall Street operators will prosper. “Finance industry employees will continue to outearn just about everybody,” says Partnoy.
Much of their great wealth is coming from you.
PHBR been making a nice stealth move here lately...
nice 100% move in the last few weeks.
Weekly chart
HCPC - well with these super-subbers, the charts are usually not a big help other than to show significant volume increases until it starts lending itself to more traditional T/A. Nothing that noteworthy that I can see here yet, but I'd watch for daily volume increases..
Art great bored LOL! Wonder if you wouldn't mind taking a look at the HCPC chart...seems to be getting interesting...but would really appreciate your take :)
NSOL getting close one way or the other, lol.
BLDV should be a good trader again. -e-
Hey Art...I picked up some TCHL and wouldn't mind being an assistant mod....I picked up some VDTI as well....Hoping for news on medicare approving ICAT for diabetics or some kind of good news!!
VDTI - grabbing a few more here at .18
VDTI grabbed a few at 23, lets see where it goes.
VDTI looking bounce ready on the 15 min here..
TMY continuing on up from the MACD turn, heading towards the 50 DMA
SPRL .0006 rumors SPRL open high low close change volume
04/28/08 0.0004 0.0035 0.0002 0.0005 +0.0000 99,693,849
03/31/08 0.0007 0.0007 0.0004 0.0005 -0.0001 56,274,963
02/29/08 0.0007 0.0035 0.0002 0.0006 -0.0003 80,978,409
01/31/08 0.0006 0.0010 0.0005 0.0009 +0.0003 11,736,368
12/31/07 0.0007 0.0016 0.0004 0.0006 -0.0002 104,226,435
11/30/07 0.0012 0.0013 0.0007 0.0008 -0.0004 23,092,116
10/31/07 0.0018 0.0040 0.0011 0.0012 -0.0006 28,704,782
09/28/07 0.0028 0.0030 0.0012 0.0018 -0.0008 81,051,283
08/31/07 0.0030 0.0035 0.0020 0.0026 -0.0002 47,661,843
07/31/07 0.0047 0.0050 0.0024 0.0028 -0.0013 31,363,978
06/29/07 0.0048 0.0060 0.0040 0.0041 -0.0007 52,659,576
05/31/07 0.0060 0.0070 0.0040 0.0048 -0.0012 62,132,995
04/30/07 0.0060 0.0085 0.0050 0.0060 -0.0010 29,376,873
03/30/07 0.0075 0.0090 0.0030 0.0070 -0.0005 43,659,080
02/28/07 0.0085 0.0095 0.0070 0.0075 -0.0005 42,785,119
01/31/07 0.0140 0.0195 0.0075 0.0080 -0.0050 52,522,032
12/29/06 0.0290 0.0290 0.0110 0.0130 -0.0140 44,851,700
11/30/06 0.0130 0.0475 0.0100 0.0270 +0.0135 65,783,821
10/31/06 0.0120 0.0175 0.0100 0.0135 +0.0025 31,887,586
09/29/06 0.0240 0.0250 0.0110 0.0110 -0.0130 12,626,522
08/31/06 0.0300 0.0320 0.0200 0.0240 -0.0040 18,010,820
07/31/06 0.0500 0.0505 0.0250 0.0280 -0.0220 14,138,794
06/30/06 0.0790 0.0790 0.0410 0.0500 -0.0260 14,874,463
Holding tight on this one :) Hammer Time on the Pincher
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=vrso
Looks like it's due for a huge bounce !
EESO - and there's the bounce..
Same with FORB.... just watching the TA. the williams starts to rise a little bit, and BAM it's up 80%..lol
have had it on watch up in the ibox here for a little while... when the MACD turns.... KABOOM!... lol
Congratulations! Excellent call. I just saw it when it was in motion, and hopped on board for a ride. Fingers crossed!
VRSO - nice lil bounce here this AM... lets see if the williams can break -50
WFYW - MACD heading to the basement... should bottom soon.. not a lot of volume though..
NP- glad to pass along some good DD... you've always had info to share with me!
hi VP, what's up.... nice info, very interesting.
Hey Art! I posted this over on the lotto board but thought you'd appreciate the info-
CROX- shorts could be in trouble...might be a great short term swing trade- over 30 million shares short
http://www.shortsqueeze.com/?symbol=CROX&submit=Short+Quote%99
Additionally this 30 million short is approx. 50% of the float
TMY cruising on up nicely.... MACD cross soon too..
CROX making a nice little move.... lets see what happens when the MACD crosses... Williams is still way oversold here..
VDTI - beautiful bounce play on the 15 min chart
LLEG - MACD almost there, williams rising... this should pop again soon here..
CLXN - MACD getting close, williams starting to rise..
HFBV - lets see if it bounces off the 50MA ... looks like the MACD will turn back up just about that time..
CLXN:Looking good for a nice bounce tomorrow IMO..em
Flip This Chit!
This premium board is for "current" and "on watch" high liquidity day and position trading stock plays. The focus of this board will be to catch Plays at or around technical bottoms, and to bail at or around technical tops.
The key will be focusing on "active plays" with 10 day hourly charts, catching some of the "big mover", and "super hyped" plays on their technical pullbacks at support, and loading up for the technical rebounds.
Will also follow some with Daily charts looking for technical support levels.
Yes I use Bigcharts, and it's not as fancy as Stockcharts, but it's not as confusing either. I've found that MACD, Williams, Volume and Psar are usually enough to find appropriate entry and exit points. (Keep it simple sucka).
This market is getting tougher and tougher, and I'm finding that playing higher liquidity stocks at support levels to be the safest and most profitable way to play lately.
Please feel free to post suggestions and/or charts. If I feel they look particularly good, I'll add them to the ibox as charts to "watch".
MACD, the Moving Average Convergence/Divergence indicator
MACD, the Moving Average Convergence/Divergence indicator, developed and popularized by Gerald Appel, provides a uniquely sensitive measurement of the intensity of the trading public's sentiment and provides early clues to trend continuation or reversal. According to Appel, this indicator is particularly dependable in signaling entry points after a sharp decline. The MACD indicator may be applied to the stock market as a whole or to individual stocks or mutual funds.
The MACD indicator uses three exponential moving averages: a short or fast average, a long or slow average, and an exponential average of the difference between the short and long moving averages, which is used as a signal line. (See Moving Averages below for a discussion on simple and exponential moving averages.)
MACD reveals overbought and oversold conditions for securities and market indexes, and generates signals that predict trend reversals with significant accuracy.
MACD produces less frequent whipsaws, as compared with moving averages.
Telescan uses a type of shorthand to refer to MACD indicators. An "8-17-9 MACD", for example, uses a short (fast) moving average of eight days or weeks, a long (slow) moving average of 17 days or weeks, and an exponential moving average of nine days or weeks. (The use of days or weeks depends on the time span of the stock graph.)
Gerald Appel recommends an 8-17-9 MACD to generate buy signals and a 12-25-9 MACD to confirm a sell signal for a stock, which has had a strong bullish move.
Regardless of the accuracy of this indicator, one should not rely on a single indicator. Study as many technical and fundamental indicators as possible before arriving at your investment decisions.
http://www.stocktradersalmanac.com/sta/research_tool_MACDAbout.jsp
Williams %R
Williams %R was developed by Larry Williams to indicate overbought and oversold levels. The indicator is very similar to Stochastic %K - except that Williams %R is plotted using negative values ranging from 0 to -100.
The number of periods used to calculate Williams %R can be varied according to the time frame that you are trading. A rule of thumb is that the indicator window should be half the length of the cycle (14 days is popular for the intermediate cycle).
Overbought and Oversold levels are normally set at -20 and -80.
http://www.incrediblecharts.com/technical/williams_percent_r.php
DISCLAIMER & RISK DISCLOSURE: I am not a registered investment adviser or broker/dealer. I make no commitment that the purchase of securities of companies profiled or otherwise mentioned on this board are suitable or advisable for any person or that an investment such securities will be profitable. In general, given the nature of the companies profiled and the lack of an active trading market for their securities, investing in such securities is highly speculative and carries a high degree of risk.
Please feel free to sign up for special EMAIL ALERTS below.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |